Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 19, 2017

Computerized neurocognitive interventions in the context of the brain training controversy

  • Rebeca Isabel García-Betances

    Rebeca Isabel García-Betances is a telecommunications engineer with an MSc in biomedical engineering and is presently a biomedical engineering PhD candidate at UPM. She is a senior researcher at the LifeSTech Group, where she works on e-Health, e-Inclusion, self-management of chronic diseases, and VR in Ambient Intelligence applications. She currently manages activities for three EU’s Horizon 2020 Programme projects related to dementia self-management, brain-computer interfaces, and smart home technologies. She has authored 12 articles in refereed specialized journals in areas of communications infrastructure for rural telemedicine, automatic patient identification, patient engagement in diabetes self-management, affective and persuasive computer-mediated healthcare, ICT use for aging- and disability-derived functional impairments, and VR environments for cognitive training of the elderly and AD patients.

    EMAIL logo
    , María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez

    María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez is a telecommunications engineer with a PhD in biomedical engineering. She is an associate professor at ETSIT, UPM, and the CTO of the LifeSTech Group. She has been responsible for the concept development and coordination of large multidisciplinary national and international projects and has been the project coordinator and technical manager of more than 30 national and EU projects. She has authored more than 100 articles in national and international journals and conferences in the fields of e-Health, adaptive interfaces and decision support, and integrated care.

    and María T. Arredondo

    María T. Arredondo is an Electrical Engineer with a PhD in Telecommunications Engineering. She is a full Professor of Bioengineering at UPM’s ETSIT. She is the CEO of LifeSTech, an international research group at UPM’s ETSIT, which she founded in 1995, dedicated to development of ICT applications to support people’s health care, welfare, quality of life, social inclusion and independent living. She has been a Principal Researcher in more than 50 EU-funded granted scientific and technical projects dealing with a variety of issues in the areas of Ambient Assisted Living and Ambient Intelligence applied to the social and healthcare sectors. She has published more than 200 papers and several books, and has served or serves on numerous committees and editorial boards.

Abstract

This article presents, in the form of an analytic narrative review, a complete picture of the state-of-the-art, challenges, and perspectives in the field of information and communication technology (ICT)-based neurocognitive interventions for older adults. The narrative particularly focuses on applications aimed at mild cognitive impairment and similar age-related cognitive deficits, which are analyzed in the context of the brain training controversy. Clarifying considerations are provided about the nature and present extent of the brain training debate, regarding the possible influence it has on the support received by research and development initiatives dealing with innovative computerized neurocognitive interventions. It is recommended that, because of the preliminary nature of most data currently available in this area, further research initiatives must be supported in the quest for better effectiveness of computer-based interventions intended for age-related cognitive impairment. The conclusion suggests that advanced ICT-based tools, such as virtual and augmented reality technologies, are the most fitting platforms for applying nonpharmacological computerized neurocognitive interventions.

About the authors

Rebeca Isabel García-Betances

Rebeca Isabel García-Betances is a telecommunications engineer with an MSc in biomedical engineering and is presently a biomedical engineering PhD candidate at UPM. She is a senior researcher at the LifeSTech Group, where she works on e-Health, e-Inclusion, self-management of chronic diseases, and VR in Ambient Intelligence applications. She currently manages activities for three EU’s Horizon 2020 Programme projects related to dementia self-management, brain-computer interfaces, and smart home technologies. She has authored 12 articles in refereed specialized journals in areas of communications infrastructure for rural telemedicine, automatic patient identification, patient engagement in diabetes self-management, affective and persuasive computer-mediated healthcare, ICT use for aging- and disability-derived functional impairments, and VR environments for cognitive training of the elderly and AD patients.

María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez

María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez is a telecommunications engineer with a PhD in biomedical engineering. She is an associate professor at ETSIT, UPM, and the CTO of the LifeSTech Group. She has been responsible for the concept development and coordination of large multidisciplinary national and international projects and has been the project coordinator and technical manager of more than 30 national and EU projects. She has authored more than 100 articles in national and international journals and conferences in the fields of e-Health, adaptive interfaces and decision support, and integrated care.

María T. Arredondo

María T. Arredondo is an Electrical Engineer with a PhD in Telecommunications Engineering. She is a full Professor of Bioengineering at UPM’s ETSIT. She is the CEO of LifeSTech, an international research group at UPM’s ETSIT, which she founded in 1995, dedicated to development of ICT applications to support people’s health care, welfare, quality of life, social inclusion and independent living. She has been a Principal Researcher in more than 50 EU-funded granted scientific and technical projects dealing with a variety of issues in the areas of Ambient Assisted Living and Ambient Intelligence applied to the social and healthcare sectors. She has published more than 200 papers and several books, and has served or serves on numerous committees and editorial boards.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 SMART4MD project (GA no. 643399) and City4Age project (GA no. 689731).

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing interests. The corresponding author had full control of all the parts of the article and has final responsibility in the decision to submit it for publication.

References

Allaire, J.C., Bäckman, L., Balota, D.A., Bavelier, D., Bjork, R.A., and Bower, G.H. (2014). A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community. Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Stanford Center on Longevity. Available at: http://longevity.stanford.edu/a-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2/. Accessed 2 May 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Alzheimer’s Association. (2017). Alzheimer’s Association Report: 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dementia 13, 325–373.10.1016/j.jalz.2017.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Anguera, J.A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J.L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., Kong, E., Larraburo, Y., Rolle, C., Johnston, E., et al. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 501, 97–101.10.1038/nature12486Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ball, K., Berch, D.B., Helmers, K.F., Jobe, J.B., Leveck, M.D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J.N., Rebok, G.W., Smith, D.M., Tennstedt, S.L., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288, 2271–2281.10.1001/jama.288.18.2271Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bennett, C.R., Corey, R.R., Giudice, U., and Guidice, N.A. (2016). Immersive virtual reality simulation as a tool for aging and driving research. International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (ITAP 2016): (Toronto, Canada: Healthy and Active Aging), pp. 377–385.10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_36Search in Google Scholar

Bourrelier, J., Ryard, J., Dion, M., Merienne, F., Manckoundia, P., and Mourey, F. (2016). Use of a virtual environment to engage motor and postural abilities in elderly subjects with and without mild cognitive impairment (MAAMI Project). IRBM 37, 75–80.10.1016/j.irbm.2016.02.007Search in Google Scholar

Cavallo, M., Hunter, E.M., van der Hiele, K., and Angilletta, C. (2016). Computerized structured cognitive training in patients affected by early-stage Alzheimer’s disease is feasible and effective: a randomized controlled study. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 31, 868–876.10.1093/arclin/acw072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chaikham, A., Putthinoi, S., Lersilp, S., Bunpun, A., and Chakpitak, N. (2016). Cognitive training program for Thai older people with mild cognitive impairment. Proc. Environ. Sci. 36, 42–45.10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Chicchi Giglioli, I.A., Pallavicini, F., Pedroli, E., Serino, S., and Riva, G. (2015). Augmented reality: a brand new challenge for the assessment and treatment of psychological disorders. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, Article 862942.10.1155/2015/862942Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Clare, L. (2017). Rehabilitation for people living with dementia: a practical framework of positive support. PLoS Med. 14, Article e1002245.10.1371/journal.pmed.1002245Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cohen, J.D., Daw, N., Engelhardt, B., Hasson, U., Li, K., Niv, Y., Norman, K.A., Pillow, J., Ramadge, P.J., Turk-Browne, N.B., et al. (2017). Computational approaches to fMRI analysis. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 304–313.10.1038/nn.4499Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Darviri, C., Zavitsanou, C., Delikou, A., Giotaki, A., Artemiadis, A., Terentiou, A., and Chrouso, G.P. (2016). A novel non-pharmaceutical treatment for patients with mild cognitive impairment. Psychology 7, 678–686.10.4236/psych.2016.75070Search in Google Scholar

Dascal, J., Reid, M., IsHak, W.W., Spiegel, B., Recacho, J., Rosen, B., and Danovitch, I. (2017). Virtual reality and medical inpatients: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 14–21.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

de la Torre-Luque, A., Valero-Aguayo, L., and de la Rubia Cuestas, E.J. (2017). Visuospatial orientation learning through virtual reality for people with severe disability. Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ. 64, 1–6.10.1080/1034912X.2016.1274022Search in Google Scholar

Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., and May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427, 311–312.10.1038/427311aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Fitzgerald, S. (2017). Is successful brain training fake news? Neurologists parse out the messaging for patients? Neurol. Today 17, 8–18.Search in Google Scholar

Foloppe, D.A., Richard, P., Yamaguchi, T., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., and Allain, P. (2015). The potential of virtual reality-based training to enhance the functional autonomy of Alzheimer’s disease patients in cooking activities: a single case study. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2015, 1–25.10.1080/09602011.2015.1094394Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Forman, E.M., Goldstein, S.P., Flack, D., Evans, B.C., Manasse, S.M., and Dochat, C. (2017). Promising technological innovations in cognitive training to treat eating-related behavior. Appetite. Epub ahead of print 14 Apr 2017.10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Foroughi, C.K., Monfort, S.S., Paczynski, M., McKnight, P.E., and Greenwoo, P.M. (2016). Placebo effects in cognitive training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7470–7474.10.1073/pnas.1601243113Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

FTC vs. LUMOS Labs, Inc. (2016). San Francisco Division of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief, The FTC vs. LUMOS Labs, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00001 Document 1, Filed 1/4/16. Available at: https://www.FTC.gov/system/files/documents/cases/160105lumoslabscmpt.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

García, L., Kartolo, A., and Méthot-Curtis, E. (2012). A Discussion of the Use of Virtual Reality in Dementia. Virtual Reality in Psychological, Medical and Pedagogical Applications. C. Eichenberg, ed. (New York, USA: InTech), pp. 123–136.10.5772/46412Search in Google Scholar

García-Betances, R.I., Jiménez-Mixco, V., Arredondo, M.T., and Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F. (2015a). Using virtual reality for cognitive training of the elderly. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 30, 49–54.10.1177/1533317514545866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

García-Betances, R.I., Arredondo Waldmeyer, M.T., Fico, G., and Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F. (2015b). A succinct overview of virtual reality technology use in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, Article 80.10.3389/fnagi.2015.00080Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

García-Betances, R.I., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F., Ottaviano, M., Pastorino, M., and Arredondo, M.T. (2016). Parametric cognitive modeling of information and computer technology usage by people with aging- and disability-derived functional impairments. Sensors 16, Article 266.10.3390/s16020266Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

García-Casal, J.A., Loizeau, A., Csipke, E., Franco-Martín, M., Perea-Bartolomé, M.V., and Orrell, M. (2016). Computer-based cognitive interventions for people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Aging Mental Health 21, 454–467. Corrigendum, Aging Mental Health 21, 2016.10.1080/13607863.2015.1132677Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Goghari, V.M. and Lawlor-Savage, L. (2017). Comparison of cognitive change after working memory training and logic and planning training in healthy older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, Article 39.10.3389/fnagi.2017.00039Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Gooding, A.L., Choi, J., Fiszdon, J.M., Wilkins, K., Kirwin, P.D., van Dyck, C.H., Devanand, D., Bell, M.D., and Rivera Mindt, M. (2015). Comparing three methods of computerised cognitive training for older adults with subclinical cognitive decline. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 1–12.10.1080/09602011.2015.1118389Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Guidolin, D., Marcoli, M., Maura, G., and Agnati, L.F. (2017). New dimensions of connectomics and network plasticity in the central nervous system. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 113–132.10.1515/revneuro-2016-0051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hardy, J.L., Nelson, R.A., Thomason, M.E., Sternberg, D.A., Katovich, K., Farzin, F., and Scanlon, M. (2015). Enhancing cognitive abilities with comprehensive training: a large, online, randomized, active-controlled trial. PLoS One 10, e0134467.10.1371/journal.pone.0134467Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Harvey, P.D., Cosentino, S., Curiel, R., Goldberg, T.E., Kaye, J., Loewenstein, D., Marson, D., Salmon, D., Wesnes, K., and Posner, H. (2017). Performance-based and observational assessments in clinical trials across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 30–39.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hill, N.T., Mowszowski, L., Naismith, S.L., Chadwick, V.L., Valenzuela, M., and Lampit, A. (2017). Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 329–340.10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ienca, M., Fabrice, J., Elger, B., Caon, M., Pappagallo, A.S., Kressig, R.W., and Wangmo, T. (2017). Intelligent assistive technology for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a systematic review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 1301–1340.10.3233/JAD-161037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkueh, M., Jonides, J., and Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10081–10086.10.1073/pnas.1103228108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jean, L., Bergeron, M.-E., Thivierge, S., and Simard, M. (2010). Cognitive intervention programs for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review of the literature. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 18, 281–296.10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37ce9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kaeberlein, M., Rabinovitch, P.S., and Martin, G.M. (2015). Healthy aging: the ultimate preventative medicine. Science 350, 1191–1193.10.1126/science.aad3267Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kallio, E.-L., Öhman, H., Kautiainen, H., Hietanen, M., and Pitkälä, K. (2017). Cognitive training interventions for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 1349–1372.10.3233/JAD-160810Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kane, R.L. and Parsons, T.D., eds. (2017). The Role of Technology in Clinical Neuropsychology (UK: Oxford University Press).10.1093/oso/9780190234737.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kujawska, A., Kujawski, S., Gajos, M., Perkowski, R., Androsiuk, J., Jarecka, J., Kożuchowski, M., Kasperska, P., Płusa, S., and Topka, W. (2016). New ways of treatment in geriatrics and perception of those methods by patients. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 1, 75–95.10.15503/jecs20161.75.91Search in Google Scholar

Leung, N.T.Y., Tam, H.M.K., Chu, L.W., Kwok, T.C.Y., Chan, F., Lam, L.C.W., Woo, J., and Lee, T.M.C. (2015). Neural plastic effects of cognitive training on aging brain. Neural Plast. 2015, Article 535618.10.1155/2015/535618Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lindenberger, U., Wenger, E., and Lövdén, M. (2017). Comment: towards a stronger science of human plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 1–2.10.1038/nrn.2017.44Search in Google Scholar

Liu, X.Y., Li, L., Xiao, J.Q., He, C.Z., Lyu, X.L., Gao, L., Yang, X.W., Cui, X.G., and Fan, L.H. (2016). Cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 29, 356–364.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lledó, L.D., Díez, J.A., Bertomeu-Motos, A., Ezquerro, S., Badesa, F.J., Sabater-Navarro, J.M., and García-Aracil, N. (2016). A comparative analysis of 2D and 3D tasks for virtual reality therapies based on robotic-assisted neurorehabilitation for post-stroke patients. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8, 205.10.3389/fnagi.2016.00205Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Maffei, L., Picano, E., Andreassi, M.G., Angelucci, A., Baldacci, F., Baroncelli, L., Begenisic, T., Bellinvia, P.F., Berardi, N., Biagi, L., et al. (Train the Brain Consortium) (2017). Randomized trial on the effects of a combined physical/cognitive training in aged MCI subjects: the Train the Brain study. Sci. Rep. 7, Article 39471.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Magaro, P.A., Brotter, B., and Jalees, M. (2015a). Nine months of memory training increases Cognistat measured memory in 79–89 year-old mild cognitively impaired individuals. Adv. Aging Res. 4, 79–88.10.4236/aar.2015.43010Search in Google Scholar

Magaro, P.A., Brotter, B., and Jalees, M. (2015b). Memory training and task specificity in 90–99-year-old seniors with mild cognitive impairment. Adv. Aging Res. 4, 1–12.10.4236/aar.2015.41001Search in Google Scholar

Mahncke, H.W., Bronstone, A., and Merzenich, M.M. (2006). Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog. Brain Res. 157, 81–109.10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57006-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Makin, S. (2016). Brain training: memory games. Nature 531, S10–S11.10.1038/531S10aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Manera, V., Chapoulie, E., Bourgeois, J., Guerchouche, R., David, R., Ondrej, J., Drettakis, G., and Robert, P. (2016). A feasibility study with image-based rendered virtual reality in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. PLoS One 11, Article e0151487.10.1371/journal.pone.0151487Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mazzoli Moraes, T., Ferreira de Andrade, A., and Silva Paiva, W. (2016). Virtual reality for the treatment of posttraumatic disorders. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 12, 785–786.10.2147/NDT.S105538Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

McCabe, J.A., Redick, T.S., and Engle, R.W. (2016). Brain-training pessimism, but applied-memory optimism. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 17, 187–191.10.1177/1529100616664716Search in Google Scholar PubMed

McKinley, R.A., McIntire, L., Nelson, J., Nelson, J., and Goodyear, C. (2017). The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Training During a Complex Procedural Task. Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. K. Hale and K. Stanney, eds. (Switzerland: Springer), pp. 173–183.10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5_15Search in Google Scholar

Medalia, A. and Erlich, M. (2017). Why cognitive health matters (editorial). Am. J. Public Health 107, 45–47.10.2105/AJPH.2016.303544Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Miller, D.B. and O’Callaghan, J.P. (2017). New horizons for focused ultrasound (FUS) – therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Metab. Clin. Exp. 69, S3–S7.10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mishra, V. and Barratt, J. (2016). Final Report on Reablement and Older People. International Federation on Aging (IFA) Copenhagen 2016 Summit. Available at: http://www.ifa-copenhagen-summit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Copenhagen-Summit-Final-Report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D.G. (2009). The PRISMA group, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097.10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Motter, J.N., Pimontel, M.A., Rindskopf, D., Devanand, D.P., Doraiswamy, P.M., and Sneed, J.R. (2016). Computerized cognitive training and functional recovery in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 189, 184–191.10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Nguyen, J., Suarez, A., Kemoun, G., Meignier, M., Le Saout, E., Damier, P., Nizard, J., and Lefaucheur, J.-P. (2017). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurophysiol. Clin. 47, 47–53.10.1016/j.neucli.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ortiz, A., Munilla, J., Górriz, J.M., and Ramírez, J. (2016). Ensembles of deep learning architectures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J Neural Syst. 26, 1650025.10.1142/S0129065716500258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Palmeri, T.J., Love, B.C., and Turner, B.M. (2017). Model-based cognitive neuroscience. J. Math. Psychol. 76, 59–64.10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Plancher, G. and Piolino, P. (2017). Virtual Reality for Assessment of Episodic Memory in Normal and Pathological Aging. The Role of Technology in Clinical Neuropsychology. R.L. Kane and T.D. Parsons, eds. (UK: Oxford University Press), pp. 237–260.10.1093/oso/9780190234737.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Ponce, F.A., Asaad, W.F., Foote, K.D., Anderson, W.S., Cosgrove, G.R., Baltuch, G.H., Beasley, K., Reymers, D.E., Oh, E.S., Targum, S.D., et al. (2015). Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer’s disease: surgical safety in the advance trial. J. Neurosurg. 125, 75–84.10.3171/2015.6.JNS15716Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rabipour, S. and Davidson, P.S.R. (2015). Do you believe in brain training? A questionnaire about expectations of computerised cognitive training. Behav. Brain Res. 295, 64–70.10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Raggi, A., Tasca, D., and Raffaele Ferri, R. (2017). A brief essay on non-pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 587–597.10.1515/revneuro-2017-0002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rebok, G.W., Ball, K., Guey, L.T., Jones, R.N., Kim, H.Y., King, J.W., Marsiske, M., Morris, J.N., Tennstedt, S.L., Unverzagt, F.W., et al. for the ACTIVE Study Group (2014). Ten-year effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 62, 16–24.10.1111/jgs.12607Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Regan, B., Wells, Y., Farrow, M., O’Halloran, P., and Workman, B. (2016). MAXCOG – maximizing cognition: a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 25, 258–269.10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Riva, G. (1998). Virtual reality as assessment tool in psychology. Virtual Reality Neuro-Psycho-Physiol. 44, 71–79.Search in Google Scholar

Riva, G. (2005). Virtual reality in psychotherapy: review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 220–240.10.1089/cpb.2005.8.220Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J.G., van der Zaag, C., Neumann, U., Thiebaux, M., Chua, C., van Rooyen, A., Humphrey, L., and Larson, P. (2000). Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology. Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 Conf. 63–70.10.1109/VR.2000.840364Search in Google Scholar

Rodakowski, J. and Skidmore, E.R. (2017). Non-pharmacological interventions for early cognitive decline. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 25, 270–271.10.1016/j.jagp.2016.12.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Román, F.J., Iturria-Medina, Y., Martínez, K., Karama, S., Burgaleta, M., Evans, A.C., Jaeggi, S.M., and Colom, R. (2017). Enhanced structural connectivity within a brain sub-network supporting working memory and engagement processes after cognitive training. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 141, 33–43.10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ross, L.A., Freed, S.A., Edwards, J.D., Phillips, C.B., and Ball, K. (2016). The impact of three cognitive training programs on driving cessation across 10 years: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw143.10.1093/geront/gnw143Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sasaki, Y. and Watanabe, T. (2017). When perceptual learning occurs. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, Article 0048.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, T.M. and Martins, R.N. (2017). Synergistic Effects of Combined Physical Activity and Brain Training on Neurological Functions. Physical Activity and the Aging Brain: Effects of Exercise on Neurological Function, R. Ross Watson, ed. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier), pp. 175–184.10.1016/B978-0-12-805094-1.00017-4Search in Google Scholar

Shah, T.M., Weinborn, M., Verdile, G., Sohrabi, H.R., and Martins, R.N. (2017). Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy older adults: a systematic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline. Neuropsychol. Rev. 27, 62–80.10.1007/s11065-016-9338-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shukla, A.W. and Okun, M.S. (2016). State of the art for deep brain stimulation therapy in movement disorders: a clinical and technological perspective. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 219–233.10.1109/RBME.2016.2588399Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Simons, D.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S.E., Chabris, C.F., Hambrick, D.Z., and Stine-Morrow, E.A. (2016). Do ‘brain-training’ programs work? Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 17, 103–186.10.1177/1529100616661983Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., Weiskopf, N., Blefari, M.L., Rana, M., Oblak E., et al. (2017). Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 86–100.10.1038/nrn.2016.164Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Smart, C.M., Karr, J.E., Areshenkoff, C.N., Rabin, L.A., Hudon, C., Gates, N., Ali, J.I., Arenaza-Urquijo, E.M., Buckley, R.F., Chetelat, G., et al. (2017). Non-pharmacologic interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: systematic review, meta-analysis, and preliminary recommendations. Neuropsychol. Rev. 27, 1–13.10.1007/s11065-017-9342-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Söderqvist, S. and Nutley, S. (2017). Working memory training – claims & evidence. New Business and Innovation, Pearson Clinical Assessment. Online document. Extended Version V.4, 1–40. Available at: http://www.cogmed.com/wp-content/uploads/CogmedClaimsEvidence.pdf. Accessed May 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Taya, F., Sun, Y., Babiloni, F., Thakor, N., and Bezerianos, A. (2015). Brain enhancement through cognitive training: a new insight from brain connectome. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, Article 44.10.3389/fnsys.2015.00044Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Torous, J., Staples, P., Fenstermacher, E., Dean, J., and Keshavan, M. (2016). Barriers, benefits, and beliefs of brain training smartphone apps: an Internet survey of younger US consumers. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, Article 180.Search in Google Scholar

University of Sydney. (2016). Brain training can help in fight against dementia, meta-analysis shows. University of Sydney Science News, ScienceDaily, 14 Nov 2016. Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161114105531.htm. Accessed May 2017.Search in Google Scholar

van de Ven, R.M., Buitenweg, J.I.V., Schmand, B., Veltman, D.J., Aaronson, J.A., Nijboer, T.C.W., Kruiper-Doesborgh, S.J., van Bennekom, C.A., Rasquin, S.M., Ridderinkhof, K.R., et al. (2017). Brain training improves recovery after stroke but waiting list improves equally: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of a computerbased cognitive flexibility training. PLoS One 12, Article e0172993.10.1371/journal.pone.0172993Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

van Heugten, C.M., Ponds, R.W.H.M., and Kessels, R.P.C. (2016). Brain training: hype or hope? Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 639–644.Search in Google Scholar

Vermeij, A., Claassen, J.A.H.R., Dautzenberg, P.L.J., and Kessels, R.P.C. (2016). Transfer and maintenance effects of online working memory training in normal ageing and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 783–809.10.1080/09602011.2015.1048694Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Vinogradov, S. (2017). The golden age of computational psychiatry is within sight. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, Article 0047.10.1038/s41562-017-0047Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J.-Y. (2016). Designing brain training games and evaluating the usability between young and elderly. 3rd Int. Conf. on Info. Science and Control Eng. (ICISCE), 8–10 July 2016, pp. 308–312. Published online Nov 2016.10.1109/ICISCE.2016.75Search in Google Scholar

Yong, E. (2016). The weak evidence behind brain-training games. The Atlantic, 2016. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/the-weak-evidence-behind-brain-training-games/502559/. Accessed 3 May 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-05-05
Accepted: 2017-06-29
Published Online: 2017-08-19
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/revneuro-2017-0031/html
Scroll to top button