Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 26, 2018

Art is not special: an assault on the last lines of defense against the naturalization of the human mind

Martin Skov and Marcos Nadal

Abstract

The assumption that human cognition requires exceptional explanations holds strong in some domains of behavioral and brain sciences. Scientific aesthetics in general, and neuroaesthetics in particular, abound with claims for art-specific cognitive or neural processes. This assumption fosters a conceptual structure disconnected from other fields and biases the sort of processes to be studied. More generally, assuming that art is special is to cling to the idea that some aspect of our species’ mental constitution makes us unique, special, and meaningful. This assumption continues to relegate scientific aesthetics to the periphery of science and hampers a naturalized view of the human mind.

References

Bartra, O., McGuire, J.T., and Kable, J.W. (2013). The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76, 412–427.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.06323507394 Search in Google Scholar

Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology (New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts). Search in Google Scholar

Berridge, K.C. and Kringelbach, M.L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 86, 646–664.10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.01825950633 Search in Google Scholar

Berridge, K.C., Robinson, T.E., and Aldridge, J.W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 9, 65–73.10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 Search in Google Scholar

Bohn, M., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2015). Communication about absent entities in great apes and human infants. Cognition 145, 63–72.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.00926319970 Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, and Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage 58, 250–258.2169998710.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012 Search in Google Scholar

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R.E., and Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1243–1249.10.1093/cercor/bhi00715616133 Search in Google Scholar

Changeux, J.-P. (1994). Art and neuroscience. Leonardo 27, 189–201.10.2307/1576051 Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 53–62.10.1162/jocn.2010.2145720175677 Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. and Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1369, 172–194.2703789810.1111/nyas.13035 Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, J.F. (2017). Pleasure junkies all around! Why it matters and why ‘the arts’ might be the answer: a biopsychological perspective. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20162837.10.1098/rspb.2016.2837 Search in Google Scholar

Cross, E.S., Hamilton, A.F.C., and Grafton, S.T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31, 1257–1267.1653042910.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033 Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience (New York, CT: Minton, Balch and Company). Search in Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1962). Mankind Evolving. The Evolution of the Human Species (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Search in Google Scholar

Fechner, G.T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik (Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf und Härtel). Search in Google Scholar

Heilbronner, S.R. (2017). Modeling risky decision-making in nonhuman animals: shared core features. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 16, 23–29.10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.03.00128523287 Search in Google Scholar

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The Human Advantage. A New Understanding of How Our Brain Became Remarkable (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Search in Google Scholar

Ishizu, T. and Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One 6, e21852.10.1371/journal.pone.0021852 Search in Google Scholar

Kirsch, L.P., Urgesi, C., and Cross, E.S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 62, 56–68.2669802010.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005 Search in Google Scholar

Kivy, P. (2012). What really happened in the eighteenth century: the ‘modern system’ re-examined (again). Br. J. Aesthet. 52, 61–74.10.1093/aesthj/ayr046 Search in Google Scholar

Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science 354, 110–114.10.1126/science.aaf811027846501 Search in Google Scholar

Levy, D.J. and Glimcher, P.W. (2012). The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 1027–1038.10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.00122766486 Search in Google Scholar

Mansouri, F.A., Egner, T., and Buckley, M.J. (2017). Monitoring demands for executive control: shared functions between human and nonhuman primates. Trends Neurosci. 40, 15–27.10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.00127986294 Search in Google Scholar

Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., and Koelsch, S. (2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 1–58. Search in Google Scholar

O’Doherty, J.P., Cockburn, J., and Pauli, W.M. (2017). Learning, reward, decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 68, 68–73. Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, M.T., Zaidel, D.W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., and Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 265–279.2699327810.1177/1745691615621274 Search in Google Scholar

Pelowski, M., Markey, P.S., Lauring, J.O., and Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: an update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 160.27199697 Search in Google Scholar

Pelowski, M., Markey, P.S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., and Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me…delight my eyes and brain: the Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Phys. Life Rev. 21, 80–125.10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.00328347673 Search in Google Scholar

Santayana, G. (1904). What is aesthetics? Phil. Rev. 13, 320–327.10.2307/2176284 Search in Google Scholar

Santos, L.R. and Rosati, A.G. (2015). The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 66, 321–347.10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015310 Search in Google Scholar

Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data. Phys. Rev. 95, 853–951. Search in Google Scholar

Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B., and Dreher, J.-C. (2013). Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 681–696.2341570310.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.002 Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, D.J. and Newport, E.L. (2006). Mechanisms underlying language acquisition: benefits from a comparative approach. Infancy 9, 241–257.10.1207/s15327078in0902_8 Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (1999). Art and the brain. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 76–96. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-12
Accepted: 2017-10-30
Published Online: 2018-01-26
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston