Abstract
Mainstream economic analysis of Tort Law assumes that efficiency cannot be formally assured by allocating liability according to causal apportioning. In this paper we will present some ways to escape from the full scope of this claim. We start by reviewing the standard conception of causality in the economic analysis of Tort Law, to show how some underlying assumptions influence the currently held view on the relation between causal apportioning and efficiency. Then, we revisit those assumptions to see how plausible they actually are. In the light of this discussion we introduce an alternative framework of causal reasoning in Tort Law. We will show how our model yields a way of allocating liability in terms of a causal apportioning rule. The outcomes obtained through this procedure are closer to efficiency than those prescribed by the mainstream.
References
Acciarri, H. 2009. La Relación de Causalidad y las Funciones del Derecho de Daños. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.Search in Google Scholar
Aumann, R., and M. Maschler. 1985. “Game Theoretic Analysis of a Bankruptcy Problem from the Talmud,” 36 Journal of Economic Theory 195–213.10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4Search in Google Scholar
Brams, S., and A. Taylor. 1996: Fair Division: from Cake Cutting to Dispute Resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598975Search in Google Scholar
Brown, J.P. 1973. “Toward an Economic Theory of Liability,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 323–350.10.1086/467501Search in Google Scholar
Calabresi, G. 1970. The Costs of Accidents. A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carbonara, E., A. Guerra, and F. Parisi. 2014. “Sharing Residual Liability: ‘Cheapest Cost Avoider’ Revisited”, 13–47 Legal Studies Research Paper Series University of Minnesota.10.2139/ssrn.2287209Search in Google Scholar
Gilles, S., 1992. “Rule-Based Negligence and the Regulation of Activity Levels,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 319–63.10.1086/467909Search in Google Scholar
Hart, H., and Honoré, T.. 1985. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Second Edition.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, D., and Aickin, M. 1984. “A Comment on Causal Apportionment,” 13 Journal of Legal Studies 191–208.10.1086/467739Search in Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. 1986. “Terms of Reference: Singular Confusion about Multiple Causation,” 15 Journal of Legal Studies 427–436.10.1086/467821Search in Google Scholar
Landes, W., and R. Posner. 1983. “Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach,” 12 Journal of Legal Studies 109–134.10.1086/467716Search in Google Scholar
Landes, W., and R. Posner. 1987. The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674864030Search in Google Scholar
Mackie, J.L. 1980. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198246420.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mas-Collel, A., M. Whinston, and J. Green. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Parisi, F., and V. Fon. 2004. “Comparative Causation,” 6 American Law and Economics Review 345–368.10.1093/aler/ahh011Search in Google Scholar
Parisi, F., and R. Singh. 2010. “The Efficiency of Comparative Causation,” 6 Review of Law and Economics 219–245.10.2202/1555-5879.1400Search in Google Scholar
Rizzo, M., and F. Arnold. 1980. “Causal Apportionment in Tort Law: An Economic Theory,” 80 Columbia Law Review 1399–1429.10.2307/1122170Search in Google Scholar
Rizzo, M., and F. Arnold. 1986. “Causal Apportionment: Reply to the Critics,” 15 Journal of Legal Studies 219–226.10.1086/467811Search in Google Scholar
Salvador-Coderch, P., Garoupa, N., and C. Gómez Liguerre. 2004. “Scope of Liability, the Vanishing Distinction between Negligence and Strict Liability”, 6 Latin American and Caribbean Law and Economics Association Annual Papers, http://repositories.cdlib.org/bple/alacde/6.Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.T. 2000. “Causation Under US Law”, in Spier, J., ed. Unification of Tort Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law.Search in Google Scholar
Shavell, S. 1980. “Strict Liability versus Negligence,” 9 Journal of Legal Studies 1–25.10.4324/9781315188133-5Search in Google Scholar
Shavell, S. 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674043510Search in Google Scholar
Singh, R. 2002. “Causation, Economic Efficiency and the Law of Torts”, 102 Centre for Development Economics, Dehli School of Economics working paper, http://www.cdedse.org/pdf/work102.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Spier, J. (ed.). 2000. Unification of Tort Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law.Search in Google Scholar
Strassfeld, R. 1992. “Causal Comparisons,” 60 Fordham Law Review 913–951.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, R. 1985. “Actual Causation vs. Probabilistic Linkage: The Bane of Economic Analysis,” 14 Journal of Legal Studies 435–456.10.1086/467780Search in Google Scholar
Wright, R. 1988. “Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts,” 73 Iowa Law Review 1001–1077.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
