Research funding: No funding has been involved.
Author contributions: Conceptualization, D.B. and P.I.; formal analysis, D.B. and P.I.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B.; writing—review and editing, D.B. and P.I. visualization, D.B. and P.I.; supervision, D.B. and P.I.; project administration, P.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the letter.
Competing interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the letter is original work and is not under review at any other publication.
1. Leszczynski, D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0038. [Online ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar
2. Hansson Mild, K, Repacholi, M, van Deventer, E, Ravazzani, P, eds. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. In: Proceedings of the WHO international seminar and working group meeting on EMF hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, 25–27 October 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.Search in Google Scholar
3. Rea, WJ, Pan, Y, Fenyves, EF, Sujisawa, I, Suyama, H, Samadi, N, et al.. Electromagnetic field sensitivity. J Bioelectr 1991;10:214–56. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368379109031410.Search in Google Scholar
4. Bergqvist, U, Vogel, E. A report prepared by a European Group of Experts for the European Commission, DGV. Stockholm: Sweden: Swedish National Institute for Working Life; 1997.Search in Google Scholar
5. WHO (World Health Organization). Electromagnetic fields and public health, electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.Search in Google Scholar
6. Belpomme, D, Campagnac, C, Irigaray, P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health 2015;30:251–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0027.Search in Google Scholar
7. Belpomme, D, Irigaray, P. Electrohypersensitivity as a newly identified and characterized neurologic pathological disorder: how to diagnose, treat, and prevent it. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:1915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21061915.Search in Google Scholar
8. De Luca, C, Thai, JC, Raskovic, D, Cesareo, E, Caccamo, D, Trukhanov, A, et al.. Metabolic and genetic screening of electromagnetic hypersensitive subjects as a feasible tool for diagnostics and intervention. Mediat Inflamm 2014;2014:924184. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/924184.Search in Google Scholar
9. Irigaray, P, Lebar, P, Belpomme, D. How ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography can contribute to the diagnosis of electrohypersensitivity. J Clin Diagn Res 2018;6:143. https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0311.1000142.Search in Google Scholar
10. Heuser, G, Heuser, SA. Functional brain MRI in patients complaining of electrohypersensitivity after long term exposure to electromagnetic fields. Rev Environ Health 2017;32:291–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2017-0014.Search in Google Scholar
11. Belpomme, D, Carlo, GL, Irigaray, P, Carpenter, DO, Hardell, L, Kundi, M, et al.. The critical importance of molecular biomarkers and imaging in the study of electrohypersensitivity. A scientific consensus international report. Int J Mol Sci 2021;7321:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147321.Search in Google Scholar
12. Havas, M. Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart and the autonomic nervous system. Rev Environ Health 2013;28:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2013-0004.Search in Google Scholar
13. Von Klitzing, L. Artificial EMG by WLAN-exposure. J Biostat Biometric App 2021;6:101.Search in Google Scholar
14. Bandara, P, Carpenter, DO. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. Lancet Planet Health 2018;2:e512–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston