Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 27, 2015

Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder

Dominique Belpomme, Christine Campagnac and Philippe Irigaray
An erratum for this article can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-8888

Abstract

Much of the controversy over the causes of electro-hypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) lies in the absence of both recognized clinical criteria and objective biomarkers for widely accepted diagnosis. Since 2009, we have prospectively investigated, clinically and biologically, 1216 consecutive EHS and/or MCS-self reporting cases, in an attempt to answer both questions. We report here our preliminary data, based on 727 evaluable of 839 enrolled cases: 521 (71.6%) were diagnosed with EHS, 52 (7.2%) with MCS, and 154 (21.2%) with both EHS and MCS. Two out of three patients with EHS and/or MCS were female; mean age (years) was 47. As inflammation appears to be a key process resulting from electromagnetic field (EMF) and/or chemical effects on tissues, and histamine release is potentially a major mediator of inflammation, we systematically measured histamine in the blood of patients. Near 40% had a increase in histaminemia (especially when both conditions were present), indicating a chronic inflammatory response can be detected in these patients. Oxidative stress is part of inflammation and is a key contributor to damage and response. Nitrotyrosin, a marker of both peroxynitrite (ONOO°-) production and opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), was increased in 28% the cases. Protein S100B, another marker of BBB opening was increased in 15%. Circulating autoantibodies against O-myelin were detected in 23%, indicating EHS and MCS may be associated with autoimmune response. Confirming animal experiments showing the increase of Hsp27 and/or Hsp70 chaperone proteins under the influence of EMF, we found increased Hsp27 and/or Hsp70 in 33% of the patients. As most patients reported chronic insomnia and fatigue, we determined the 24 h urine 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate (6-OHMS)/creatinin ratio and found it was decreased (<0.8) in all investigated cases. Finally, considering the self-reported symptoms of EHS and MCS, we serially measured the brain blood flow (BBF) in the temporal lobes of each case with pulsed cerebral ultrasound computed tomosphygmography. Both disorders were associated with hypoperfusion in the capsulothalamic area, suggesting that the inflammatory process involve the limbic system and the thalamus. Our data strongly suggest that EHS and MCS can be objectively characterized and routinely diagnosed by commercially available simple tests. Both disorders appear to involve inflammation-related hyper-histaminemia, oxidative stress, autoimmune response, capsulothalamic hypoperfusion and BBB opening, and a deficit in melatonin metabolic availability; suggesting a risk of chronic neurodegenerative disease. Finally the common co-occurrence of EHS and MCS strongly suggests a common pathological mechanism.


Corresponding author: Philippe Irigaray, PhD, ARTAC, 57-59 rue de la convention, 75015 Paris, Phone: +33 (0)1 45 78 53 54, Fax: +33 (0)1 45 78 53 50, E-mail: ; Association for Research and Treatments Against Cancer (ARTAC), F-75015 Paris, France; and European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (ECERI), Brussels, Belgium

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a specific grant from the ARTAC provided by patient’s donations and non-profit grants from Foundation Lea Nature-France, Foundation Pour une Terre Humaine-France and Foundation Un Monde par Tous-France. The authors acknowledge Dr. Natalio Awaida from “Labo XV-Paris” for the high quality of the blood analysis, Tony Tweedale from R.I.S.K. (Rebutting Industry Science with Knowledge) (Brussels, Belgium) for his review and valuable comments on early draft. The authors thank also Ms Meris Michaels (an ARTAC member from Switzerland) for her specific financial support.

  1. Conflicts of interest statement: All the authors declare no financial conflict of interests.

References

1. Randolph TG. Human ecology and susceptibility to the chemical environment, ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. 1962:148pp.Search in Google Scholar

2. Nethercott JR, Davidoff LL, Curbow B, Abbey H. Multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome: toward a working case definition. Arch Environ Health 1993;48(1):19–26.10.1080/00039896.1993.9938389Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS): a consensus. Arch Environ Health 1999;54(3):147–9.10.1080/00039899909602251Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Genuis SJ. Sensitivity-related illness: the escalating pandemic of allergy, food intolerance and chemical sensitivity. Sci Total Environ 2010;408(24):6047–61.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Rea WJ, Pan Y, Fenyves EJ, Sujisawa I, Suyama H, et al. Electromagnetic field sensitivity. J Bioelectricity 1991;10(1–2):241–56.10.3109/15368379109031410Search in Google Scholar

6. Bergqvist U, Vogel E, Editors. Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DGV. Arbete och Hälsa, 1997:19. Swedish National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden. Available at: http://www2.niwl.se/forlag/en/.Search in Google Scholar

7. Santini R, Seigne M, Bonhomme-Faivre L, Bouffet S, Defrasme E, et al. Symptoms experienced by users of digital cellular phones: a study of a French engineering school. Electromagn Biol Med 2002;21(1):81–8.10.1081/JBC-120003113Search in Google Scholar

8. Santini R, Santini P, Le Ruz P, Danze JM, Seigne M. Survey study of people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base. Electromagn Biol Med 2003;22(1):41–9.10.1081/JBC-120020353Search in Google Scholar

9. Hansson Mild K, Repacholi M, Van Deventer E, Ravazzani P, editors. 2006. In: Proceedings, International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25–27, 2004. Milan: World Health Organization. Working group report, 15–26. Available at: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/EHS_Proceedings_June2006.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

10. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly’electromagnetic hypersensitivity’): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2010;31(1):1–11.Search in Google Scholar

11. Bornschein S, Förstl H, Zilker T. Idiopathic environmental intolerances (formerly multiple chemical sensitivity) psychiatric perspectives. J Intern Med 2001;250(4):309–21.10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00870.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Röösli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ Res 2008;107(2):277–87.10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Röösli M, Mohler E, Frei P. Sense and sensibility in the context of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. C R physique 2010;11:576–84.10.1016/j.crhy.2010.10.007Search in Google Scholar

14. Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Bolte J, Schipper M, Yzermans J, et al. Non-specific physical symptoms and electromagnetic field exposure in the general population: can we get more specific? A systematic review. Environ Int 2012;41:15–28.10.1016/j.envint.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Genuis SJ, Lipp CT. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction? Sci Total Environ 2012;414:103–12.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Köteles F, Szemerszky R, Gubányi M, Körmendi J, Szekrényesi C, et al. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) and electrosensibility (ES) – are they connected? Int J Hyg Environ Health 2013;216(3): 362–70.10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Marc-Vergnes JP. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: the opinion of an observer neurologist. C R Physique 2010;11:564–75.10.1016/j.crhy.2010.12.006Search in Google Scholar

18. Carpenter DO. Excessive exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields may cause the development of electrohypersensitivity. Altern Ther Health Med 2014;20(6):40–2.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hagström M, Auranen J, Ekman R. Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study. Pathophysiology 2013;20(2):117–22.10.1016/j.pathophys.2013.02.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. De Luca C, Raskovic D, Pacifico V, Thai JC, Korkina L. The search for reliable biomarkers of disease in multiple chemical sensitivity and other environmental intolerances. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8(7):2770–97.10.3390/ijerph8072770Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Lebret E, Rubin GJ. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria. BMC Public Health 2012;12:643.10.1186/1471-2458-12-643Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Jorgensen LG. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for cerebral perfusion. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1995;625:1–44.Search in Google Scholar

23. Texier JJ, Grunitsky E, Lepetit JM, Lajoix M, Cognard J, et al. Variation in the functional circulatory value measured by ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography during the administration of general intravenous anesthesia. Agressologie 1986;27(6):487–94.Search in Google Scholar

24. Parini M, Lepetit JM, Dumas M, Tapie P, Lemoine J. Ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography. Application in 143 healthy subjects. Agressologie 1984;25(5):585–9.Search in Google Scholar

25. Lajoix M, Bechonnet G, Lepetit JM. Ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography and cerebral perfusion pressure. Agressologie 1983;24(9):425–7.Search in Google Scholar

26. Albert PJ, Proal AD, Marshall TG. Vitamin D: the alternative hypothesis. Autoimmun Rev 2009;8(8):639–44.10.1016/j.autrev.2009.02.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Tuohimaa P, Keisala T, Minasyan A, Cachat J, Kalueff A. Vitamin D, nervous system and aging. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009;34(Suppl 1):S278–86.10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Eyles DW, Feron F, Cui X, Kesby JP, Harms LH, et al. Developmental vitamin D deficiency causes abnormal brain development. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009;34(Suppl 1):S247–57.10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Rocha SM, Pires J, Esteves M, Graça B, Bernardino L. Histamine: a new immunomodulatory player in the neuron-glia crosstalk. Front Cell Neurosci 2014;8:120.10.3389/fncel.2014.00120Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Greaves MW, Sabroe RA. Histamine: the quintessential mediator. J Dermatol 1996;23(11):735–40.10.1111/j.1346-8138.1996.tb02694.xSearch in Google Scholar

31. Abbott NJ. Inflammatory mediators and modulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2000;20(2):131–47.10.1023/A:1007074420772Search in Google Scholar

32. Mayhan WG. Role of nitric oxide in histamine-induced increases in permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 1996;743(1–2):70–6.10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01021-9Search in Google Scholar

33. Tan KH, Harrington S, Purcell WM, Hurst RD. Peroxynitrite mediates nitric oxide-induced blood-brain barrier damage. Neurochem Res 2004;29(3):579–87.10.1023/B:NERE.0000014828.32200.bdSearch in Google Scholar

34. Phares TW, Fabis MJ, Brimer CM, Kean RB, Hooper DC. A peroxynitrite-dependent pathway is responsible for blood-brain barrier permeability changes during a central nervous system inflammatory response: TNF-alpha is neither necessary nor sufficient. J Immunol 2007;178(11):7334–43.10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7334Search in Google Scholar

35. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2007;87(1):315–424.10.1152/physrev.00029.2006Search in Google Scholar

36. Yang S, Chen Y, Deng X, Jiang W, Li B, et al. Hemoglobin-induced nitric oxide synthase overexpression and nitric oxide production contribute to blood-brain barrier disruption in the rat. J Mol Neurosci 2013;51(2):352–63.10.1007/s12031-013-9990-ySearch in Google Scholar

37. Kanner AA, Marchi N, Fazio V, Mayberg MR, Koltz MT, et al. Serum S100beta: a noninvasive marker of blood-brain barrier function and brain lesions. Cancer 2003;97(11):2806–13.10.1002/cncr.11409Search in Google Scholar

38. Kapural M, Krizanac-Bengez Lj, Barnett G, Perl J, Masaryk T, et al. Serum S-100beta as a possible marker of blood-brain barrier disruption. Brain Res 2002;940(1–2):102–4.10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02586-6Search in Google Scholar

39. Marchi N, Cavaglia M, Fazio V, Bhudia S, Hallene K, et al. Peripheral markers of blood-brain barrier damage. Clin Chim Acta 2004;342(1–2):1–12.10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Koh SX, Lee JK. S100B as a marker for brain damage and blood-brain barrier disruption following exercise. Sports Med 2014;44(3):369–85.10.1007/s40279-013-0119-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Gunaydin H, Houk KN. Mechanisms of peroxynitrite-mediated nitration of tyrosine. Chem Res Toxicol 2009;22(5):894–8.10.1021/tx800463ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. de Pomerai D, Daniells C, David H, Allan J, Duce I, et al. Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves. Nature 2000;405(6785):417–8.10.1038/35013144Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. French PW, Penny R, Laurence JA, McKenzie DR. Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and cancer. Differentiation 2001;67(4–5):93–7.10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.670401.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Blank M, Goodman R. Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology 2009;16(2–3):71–8.10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Yang XS, He GL, Hao YT, Xiao Y, Chen CH, et al. Exposure to 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields elicits an HSP-related stress response in rat hippocampus. Brain Res Bull 2012;88(4):371–8.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Kesari KK, Meena R, Nirala J, Kumar J, Verma HN. Effect of 3G cell phone exposure with computer controlled 2-D stepper motor on non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway in rat brain. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;68(2):347–58.10.1007/s12013-013-9715-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Berberian PA, Myers W, Tytell M, Challa V, Bond MG. munohistochemical localization of heat shock protein-70 in normal-appearing and atherosclerotic specimens of human arteries. Am J Pathol 1990;136(1):71–80.Search in Google Scholar

48. Georgopoulos C, Welch WJ. Role of the major heat shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1993;9:601–34.10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.003125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996;381(6583):571–9.10.1038/381571a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Sabirzhanov B, Stoica BA, Hanscom M, Piao CS, Faden AI. Over-expression of HSP70 attenuates caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways and inhibits neuronal apoptosis. J Neurochem 2012;123(4):542–54.10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07927.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Yenari MA, Liu J, Zheng Z, Vexler ZS, Lee JE, et al. Antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of heat-shock protein protection. Ann NY Acad Sci 2005;1053:74–83.10.1196/annals.1344.007Search in Google Scholar

52. Kelly S, Yenari MA. Neuroprotection: heat shock proteins. Curr Med Res Opin 2002;18(Suppl 2):s55–60.10.1185/030079902125000732Search in Google Scholar

53. Leszczynski D, Joenväärä S, Reivinen J, Kuokka R. Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. Differentiation 2002;70(2–3):120–9.10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.700207.xSearch in Google Scholar

54. Leak RK, Zhang L, Stetler RA, Weng Z, Li P, et al. HSP27 protects the blood-brain barrier against ischemia-induced loss of integrity. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2013;12(3):325–37.10.2174/1871527311312030006Search in Google Scholar

55. Di Carlo A, White N, Guo F, Garrett P, Litovitz T. Chronic electromagnetic field exposure decreases HSP70 levels and lowers cytoprotection. J Cell Biochem 2002;84(3):447–54.10.1002/jcb.10036Search in Google Scholar

56. Ohmori H, Kanayama N. Mechanisms leading to autoantibody production: link between inflammation and autoimmunity. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 2003;2(3):232–41.10.2174/1568010033484124Search in Google Scholar

57. Profumo E, Buttari B, Riganò R. Oxidative stress in cardiovascular inflammation: its involvement in autoimmune responses. Int J Inflam 2011;2011:295705.10.4061/2011/295705Search in Google Scholar

58. Lin H, Opler M, Head M, Blank M, Goodman R. Electromagnetic field exposure induces rapid, transitory heat shock factor activation in human cells. J Cell Biochem 1997;66(4):482–88.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19970915)66:4<482::AID-JCB7>3.0.CO;2-HSearch in Google Scholar

59. Tsurita G, Ueno S, Tsuno NH, Nagawa H, Muto T. Effects of exposure to repetitive pulsed magnetic stimulation on cell proliferation and expression of heat shock protein 70 in normal and malignant cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;261(3):689–94.10.1006/bbrc.1999.1110Search in Google Scholar

60. Bozic B, Cucnik S, Kveder T, Rozman B. Autoimmune reactions after electro-oxidation of IgG from healthy persons: relevance of electric current and antioxidants. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1109:158–66.10.1196/annals.1398.019Search in Google Scholar

61. Burch JB, Reif JS, Yost MG, Keefe TJ, Pitrat CA. Reduced excretion of a melatonin metabolite in workers exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150(1):27–36.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009914Search in Google Scholar

62. Kovács J, Brodner W, Kirchlechner V, Arif T, Waldhauser F. Measurement of urinary melatonin: a useful tool for monitoring serum melatonin after its oral administration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85(2):666–70.10.1210/jcem.85.2.6349Search in Google Scholar

63. Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Curb JD, Masaki K, White LR, et al. Early inflammation and dementia: a 25-year follow-up of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Ann Neurol 2002;52(2):168–74.10.1002/ana.10265Search in Google Scholar

64. Dik MG, Jonker C, Hack CE, Smit JH, Comijs HC, et al. Serum inflammatory proteins and cognitive decline in older persons. Neurology 2005;64(8):1371–7.10.1212/01.WNL.0000158281.08946.68Search in Google Scholar

65. Gazerani P, Pourpak Z, Ahmadiani A, Hemmati A, Kazemnejad A. A correlation between migraine, histamine and immunoglobulin E. Scand J Immunol 2003;57(3):286–90.10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01216.xSearch in Google Scholar

66. Stamataki E, Stathopoulos A, Garini E, Kokkoris S, Glynos C, et al. Serum S100B protein is increased and correlates with interleukin 6, hypoperfusion indices, and outcome in patients admitted for surgical control of hemorrhage. Shock 2013;40(4):274–80.10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182a35de5Search in Google Scholar

67. Donato R. S100: a multigenic family of calcium-modulated proteins of the EF-hand type with intracellular and extracellular functional roles. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2001;33(7):637–68.10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00046-2Search in Google Scholar

