Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 15, 2017

Associations of built environment and children’s physical activity: a narrative review

Houshmand E. Masoumi

Abstract

Problem:

Childhood obesity has been an epidemic particularly in high-income countries. There is a considerable volume of data and studies depicting the rising number of obese children and adolescents in different countries. As suggested by the literature, physical inactivity is one the main drivers of childhood obesity. This paper addresses the associations of the built environment with physical activity of children in order to find to theoretically facilitate intervention and prevention measures.

Literature:

There is a large body of literature describing the overall determinants of children’s physical activity. The built environment is one of the influential factors that have been partially examined. Among the physical environment indicators, distance to school has been repeatedly reported to be negatively associated with active travels to school; thus, it indirectly affects physical activity of children. Apart from distance to school, some other built environment indicators have also been less researched, such as population and construction densities, distance to the city center, land use mix, and type of urban fabric (urban, suburban, etc.).

Objective:

The purpose of this review was to shed light on some of the less-studied areas of the existing literature related to the relationship between the built environment and physical activity of children aged between 3 and 12 years.

Method:

The English-language publications, majority of which were peer-reviewed journal papers published in recent years, were collected and descriptively analyzed. Two large categories were the backbone of this narrative review: (1) non-school outdoor activities of children that take place in the residential neighborhood and (2) commuting to school and the related interventions such as safe routes to school.

Results:

Seven areas were synthesized by this review of the literature. Differences in associations of the built environment and physical activity in (1) different types of urban forms and land uses such as urban, suburban, high-density, etc.; (2) different city sizes such as small towns, mid-sized cities, large cities and megacities; (3) different cultures, subcultures and ethnicities in the same city of country, e.g. the Asian minority of London or the Turkish minority of Germany; (4) between perceptions of parents and children and associations with children’s physical activity, e.g. how they perceive safety and security of the neighborhood; (5) associations of the built environment with children’s physical activity in less-studied contexts, e.g. many developing and under-developed countries or eastern European countries; (6) differences in built environment – physical activity associations in different regions of the world, e.g. continents; and finally (7) associations between mobility patterns of parents and their children’s physical activity, for instance, the frequencies of taking public transport or walk as a commute mode.

Conclusion:

Researchers are recommended to focus their less-researched subtopics mentioned under the Results section in accordance with local conditions observed in less-researched contexts so that measures and interventions are accordingly planned.


Corresponding author: Houshmand E. Masoumi, Senior Researcher, Technische Unviesität Berlin, Center for Technology and Society, Hardenbergstr. 16-18, 10623 Berlin, Germany

Acknowledgments

This study has been conducted as a part of the project “Multisport Against Physical Sedentary”-M.A.P.S. (project number 567236-EPP-1-2015-2-IT-SPO-SCP) funded by the ERASMUS+ program of the European Commission. The funders had no role in undertaking this review. The paper is a rearrangement of a part of a report submitted to the European Commission.

Author statement

  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

References

1. Tranter P, Doyle J. Reclaiming the residential street as play space. Int Play J 1996;4:91–7.Search in Google Scholar

2. Karsten L. It all used to be better? Different generations on continuity and change in urban children’s daily use of space. Child Geogr 2005;3(3):275–90.10.1080/14733280500352912Search in Google Scholar

3. Hillman M. Children’s rights and adults’ wrongs. Child Geogr 2006;1(4):61–7.10.1080/14733280600577418Search in Google Scholar

4. Ness AR, Leary SD, Mattocks C, Blair SN, Reilly JJ, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in a large cohort of children. PLoS Med 2007;4(3):e97.10.1371/journal.pmed.0040097Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Owen CG, Nightingale CM, Rudnicka AR, Cook DG, Ekelund U, et al. Ethnic and gender differences in physical activity levels among 9-10-year-old children of white European, South Asian and African-Caribbean origin: the Child Heart Health Study in England (CHASE Study). Int J Epidemiol 2009;38(4):1082–93.10.1093/ije/dyp176Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Riddoch CJ, Bo AL, Wedderkopp N, Harro M, Klasson-Heggebo L, et al. Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36(1):86–92.10.1249/01.MSS.0000106174.43932.92Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. McDonald NC, Aalborg AE. Why parents drive children to school: implications for safe routes to school programs. J Am Plann Assoc 2009;75(3):331–42.10.1080/01944360902988794Search in Google Scholar

8. Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hanson CL, Haddock CK, Klesges LM. Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers. Health Psychol 1990;9(4):435–49.10.1037/0278-6133.9.4.435Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL, Berry CC, Elder JP, et al. Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool children. Health Psychol 1993;12(5):390–8.10.1037/0278-6133.12.5.390Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tandy CA. Children’s diminishing play space: a study of inter-generational change in children’s use of their neighbourhoods. Aust Geogr Stud 1999;37(2):154–64.10.1111/1467-8470.00076Search in Google Scholar

11. Ekelund U, Brage S, Froberg K, Harro M, Anderssen SA, et al. TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European Youth Heart Study. PLoS Med 2006;3(12):e488.10.1371/journal.pmed.0030488Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Leary SD, Ness AR, Smith GD, Mattocks C, Deere K, et al. Physical activity and blood pressure in childhood: findings from a population-based study. Hypertension 2008;51(1):92–8.10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.099051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Owen CG, Nightingale CM, Rudnicka AR, Sattar N, Cook DG, et al. Physical activity, obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors in 9- to 10-year-old UK children of white European, South Asian and black African-Caribbean origin: the Child Heart And health Study in England (CHASE). Diabetologia 2010;53(8):1620–30.10.1007/s00125-010-1781-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Griew P, Page A, Thomas S, Hillsdon M, Cooper AR. The school effect on children’s school time physical activity: the PEACH Project. Prev Med 2010;51(3–4):282–6.10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Wheeler BW, Cooper AR, Page AS, Jago R. Greenspace and children’s physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Prev Med 2010;51(2):148–52.10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, et al. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med 2010;50 Suppl 1:S74–9.10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Sarjala S, Broberg A, Hynynen A. Children and youth transport in different urban morphological types. J Transp Land Use 2013;9(2):1–17.10.5198/jtlu.2015.803Search in Google Scholar

18. Spengler JO, Floyd MF, Maddock JE, Gobster PH, Suau LJ, et al. Correlates of park-based physical activity among children in diverse communities: results from an observational study in two cities. Am J Health Promot 2011;25(5):e1–9.10.4278/ajhp.090211-QUAN-58Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Taylor WC, Carlos Poston WS, Jones K, Kraft MK. Environmental justice: obesity, physical activity and health eating. J Phys Act Health 2006;3(Suppl 1):30–54.10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s30Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Pabayo R, Belsky J, Gauvin L, Curtis S. Do area characteristics predict change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 11 to 15 years? Soc Sci Med 2011;72(3):430–8.10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. J Phys Act Health 2008;5(4):619–32.10.1123/jpah.5.4.619Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Davison KK, Lawson CT. Do attributes in the physical environment influence children’s physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006;3:19.10.1186/1479-5868-3-19Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Bocarro JN, Floyd MF, Smith WR, Edwards MB, Schultz CL, et al. Social and environmental factors related to boys’ and girls’ park-based physical activity. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:E97.10.5888/pcd12.140532Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Jones AP, Coombes EG, Griffin SJ, van Sluijs EM. Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009;6:42.10.1186/1479-5868-6-42Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Plotnikoff RC, Gebel K, Lubans DR. Self-efficacy, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adolescent girls: testing mediating effects of the perceived school and home environment. J Phys Act Health 2014;11(8):1579–86.10.1123/jpah.2012-0414Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Rezende LF de, Azeredo CM, Silva KS, Claro RM, França-Junior I, et al. The role of school environment in physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0131342.10.1371/journal.pone.0131342Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Carver A, Salmon J, Campbell K, Baur L, Garnett S, et al. How do perceptions of local neighborhood relate to adolescents’ walking and cycling? Am J Health Promot 2005;20(2):139–47.10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.139Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Burman M, Brown J, Tisdall J, Batchelor S. A view from the girls: exploring violence and violent behavior; ESRC Full Research Report; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

29. Valentine G. “Oh Yes I Can.” “Oh No You Can’t”: children and parents’ understandings of kids’ competence to negotiate public space safely. Antipode 1997;29(1):65–89.10.1111/1467-8330.00035Search in Google Scholar

30. Molnar BE, Gortmaker SL, Bull FC, Buka SL. Unsafe to play? Neighborhood disorder and lack of safety predict reduced physical activity among urban children and adolescents. Am J Health Promot 2004;18(5):378–86.10.4278/0890-1171-18.5.378Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Hüttenmoser M. Children and their living surroundings: empirical investigations into the significance of living surroundings for the everyday life and development of children. Child Environ 1995;12(4):403–13.Search in Google Scholar

32. Prezza M, Alparone FR, Cristallo C, Luigi S. Parental perception of social risk and of positive potentiality of outdoor autonomy for children: the development of two instruments. J Environ Psychol 2005;25(4):437–53.10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.12.002Search in Google Scholar

33. La Weir A, Etelson D, Brand DA. Parents’ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children’s physical activity. Prev Med 2006;43(3):212–7.10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Duncan EK, Scott DJ, Schofield G. Pedometer-determined physical activity and active transport in girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008;5:2.10.1186/1479-5868-5-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Duncan MJ, Birch S, Al-Nakeeb Y, Nevill AM. Ambulatory physical activity levels of white and South Asian children in Central England. Acta Paediatr 2012;101(4):e156–62.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02566.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Eyre EL, Duncan MJ, Birch SL, Cox VM. Low socio-economic environmental determinants of children’s physical activity in Coventry, UK: a qualitative study in parents. Prev Med Rep 2014;1:32–42.10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Grow HMG, Saelens BE. Physical activity and environments which promote active living in youth (US). In: Lake AA, Alvanides S, Townshend TG, editors. Obesogenic environments: complexities, perceptions, and objective measures. Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Pub, 2010:97–115.Search in Google Scholar

38. Scott S, Harden J, Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K. Strangers what kind of danger? Children’s and parent’s constructions of risk. University of Hull, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

39. Carver A, Timperio A, Hesketh K, Crawford D. Are children and adolescents less active if parents restrict their physical activity and active transport due to perceived risk? Soc Sci Med 2010;70(11):1799–805.10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Timperio A, Crawford D, Telford A, Salmon J. Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev Med 2004;38(1):39–47.10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Tunstall H. Neighbourhoods and health. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, editors. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, USA, 2003:320, 39.50. ISBN 0195138384. Int J Epidemiol 2004;34(1):231–2.10.1093/ije/dyh387Search in Google Scholar

42. Mota J, Almeida M, Santos P, Ribeiro JC. Perceived neighborhood environments and physical activity in adolescents. Prev Med 2005;41(5–6):834–6.10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.07.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Gomez JE, Johnson BA, Selva M, Sallis JF. Violent crime and outdoor physical activity among inner-city youth. Prev Med 2004;39(5):876–81.10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Burdette HL, Whitaker RC. Neighborhood playgrounds, fast food restaurants, and crime: relationships to overweight in low-income preschool children. Prev Med 2004;38(1): 57–63.10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Valentine G. ‘My son’s a bit dizzy.’ ‘my wife’s a bit soft’: gender, children and cultures of parenting. Gend Place Cult 1997;4(1):37–62.10.1080/09663699725495Search in Google Scholar

46. Morris J, Wang F, Lilja L. School children’s travel patterns: a look back and a way forward. Transport Engineering in Australia 2001;7(1/2):15.Search in Google Scholar

47. Blood W, Enders M, Jennett C, Lupton D, Tulloch M, et al. Fear of crime. Barton, A.C.T.: National Campaign Against Violence and Crime Unit, Attorney-General’s Dept. [and] Criminology Research Council, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

48. Veitch J, Bagley S, Ball K, Salmon J. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health Place 2006;12(4):383–93.10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Curtis C, Babb C, Olaru D. Built environment and children’s travel to school. Transp Pol 2015;42:21–33.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.003Search in Google Scholar

50. Motl RW, Dishman RK, Ward DS, Saunders RP, Dowda M, et al. Perceived physical environment and physical activity across one year among adolescent girls: self-efficacy as a possible mediator? J Adolesc Health 2005;37(5):403–8.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Mullan E. Do you think that your local area is a good place for young people to grow up? The effects of traffic and car parking on young people’s views. Health Place 2003;9(4):351–60.10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00069-2Search in Google Scholar

52. Carver A, Timperio A, Crawford D. Playing it safe: the influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity. A review. Health Place 2008;14(2):217–27.10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Tranter P, Pawson E. Children’s access to local environments: a case-study of Christchurch, New Zealand. Local Environ 2001;6(1):27–48.10.1080/13549830120024233Search in Google Scholar

54. Stevenson MR, Lo SK, Laing BA, Jamrozik KD. Childhood pedestrian injuries in the Perth metropolitan area. Med J Aust 1992;156(4):234–8.10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb139739.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Petch R, Henson R. Child road safety in the urban environment. J Transp Geogr 2000;8(3):197–211.10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00006-5Search in Google Scholar

56. Matthews H. Living on the edge: children as ‘outsiders’. Tijd voor Econ Soc Geog 1995;86(5):456–66.10.1111/j.1467-9663.1995.tb01867.xSearch in Google Scholar

57. Gielen AC, Defrancesco S, Bishai D, Mahoney P, Ho S, et al. Child pedestrians: the role of parental beliefs and practices in promoting safe walking in urban neighborhoods. J Urban Health 2004;81(4):545–55.10.1093/jurban/jth139Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Department of Transport. Attitudes to, and potential take-up of, additional home to school transport; 2001 [cited June 2016]. Available at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/schooltravel/research/attitudestoandpotentialtakeu5747.Search in Google Scholar

59. Department of Transport. National Travel Survey: 2008; 2009 [cited June 2016]. Available at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/162469/221412/221531/223955/32274311/NTS2008.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

60. McDonald NC. Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969–2001. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(6):509–16.10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Salmon J, Timperio A, Cleland V, Venn A. Trends in children’s physical activity and weight status in high and low socio-economic status areas of Melbourne, Victoria, 1985–2001. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29(4):337–42.10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00204.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

62. van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Corpuz G, Bauman AE. Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates? Prev Med 2008;46(1):60–2.10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Garrad J. Active travel to school: literature review: ACT Government, Health; 2011 [cited 2016 Jun 9]. Available at: http://www.timetotalk.act.gov.au/storage/Active%20travel%20to%20school%20Literature%20Review.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

64. Wolfe MK, McDonald NC. Association between neighborhood social environment and children’s independent mobility. J Phys Act Health 2016;13:970–9.10.1123/jpah.2015-0662Search in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Rahman T, Cushing RA, Jackson RJ. Contributions of built environment to childhood obesity. Mt Sinai J Med 2011;78(1):49–57.10.1002/msj.20235Search in Google Scholar PubMed

66. Hillman M, Adams J, Whitelegg J. One false move … a study of children’s independent mobility. London: PSI Publishing, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

67. Aziz IS, Yusoff ZM, Omar D. Walking measure to school: short route or safe route?; 2014. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269991556.Search in Google Scholar

68. Aziz IS, Yusoff ZM, Omar D, Rahman A. GIS route network analysis for safe journey to school; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

69. Helbich M, Emmichoven MJ, Dijst MJ, Kwan M, Pierik FH, et al. Natural and built environmental exposures on children’s active school travel: a Dutch global positioning system-based cross-sectional study. Health Place 2016;39:101–9.10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.03.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Oxford L, Pollock J. How actively do children travel to their pre-school setting? J Transp Health 2015;2(2):151–9.10.1016/j.jth.2015.02.002Search in Google Scholar

71. Panter JR, Jones AP, Van S, Esther MF, Griffin SJ. Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children’s active commuting. Am J Prev Med 2010;38(3):268–78.10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72. Schlossberg M, Greene J, Phillips PP, Johnson B, Parker B. School trips: effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. J Am Plann Assoc 2006;72(3):337–46.10.1080/01944360608976755Search in Google Scholar

73. McMillan T. The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school. Transp Res A 2007;41(1):69–79.10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.011Search in Google Scholar

74. Mitra R, Buliung RN. Exploring differences in school travel mode choice behaviour between children and youth. Transp Pol 2015;42:4–11.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.005Search in Google Scholar

75. Easton S, Ferrari E. Children’s travel to school –the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors. Transp Pol 2015;44:9–18.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.023Search in Google Scholar

76. Yeung J, Wearing S, Hills AP. Child transport practices and perceived barriers in active commuting to school. Transp Res A 2008;42(6):895–900.10.1016/j.tra.2007.12.007Search in Google Scholar

77. Gutierrez-Zornoza M, Sanchez-Lopez M, Garcia-Hermoso A, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Chillon P, et al. Active commuting to school, weight status, and cardiometabolic risk in children from rural areas: the Cuenca study. Health Educ Behav 2015;42(2):231–9.10.1177/1090198114549373Search in Google Scholar PubMed

78. Lu W, McKyer ELJ, Lee C, Ory MG, Goodson P, et al. Children’s active commuting to school: an interplay of self-efficacy, social economic disadvantage, and environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12:29.10.1186/s12966-015-0190-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

79. Aarts MJ, Mathijssen JJ, van Oers JA, Schuit AJ. Associations between environmental characteristics and active commuting to school among children: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Med 2013;20(4):538–55.10.1007/s12529-012-9271-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Larsen K, Gilliland J, Hess PM. Route-based analysis to capture the environmental influences on a child’s mode of travel between home and school. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012;102(6):1348–65.10.1080/00045608.2011.627059Search in Google Scholar

81. Prezza M, Pilloni S, Morabito C, Sersante C, Alparone FR, et al. The influence of psychosocial and environmental factors on children’s independent mobility and relationship to peer frequentation. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2001;11(6):435–50.10.1002/casp.643Search in Google Scholar

82. McDonald NC. Household interactions and children’s school travel: the effect of parental work patterns on walking and biking to school. J Transport Geogr 2008;16(5):324–31.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.01.002Search in Google Scholar

83. Hinckson EA, Garrett N, Duncan S. Active commuting to school in New Zealand children (2004–2008): a quantitative analysis. Prev Med 2011;52(5):332–6.10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Davison KK, Werder JL, Lawson CT. Children’s active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(3):A100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

85. Tudor-Locke C, Neff LJ, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL, Popkin BM. Omission of active commuting to school and the prevalence of children’s health-related physical activity levels: the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Study. Child Care Health 2002;28(6):507–12.10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00295.xSearch in Google Scholar

86. Cooper AR, Page AS, Foster LJ, Qahwaji D. Commuting to school: are children who walk more physically active? Am J Prev Med 2003;25(4):273–6.10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00205-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Heelan KA, Donnelly JE, Jacobsen DJ, Mayo MS, Washburn R, et al. Active commuting to and from school and BMI in elementary school children-preliminary data. Child Care Health 2005;31(3):341–9.10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00513.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Sirard JR, Riner WF, McIver KL, Pate RR. Physical activity and active commuting to elementary school. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(12):2062–9.10.1249/01.mss.0000179102.17183.6bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Cooper AR, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, Page AS, Froberg K. Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. Am J Prev Med 2005;29(3):179–84.10.1016/j.amepre.2005.05.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Wang H, Andersen LB, Froberg K, et al. Active travel to school and cardiovascular fitness in Danish children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006;38(10):1724–31.10.1249/01.mss.0000229570.02037.1dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Owen CG, Nightingale CM, Rudnicka AR, van Sluijs EMF, Ekelund U, et al. Travel to school and physical activity levels in 9-10 year-old UK children of different ethnic origin; Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE). PLoS One 2012;7(2):e30932.10.1371/journal.pone.0030932Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

92. Villa-Gonzalez E, Ruiz JR, Chillon P. Associations between active commuting to school and health-related physical fitness in Spanish school-aged children: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12(9):10362–73.10.3390/ijerph120910362Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

93. Larouche R, Saunders TJ, Faulkner GEJ, Colley R, Tremblay MS. Associations between active school transport and physical activity, body composition, and cardiovascular fitness: a systematic review of 68 studies. J Phys Act Health 2014;11(1):206–27.10.1123/jpah.2011-0345Search in Google Scholar PubMed

94. Dellinger AM, Staunton CE. Barrieres to children walking and biking to school – United States, 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;32(51):701–4.Search in Google Scholar

95. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Li L, Allen D. Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to school: cross sectional survey of primary school children. Br Med J 1998;316(7142):1426–8.10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1426Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

96. Braza M, Shoemaker W, Seeley A. Neighborhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary school in 34 California communities. Am J Health Promot 2004;19(2):128–36.10.4278/0890-1171-19.2.128Search in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Harten N, Olds T. Patterns of active transport in 11–12 year old Australian children. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004;28(2):167–72.10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00931.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

98. Orenstein MR, Gutierrez N, Rice TM, Cooper JF, Ragland DR. Safe routes to school safety and mobility analysis. Safe Transportation Research & Education Center 2007. Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5455454c.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

99. Boarnet MG, Anderson CL, Day K, McMillan T, Alfonzo M. Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children’s active transportation to school. Am J Prev Med 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):134–40.10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

100. Leden L, Wikstrom P, Garder P, Rosander P. Safety and accessibility effects of code modifications and traffic calming of an arterial road. Accid Anal Prev 2006;38(3):455–61.10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

101. Staunton CE, Hubsmith D, Kallins W. Promoting safe walking and biking to school: the Marin County success story. Am J Public Health 2003;93(9):1431–4.10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1431Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

102. Buckley A, Lowry MB, Brown H, Barton B. Evaluating safe routes to school events that designate days for walking and bicycling. Transp Pol 2013;30:294–300.10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.021Search in Google Scholar

103. Stewart O, Moudon AV, Claybrooke C. Multistate evaluation of safe routes to school programs. Am J Health Promot 2014;28(3):89–96.10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-210Search in Google Scholar PubMed

104. McDonald NC, Steiner RL, Lee C, Smith TR, Zhu X, et al. Impact of the safe routes to school program on walking and bicycling. J Am Plann Assoc 2014;80(2):153–67.10.1080/01944363.2014.956654Search in Google Scholar

105. Levin MS, Moeti R, Pullen-Seufert N. Implementing safe routes to school: application for the socioecological model and issues to consider. Health Promot Pract 2009;10(4):606–14.10.1177/1524839907309378Search in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Watson M, Dannenberg AL. Investment in safe routes to school projects: public health benefits for the larger community. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(3):A90.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

107. Atteberry H, Dowdy D, Oluyomi A, Nichols D, Ory MG, et al. A contextual look at safe routes to school implementation in Texas. Environ Behav 2016;48(1):192–209.10.1177/0013916515612254Search in Google Scholar

108. Hoelscher D, Ory M, Dowdy D, Miao J, Atteberry H, et al. Effects of funding allocation for safe routes to school programs on active commuting to school and related behavioral, knowledge, and psychosocial outcomes: results from the Texas Childhood Obesity Prevention Policy Evaluation (T-COPPE) study. Environ Behav 2016;48(1):210–29.10.1177/0013916515613541Search in Google Scholar

109. Appleyard BS. Planning safe routes to school: how will my child get to and from school? Planning 2003;5(69):34–7.Search in Google Scholar

110. Ragland DR, Pande S, Bigham J, Cooper JF. Examining long-term impact of California safe routes to school program. Transp Res Rec 2014;2464:86–92.10.3141/2464-11Search in Google Scholar

111. Boarnet MG, Anderson C, Day K, McMillan T, Alfonzo M. Safe routes to school: volume 2: detailed results: University of California Irvine; 2003. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/SafeRTS2School/SR2Svol_2_final11-05-03.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

112. Boarnet MG, Day K, Anderson C, McMillan T, Alfonzo M. California’s safe routes to school program: impacts on walking, bicycling, and pedestrian safety. J Am Plann Assoc 2005;71(3):301–17.10.1080/01944360508976700Search in Google Scholar

113. D’Haese S, Vanwolleghem G, Hinckson E, Bourdeaudhuij I de, Deforche B, et al. Cross-continental comparison of the association between the physical environment and active transportation in children: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12:145.10.1186/s12966-015-0308-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

114. Larouche R, Sarmiento OL, Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Church TS, et al. Are the correlates of active school transport context-specific? Int J Obes Suppl 2015;5(Suppl 2):S89–99.10.1038/ijosup.2015.25Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

115. Sturm R. Childhood obesity – what we can learn from existing data on societal trends, Part 1. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2(1):A12.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-8-23
Accepted: 2017-6-30
Published Online: 2017-8-15
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow