Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 18, 2017

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Mana Biabani EMAIL logo , Maryam Aminitehrani , Maryam Zoghi , Michael Farrell , Gary Egan and Shapour Jaberzadeh

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is increasingly being used to affect the neurological conditions with deficient intracortical synaptic activities (i.e. Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy). In addition, it is suggested that the lasting effects of tDCS on corticospinal excitability (CSE) have intracortical origin. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether tDCS has any effect on intracortical circuits. Eleven electronic databases were searched for the studies investigating intracortical changes induced by anodal (a) and cathodal (c) tDCS, in healthy individuals, using two paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigms: short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Additionally, motor-evoked potential (MEP) size alterations, assessed by single-pulse TMS, were extracted from these studies to investigate the probable intracortical origin of tDCS effects on CSE. The methodological quality of included studies was examined using Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Downs and Black’s (D&B) assessment tools. Thirteen research papers, including 24 experiments, were included in this study scoring good and medium quality in PEDro and D&B scales, respectively. Immediately following anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) applications, we found significant decreases in SICI, but increases in ICF and MEP size. However, ICF and MEP size significantly decreased, and SICI increased immediately following cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that a-tDCS changes intracortical activities (SICI and ICF) toward facilitation, whereas c-tDCS alters them toward inhibition. It can also be concluded that increases and decreases in CSE after tDCS application are associated with corresponding changes in intracortical activities. The results suggest that tDCS can be clinically useful to modulate intracortical circuits.

References

Alexander, R. (2013). Brain Stimulation: Chapter 39 (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Epilepsy Elsevier).Search in Google Scholar

Amadi, U., Allman, C., Johansen-Berg, H., and Stagg, C.J. (2015). The homeostatic interaction between anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and motor learning in humans is related to GABA(A) activity. Brain Stimul. 8, 898–905.10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bastani, A. and Jaberzadeh, S. (2012). Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 644–657.10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Batsikadze, G., Moliadze, V., Paulus, W., Kuo, M., and Nitsche, M. (2013). Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 591, 1987–2000.10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Berardelli, A., Abbruzzese, G., Chen, R., Orth, M., Ridding, M.C., Stinear, C., Suppa, A., Trompetto, C., and Thompson, P.D. (2008). Consensus paper on short-interval intracortical inhibition and other transcranial magnetic stimulation intracortical paradigms in movement disorders. Brain Stimul. 1, 183–191.10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Boros, K., Poreisz, C., Munchau, A., Paulus, W., and Nitsche, M.A. (2008). Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 1292–1300.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Chen, R., Tam, A., Bütefisch, C., Corwell, B., Ziemann, U., Rothwell, J.C., and Cohen, L.G. (1998). Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 2870–2881.10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2870Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Christova, M., Rafolt, D., and Gallasch, E. (2015). Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability. Behav. Brain Res. 287, 27–33.10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Clark, V.P., Coffman, B.A., Trumbo, M.C., and Gasparovic, C. (2011). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces localized and specific alterations in neurochemistry: a 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neurosci. Lett. 500, 67–71.10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.244Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Day, B., Dressler, D., Maertens de Noordhout, A., Marsden, C., Nakashima, K., Rothwell, J., and Thompson, P. (1989). Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J. Physiol. 412, 449–473.10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017626Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Deeks, J.J. and Higgins, J.P.T., on behalf of the Statistical Methods Group of The Cochrane Collaboration. (2010). Statistical Algorithms in Review Manager 5, Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/documentation/Statistical-methods-in-RevMan-5.pdf. Accessed date: 1, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Di Lazzaro, V., Rothwell, J.C., Oliviero, A., Profice, P., Insola, A., Mazzone, P., and Tonali, P. (1999). Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 129, 494–499.10.1007/s002210050919Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Di Lazzaro, V., Manganelli, F., Dileone, M., Notturno, F., Esposito, M., Capasso, M., Dubbioso, R., Pace, M., Ranieri, F., Minicuci, G., et al. (2012). The effects of prolonged cathodal direct current stimulation on the excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex. J. Neural. Transm. 119, 1499–1506.10.1007/s00702-012-0845-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Downs, S.H. and Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 52, 377–384.10.1136/jech.52.6.377Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Eng, J.J., Teasell, R., Miller, W.C., Wolfe, D.L., Townson, A.F., Aubut, J.A., Abramson, C., Hsieh, J.T., Connolly, S., and Konnyu, K. (2007). Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence: methods of the SCIRE systematic review. Top Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 13, 1–10.10.1310/sci1301-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Ruggiero, F., and Priori, A. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation as treatment for Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders. Basal Ganglia 6, 53–61.10.1016/j.baga.2015.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Foley, N.C., Teasell, R.W., Bhogal, S.K., and Speechley, M.R. (2003). Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: methodology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 10, 1–7.10.1310/Y6TG-1KQ9-LEDQ-64L8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fricke, K., Seeber, A.A., Thirugnanasambandam, N., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M.A., and Rothwell, J.C. (2011). Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 1141–1149.10.1152/jn.00608.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Froc, D.J., Chapman, C.A., Trepel, C., and Racine, R.J. (2000). Long-term depression and depotentiation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat. J. Neurosci. 20, 438–445.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00438.2000Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Heise, K.-F., Niehoff, M., Feldheim, J., Liuzzi, G., Gerloff, C., and Hummel, F.C. (2014). Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age. Front Aging Neurosci. 6, 146.10.3389/fnagi.2014.00146Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Hendy, A.M. and Kidgell, D.J. (2014). Anodal-tDCS applied during unilateral strength training increases strength and corticospinal excitability in the untrained homologous muscle. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 3243–3252.10.1007/s00221-014-4016-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hendy, A.M., Teo, W.P., and Kidgell, D.J. (2015). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation prolongs the cross-education of strength and corticomotor plasticity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47, 1788–1797.10.1249/MSS.0000000000000600Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Higgins, J.P. and Green, S. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Melbourne, Australia: John Wiley & Sons).Search in Google Scholar

Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., and Altman, D.G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. Br. Med. J. 327, 557–560.10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557Search in Google Scholar

Ho, K.-H., Lee, M., Nithi, K., Palace, J., and Mills, K. (1999). Changes in motor evoked potentials to short-interval paired transcranial magnetic stimuli in multiple sclerosis. Neurophysiol. Clin. 110, 712–719.10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00048-0Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, J.C., Forte, J.D., and Carter, O. (2015). Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia 66, 213–236.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Isaacson, J.S. and Scanziani, M. (2011). How inhibition shapes cortical activity. Neuron 72, 231–243.10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Joseph A. (2011). Plot Digitizer 2.5.1. Available from http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/. Accessed date: 1, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Kidgell, D.J., Daly, R.M., Young, K., Lum, J., Tooley, G., Jaberzadeh, S., Zoghi, M., and Pearce, A.J. (2013a). Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity. Neural Plast. 2013, 1–9.10.1155/2013/603502Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kidgell, D.J., Goodwill, A.M., Frazer, A.K., and Daly, R.M (2013b). Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. BMC Neurosci. 14, 1–12.10.1186/1471-2202-14-64Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kujirai, T., Caramia, M., Rothwell, J.C., Day, B., Thompson, P., Ferbert, A., Wroe, S., Asselman, P., and Marsden, C.D. (1993). Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 471, 501.10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Liebetanz, D., Nitsche, M.A., Tergau, F., and Paulus, W. (2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125, 2238–2247.10.1093/brain/awf238Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lopez-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Rio-Rodriguez, D., and Fernandez-Del-Olmo, M. (2014). Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 7, 372–380.10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Maher, C.G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R.D., Moseley, A.M., and Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys. Ther. 83, 713–721.10.1093/ptj/83.8.713Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Manganotti, P., Bongiovanni, L.G., Zanette, G., and Fiaschi, A. (2000). Early and late intracortical inhibition in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 41, 1129–1138.10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00318.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Moseley, A.M., Herbert, R.D., Sherrington, C., and Maher, C.G. (2002). Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Austr. J. Physiother. 48, 43–49.10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6Search in Google Scholar

Nitsche, M.A. and Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 527, 633–639.10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nitsche, M.A. and Paulus, W. (2001). Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57, 1899–1901.10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Nitsche, M., Fricke, K., Henschke, U., Schlitterlau, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Henning, S., Tergau, F., and Paulus, W. (2003). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 553, 293–301.10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nitsche, M., Liebetanz, D., Schlitterlau, A., Henschke, U., Fricke, K., Frommann, K., Lang, N., Henning, S., Paulus, W., and Tergau, F. (2004). GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 2720–2726.10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03398.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Nitsche, M.A., Seeber, A., Frommann, K., Klein, C.C., Rochford, C., Nitsche, M.S., Fricke, K., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., and Antal, A. (2005). Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 568, 291–303.10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nitsche, M.A., Cohen, L.G., Wassermann, E.M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P.S., and Fregni, F. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 1, 206–223.10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ogata, K., Yamasaki, T., and Tobimatsu, S. (2007). Modulation of intracortical inhibition and facilitation of motor cortex through transcranial direct current stimulation. International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, IEEE/ICME, pp. 2000–2003.10.1109/ICCME.2007.4382099Search in Google Scholar

Quartarone, A., Rizzo, V., Bagnato, S., Morgante, F., Sant’Angelo, A., Romano, M., Crupi, D., Girlanda, P., Rothwell, J.C., and Siebner, H.R. (2005). Homeostatic-like plasticity of the primary motor hand area is impaired in focal hand dystonia. Brain 128, 1943–1950.10.1093/brain/awh527Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Quartarone, A., Lang, N., Rizzo, V., Bagnato, S., Morgante, F., Sant’angelo, A., Crupi, D., Battaglia, F., Messina, C., and Girlanda, P. (2007). Motor cortex abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with transcranial direct-current stimulation. Muscle Nerve 35, 620–624.10.1002/mus.20737Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Saunders, L.D., Soomro, G.M., Buckingham, J., Jamtvedt, G., and Raina, P. (2003). Assessing the methodological quality of nonrandomized intervention studies. West J. Nurs. Res. 25, 223–237.10.1177/0193945902250039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Siebner, H.R., Lang, N., Rizzo, V., Nitsche, M.A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R.N., and Rothwell, J.C. (2004). Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 24, 3379–3385.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5316-03.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Slade, S.C. and Keating, J.L. (2007). Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 30, 301–311.10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stagg, C.J. and Nitsche, M.A. (2011). Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17, 37–53.10.1177/1073858410386614Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stagg, C.J., Best, J.G., Stephenson, M.C., O’Shea, J., Wylezinska, M., Kincses, Z.T., Morris, P.G., Matthews, P.M., and Johansen-Berg, H. (2009). Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J. Neurosci. 29, 5202–5206.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-08.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Trepel, C. and Racine, R. (1998). Long-term potentiation in the neocortex of the adult, freely moving rat. Cereb. Cortex 8, 719–729.10.1093/cercor/8.8.719Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Vaseghi, B., Zoghi, M., and Jaberzadeh, S. (2015). The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation. Front Hum. Neurosci. 9, 1–13.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00533Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Vaseghi, B., Zoghi, M., and Jaberzadeh, S. (2016). Unihemispheric concurrent dual-site cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation: the effects on corticospinal excitability. Eur. J. Neurosci. 43, 1161–1172.10.1111/ejn.13229Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Veronezi, B., Moffa, A., Carvalho, A., Galhardoni, R., Simis, M., Benseñor, I., Lotufo, P., Machado-Vieira, R., Daskalakis, Z., and Brunoni, A. (2016). Evidence for increased motor cortical facilitation and decreased inhibition in atypical depression. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 134, 172–182.10.1111/acps.12565Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zaghi, S., Heine, N., and Fregni, F. (2009). Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: a review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches. J. Pain Manag. 2, 339.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Woolley, D.G., Swinnen, S.P., Feys, H., Meesen, R., and Wenderoth, N. (2014). Changes in corticomotor excitability and intracortical inhibition of the primary motor cortex forearm area induced by anodal tDCS. PLoS One 9, 1–10.10.1371/journal.pone.0101496Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2017-03-22
Accepted: 2017-05-20
Published Online: 2017-08-18
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.9.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/revneuro-2017-0023/html
Scroll to top button