68. Michetti F, Corvino V, Geloso MC, Lattanzi W, Bernardini C, et al. The S100B protein in biological fluids: more than a lifelong biomarker of brain distress. J Neurochem 2012;120(5):644–59.10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07612.xSearch in Google Scholar

69. Sheng JG, Mrak RE, Griffin WS. Glial-neuronal interactions in Alzheimer disease: progressive association of IL-1alpha+ microglia and S100beta+ astrocytes with neurofibrillary tangle stages. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997;56(3):285–90.10.1097/00005072-199703000-00007Search in Google Scholar

70. Migheli A, Cordera S, Bendotti C, Atzori C, Piva R, et al. S-100beta protein is upregulated in astrocytes and motor neurons in the spinal cord of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurosci Lett 1999;261(1–2):25–28.10.1016/S0304-3940(98)01001-5Search in Google Scholar

71. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Biomarkers in volunteers exposed to mobile phone radiation. Toxicol Lett 2015;235(2):140–6.10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.03.016Search in Google Scholar

72. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K, Hardell L. Exposure to an 890-MHz mobile phone-like signal and serum levels of S100B and transthyretin in volunteers. Toxicol Lett 2009;189(1):63–6.10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.027Search in Google Scholar

73. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Use of wireless telephones and serum S100B levels: a descriptive cross-sectional study among healthy Swedish adults aged 18-65 years. Sci Total Environ 2009;407(2):798–805.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.051Search in Google Scholar

74. Brzezinski A. Melatonin in humans. N Engl J Med 1997;336(3): 186–95.10.1056/NEJM199701163360306Search in Google Scholar

75. Baydas G, Ozer M, Yasar A, Koz ST, Tuzcu M. Melatonin prevents oxidative stress and inhibits reactive gliosis induced by hyperhomocysteinemia in rats. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2006;71 (Suppl 1):S91–5.10.1134/S0006297906130153Search in Google Scholar

76. Wada H, Inagaki N, Yamatodani A, Watanabe T. Is the histaminergic neuron system a regulatory center for whole-brain activity? Trends Neurosci 1991;14(9):415–8.10.1016/0166-2236(91)90034-RSearch in Google Scholar

77. Onodera K, Yamatodani A, Watanabe T, Wada H. Neuropharmacology of the histaminergic neuron system in the brain and its relationship with behavioral disorders. Prog Neurobiol 1994;42(6):685–702.10.1016/0301-0082(94)90017-5Search in Google Scholar

78. Haas HL, Sergeeva OA, Selbach O. Histamine in the nervous system. Physiol Rev 2008;88(3):1183–241.10.1152/physrev.00043.2007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Panula P, Nuutinen S. The histaminergic network in the brain: basic organization and role in disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14(7):472–87.10.1038/nrn3526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Chen YY, Lv J, Xue XY, He GH, Zhou Y, et al. Effects of sympathetic histamine on vasomotor responses of blood vessels in rabbit ear to electrical stimulation. Neurosci Bull 2010;26(3):219–24.10.1007/s12264-010-1126-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

81. Murakami M, Yoshikawa T, Nakamura T, Ohba T, Matsuzaki Y, et al. Involvement of the histamine H1 receptor in the regulation of sympathetic nerve activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;458(3):584–9.10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

82. Havas M. Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart, and the autonomic nervous system. Rev Environ Health 2013;28(2–3):75–84.10.1515/reveh-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Adachi N. Cerebral ischemia and brain histamine. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005;50(2):275–86.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Dale HH. On some physiological actions of ergot. J Physiol 1906;34(3):163–206.10.1113/jphysiol.1906.sp001148Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

85. Sick E, Brehin S, André P, Coupin G, Landry Y, et al. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) activate mast cells. Br J Pharmacol 2010;161(2):442–55.10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00905.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Donato R, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Arcuri C, Bianchi R, et al. S100B’s double life: intracellular regulator and extracellular signal. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793(6):1008–22.10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Goh SY, Cooper ME. Clinical review: the role of advanced glycation end products in progression and complications of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(4):1143–52.10.1210/jc.2007-1817Search in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Padawer J. Quantitative studies with mast cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963;103:87–138.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb53693.xSearch in Google Scholar

89. Marshall JS. Mast-cell responses to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4(10):787–99.10.1038/nri1460Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Rinne JO, Anichtchik OV, Eriksson KS, Kaslin J, Tuomisto L, et al. Increased brain histamine levels in Parkinson’s disease but not in multiple system atrophy. J Neurochem 2002;81(5): 954–60.10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00871.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Dux E, Temesvári P, Joó F, Adám G, Clementi F, et al. The blood-brain barrier in hypoxia: ultrastructural aspects and adenylate cyclase activity of brain capillaries. Neuroscience 1984;12(3):951–8.10.1016/0306-4522(84)90182-9Search in Google Scholar

92. Gotoh O, Asano T, Koide T, Takakura K. Ischemic brain edema following occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in the rat. I: the time courses of the brain water, sodium and potassium contents and blood-brain barrier permeability to 125I-albumin. Stroke 1985;16(1):101–9.10.1161/01.STR.16.1.101Search in Google Scholar

93. Hardebo JE, Beley A. Influence of blood pressure on blood-brain barrier function in brain ischemia. Acta Neurol Scand 1984;70(5):356–9.Search in Google Scholar

94. Hatashita S, Hoff JT. Brain edema and cerebrovascular permeability during cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke 1990;21(4):582–8.10.1161/01.STR.21.4.582Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Vicente E, Degerone D, Bohn L, Scornavaca F, Pimentel A, et al. Astroglial and cognitive effects of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in the rat. Brain Res 2009;1251:204–12.10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

