Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 9, 2020

Current knowledge on urease and nitrification inhibitors technology and their safety

Aishwarya Ray, Chikere Nkwonta, Patrick Forrestal, Martin Danaher, Karl Richards, Tom O’Callaghan, Sean Hogan and Enda Cummins

Abstract

Objective

Urea is one of the most widely used commercial fertilisers worldwide due to its high N density and cost effectiveness. However, it can be lost in the form of gaseous ammonia and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which can potentially lead to environmental pollution. Farmers are compelled to apply more urea to account for those losses, thereby increasing their expenditure on fertilization. The objective of this paper is to present a literature review on current knowledge regarding inhibitor technologies such as urease inhibitor; n-(N-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), and nitrification inhibitor; dicyandiamide (DCD).

Methods

A thorough review of all the scientific literature was carried out and a proposed risk assessment framework developed.

Results

The study showed that the urease inhibitor NBPT significantly reduced NH3 loss from urea. However, concerns about NBPT safety to human health had been raised when the nitrification inhibitor DCD appeared as a residue in milk. This article presents a risk assessment framework for evaluating human exposure to chemicals like NBPT or DCD, following the consumption of foods of animal origin (e.g. milk) from cows grazing on inhibitor-treated pasture.

Conclusion

The EU’s target of a 40% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 can be aided by using NBPT as part of an overall suite of solutions. A comprehensive risk assessment is advised for effective evaluation of potential risks from exposure to these inhibitors.


Corresponding author: Aishwarya Ray, School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland, E-mail:

Funding source: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

Award Identifier / Grant number: 17/F/207

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine (DAFM), Ireland [Grant Number: 17/F/207].

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Harty, MA, Forrestal, PJ, Carolan, R, Watson, CJ, Hennessy, D, Lanigan, GJ, et al.. Temperate grassland yields and nitrogen uptake are influenced by fertiliser nitrogen source. Agron J 2017;109:71–9. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.06.0362.Search in Google Scholar

2. Engel, RE, Williams, EC, Wallander, R, Hilmer, J. Apparent persistence of N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide is greater in alkaline soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2013;77:1424–429. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0380.Search in Google Scholar

3. Beusen, AHW, Bouwman, AF, Heuberger, PSC, Drecht, GV, Van Der Hoek, KW. Bottom-up uncertainty estimates of global ammonia emissions from global agricultural production systems. Atmos Environ 2008;42:6067–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.044.Search in Google Scholar

4. Varel, VH, Wells, JE, Miller, DN. Combination of a urease inhibitor and a plant essential oil to control coliform bacteria, odour production and ammonia loss from cattle waste. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102:472–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03120.x.Search in Google Scholar

5. Harty, MA, Forrestal, PJ, Watson, CJ, McGeough, KL, Carolan, R, Elliot, C, et al.. Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations. Sci Total Environ 2016;32:576–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.120.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hendrickson, LL, Douglass, EA. Metabolism of the urease inhibitor n-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 1993;25:1613–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(93)90017-6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Engel, RE, Towey, BD, Gravens, E. Degradation of the urease inhibitor NBPT as affected by soil pH. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2015;79:1674–683. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.05.0169.Search in Google Scholar

8. Watson, CJ, Stevens, RJ, Laughlin, RJ. Effectiveness of the urease inhibitor NBPT (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) for improving the efficiency of urea for ryegrass production. Nutrient Cycl Agroecosyst 1990;24:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01073142.Search in Google Scholar

9. Rawluk, CDL, Grant, CA, Racz, GJ. Ammonia volatilisation from soils fertilized with urea and varying rates of urease inhibitor NBPT. Can J Soil Sci 2001;81:239–46. https://doi.org/10.4141/s00-052.Search in Google Scholar

10. Engel, RE, Jones, C, Wallander, R. Ammonia volatilisation from urea and mitigation by NBPT following surface application to cold soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2011;75:2348–357. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0229.Search in Google Scholar

11. Suter, HC, Pengthamkeerati, P, Walker, C, Chen, Di. Influence of temperature and soil type on inhibition of urea hydrolysis by N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide in wheat and pasture soils in south-eastern Australia. Soil Res 2011;49:315–19. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr10243.Search in Google Scholar

12. Black, AS, Sherlock, RR, Smith, NP. Effect of timing of simulated rainfall on ammonia volatilisation from urea, applied to soil of varying moisture content. Eur J Soil Sci 1987;38:679–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1987.tb02165.x.Search in Google Scholar

13. Sanz-Cobena, A, Misselbrook, T, Camp, V, Vallejo, A. Effect of water addition and the urease inhibitor NBPT on the abatement of ammonia emission from surface applied urea. Atmos Environ 2011;45:1517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.051.Search in Google Scholar

14. Cantarella, H, Trivelin, PC, Contin, TL, Dias, FL, Rossetto, R, Marcelino, R, et al.. Ammonia volatilisation from urease inhibitor-treated urea applied to sugarcane trash blankets. Sci Agric 2008;65:397–01. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162008000400011.Search in Google Scholar

15. European Commission. The Paris protocol – a blueprint for tackling global climate change beyond 2020 [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2015. [cited 2020 Jun 23].Search in Google Scholar

16. Forrestal, PJ, Harty, M, Carolan, R, Watson, CJ, Lanigan, GJ, Wall, DP, et al.. Can the agronomic performance of urea equal calcium ammonium nitrate across nitrogen rates in temperate grassland? Soil Use Manag 2017;33:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12341.Search in Google Scholar

17. Tian, Z, Wang, JJ, Liu, S, Zhang, Z, Dodla, SK, Myers, G. Application effects of coated urea and urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical cotton field of the Mississippi delta region. Sci Total Environ 2015;533:329–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.147.Search in Google Scholar

18. Cantarella, H, Otto, R, Soares, JR, Silva, AG. Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: a review. J Adv Res 2018;13:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

19. Modolo, LV, Da-Silva, CJ, Brandão, DS, Shaves, IS. A minireview on what we have learned about urease inhibitors of agricultural interest since mid-2000s. J Adv Res 2008;13:29–37.10.1016/j.jare.2018.04.001Search in Google Scholar

20. Tao, R, Li, J, Guan, Y, Liang, Y, Hu, B, Lv, J, et al.. Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on the soil mineral nitrogen dynamics and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions on calcareous soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2018;25:9155–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1226-9.Search in Google Scholar

21. Bremner, JM, Krogmeier, MJ. Elimination of the adverse effects of urea fertiliser on seed germination, seedling growth, and early plant growth in soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85:4601–604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.13.4601.Search in Google Scholar

22. Abalos, D, Jeffery, S, Sanz-Cobena, A, Guardia, G, Vallejo, A. Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2014;189:136–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.036.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bia Bord. Irish agriculture and food & drink sector [Internet]. Ireland: Bia Bord; 2020. [cited 2020 Apr 25].Search in Google Scholar

24. Kiss, S, Simihăian, M. Improving efficiency of urea fertilisers by inhibition of soil urease activity. New York: Springer; 2002.10.1007/978-94-017-1843-1Search in Google Scholar

25. Welten, BG, Ledgard, SF, Balvert, SF, Kear, MJ, Dexter, MM. Effects of oral administration of dicyandiamide to lactating dairy cows on residues in milk and the efficacy of delivery via a supplementary feed source. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2016;217:111–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.013.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ledgard, SF, Menneer, JC, Dexter, MM, Kear, MJ, Lindsey, S, Peters, JS, et al.. A novel concept to reduce nitrogen losses from grazed pastures by administering soil nitrogen process inhibitors to ruminant animals: a study with sheep. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008;125:148–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

27. European Commission. Commission regulation (EC) No 1107/2008 [Internet]. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union; 2008. [cited 25 March 2019].Search in Google Scholar

28. AlzChem. Safety data sheet [Internet]. Germany: AlzChem; 2019. [updated 2019 Jul 01, cited 23 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

29. Department of Health and Ageing. N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT). Australia: National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS); 2011.Search in Google Scholar

30. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. Approved criteria for classifying hazardous substances [NOHSC : 1008 (2004)]. Australia: NOHSC; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

31. World Health Organization. Harmonization project document no. 1 IPCS risk assessment terminology: definition of key terms [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2004. [cited 26 March 2019].Search in Google Scholar

32. World Health Organization. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food (Environmental health criteria; 240). Geneva: WHO; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

33. Watson, CJ, Akhonzada, NA, Hamilton, JTG, Matthews, DI. Rate and mode of application of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on ammonia volatilisation from surface-applied urea. Soil Use Manag 2008;24:246–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00157.x.Search in Google Scholar

34. Carmona, G, Christianson, CB, Byrnes, BH. Temperature and low concentration effects of the urease inhibitor N-(n-Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBTPT) on ammonia volatilisation from urea. Soil Biol Biochem 1990;22:933–37. .10.1016/0038-0717(90)90132-JSearch in Google Scholar

35. Mira, AB, Cantarella, H, Souza-Netto, GJM, Moreira, LA, Kamogawa, MY, Otto, R. Optimizing urease inhibitor usage to reduce ammonia emission following urea application over crop residues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2017;248:105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.032.Search in Google Scholar

36. Parker, DB, Pandrangi, S, Greene, LW, Almas, LK, Cole, NA, Rhoades, MB, et al.. Rate and frequency of urease inhibitor application for minimizing ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards. Trans ASABE 2005;48:787–93.10.13031/2013.18321Search in Google Scholar

37. San Francisco, S, Urrutia, O, Martin, V, Peristeropoulos, A, Garcia-Mina, JM. Efficiency of urease and nitrification inhibitors in reducing ammonia volatilization from diverse nitrogen fertilizers applied to different soil types and wheat straw mulching. J Sci Food Agric 2011;91:1569–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4349.Search in Google Scholar

38. Soares, JR, Sousa, RM, Otto, R, Sequeira, CH. Stability of urease inhibitor added to urea. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2016 international nitrogen initiative conference, ‘solutions to improve nitrogen use efficiency for the world’ Dec 4–8 Melbourne, Australia; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

39. Schultz, PB, Yurk, J, Adeshina, F, Lorber, M, Pollard, K, Choudhury, H, et al.. Travis and Arms revisited: a second look at a widely used bioconcentration algorithm. Toxicol Ind Health 2001;17:163–75. https://doi.org/10.1191/0748233701th110oa.Search in Google Scholar

40. Hendriks, AJ, Smítková, H, Huijbregts, MA. A new twist on an old regression: transfer of chemicals to beef and milk in human and ecological risk assessment. Chemosphere 2007;70:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.030.Search in Google Scholar

41. Rosenbaum, RK, McKone, TE, Jolliet, O. CKow: a dynamic model for chemical transfer to meat and milk. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:8191–198. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803644z.Search in Google Scholar

42. Rai, PK, Lee, SS, Zhang, M, Tsang, YF, Kim, KH. Heavy metals in food crops: health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ Int 2019;125:365–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.067.Search in Google Scholar

43. Wappelhorst, O, Kühn, I, Heidenreich, H, Markert, B. Transfer of selected elements from food into human milk. Nutrition 2002;18:316–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00798-5.Search in Google Scholar

44. MacLachlan, DJ. Estimating the transfer of contaminants in animal feedstuffs to livestock tissues, milk and eggs. Anim Prod Sci 2011;51:1067–078. https://doi.org/10.1071/an11112.Search in Google Scholar

45. Travis, CC, Arms, AD. Bioconcentration of organics in beef, milk, and vegetation. Environ Sci Technol 1988;22:271–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00168a005.Search in Google Scholar

46. Dowdy, DL, McKone, TE, Hsieh, DP. Prediction of chemical biotransfer of organic chemicals from cattle diet into beef and milk using the molecular connectivity index. Environ Sci Technol 1996;30:984–89. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950398c.Search in Google Scholar

47. Leeman, WR, Van Den Berg, KJ, Houben, GF. Transfer of chemicals from feed to animal products: the use of transfer factors in risk assessment. Food Addit Contam 2007;24:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030600815512.Search in Google Scholar

48. MacLachlan, DJ, Bhula, R. Estimating the residue transfer of pesticides in animal feedstuffs to livestock tissues, milk and eggs; a review. Aust J Exp Agric 2008;48:589–98. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea07196.Search in Google Scholar

49. De Liguoro, M, Longo, F, Brambilla, G, Cinquina, A, Bocca, A, Lucisano, A. Distribution of the anthelmintic drug albendazole and its major metabolites in ovine milk and milk products after a single oral dose. J Dairy Res 1996;63:533–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029900032076.Search in Google Scholar

50. Imperiale, FA, Busetti, MR, Suárez, VH, Lanusse, CE. Milk excretion of ivermectin and moxidectin in dairy sheep: assessment of drug residues during cheese elaboration and ripening period. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:6205–11. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049117n.Search in Google Scholar

51. Cerkvenik, V, Perko, B, Rogelj, I, Doganoc, DZ, Skubic, V, Beek, WMJ, et al.. Fate of ivermectin residues in ewes’ milk and derived products. J Dairy Res 2004;71:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029903006381.Search in Google Scholar

52. Adetunji, VO. Effects of processing on antibiotic residues (streptomycin, penicillin-G and tetracycline) in soft cheese and yogurt proceessing lines. Pakistan J Nutr 2011;10:792–95. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.792.795.Search in Google Scholar

53. Imperiale, F, Pis, A, Sallovitz, J, Lisfchitz, A, Busetti, M, Suárez, V, et al.. Pattern of eprinomectin milk excretion in dairy sheep unaffected by lactation stage: comparative residual profiles in dairy products. J Food Protect 2006;69:2424–9. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-69.10.2424.Search in Google Scholar

54. Anastasio, A, Veneziano, V, Capurro, E, Rinaldi, L, Cortesi, ML, Rubino, R, et al.. Fate of eprinomectin in goat milk and cheeses with different ripening times following pour-on administration. J Food Protect 2005;68:1097–101. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-68.5.1097.Search in Google Scholar

55. Hakk, H, Shappell, NW, Lupton, SJ, Shelver, WL, Fanaselle, W, Oryang, D, et al.. Distribution of animal drugs between skim milk and milk fat fractions in spiked whole milk: understanding the potential impact on commercial milk products. J Agric Food Chem 2016;64:326–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04726.Search in Google Scholar

56. Lupton, SJ, Shappell, NW, Shelver, WL, Hakk, H. Distribution of spiked drugs between milk fat, skim milk, whey, curd, and milk protein fractions: expansion of partitioning models. J Agric Food Chem 2018;66:306–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04463.Search in Google Scholar

57. Shappell, NW, Shelver, WL, Lupton, SJ, Fanaselle, W, Van Doren, JM, Hakk, H. Distribution of animal drugs among curd, whey, and milk protein fractions in spiked skim milk and whey. J Agric Food Chem 2017;65:938–49. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04258.Search in Google Scholar

58. Grunwald, L, Petz, M. Food processing effects on residues: penicillin in milk and yoghurt. Anal Chim Acta 2003;483:73–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(02)01405-8.Search in Google Scholar

59. Zorraquino, MA, Roca, M, Fernandez, N, Molina, MP, Althaus, R. Heat inactivation of beta-lactam antibiotics in milk. J Food Protect 2008;71:1193–8. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-71.6.1193.Search in Google Scholar

60. Moats, WA. Inactivation of antibiotics by heating in foods and other substrates – a review. J Food Protect 1988;51:491–97. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-51.6.491.Search in Google Scholar

61. Papapanagiotou, EP, Fletouris, DJ, Psomas, EI. Effect of various heat treatments and cold storage on sulphamethazine residues stability in incurred piglet muscle and cow milk samples. Anal Chim Acta 2005;529:305–09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.09.029.Search in Google Scholar

62. Spaepen, KRI, Van Leemput, LJJ, Wislocki, PG, Verschueren, C. A uniform procedure to estimate the predicted environmental concentration of the residues of veterinary medicines in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 1997;16:1977–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160930.Search in Google Scholar

63. Paulo, MJ, van der Voet, H, Jansen, MJ, Braak, CJ, van Klaveren, JD. Risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides using a Bayesian method. Pest Manag Sci 2005;61:759–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1060.Search in Google Scholar

64. Boobis, AR, Ossendorp, BC, Banasiak, U, Hamey, PY, Sebestyen, I, Moretto, A. Cumulative risk assessment of pesticide residues in food. Toxicol Lett 2008;180:137–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

65. European Food Safety Authority. Guidance of the scientific committee on a request from EFSA related to uncertainties in dietary exposure assessment [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2007. [cited 2020 Jun 23].10.2903/j.efsa.2007.438Search in Google Scholar

66. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific colloquium: cumulative risk assessment of pesticides to human health: the way forward [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2007. [cited 2020 Jun 23].Search in Google Scholar

67. European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their residues on a request from the commission on acute dietary intake assessment of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2007. [cited 2020 Jun 23].10.2903/j.efsa.2007.538Search in Google Scholar

68. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion of the panel on plant protection products and their residues (PPR Panel) on a request from the EFSA evaluate the suitability of existing methodologies and, if appropriate, the identification of new approaches to assess cumulative and synergistic risks from pesticides to human health with a view to set MRLs for those pesticides in the frame of regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2008. [cited 2020 Jun 23].Search in Google Scholar

69. Monagail, MM, Cummins, E, Bermejo, R, Daly, E, Costello, D, Morrison, L. Quantification and feed to food transfer of total and inorganic arsenic from a commercial seaweed feed. Environ Int 2018;118:314–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.032.Search in Google Scholar

70. Cummins, E, Adkin, A. Exposure assessment of TSEs from the landspreading of meat and bone meal. Risk Anal 2007;27:1179–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00953.x.Search in Google Scholar

71. Clarke, R, Peyton, D, Healy, MG, Fenton, O, Cummins, E. A quantitative microbial risk assessment model for total coliforms and E. coli in surface runoff following application of biosolids to grassland. Environ Pollut 2017;224:739–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.025.Search in Google Scholar

72. Clarke, R, Healy, MG, Fenton, O, Cummins, E. Quantitative risk assessment of antimicrobials in biosolids applied on agricultural land and potential translocation into food. Food Res Int 2018;106:1049–060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.072.Search in Google Scholar

73. O’Brien, N, Cummins, E. Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2010;45:992–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934521003772410.Search in Google Scholar

74. Allende, A, Castro-Ibáñez, I, Lindqvist, R, Gil, MI, Uyttendaele, M, Jacxsens, L. Quantitative contamination assessment of Escherichia coli in baby spinach primary production in Spain: effects of weather conditions and agricultural practices. Int J Food Microbiol 2017;257:238–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.06.027.Search in Google Scholar

75. Allende, A, Truchado, P, Lindqvist, R, Jacxsens, L. Quantitative microbial exposure modelling as a tool to evaluate the impact of contamination level of surface irrigation water and seasonality on faecal hygiene indicator E. coli in leafy green production. Food Microbiol 2018;75:82–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.016.Search in Google Scholar

76. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion on risk assessment for a selected group of pesticides from the triazole group to test possible methodologies to assess cumulative effects from exposure through food from these pesticides on human health1 EFSA panel on plant protection products and their residues (PPR Panel) [Internet]. Italy: EFSA; 2009. [updated 2009 Nov 19; cited 2020 Jun 23].10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1167Search in Google Scholar

77. van der Voet, H, de Boer, WJ, Kruisselbrink, JW, Goedhart, PW, van der Heijden, G, Kennedy, MC, et al.. The MCRA model for probabilistic single-compound and cumulative risk assessment of pesticides. Food Chem Toxicol 2015;79:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

78. O’Brien, NJ, Cummins, EJ. A risk assessment framework for assessing metallic nanomaterials of environmental concern: aquatic exposure and behavior. Risk Anal 2011;31:706–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01540.x.Search in Google Scholar

79. Schuhmacher, M, Meneses, M, Xifró, A, Domingo, JL. The use of Monte-Carlo simulation techniques for risk assessment: study of a municipal waste. Chemosphere 2001;43:787–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00435-5.Search in Google Scholar

80. Van de Ligt, J, Borghoff, SJ, Yoon, M, Ferguson, LJ, DeMaio, W, McClanahan, RH. Nondetectable or minimal detectable residue levels of N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide in bovine tissues and milk from a 28-d NBPT dosing study. Transl Anim Sci 2019;3:1606–616. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz153.Search in Google Scholar

81. Humphreys, J, O’Connell, K, Casey, IA. Nitrogen flows and balances in four grassland-based systems of dairy production on a clay-loam soil in a moist temperate climate. Grass Forage Sci 2008;63:467–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00660.x.Search in Google Scholar

82. Zhao, S, Wang, J, Zheng, N, Bu, D, Sun, P, Yu, Z. Reducing microbial ureolytic activity in the rumen by immunization against urease therein. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0409-6.Search in Google Scholar

83. Jin, D, Zhao, S, Zheng, N, Beckers, Y, Wang, J. Urea metabolism and regulation by rumen bacterial urease in ruminants – a review. Ann Anim Sci 2018;18:303–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2017-0028.Search in Google Scholar

84. Kafarski, P, Talma, M. Recent advances in design of new urease inhibitors: a review. J Adv Res 2018;13:101–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

85. Patra, AK, Aschenbach, JR. Ureases in the gastrointestinal tracts of ruminant and monogastric animals and their implication in urea-N/ammonia metabolism: a review. J Adv Res 2018;13:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

86. Zaman, M, Saggar, S, Blennerhassett, JD, Singh, J. Effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N transformation, gaseous emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide, pasture yield and N uptake in grazed pasture system. Soil Biol Biochem 2009;41:1270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

87. Singh, J, Kunhikrishnan, A, Bolan, NS, Saggar, S. Impact of urease inhibitor on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from temperate pasture soil cores receiving urea fertilizer and cattle urine. Sci Total Environ 2013;465:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.018.Search in Google Scholar

88. Ludden, PA, Harmon, DL, Larson, BT, Axe, DE. Influence of the novel urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on ruminant nitrogen metabolism: I. in vitro urea kinetics and substrate digestion. J Anim Sci 2000;78:181–87. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.781181x.Search in Google Scholar

89. Ludden, PA, Harmon, DL, Huntington, GB, Larson, BT, Axe, DE. Influence of the novel urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on ruminant nitrogen metabolism: II. ruminal nitrogen metabolism, diet digestibility, and nitrogen balance in lambs [Internet]. J Anim Sci. Oxford University Press (OUP; 2000, 78:188 p. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.781188X.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-21
Accepted: 2020-11-04
Published Online: 2020-12-09
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston