Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 27, 2019

Monitoring and assessment of formaldehyde levels in residential areas from two cities in Romania

Iulia A. Neamtiu, Tiberiu Cimpan, Jieqiong Zhou, Irina Schiopu, Mihai Surcel and Shao Lin


Formaldehyde has become a ubiquitous contaminant in the air, and people are exposed to it worldwide. However, few studies have evaluated the temporal-spatial levels/changes of formaldehyde exposure at residences, and the relationship between its outdoor and indoor levels has been rarely examined. The aim of this study was to assess community formaldehyde exposure in Sebes and Aiud, Romania to identify: (1) home environment characteristics that may play an important role in exposure; and understand: (2) if there were differences in formaldehyde levels between the two cities; (3) if there were temporal variations within each city; and (4) whether outdoor formaldehyde levels influence indoor levels. We simultaneously performed indoor and outdoor active air sampling for formaldehyde at each investigated residential location over a 3-year period and analyzed the samples by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). The mean values of indoor and outdoor formaldehyde levels in both cities fell in the range 0.014–0.035 mg/m3. The correlation analysis indicated mostly positive but not significant (p > 0.05) correlations between indoor formaldehyde and microclimate factors (temperature, humidity, pressure). Notably, home insulation was found to be significantly correlated with increased indoor formaldehyde levels. There were no significant differences in mean indoor or outdoor formaldehyde levels between Sebes and Aiud over the 3-year study period. When comparing the formaldehyde levels in both cities over the 3-year period, only outdoor formaldehyde levels were significantly higher in 2016, as compared to those in 2017 and 2018.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.


1. Aronson JK, editor. Formaldehyde in Meyler’s side effects of drugs. The International Encyclopedia of Adverse Drug Reactions and Interactions, 15th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc., 2006:1439–43.10.1016/B0-44-451005-2/00688-4Search in Google Scholar

2. Salthammer T. Formaldehyde in the ambient atmosphere: from an indoor pollutant to an outdoor pollutant? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52(12):3320–7.10.1002/anie.201205984Search in Google Scholar

3. Sumin K. Control of formaldehyde and TVOC emission from wood-based flooring composites at various manufacturing processes by surface finishing. J Hazard Mater 2010;176(1–3):14–9.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.113Search in Google Scholar

4. Li S, Banyasz JL, Parrish ME, Lyons-Hart J, Shafer KH. Formaldehyde in the gas phase of mainstream cigarette smoke. J Anal Appl Pyrol 2002;65(2):137–45.10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00185-1Search in Google Scholar

5. Baker RR. The generation of formaldehyde in cigarettes – overview and recent experiments. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44(1):1977–822.10.1016/j.fct.2006.05.017Search in Google Scholar

6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (California) – Air Resources Board. Indoor air quality guideline: formaldehyde in the home. Available at: Accessed August 2, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

7. U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA. Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde and 2010 Addendum to the Profile. Available at: Accessed July 12, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhao Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Ferm M, Liang Y, Norbäck D. Asthmatic symptoms among pupils in relation to winter indoor and outdoor air pollution in schools in Taiyuan, China. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116(1):90–7.10.1289/ehp.10576Search in Google Scholar

9. Garrett MH, Hooper MA, Hooper BM, Rayment PR, Abramson MJ. Increased risk of allergy in children due to formaldehyde exposure in homes. Allergy 1999;54(4):330–7.10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00763.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Rumchev KB, Spickett JT, Bulsara MK, Philips MR, Stick SM. Domestic exposure to formaldehyde significantly increases the risk of asthma in young children. Eur Respir J 2002;20(2):403–8.10.1183/09031936.02.00245002Search in Google Scholar

11. McGwin G, Lienert J, Kennedy JI. Formaldehyde exposure and asthma in children: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118(3):313–7.10.1289/ehp.0901143Search in Google Scholar

12. NIOSH. Formaldehyde by GC: Method 2541. In: Eller PM, Cassinelli ME, editors. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1994:2–5.Search in Google Scholar

13. Croghan CW, Egeghy PP. Methods for dealing with values below the Limit of Detection using SAS. Available at: in Google Scholar

14. Krzyzanowski M, Quackenboss JJ, Lebowitz MD. Chronic respiratory effects of indoor formaldehyde exposure. Environ Res 1990;52(2):117–25.10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80247-6Search in Google Scholar

15. Gilbert NL, Gauvin D, Guay M, Heroux M-E, Dupuis G, Legris M, et al. Housing characteristics and indoor concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde in Quebec City, Canada. Environ Res 2006;102(1):1–8.10.1016/j.envres.2006.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Dallongeville A, Costet N, Zmirou-Navier D, Le Bot B, Chevrier C, Deguen S, et al. Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds of respiratory health relevance in French dwellings. Indoor Air 2016;26(3):426–38.10.1111/ina.12225Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 40: Formaldehyde. Available at: in Google Scholar

18. Nielsen GD, Wolkoff P. Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value. Arch Toxicol 2010;84(6):423–46.10.1007/s00204-010-0549-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Chin J-Y, Godwin C, Parker E, Robins T, Lewis T, Harbin P, et al. Levels and sources of volatile organic compounds in homes of children with asthma. Indoor Air 2014;24(4):403–15.10.1111/ina.12086Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Yang W, Sohn J, Kim J, Son B, Park J. Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings Korea. J Environ Manage 2009:90(1):348–54.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Chang M, Park H, Ha M, Hong Y, Lim Y, Kim Y, et al. The effect of prenatal TVOC exposure on birth and infant weight: the mothers and children’s environmental health study. Pediatr Res 2017;82(3):423–8.10.1038/pr.2017.55Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Hult EL, Willem H, Price PN, Hotchi T, Russell ML, Singer BC. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: in-home measurements of ventilation control and source control. Indoor Air 2014;25(5):523–35.10.2172/1167387Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-12-10
Accepted: 2019-04-25
Published Online: 2019-05-27
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow