Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 13, 2014

Biology of percutaneous penetration

  • Nicholas R. Blickenstaff EMAIL logo , Garrett Coman , Collin M. Blattner , Rosa Andersen and Howard I. Maibach

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous penetration is a passive process that can occur following skin exposure to chemicals used in agriculture, industry, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and in the household. Once a penetrant is absorbed into the skin it may cause a local reaction or enter systemic circulation to produce widespread effects. Improved understanding of the skin barrier and biological aspects that impede absorption of topical substances is essential for advancing the fields of dermatotoxicology and dermatopharmacology as they pertain to percutaneous penetration.

Methods: Pubmed search results for “percutaneous penetration”, “absorption”, “stratum corneum”, “xenobiotics”, “skin factors”, “decontamination”, and “transdermal” were reviewed from 1965 to 2014. Relevant articles discussing the influence of biological factors on percutaneous penetration of topical substances were included.

Results: Absorption of a topical substance across the skin is most notably influenced by concentration, contact duration, frequency, and the surface area exposed. The interplay between these factors, along with skin biology and the physiochemical properties of the penetrant, can lead to enhanced percutaneous penetration.

Conclusion: Percutaneous penetration is a highly complicated and dynamic process influenced by numerous skin and environmental factors. Although research over the last few decades has provided plenty of new insights to improve our understanding of percutaneous penetration, many areas lack clarity due to conflicting data.


Corresponding author: Nicholas Blickenstaff, Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, 90 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA, Phone: +208-869-7193, Fax: +415-753-5304, E-mail:

References

1. Hodgson E. A textbook of modern toxicology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.10.1002/0471646776Search in Google Scholar

2. Ngo MA, Maibach HI. 15 Factors of percutaneous penetration of pesticides. In: Parameters for pesticide QSAR and PBPK/PD Models for human risk assessment, vol 1099. ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, 2012:67–86. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2012-1099.ch006.10.1021/bk-2012-1099.ch006Search in Google Scholar

3. Michaels AS, Chandrasekaran SK, Shaw JE. Drug permeation through human skin: theory and invitro experimental measurement. AIChE J 1975;21:985–96.10.1002/aic.690210522Search in Google Scholar

4. Boucaud A, Machet L. Transdermal transport by phonophoresis. In: Percutaneous absorption. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005:739–58.Search in Google Scholar

5. Albery WJ, Hadgraft J. Percutaneous absorption: in vivo experiments. J Pharm Pharmacol 1979;31:140–7.Search in Google Scholar

6. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci Off J Eur Fed Pharm Sci 2001;14:101–14.10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00167-1Search in Google Scholar

7. Liu X, Grice JE, Lademann J, Otberg N, Trauer S, et al. Hair follicles contribute significantly to penetration through human skin only at times soon after application as a solvent deposited solid in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;72:768–74.10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04022.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Kao J, Hall J, Helman G. In vitro percutaneous absorption in mouse skin: influence of skin appendages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988;94:93–103.10.1016/0041-008X(88)90340-7Search in Google Scholar

9. Touitou E, Meidan VM, Horwitz E. Methods for quantitative determination of drug localized in the skin. J Controlled Release 1998;56:7–21.10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00060-1Search in Google Scholar

10. Dokka S, Cooper SR, Kelly S, Hardee GE, Karras JG. Dermal delivery of topically applied oligonucleotides via follicular transport in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 2005;124:971–5.10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23672.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Ogiso T, Shiraki T, Okajima K, Tanino T, Iwaki M, et al. Transfollicular drug delivery: penetration of drugs through human scalp skin and comparison of penetration between scalp and abdominal skins in vitro. J Drug Target 2002;10:369–78.10.1080/1061186021000001814Search in Google Scholar

12. Ryan T. Biochemistry and physiology of the skin-cutaneous circulation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gilchrest BA. Skin and aging processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lavker RM, Zheng PS, Dong G. Morphology of aged skin. Clin Geriatr Med 1989;5:53–67.10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30695-5Search in Google Scholar

15. Konda S, Meier-Davis SR, Cayme B, Shudo J, Maibach HI. Age-related percutaneous penetration part 1: skin factors. Skin Ther Lett 2012;17:1–5.Search in Google Scholar

16. Rogers J, Harding C, Mayo A, Banks J, Rawlings A. Stratum corneum lipids: the effect of ageing and the seasons. Arch Dermatol Res 1996;288:765–70.10.1007/BF02505294Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Potts RO, Buras EM Jr, Chrisman DA Jr. Changes with age in the moisture content of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1984;82:97–100.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12259203Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Alikhan A, Wilhelm K-P, Alikhan FS, Maibach HI. Transepidermal water loss and aging. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, MD HIM, editors. Textbook of aging skin. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2010:695–703. Available at: http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-540-89656-267.10.1007/978-3-540-89656-2_67Search in Google Scholar

19. Man MQ, Xin SJ, Song SP, Cho SY, Zhang XJ, et al. Variation of skin surface ph, sebum content and stratum corneum hydration with age and gender in a large Chinese population. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:190–9.10.1159/000231524Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Ghadially R, Brown BE, Sequeira-Martin SM, Feingold KR, Elias PM. The aged epidermal permeability barrier. Structural, functional, and lipid biochemical abnormalities in humans and a senescent murine model. J Clin Invest 1995;95:2281–90.10.1172/JCI117919Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Batisse D, Bazin R, Baldeweck T, Querleux B, Lévêque J-L. Influence of age on the wrinkling capacities of skin. Skin Res Technol Off J Int Soc Bioeng Skin ISBS Int Soc Digit Imaging Skin ISDIS Int Soc Skin Imaging ISSI 2002;8:148–54.10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.10308.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Sandby-Møller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm Venereol 2003;83:410–3.10.1080/00015550310015419Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Branchet MC, Boisnic S, Frances C, Robert AM. Skin thickness changes in normal aging skin. Gerontology 1990;36:28–35.10.1159/000213172Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Lavker RM, Zheng P, Dong G. Aged skin: a study by light, transmission electron, and scanning electron microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 1987;88(s3):44s–51s.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12468934Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Hull MT, Warfel KA. Age-related changes in the cutaneous basal lamina: scanning electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol 1983;81:378–80.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12519989Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. Biophysical parameters of skin: map of human face, regional, and age-related differences. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:28–34.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01138.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Choi E-H, Man M-Q, Xu P, Xin S, Liu Z, et al. Stratum corneum acidification is impaired in moderately aged human and murine skin. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:2847–56.10.1038/sj.jid.5700913Search in Google Scholar

28. Zlotogorski A. Distribution of skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of adults. Arch Dermatol Res 1987;279:398–401.10.1007/BF00412626Search in Google Scholar

29. Holleran WM, Takagi Y, Imokawa G, Jackson S, Lee JM, et al. beta-Glucocerebrosidase activity in murine epidermis: characterization and localization in relation to differentiation. J Lipid Res 1992;33:1201–9.10.1016/S0022-2275(20)40772-2Search in Google Scholar

30. Bowser PA, Gray GM. Sphingomyelinase in pig and human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1978;70:331–5.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12543516Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Schmid-Wendtner M-H, Korting HC. PH and skin care. Berlin, Germany: ABW Wissenschaftsverlag, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

32. Berardesca E, Distante F, Vignoli GP, Oresajo C, Green B. Alpha hydroxyacids modulate stratum corneum barrier function. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:934–8.10.1111/j.1365-2133.1997.tb01554.xSearch in Google Scholar

33. Pochi PE, Strauss JS, Downing DT. Age-related changes in sebaceous gland activity. J Invest Dermatol 1979;73:108–11.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12532792Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Imokawa G, Abe A, Jin K, Higaki Y, Kawashima M, et al. Decreased level of ceramides in stratum corneum of atopic dermatitis: an etiologic factor in atopic dry skin? J Invest Dermatol 1991;96:523–6.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470233Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Menczel E. Delipidization of the cutaneous permeability barrier and percutaneous penetration, 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

36. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Skin surface lipid and skin friction: relation to age, sex and anatomical region. Skin Pharmacol Off J Skin Pharmacol Soc 1995;8:246–51.10.1159/000211354Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Schreiner V, Gooris GS, Pfeiffer S, Lanzendörfer G, Wenck H, et al. Barrier characteristics of different human skin types investigated with X-ray diffraction, lipid analysis, and electron microscopy imaging. J Invest Dermatol 2000;114:654–60.10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00941.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Potts R, Buras E. In vivo changes in the dynamic viscosity of human stratum corneum as a function of age and ambient moisture. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985;36:169–76.Search in Google Scholar

39. Torgalkar AM. A resonance frequency technique to determine the energy absorbed in stratum corneum in vivo. In: Marks R, Payne PA, editors. Bioengineering and the skin. Netherlands: Springer, 1981:55–65. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-7310–7_7.10.1007/978-94-009-7310-7_7Search in Google Scholar

40. Roskos KV, Maibach HI, Guy RH. The effect of aging on percutaneous absorption in man. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1989;17:617–30.10.1007/BF01062121Search in Google Scholar

41. Harvell JD, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and inflammation in aged skin: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:1015–21.10.1016/S0190-9622(94)70273-XSearch in Google Scholar

42. Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Maibach HI. Skin aging: effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface ph, and casual sebum content. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1806–9.10.1001/archderm.1991.04520010052006Search in Google Scholar

43. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritant contact dermatitis in vulvar and forearm skin of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23(4 Pt 1):648–52.10.1016/0190-9622(90)70268-MSearch in Google Scholar

44. Grice KA, Bettley FR. Skin water loss and accidental hypothermia in psoriasis, ichthyosis, and erythroderma. Br Med J 1967;4:195–8.10.1136/bmj.4.5573.195Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Jemec GB, Agner T, Serup J. Transonychial water loss: relation to sex, age and nail-plate thickness. Br J Dermatol 1989;121:443–6.10.1111/j.1365-2133.1989.tb15511.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Kligman AM. Perspectives and problems in cutaneous gerontology. J Invest Dermatol 1979;73:39–46.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12532758Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Rougier A, Lotte C, Corfucc P, Maibach H. Relationship between skin permeability and corneocyte size according to anatomic site, age, and sex in man. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1988;39:15–26.Search in Google Scholar

48. Dupuis D, Lotte C, Wilson D, Maibach H. In vivo relationship between percutaneous absorption and transepidermal water loss according to anatomic site in man. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1986;37:351–7.Search in Google Scholar

49. Leveque J. Measurement of transepidermal water loss. In: Cutaneous investigation in health and disease: non-invasive methods and instrumentation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

50. Berardesca E, Maibach H. Transepidermal water loss and skin surface hydration in the non invasive assessment of stratum corneum function. Derm Beruf Umw 1990;38:50–3.Search in Google Scholar

51. Crutcher W, Maibach H. The effect of perfusion rate on in vitro percutaneous penetration. J Invest Dermatol 1969;53:264–9.10.1038/jid.1969.145Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Richardson D, Tyra J, McCray A. Attenuation of the cutaneous vasoconstrictor response to cold in elderly man. J Gerontol 1992;47:211–4.10.1093/geronj/47.6.M211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Oimomi M, Hatanaka H, Maeda Y, Hata F, Kitamura Y, et al. Autonomic nervous function determined by changes of periflux blood flow in the aged. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1986;5:159–63.10.1016/0167-4943(86)90018-XSearch in Google Scholar

54. Swartzendruber DC, Wertz PW, Madison KC, Downing DT. Evidence that the corneocyte has a chemically bound lipid envelope. J Invest Dermatol 1987;88:709–13.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470383Search in Google Scholar

55. Elias PM. Epidermal barrier function: intercellular lamellar lipid structures, origin, composition and metabolism. J Controlled Release 1991;15:199–208.10.1016/0168-3659(91)90111-PSearch in Google Scholar

56. Rawlings AV. Trends in stratum corneum research and the management of dry skin conditions. Int J Cosmet Sci 2003;25:63–95.10.1046/j.1467-2494.2003.00174.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Wertz PW. Current understanding of skin biology pertinent to skin penetration: skin biochemistry. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2013;26:217–26.10.1159/000351949Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Fulmer AW, Kramer GJ. Stratum corneum lipid abnormalities in surfactant-induced dry scaly skin. J Invest Dermatol 1986;86:598–602.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12355351Search in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Macheleidt O, Kaiser HW, Sandhoff K. Deficiency of epidermal protein-bound omega-hydroxyceramides in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2002;119:166–73.10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01833.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Lodén M, Maibach HI. Treatment of dry skin syndrome: the art and science of moisturizers. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012.10.1007/978-3-642-27606-4Search in Google Scholar

61. Choi MJ, Maibach HI. Role of ceramides in barrier function of healthy and diseased skin. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005;6:215–23.10.2165/00128071-200506040-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Di Nardo A, Sugino K, Wertz P, Ademola J, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) induced irritant contact dermatitis: a correlation study between ceramides and in vivo parameters of irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:86–91.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02296.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Chew A-L, Maibach HI. Occupational issues of irritant contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2003;76:339–46.10.1007/s00420-002-0419-0Search in Google Scholar

64. Benfeldt E, Serup J, Menné T. Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous salicylic acid penetration in human skin: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:739–48.10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02859.xSearch in Google Scholar

65. Kao J, Patterson FK, Hall J. Skin penetration and metabolism of topically applied chemicals in six mammalian species, including man: an in vitro study with benzo[a]pyrene and testosterone. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1985;81(3 Pt 1):502–16.10.1016/0041-008X(85)90421-1Search in Google Scholar

66. Storm JE, Collier SW, Stewart RF, Bronaugh RL. Metabolism of xenobiotics during percutaneous penetration: role of absorption rate and cutaneous enzyme activity. Fundam Appl Toxicol Off J Soc Toxicol 1990;15:132–41.10.1093/toxsci/15.1.132Search in Google Scholar

67. Bando H, Mohri S, Yamashita F, Takakura Y, Hashida M. Effects of skin metabolism on percutaneous penetration of lipophilic drugs. J Pharm Sci 1997;86:759–61.10.1021/js960408nSearch in Google Scholar

68. Bashir S, Maibach H. Percutaneous absorption: drugs-cosmetics-mechanism-methodology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

69. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Regional variation in percutaneous penetration of 14C Cortisol in Man1. J Invest Dermatol 1967;48:181–3.Search in Google Scholar

70. Ngo MA, O’Malley M, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and exposure assessment of pesticides. J Appl Toxicol 2010;30:91–114.Search in Google Scholar

71. Rougier A, Dupuis D, Lotte C, Roguet R, Wester RC, et al. Regional variation in percutaneous absorption in man: measurement by the stripping method. Arch Dermatol Res 1986;278:465–9.10.1007/BF00455165Search in Google Scholar

72. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion: treatment or drug-like device? Skin Pharmacol Off J Skin Pharmacol Soc 1988;1:207–15.10.1159/000210775Search in Google Scholar

73. Haftek M, Teillon MH, Schmitt D. Stratum corneum, corneodesmosomes and ex vivo percutaneous penetration. Microsc Res Tech 1998;43:242–9.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19981101)43:3<242::AID-JEMT6>3.0.CO;2-GSearch in Google Scholar

74. Bucks D, Maibach HI. Occlusion does not uniformly enhance penetration in vivo. In: Percutaneous absorption. Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005:65–83. Available at: http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/9780849359033.ch4.10.1201/9780849359033.ch4Search in Google Scholar

75. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effects of skin occlusion on percutaneous absorption: an overview. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2001;14:1–10.10.1159/000056328Search in Google Scholar

76. Treffel P, Muret P, Muret-D’Aniello P, Coumes-Marquet S, Agache P. Effect of occlusion on in vitro percutaneous absorption of two compounds with different physicochemical properties. Skin Pharmacol Off J Skin Pharmacol Soc 1992;5:108–13.10.1159/000211027Search in Google Scholar

77. Bucks DA, McMaster JR, Maibach HI, Guy RH. Bioavailability of topically administered steroids: a “mass balance” technique. J Invest Dermatol 1988;91:29–33.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12463284Search in Google Scholar

78. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Penetration of 14c hydrocortisone through normal skin: The effect of stripping and occlusion. Arch Dermatol 1965;91:661–6.10.1001/archderm.1965.01600120093023Search in Google Scholar

79. Ecobichon DJ. Occupational hazards of pesticide exposure: sampling, monitoring, measuring. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

80. Guy R, Bucks D, McMaster J, Villaflor D, Roskos K, et al. Kinetics of drug absorption across human skin in vivo. Skin Pharmacokinet 1987:70–6.Search in Google Scholar

81. Maibach H, Feldmann R. Systemic absorption of pesticides through the skin of man; in task group on occupational exposure to pesticides. Washington: Federal Working Group on Pest Management, 1974:120–7.Search in Google Scholar

82. Bronaugh RL, Stewart RF, Wester RC, Bucks D, Mailbach HI, et al. Comparison of percutaneous absorption of fragrances by humans and monkeys. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc 1985;23:111–4.10.1016/0278-6915(85)90228-5Search in Google Scholar

83. Tsai J-C, Sheu H-M, Hung P-L, Cheng C-L. Effect of barrier disruption by acetone treatment on the permeability of compounds with various lipophilicities: implications for the permeability of compromised skin. J Pharm Sci 2001;90:1242–54.10.1002/jps.1077Search in Google Scholar

84. Gattu S, Maibach HI. Modest but increased penetration through damaged skin: an overview of the in vivo human model. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011;24:2–9.10.1159/000314995Search in Google Scholar

85. Yeung D, Nacht S, Bucks D, Maibach HI. Benzoyl peroxide: percutaneous penetration and metabolic disposition. II. Effect of concentration. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;9:920–4.10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70209-4Search in Google Scholar

86. Reifenrath WG, Robinson PB, Bolton VD, Aliff RE. Percutaneous penetration of mosquito repellents in the hairless dog: effect of dose on percentage penetration. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1981;19:195–9.10.1016/0015-6264(81)90358-8Search in Google Scholar

87. Wedig JH, Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration of the magnesium sulfate adduct of dipyrithione in man. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1977;41:1–6.10.1016/0041-008X(77)90049-7Search in Google Scholar

88. Wester RC, Noonan PK, Maibach HI. Variations in percutaneous absorption of testosterone in the rhesus monkey due to anatomic site of application and frequency of application. Arch Dermatol Res 1980;267:229–35.10.1007/BF00403844Search in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Wester RC, Noonan PK, Maibach HI. Frequency of application on percutaneous absorption of hydrocortisone. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:620–2.10.1001/archderm.1977.01640050080011Search in Google Scholar

90. Feldmann R, Maibach H. Systemic Absorption of pesticides through the skin of man. In: Occupation exposure to pesticides. Report to the Federal Working Group on Pest Management from the Task Group on Occupational Exposure to Pesticides, 1974:120–7.Search in Google Scholar

91. Wester RC, Maibach HI, Bucks DA, Sedik L, Melendres J, et al. Percutaneous absorption of [14C]DDT and [14C]benzo[a]pyrene from soil. Toxicol Sci 1990;15:510–6.10.1093/toxsci/15.3.510Search in Google Scholar

92. Sved S, McLean WM, McGilveray IJ. Influence of the method of application on pharmacokinetics of nitroglycerin from ointment in humans. J Pharm Sci 1981;70:1368–9.10.1002/jps.2600701220Search in Google Scholar

93. Moss GP, Dearden JC, Patel H, Cronin MTD. Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption. Toxicol Vitro Int J Publ Assoc BIBRA 2002;16:299–317.10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00003-6Search in Google Scholar

94. Wilschut A, ten Berge WF, Robinson PJ, McKone TE. Estimating skin permeation. The validation of five mathematical skin permeation models. Chemosphere 1995;30:1275–96.10.1016/0045-6535(95)00023-2Search in Google Scholar

95. Potts RO, Guy RH. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm Res 1992;9:663–9.10.1023/A:1015810312465Search in Google Scholar

96. Patel H, ten Berge W, Cronin MTD. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals. Chemosphere 2002;48:603–13.10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00114-5Search in Google Scholar

97. Potts RO, Guy RH. A predictive algorithm for skin permeability: the effects of molecular size and hydrogen bond activity. Pharm Res 1995;12:1628–33.10.1023/A:1016236932339Search in Google Scholar

98. Farahmand S, Maibach HI. Transdermal drug pharmacokinetics in man: interindividual variability and partial prediction. Int J Pharm 2009;367:1–15.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.11.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

99. Bos JD, Meinardi MMHM. The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 2000;9:165–9.10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

100. Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem Rev 1971;71:525–616.10.1021/cr60274a001Search in Google Scholar

101. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration of steroids in man1. J Invest Dermatol 1969;52:89–94.10.1038/jid.1969.12Search in Google Scholar

102. Scheuplein RJ. Mechanism of percutaneous adsorption. I. Routes of penetration and the influence of solubility. J Invest Dermatol 1965;45:334–46.10.1038/jid.1965.140Search in Google Scholar

103. Hilton J, Woollen BH, Scott RC, Auton TR, Trebilcock KL, Wilks MF. Vehicle effects on in vitro percutaneous absorption through rat and human skin. Pharm Res 1994;11:1396–1400.10.1023/A:1018931503784Search in Google Scholar

104. Hui X, Lamel S, Qiao P, Maibach HI. Isolated human/animal stratum corneum as a partial model for 15 steps in percutaneous absorption: emphasizing decontamination, Part I. J Appl Toxicol 2013;33:157–72.10.1002/jat.2821Search in Google Scholar

105. Scheuplein R, Bronaugh R. Biochemistry and physiology of the skin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

106. Raykar PV, Fung MC, Anderson BD. The role of protein and lipid domains in the uptake of solutes by human stratum corneum. Pharm Res 1988;5:140–50.10.1023/A:1015956705293Search in Google Scholar

107. Gogoleva T, Ademola J, Wester R, Magee P, Maibach H. Relative contributions of human skin layers to partitioning of chemicals with varying lipophilicity. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI, editors. Percutaneous absorption: drugs-cosmetics-mechanisms-methodology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

108. Barry BW. Lipid-protein-partitioning theory of skin penetration enhancement. J Controlled Release 1991;15:237–48.10.1016/0168-3659(91)90115-TSearch in Google Scholar

109. Wohnsland F, Faller B. High-throughput permeability ph profile and high-throughput alkane/water log p with artificial membranes. J Med Chem 2001;44:923–30.10.1021/jm001020eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

110. Sinkó B, Garrigues TM, Balogh GT, Nagy ZK, Tsinman O, et al. Skin-PAMPA: a new method for fast prediction of skin penetration. Eur J Pharm Sci 2012;45:698–707.10.1016/j.ejps.2012.01.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

111. Sinkó B, Kökösi J, Avdeef A, Takács-Novák K. A PAMPA study of the permeability-enhancing effect of new ceramide analogues. Chem Biodivers 2009;6:1867–74.10.1002/cbdv.200900149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

112. Hughes MF, Edwards BC. In vitro dermal absorption of pyrethroid pesticides in human and rat skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010;246:29–37.10.1016/j.taap.2010.04.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

113. Wester RC, Maibach HI. In vivo percutaneous absorption and decontamination of pesticides in humans. J Toxicol Environ Health 1985;16:25–37.10.1080/15287398509530716Search in Google Scholar PubMed

114. Wester RC, Melendres J, Sarason R, McMaster J, Maibach HI. Glyphosate skin binding, absorption, residual tissue distribution, and skin decontamination. Fundam Appl Toxicol Off J Soc Toxicol 1991;16:725–32.10.1093/toxsci/16.4.725Search in Google Scholar

115. Moody RP, Maibach HI. Skin decontamination: importance of the wash-in effect. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44:1783–8.10.1016/j.fct.2006.05.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-7-20
Accepted: 2014-8-21
Published Online: 2014-9-13
Published in Print: 2014-8-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 6.6.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2014-0052/html
Scroll to top button