96. Liu H, Zhang J. Cerebral hypoperfusion and cognitive impairment: the pathogenic role of vascular oxidative stress. Int J Neurosci 2012;122(9):494–9.10.3109/00207454.2012.686543Search in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Davies AL, Desai RA, Bloomfield PS, McIntosh PR, Chapple KJ, et al. Neurological deficits caused by tissue hypoxia in neuroinflammatory disease. Ann Neurol 2013;74(6):815–25.10.1002/ana.24006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

98. Pache M, Kaiser HJ, Akhalbedashvili N, Lienert C, Dubler B, et al. Extraocular blood flow and endothelin-1 plasma levels in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 2003;49(3):164–8.10.1159/000069085Search in Google Scholar PubMed

99. De Ley G, Demeester G, Leusen L. Cerebral histamine in hypoxia. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 1984;94(4):33–5.Search in Google Scholar

100. Yu XX, Barger JL, Boyer BB, Brand MD, Pan G, et al. Impact of endotoxin on UCP homolog mRNA abundance, thermoregulation, and mitochondrial proton leak kinetics. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000;279(2):E433–46.10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.2.E433Search in Google Scholar PubMed

101. Astrup J. Energy-requiring cell functions in the ischemic brain. Their critical supply and possible inhibition in protective therapy. J Neurosurg 1982;56(4):482–97.10.3171/jns.1982.56.4.0482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

102. Ribatti D. The crucial role of mast cells in blood-brain barrier alterations. Exp Cell Res 2015. pii: S0014-4827(15)00193-7.Search in Google Scholar

103. Lindsberg PJ, Strbian D, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML. Mast cells as early responders in the regulation of acute blood-brain barrier changes after cerebral ischemia and hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30(4):689–7.10.1038/jcbfm.2009.282Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

104. Nordal RA, Wong CS. Molecular targets in radiation-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62(1):279–87.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.039Search in Google Scholar

105. Block ML, Zecca L, Hong JS. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8(1):57–69.10.1038/nrn2038Search in Google Scholar

106. Frank-Cannon TC, Alto LT, McAlpine FE, Tansey MG. Does neuroinflammation fan the flame in neurodegenerative diseases? Mol Neurodegener 2009;4:47.10.1186/1750-1326-4-47Search in Google Scholar

107. O’Connor TM, O’Connell J, O’Brien DI, Goode T, Bredin CP, et al. The role of substance P in inflammatory disease. J Cell Physiol 2004;201(2):167–80.10.1002/jcp.20061Search in Google Scholar

108. Raslan F, Schwarz T, Meuth SG, Austinat M, Bader M, et al. Inhibition of bradykinin receptor B1 protects mice from focal brain injury by reducing blood-brain barrier leakage and inflammation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30(8):1477–86.10.1038/jcbfm.2010.28Search in Google Scholar

109. Zhu J, Qu C, Lu X, Zhang S. Activation of microglia by histamine and substance P. Cell Physiol Biochem 2014;34(3):768–80.10.1159/000363041Search in Google Scholar

110. Kettenmann H, Hanisch UK, Noda M, Verkhratsky A. Physiology of microglia. Physiol Rev 2011;91(2):461–553.10.1152/physrev.00011.2010Search in Google Scholar

111. Ammari M, Brillaud E, Gamez C, Lecomte A, Sakly M, et al. Effect of a chronic GSM 900 MHz exposure on glia in the rat brain. Biomed Pharmacother 2008;62(4):273–81.10.1016/j.biopha.2008.03.002Search in Google Scholar

112. Hösli L, Hösli E, Schneider U, Wiget W. Evidence for the existence of histamine H1- and H2-receptors on astrocytes of cultured rat central nervous system. Neurosci Lett 1984;48(3):287–91.10.1016/0304-3940(84)90052-1Search in Google Scholar

113. Dong Y, Benveniste EN. Immune function of astrocytes. Glia 2001;36(2):180–90.10.1002/glia.1107Search in Google Scholar PubMed

114. Majno G, Gilmore V, Leventhal M. On the mechanism of vascular leakage caused by histaminetype mediators. A microscopic study in vivo. Circ Res 1967;21(6):833–47.10.1161/01.RES.21.6.833Search in Google Scholar

115. Mayhan WG. Regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. Microcirculation 2001;8(2):89–104.Search in Google Scholar

116. Gurney KJ, Estrada EY, Rosenberg GA. Blood-brain barrier disruption by stromelysin-1 facilitates neutrophil infiltration in neuroinflammation. Neurobiol Dis 2006;23(1):87–96.10.1016/j.nbd.2006.02.006Search in Google Scholar

117. Moretti R, Pansiot J, Bettati D, Strazielle N, Ghersi-Egea JF, et al. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in disorders of the developing brain. Front Neurosci 2015;9:40.10.3389/fnins.2015.00040Search in Google Scholar

118. Kasparová S, Brezová V, Valko M, Horecký J, Mlynárik V, et al. Study of the oxidative stress in a rat model of chronic brain hypoperfusion. Neurochem Int 2005;46(8):601–11.10.1016/j.neuint.2005.02.006Search in Google Scholar

119. Oscar KJ, Hawkins TD. Microwave alteration of the blood-brain barrier system of rats. Brain Res 1977;126(2):281–93.10.1016/0006-8993(77)90726-0Search in Google Scholar

120. Oscar KJ, Gruenau SP, Folker MT, Rapoport SI. Local cerebral blood flow after microwave exposure. Brain Res 1981;204(1):220–5.10.1016/0006-8993(81)90668-5Search in Google Scholar

121. Albert EN, Kerns JM. Reversible microwave effects on the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 1981;230(1–2):153–64.10.1016/0006-8993(81)90398-XSearch in Google Scholar

122. Nittby H, Grafström G, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Brun A, et al. Radiofrequency and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field effects on the blood-brain barrier. Electromagn Biol Med 2008;27(2):103–26.10.1080/15368370802061995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

123. Reiter RJ. Melatonin suppression by static and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: relationship to the reported increased incidence of cancer. Rev Environ Health 1994;10 (3–4):171–86.10.1515/REVEH.1994.10.3-4.171Search in Google Scholar PubMed

124. Burch JB, Reif JS, Yost MG, Keefe TJ, Pitrat CA. Nocturnal excretion of a urinary melatonin metabolite among electric utility workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1998;24(3):183–9.10.5271/sjweh.297Search in Google Scholar PubMed

125. Pfluger DH, Minder CE. Effects of exposure to 16.7 Hz magnetic fields on urinary 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate excretion of Swiss railway workers. J Pineal Res 1996;21(2):91–100.10.1111/j.1600-079X.1996.tb00275.xSearch in Google Scholar

126. Reiter RJ. Melatonin in the context of the reported bioeffects of environmental electromagnetic fields. Bioelectroch Bioener 1998;47:135–42.10.1016/S0302-4598(98)00152-4Search in Google Scholar

127. Reiter RJ, Pablos MI, Agapito TT, Guerrero JM. Melatonin in the context of the free radical theory of aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 1996;786:362–78.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb39077.xSearch in Google Scholar

128. Reiter R, Tang L, Garcia JJ, Muñoz-Hoyos A. Pharmacological actions of melatonin in oxygen radical pathophysiology. Life Sci 1997;60(25):2255–71.10.1016/S0024-3205(97)00030-1Search in Google Scholar

129. The Bioinitiative report 2012. A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). Available at: www.bioinitiative.org.Search in Google Scholar

130. Girgert R, Hanf V, Emons G, Gründker C. Signal transduction of the melatonin receptor MT1 is disrupted in breast cancer cells by electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2010;31(3):237–45.Search in Google Scholar

131. Hendrick JP, Hartl FU. The role of molecular chaperones in protein folding. FASEB J 1995;9(15):1559–69.10.1096/fasebj.9.15.8529835Search in Google Scholar PubMed

132. Banecka-Majkutewicz Z, Grabowski M, Kadziński L, Papkov A, Węgrzyn A, et al. Increased levels of antibodies against heat shock proteins in stroke patients. Acta Biochim Pol 2014;61(2):379–83.10.18388/abp.2014_1910Search in Google Scholar

133. Tanaka S, Ichikawa A. Recent advances in molecular pharmacology of the histamine systems: immune regulatory roles of histamine produced by leukocytes. J Pharmacol Sci 2006;101(1):19–23.10.1254/jphs.FMJ06001X5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

134. Johansson O. Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment. Pathophysiology 2009;16(2–3):157–77.10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.03.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

135. Gangi S, Johansson O. A theoretical model based upon mast cells and histamine to explain the recently proclaimed sensitivity to electric and/or magnetic fields in humans. Med Hypotheses 2000;54(4):663–71.10.1054/mehy.1999.0923Search in Google Scholar PubMed

136. Pall ML. Post-radiation syndrome as a NO/ONOO- cycle, chronic fatigue syndrome-like disease. Med Hypotheses 2008;71(4):537–41.10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

137. Levallois P. Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(Suppl 4):613–8.10.1289/ehp.02110s4613Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

138. Theoharides TC, Donelan J, Kandere-Grzybowska K, Konstantinidou A. The role of mast cells in migraine pathophysiology. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005;49(1):65–76.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.11.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

139. Ozturk A, Degirmenci Y, Tokmak B, Tokmak A. Frequency of migraine in patients with allergic rhinitis. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29(2):528–31.10.12669/pjms.292.3148Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

140. Alstadhaug KB. Histamine in migraine and brain. Headache 2014;54(2):246–59.10.1111/head.12293Search in Google Scholar PubMed

141. Renkawek K, Bosman GJ, de Jong WW. Expression of small heat-shock protein hsp 27 in reactive gliosis in Alzheimer disease and other types of dementia. Acta Neuropathol 1994;87(5):511–9.10.1007/BF00294178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

142. Renkawek K, Stege GJ, Bosman GJ. Dementia, gliosis and expression of the small heat shock proteins hsp27 and alpha B-crystallin in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport 1999;10(11):2273–6.10.1097/00001756-199908020-00009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

143. Donato R. Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. Microsc Res Tech 2003;60(6):540–51.10.1002/jemt.10296Search in Google Scholar PubMed

144. Andreazza AC, Cassini C, Rosa AR, Leite MC, de Almeida LM, et al. Serum S100B and antioxidant enzymes in bipolar patients. J Psychiatr Res 2007;41(6):523–9.10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.07.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

145. Donato R, Cannon BR, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Hsu K, et al. Functions of S100 proteins. Curr Mol Med 2013;13(1):24–57.10.2174/156652413804486214Search in Google Scholar

146. Mu H, Wang X, Lin P, Yao Q, Chen C. Nitrotyrosine promotes human aortic smooth muscle cell migration through oxidative stress and ERK1/2 activation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008;1783(9):1576–84.10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.04.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

147. Kimata H. Effect of exposure to volatile organic compounds on plasma levels of neuropeptides, nerve growth factor and histamine in patients with self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2004;207(2):159–63.10.1078/1438-4639-00262Search in Google Scholar

148. Irigaray P, Belpomme D. Basic properties and molecular mechanisms of exogenous chemical carcinogens. Carcinogenesis 2010;31(2):135–48.10.1093/carcin/bgp252Search in Google Scholar

149. McKeown-Eyssen G, Baines C, Cole DE, Riley N, Tyndale RF, et al. Case-control study of genotypes in multiple chemical sensitivity: CYP2D6, NAT1, NAT2, PON1, PON2 and MTHFR. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33(5):971–8.10.1093/ije/dyh251Search in Google Scholar

150. Schnakenberg E, Fabig KR, Stanulla M, Strobl N, Lustig M, et al. A cross-sectional study of self-reported chemical-related sensitivity is associated with gene variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Environ Health 2007;6:6.10.1186/1476-069X-6-6Search in Google Scholar

151. Caccamo D, Cesareo E, Mariani S, Raskovic D, Ientile R, et al. Xenobiotic sensor- and metabolism-related gene variants in environmental sensitivity-related illnesses: a survey on the Italian population. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013;2013:831969.10.1155/2013/831969Search in Google Scholar

152. Berg ND, Rasmussen HB, Linneberg A, Brasch-Andersen C, Fenger M, et al. Genetic susceptibility factors for multiple chemical sensitivity revisited. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2010;213(2):131–9.10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar

153. De Luca C, Scordo MG, Cesareo E, Pastore S, Mariani S, et al. Biological definition of multiple chemical sensitivity from redox state and cytokine profiling and not from polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010;248(3):285–92.10.1016/j.taap.2010.04.017Search in Google Scholar

154. Kirschvink JL, Kobayashi-Kirschvink A, Woodford BJ. Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89(16):7683–7.10.1073/pnas.89.16.7683Search in Google Scholar

155. Kirschvink JL, Walker MM, Diebel CE. Magnetite-based magnetoreception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001;11(4):462–7.10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00235-XSearch in Google Scholar

156. Kirschvink JL. Microwave absorption by magnetite: a possible mechanism for coupling nonthermal levels of radiation to biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics 1996;17(3):187–94.10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:3<187::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar

157. De Luca C, Scordo G, Cesareo E, Raskovic D, Genovesi G, et al. Idiopathic environmental intolerances (IEI): from molecular epidemiology to molecular medicine. Indian J Exp Biol 2010;48(7):625–35.Search in Google Scholar

158. Costa A, Branca V, Minoia C, Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Heavy metals exposure and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Sci Total Environ 2010;408(20):4919–20.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.045Search in Google Scholar

159. Burns-Naas LA, Meade BJ, Munson AE. Toxic responses of the immune system. In: Klaassen CD, editor. Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic of poisons, 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001:419–70.Search in Google Scholar

160. Gardner RM, Nyland JF, Evans SL, Wang SB, Doyle KM, et al. Mercury induces an unopposed inflammatory response in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117(12):1932–8.10.1289/ehp.0900855Search in Google Scholar

161. Goyer RA, Clarkson TW. Toxic effects of metals. In: Klaassen CD, editor. Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic of poisons, 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001:822–6.Search in Google Scholar

162. Minoia C, Ronchi A, Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Blood lead, cadmium, and mercury concentrations in the Korean population. Environ Res 2010;110(5):532.10.1016/j.envres.2010.03.009Search in Google Scholar

163. Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, et al. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci 2008;11(8):1142–6.10.3923/pjbs.2008.1142.1146Search in Google Scholar

164. Störtebecker P. Mercury poisoning from dental amalgam through a direct nose-brain transport. Lancet 1989;1(8648):1207.10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92789-XSearch in Google Scholar

165. Miller CS. Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance – an emerging theory of disease? Environ Health Perspect 1997;105(Suppl 2): 445–53.10.1289/ehp.97105s2445Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

166. Rubin LL, Staddon JM. The cell biology of the blood-brain barrier. Annu Rev Neurosci 1999;22:11–28.10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.11Search in Google Scholar PubMed

167. Löscher W, Potschka H. Role of drug efflux transporters in the brain for drug disposition and treatment of brain diseases. Prog Neurobiol 2005;76(1):22–76.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

168. Meairs S, Alonso A. Ultrasound, microbubbles and the blood-brain barrier. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007;93(1–3): 354–62.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

169. Smith MW, Gumbleton M. Endocytosis at the blood-brain barrier: from basic understanding to drug delivery strategies. J Drug Target 2006;14(4):191–214.10.1080/10611860600650086Search in Google Scholar PubMed

170. Stam R. Electromagnetic fields and the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res Rev 2010;65(1):80–97.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001Search in Google Scholar

171. Mrak RE, Griffin WS. Glia and their cytokines in progression of neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26(3):349–54.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.05.010Search in Google Scholar

172. Griffin WS. Inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83(2):470S–4S.10.1093/ajcn/83.2.470SSearch in Google Scholar

173. Erickson MA, Banks WA. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction as a cause and consequence of Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33(10):1500–13.10.1038/jcbfm.2013.135Search in Google Scholar

174. Bell RD, Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular mechanisms and blood-brain barrier disorder in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 2009;118(1):103–13.10.1007/s00401-009-0522-3Search in Google Scholar

175. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, et al. Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2000;21(3):383–421.10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00124-XSearch in Google Scholar

176. Sastre M, Klockgether T, Heneka MT. Contribution of inflammatory processes to Alzheimer’s disease: molecular mechanisms. Int J Dev Neurosci 2006;24(2–3):167–76.10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.11.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

177. Ionov ID. Self-amplification of nigral degeneration in Parkinson’s disease: a hypothesis. Int J Neurosci 2008;118(12):1763–80.10.1080/00207450802330561Search in Google Scholar PubMed

178. Jadidi-Niaragh F, Mirshafiey A. Histamine and histamine receptors in pathogenesis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neuropharmacology 2010;59(3):180–9.10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.05.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

179. Anderson G, Berk M, Dodd S, Bechter K, Altamura AC, et al. Immuno-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and neuroprogressive pathways in the etiology, course and treatment of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013;42:1–4.10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.10.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

180. Ng F, Berk M, Dean O, Bush AI. Oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders: evidence base and therapeutic implications. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008;11(6):851–76.10.1017/S1461145707008401Search in Google Scholar PubMed

181. Patel JP, Frey BN. Disruption in the blood-brain barrier: the missing link between brain and body inflammation in bipolar disorder? Neural Plast 2015;2015:708306.10.1155/2015/708306Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

182. Berk M, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Dean OM, Giorlando F, et al. Pathways underlying neuroprogression in bipolar disorder: focus on inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotrophic factors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011;35(3):804–17.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

183. Merritt JH, Chamness AF, Allen SJ. Studies on blood-brain barrier permeability after microwave-radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 1978;15(4):367–77.10.1007/BF01323461Search in Google Scholar PubMed

184. Avsenik J, Bisdas S, Popovic KS. Blood-brain barrier permeability imaging using perfusion computed tomography. Radiol Oncol 2015;49(2):107–14.10.2478/raon-2014-0029Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

185. Uttara B, Singh AV, Zamboni P, Mahajan RT. Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: a review of upstream and downstream antioxidant therapeutic options. Curr Neuropharmacol 2009;7(1):65–74.10.2174/157015909787602823Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

186. Galasko D, Montine TJ. Biomarkers of oxidative damage and inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomark Med 2010;4(1):27–36.10.2217/bmm.09.89Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

187. Heneka MT, O’Banion MK. Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroimmunol 2007;184(1–2):69–91.10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

188. Tachibana H, Meyer JS, Kitagawa Y, Tanahashi N, Kandula P, et al. Xenon contrast CT-CBF measurements in parkinsonism and normal aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33(6):413–21.10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb07152.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

189. Abe Y, Kachi T, Kato T, Arahata Y, Yamada T, et al. Occipital hypoperfusion in Parkinson’s disease without dementia: correlation to impaired cortical visual processing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74(4):419–22.10.1136/jnnp.74.4.419Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

190. Kikuchi A, Takeda A, Kimpara T, Nakagawa M, Kawashima R, et al. Hypoperfusion in the supplementary motor area, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and insular cortex in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2001;193(1):29–36.10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00641-4Search in Google Scholar

191. Kasama S, Tachibana H, Kawabata K, Yoshikawa H. Cerebral blood flow in Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer’s disease according to three-dimensional stereotactic surface projection imaging. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19(5–6):266–75.10.1159/000084551Search in Google Scholar PubMed

192. Derejko M, Slawek J, Wieczorek D, Brockhuis B, Dubaniewicz M, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow in Parkinson’s disease as an indicator of cognitive impairment. Nucl Med Commun 2006;27(12): 945–51.10.1097/01.mnm.0000243370.18883.62Search in Google Scholar PubMed

193. Sobel E, Davanipour Z, Sulkava R, Erkinjuntti T, Wikstrom J, et al. Occupations with exposure to electromagnetic fields: a possible risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Epidemiol 1995:142(5):515–24.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117669Search in Google Scholar PubMed

194. Sobel E, Dunn M, Davanipour Z, Qian Z, Chui HC. Elevated risk of Alzheimer’s disease among workers with likely electromagnetic field exposure. Neurol 1996;47(6):1477–81.10.1212/WNL.47.6.1477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

195. Qiu C, Fratiglioni L, Karp A, Winblad B, Bellander T. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiol 2004;15(6): 687–94.10.1097/01.ede.0000142147.49297.9dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

196. Davanipour Z, Sobel E. Long-term exposure to magnetic fields and the risks of Alzheimer’s disease and breast cancer: further biological research. Pathophysiol 2009;16(2–3):149–56.10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

197. Garcia AM, Sisternas A, Hoyos SP. Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2008:37(2):329–40.10.1093/ije/dym295Search in Google Scholar PubMed

198. Arendash GW, Sanchez-Ramos J, Mori T, Mamcarz M, Lin X, et al. Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;19(1):191–210.10.3233/JAD-2010-1228Search in Google Scholar PubMed

199. Söderqvist F, Hardell L, Carlberg M, Mild KH. Radiofrequency fields, transthyretin, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;20(2):599–606.10.3233/JAD-2010-1395Search in Google Scholar PubMed

200. Purdey M. Elevated levels of ferrimagnetic metals in foodchains supporting the Guam cluster of neurodegeneration: do metal nucleated crystal contaminants [corrected] evoke magnetic fields that initiate the progressive pathogenesis of neurodegeneration? Med Hypotheses 2004;63(5):793–809.10.1016/j.mehy.2004.04.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

201. Hallberg O, Oberfeld G. Letter to the editor: will we all become electrosensitive? Electromagn Biol Med 2006;25(3):189–91.10.1080/15368370600873377Search in Google Scholar PubMed

202. World Health Organisation. Electromagnetic fields (300 Hz– 300 GHz) 1993. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc137.htm.Search in Google Scholar

203. Gibson PR, Kovach S, Lupfer A. Unmet health care needs for persons with environmental sensitivity. J Multidisc Healthcare 2015;8:59–66.10.2147/JMDH.S61723Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2015-9-11
Accepted: 2015-11-2
Published Online: 2015-11-27
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow