Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 26, 2018

Art is not special: an assault on the last lines of defense against the naturalization of the human mind

  • Martin Skov EMAIL logo and Marcos Nadal


The assumption that human cognition requires exceptional explanations holds strong in some domains of behavioral and brain sciences. Scientific aesthetics in general, and neuroaesthetics in particular, abound with claims for art-specific cognitive or neural processes. This assumption fosters a conceptual structure disconnected from other fields and biases the sort of processes to be studied. More generally, assuming that art is special is to cling to the idea that some aspect of our species’ mental constitution makes us unique, special, and meaningful. This assumption continues to relegate scientific aesthetics to the periphery of science and hampers a naturalized view of the human mind.


Bartra, O., McGuire, J.T., and Kable, J.W. (2013). The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 76, 412–427.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology (New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts).Search in Google Scholar

Berridge, K.C. and Kringelbach, M.L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 86, 646–664.10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Berridge, K.C., Robinson, T.E., and Aldridge, J.W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 9, 65–73.10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bohn, M., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2015). Communication about absent entities in great apes and human infants. Cognition 145, 63–72.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, and Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage 58, 250–258.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R.E., and Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1243–1249.10.1093/cercor/bhi007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Changeux, J.-P. (1994). Art and neuroscience. Leonardo 27, 189–201.10.2307/1576051Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 53–62.10.1162/jocn.2010.21457Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chatterjee, A. and Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1369, 172–194.10.1111/nyas.13035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Christensen, J.F. (2017). Pleasure junkies all around! Why it matters and why ‘the arts’ might be the answer: a biopsychological perspective. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20162837.10.1098/rspb.2016.2837Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cross, E.S., Hamilton, A.F.C., and Grafton, S.T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31, 1257–1267.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience (New York, CT: Minton, Balch and Company).Search in Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1962). Mankind Evolving. The Evolution of the Human Species (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Fechner, G.T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik (Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf und Härtel).Search in Google Scholar

Heilbronner, S.R. (2017). Modeling risky decision-making in nonhuman animals: shared core features. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 16, 23–29.10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.03.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The Human Advantage. A New Understanding of How Our Brain Became Remarkable (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).10.7551/mitpress/9780262034258.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ishizu, T. and Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One 6, e21852.10.1371/journal.pone.0021852Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kirsch, L.P., Urgesi, C., and Cross, E.S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 62, 56–68.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kivy, P. (2012). What really happened in the eighteenth century: the ‘modern system’ re-examined (again). Br. J. Aesthet. 52, 61–74.10.1093/aesthj/ayr046Search in Google Scholar

Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science 354, 110–114.10.1126/science.aaf8110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Levy, D.J. and Glimcher, P.W. (2012). The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 1027–1038.10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mansouri, F.A., Egner, T., and Buckley, M.J. (2017). Monitoring demands for executive control: shared functions between human and nonhuman primates. Trends Neurosci. 40, 15–27.10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., and Koelsch, S. (2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 1–58.10.1017/S0140525X17000309Search in Google Scholar PubMed

O’Doherty, J.P., Cockburn, J., and Pauli, W.M. (2017). Learning, reward, decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 68, 68–73.10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044216Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Pearce, M.T., Zaidel, D.W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., and Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 265–279.10.1177/1745691615621274Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Pelowski, M., Markey, P.S., Lauring, J.O., and Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: an update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 160.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Pelowski, M., Markey, P.S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., and Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me…delight my eyes and brain: the Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Phys. Life Rev. 21, 80–125.10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Santayana, G. (1904). What is aesthetics? Phil. Rev. 13, 320–327.10.2307/2176284Search in Google Scholar

Santos, L.R. and Rosati, A.G. (2015). The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 66, 321–347.10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015310Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data. Phys. Rev. 95, 853–951.10.1152/physrev.00023.2014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B., and Dreher, J.-C. (2013). Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 681–696.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Weiss, D.J. and Newport, E.L. (2006). Mechanisms underlying language acquisition: benefits from a comparative approach. Infancy 9, 241–257.10.1207/s15327078in0902_8Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (1999). Art and the brain. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 76–96.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-12
Accepted: 2017-10-30
Published Online: 2018-01-26
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button