Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 25, 2014

The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in cognition and behavior

  • Frank A. Jonker

    F.A. Jonker recieved his master of arts (MA) in 2000 in clinical psychology. He became a general mental healthcare psychologist (GZ-psychologist) in 2006. From 2008 he worked in a mental health institute for neuropsychiatry (Vesalius), sub-department of mental health institute Altrecht (the Netherlands). He became a specialist in clinical neuropsychology in 2012 and is head of the department. Since 2013 he is also is a researcher at the VU University Amsterdam (the Netherlands), department of Clinical Neuropsychology, specialist on the interaction between brain injury and behavior.

    EMAIL logo
    , Cees Jonker

    Cees Jonker received his graduation as neurologist in 1975 and specialized in behavioral neurology. He became a staff member on a neuropsychiatric institute, after that he was appointed at the Alzheimer Center at the VU University. In 1986 he defended his PhD thesis on Senile Dementia on Alzheimertype. From 1989–1994 he was scientific director of the Amsterdam Study on the Elderly (AMSTEL), a large-scale population-based study on cognitive decline and dementia. From 1995 he was associate professor at the LASA study and in 2001 he was appointed a professor in Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia. He was honoured for his scientific work by the Dutch Psychiatric Association in 1987.

    , Philip Scheltens

    Philip Scheltens received his MD in 1984 at VU University and became a staff neurologist in 1991. He defended his PhD thesis on MRI in Alzheimer’s disease in 1993 and was appointed a Professor of Cognitive Neurology in 2000. From that time on he led the Alzheimer Center which grew into the largest in the Netherlands under his leadership in terms of patient care and research. He was honored with a membership of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2011.

    and Erik J.A. Scherder

    Erik Scherder is head of the department clinical Neuropsychology and full professor at the VU University Amsterdam (the Netherlands). Furthermore he is full professor for Human Movement Sciences at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (the Netherlands). Currently, he is conducting research on pain experience in people with neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) plays a crucial role in behavior and is a common site for damage due to different types of injuries, e.g., closed head injuries, cerebrovascular accidents, tumors, neurosurgical interventions. Despite the (severe) behavioral changes following OFC lesions, persons with damage to the OFC appear to be cognitively intact, i.e., at least when assessed by means of standard neuropsychological tests. Meanwhile, neuropsychological tests addressing reversal learning, gambling, and social cognition show a decline in these patients. The goal of the present review is to link the performance of these latter neuropsychological tests to behavior. The results suggest that in patients with orbitofrontal lesions, reversal learning is more associated with behavioral disinhibition and that impairment in recognition of expressed emotion is more associated with social inappropriate behavior. The faux pas test (theory of mind) appears not to be sensitive to orbitofrontal lesions. Future studies should involve a larger numbers of patients with well-defined locations in the OFC and should integrate specific neuropsychological tests and quantitative behavioral measures to better understand the contribution of the OFC to cognition and behavior.


Corresponding author: Frank A. Jonker, GGZ Altrecht, Vesalius Centre for Neuropsychiatry Woerden, Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Polanerbaan 2, NL-3447 GN Woerden, The Netherlands, e-mail: ,

About the authors

Frank A. Jonker

F.A. Jonker recieved his master of arts (MA) in 2000 in clinical psychology. He became a general mental healthcare psychologist (GZ-psychologist) in 2006. From 2008 he worked in a mental health institute for neuropsychiatry (Vesalius), sub-department of mental health institute Altrecht (the Netherlands). He became a specialist in clinical neuropsychology in 2012 and is head of the department. Since 2013 he is also is a researcher at the VU University Amsterdam (the Netherlands), department of Clinical Neuropsychology, specialist on the interaction between brain injury and behavior.

Cees Jonker

Cees Jonker received his graduation as neurologist in 1975 and specialized in behavioral neurology. He became a staff member on a neuropsychiatric institute, after that he was appointed at the Alzheimer Center at the VU University. In 1986 he defended his PhD thesis on Senile Dementia on Alzheimertype. From 1989–1994 he was scientific director of the Amsterdam Study on the Elderly (AMSTEL), a large-scale population-based study on cognitive decline and dementia. From 1995 he was associate professor at the LASA study and in 2001 he was appointed a professor in Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia. He was honoured for his scientific work by the Dutch Psychiatric Association in 1987.

Philip Scheltens

Philip Scheltens received his MD in 1984 at VU University and became a staff neurologist in 1991. He defended his PhD thesis on MRI in Alzheimer’s disease in 1993 and was appointed a Professor of Cognitive Neurology in 2000. From that time on he led the Alzheimer Center which grew into the largest in the Netherlands under his leadership in terms of patient care and research. He was honored with a membership of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2011.

Erik J.A. Scherder

Erik Scherder is head of the department clinical Neuropsychology and full professor at the VU University Amsterdam (the Netherlands). Furthermore he is full professor for Human Movement Sciences at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (the Netherlands). Currently, he is conducting research on pain experience in people with neurodegenerative diseases.

Acknowledgments

F.A.J. would like to express his deep gratitude to E.J.A. Scherder, C. Jonker, and P. Scheltens, his research supervisors, for their patient guidance, enthusiastic encouragement, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. He would also like to thank GGZ Altrecht, Vesalius Centre for Neuropsychiatry; Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center for their financial supporter on this research project.

References

Anderson, S.W., Barrash, J., Bechara, A., and Tranel, D. (2006). Impairments of emotion and real-world complex behavior following childhood- or adult-onset damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 12, 224–235.10.1017/S1355617706060346Search in Google Scholar

Bachevalier, J., Machado, C.J., and Kazama, A. (2011). Behavioral outcomes of late-onset or early-onset orbital frontal cortex (areas 11/13) lesions in rhesus monkeys. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1239, 71–86.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06211.xSearch in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., and Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 29, 407–418.10.1023/A:1023035012436Search in Google Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., and Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15.10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3Search in Google Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A.R., and Lee, G.P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J. Neurosci. 19, 5473–5481.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05473.1999Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, H.A., Rolls, E.T., and Kischka, U. (2004). Impulsivity, time perception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions. Brain 127(Pt 5), 1108–1126.10.1093/brain/awh135Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Berlin, H.A., Rolls, E.T., and Iversen, S.D. (2005). Borderline personality disorder, impulsivity, and the orbitofrontal cortex. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 2360–2373.10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2360Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Blair, R.J.R. (2007). Dysfunctions of medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex in psychopathy. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1121, 461–479.10.1196/annals.1401.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Blair, R.J. and Cipolotti, L. (2000). Impaired social response reversal. A case of “acquired sociopathy”. Brain 123, 1122–1141.10.1093/brain/123.6.1122Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Busemeyer, J.R. and Stout, J.C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychol. Assess. 14, 253–262.10.1037/1040-3590.14.3.253Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Angladette, L., Benoit, N., and Pierrot-Deseilligny, C. (1999). A man who borrowed cars. Lancet 353, 34.10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09047-3Search in Google Scholar

Cummings, J.L. (1995). Anatomic and behavioral aspects of frontal-subcortical circuits. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 769, 1–13.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38127.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error and the future of human life. Sci. Am. 271, 144.10.1038/scientificamerican1094-144Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Duffy, J.D. and Campbell, J.J. (1994). The regional prefrontal syndromes: a theoretical and clinical overview. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 6, 379–387.10.1176/jnp.6.4.379Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fellows, L.K. (2007). The role of orbitofrontal cortex in decision making: a component process account. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1121, 421–430.10.1196/annals.1401.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fellows, L.K. and Farah, M.J. (2005). Different underlying impairments in decision-making following ventromedial and dorsolateral frontal lobe damage in humans. Cereb. Cortex 15, 58–63.10.1093/cercor/bhh108Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fellows, L.K. and Farah, M.J. (2007). The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in decision making: judgment under uncertainty or judgment per se? Cereb. Cortex 17, 2669–2674.10.1093/cercor/bhl176Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Floris, G., Cannas, A., Melis, M., Solla, P., and Marrosu, M.G. (2008). Pathological gambling, delusional parasitosis and adipsia as a post-haemorrhagic syndrome: a case report. Neurocase 14, 385–389.10.1080/13554790802385418Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Frith, U. and Frith, C.D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358, 459–473.10.1098/rstb.2002.1218Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Fujii, T., Suzuki, M., Suzuki, K., Ohtake, H., Tsukiura, T., and Miura, R. (2005). Normal memory and no confabulation after extensive damage to the orbitofrontal cortex. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 1309–1310.10.1136/jnnp.2004.061846Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Funayama, M., Mimura, M., Koshibe, Y., and Kato, Y. (2010). Squalor syndrome after focal orbitofrontal damage. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 23, 135–139.10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181d746baSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Geraci, A., Surian, L., Ferraro, M., and Cantagallo, A. (2010). Theory of Mind in patients with ventromedial or dorsolateral prefrontal lesions following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 24, 978–987.10.3109/02699052.2010.487477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Grace, J., Stout, J.C., and Malloy, P.F. (1999). Assessing frontal lobe behavioral syndromes with the frontal lobe personality scale. Assessment 6, 269–284.10.1177/107319119900600307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hahm, D.S., Kang, Y., Cheong, S.S., and Na, D.L. (2001). A compulsive collecting behavior following an A-com aneurysmal rupture. Neurology 56, 398–400.10.1212/WNL.56.3.398Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hanna-Pladdy, B. (2007). Dysexecutive syndromes in neurologic disease. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 31, 119–127.10.1097/NPT.0b013e31814a63c2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Izquierdo, A. (2004). Bilateral orbital prefrontal cortex lesions in rhesus monkeys disrupt choices guided by both reward value and reward contingency. J. Neurosci. 24, 7540–7548.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1921-04.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kazama, A. and Bachevalier, J. (2009). Selective aspiration or neurotoxic lesions of orbital frontal areas 11 and 13 spared monkeys’ performance on the object discrimination reversal task. J. Neurosci. 29, 2794–2804.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4655-08.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Leopold, A., Krueger, F., dal Monte, O., Pardini, M., Pulaski, S.J., Solomon, J., and Grafman, J. (2012). Damage to the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex impacts affective theory of mind. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 871–880.10.1093/scan/nsr071Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Manes, F., Sahakian, B., Clark, L., Rogers, R., Antoun, N., Aitken, M., and Robbins, T. (2002). Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. Brain 125(Pt 3), 624–639.10.1093/brain/awf049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mitchell, D.G.V., Avny, S.B., and Blair, R.J.R. (2006a). Divergent patterns of aggressive and neurocognitive characteristics in acquired versus developmental psychopathy. Neurocase 12, 164–178.10.1080/13554790600611288Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mitchell, D.G.V., Fine, C., Richell, R.A., Newman, C., Lumsden, J., Blair, K.S., and Blair, R.J.R. (2006b). Instrumental learning and relearning in individuals with psychopathy and in patients with lesions involving the amygdala or orbitofrontal cortex. Neuropsychology 20, 280–289.10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.280Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Moll, J., De Oliveira-Souza, R., and Zahn, R. (2008). The neural basis of moral cognition: sentiments, concepts, and values. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1124, 161–180.10.1196/annals.1440.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Namiki, C., Yamada, M., Yoshida, H., Hanakawa, T., Fukuyama, H., and Murai, T. (2008). Small orbitofrontal traumatic lesions detected by high resolution MRI in a patient with major behavioural changes. Neurocase 14, 474–479.10.1080/13554790802459494Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ogai, M., Iyo, M., Mori, N., and Takei, N. (2005). A right orbitofrontal region and OCD symptoms: a case report. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 111, 74–76; discussion 76–77.10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00395.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Poletti, M., Lucetti, C., and Bonuccelli, U. (2010). Out-of-control sexual behavior in an orbitofrontal cortex-damaged elderly patient. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 22, E7.10.1176/jnp.2010.22.2.247.e7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Reid-Arndt, S.A., Nehl, C., and Hinkebein, J. (2007). The Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale (FrSBe) as a predictor of community integration following a traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 21, 1361–1369.10.1080/02699050701785062Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rolls, E.T. (2000). The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb. Cortex 10, 284–294.10.1093/cercor/10.3.284Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rolls, E.T., Hornak, J., Wade, D., and McGrath, J. (1994). Emotion-related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 57, 1518–1524.10.1136/jnnp.57.12.1518Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rudebeck, P.H. and Murray, E.A. (2011a). Balkanizing the primate orbitofrontal cortex: distinct subregions for comparing and contrasting values. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1239, 1–13.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06267.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rudebeck, P.H. and Murray, E.A. (2011b). Dissociable effects of subtotal lesions within the macaque orbital prefrontal cortex on reward-guided behavior. J. Neurosci. 31, 10569–10578.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0091-11.2011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rudebeck, P.H., Saunders, R.C., Prescott, A.T., Chau, L.S., and Murray, E.A. (2013). Prefrontal mechanisms of behavioral flexibility, emotion regulation and value updating. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1140–1145.10.1038/nn.3440Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rushworth, M.F.S., Behrens, T.E.J., Rudebeck, P.H., and Walton, M.E. (2007). Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 168–176.10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. and Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: a lesion study. Neuropsychologia 45, 3054–3067.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tomer, R., Berger, B.D., Goldsher, D., and Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 18, 55–67.10.1097/01.wnn.0000152228.90129.99Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tibi-Elhanany, Y., and Aharon-Peretz, J. (2006). The ventromedial prefrontal cortex is involved in understanding affective but not cognitive theory of mind stories. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 149–166.10.1080/17470910600985589Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Slachevsky, A., Peña, M., Pérez, C., Bravo, E., and Alegría, P. (2006). Neuroanatomical basis of behavioral disturbances in patients with prefrontal lesions. Biol. Res. 39, 237–250.10.4067/S0716-97602006000200006Search in Google Scholar

Spikman, J.M., Milders, M.V., Visser-Keizer, A.C., Westerhof-Evers, H.J., Herben-Dekker, M., and van der Naalt, J. (2013). Deficits in facial emotion recognition indicate behavioral changes and impaired self-awareness after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. PloS One 8, e65581.10.1371/journal.pone.0065581Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Stone, V.E., Baron-Cohen, S., and Knight, R.T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 640–656.10.1162/089892998562942Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stuss, D.T. and Levine, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 401–433.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135220Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Umeda, S., Mimura, M., and Kato, M. (2010). Acquired personality traits of autism following damage to the medial prefrontal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 5, 19–29.10.1080/17470910902990584Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Volle, E., Beato, R., Levy, R., and Dubois, B. (2002). Forced collectionism after orbitofrontal damage. Neurology 58, 488–490.10.1212/WNL.58.3.488Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wallis, J.D. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex and its contribution to decision-making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 31–56.10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094334Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Walton, M.E., Behrens, T.E.J., Noonan, M.P., and Rushworth, M.F.S. (2011). Giving credit where credit is due: orbitofrontal cortex and valuation in an uncertain world. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1239, 14–24.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06257.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Zald, D.H. and Andreotti, C. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment of the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 48, 3377–3391.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-6-27
Accepted: 2014-8-24
Published Online: 2014-9-25
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/revneuro-2014-0043/html
Scroll to top button