Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg December 19, 2017

Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective

Benjamin Käfer
From the journal Review of Economics

Abstract

The aim of this survey article is to discuss P2P lending, a subcategory of crowdfunding, from a (financial stability) risk perspective. The discussion focuses on a number of dimensions such as the role of soft information, herding, platform default risk, liquidity risk, and the institutionalization of P2P markets. Overall, we conclude that P2P lending is more risky than traditional banking. However, it is important to recognize that a constant conclusion would be misleading. P2P platforms have evolved and changed their appearance markedly over time, which implies that although our final conclusion of increased riskiness through P2P markets remains valid over time, it is based on different arguments at different points in time.

References

Agrawal, A. K., C. Catalini and A. Goldfarb (2014): Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding, Innovation Policy and the Economy 14, 63–97.10.1086/674021Search in Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A. (1970): The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500.10.2307/1879431Search in Google Scholar

Baker, T. (2015): Marketplace Lenders are a Systemic Risk, American Banker, August 17, http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/marketplace-lenders-are-a-systemic-risk-1076047-1.html?zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1 (accessed January 16, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Belleflamme, P., N. Omrani and M. Peitz (2015): The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms, Information Economics and Policy 33, 11–28.10.1016/j.infoecopol.2015.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Borello, G., V. De Crescenzo and F. Pichler (2015): The Funding Gap and the Role of Financial Return Crowdfunding: Some Evidence from European Platforms, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce 20, 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Cortese, A. (2014): Loans That Avoid Banks? Maybe Not, The New York Times, May 3.Search in Google Scholar

Deutsche Bundesbank. (2015): Die Ertragslage Der Deutschen Kreditinstitute Im Jahr 2014. Monatsbericht, September, 43–77.Search in Google Scholar

Devasabai, K. (2014): A Loan in the Dark, Risk magazine, October, 18–26.Search in Google Scholar

Dorfleitner, G., C. Priberny, S. Schuster, J. Stoiber, M. Weber, I. De Castro and J. Kammler (2016): Description-Text Related Soft Information in Peer-To-Peer Lending – Evidence from Two Leading European Platforms, Journal of Banking and Finance 64, 169–187.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.009Search in Google Scholar

EBA (2015): Opinion of the European Banking Authority on Lending-Based Crowdfunding, European Banking Authority, EBA-Op-2015-03.Search in Google Scholar

The Economist (2015): From the People, for the People – But Will Financial Democracy Work in a Downturn? May 9.Search in Google Scholar

Emekter, R., Y. Tu, B. Jirasakuldech and M. Lu (2015): Evaluating Credit Risk and Loan Performance in Online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending, Applied Economics 47, 54–70.10.1080/00036846.2014.962222Search in Google Scholar

Everett, C. R. (2015): Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending, Banking and Finance Review 7, 15–54.10.2139/ssrn.1114428Search in Google Scholar

FCA (2015): A Review of the Regulatory Regime for Crowdfunding and the Promotion of Non-Readily Realisable Securities by Other Media, UK Financial Conduct Authority, February.Search in Google Scholar

Freedman, S. and G. Z. Jin (2008): Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.Com, NET Institute Working Paper No. 08-43, November.10.2139/ssrn.1936057Search in Google Scholar

GAO (2011): Person-To-Person Lending: New Regulatory Challenges Could Emerge as the Industry Grows, United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-11-613, July.Search in Google Scholar

Gorton, G. (2010): Slapped by the Invisible Hand: Banking and the Panic of 2007. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.2139/ssrn.1401882Search in Google Scholar

Greiner, M. (2013): Determinants and Consequences of Herding in P2P Lending Markets, Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, August 15–17.Search in Google Scholar

Herzenstein, M., U. M. Dholakia and R. L. Andrews (2011): Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions, Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, 27–36.10.1016/j.intmar.2010.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrand, T., M. Puri and J. Rocholl (2010): Skin in the Game in the Originate-to-Distribute Model: Evidence from the Online Social Lending Market, Working Paper. http://www.suomenpankki.fi/en/tutkimus/konferenssit/konferenssit_tyopajat/Documents/CEPR2010/CEPR2010_HildebrandPuriRocholl_paper.pdf (accessed March 21, 2016)Search in Google Scholar

IMF (2015): Statistical Appendix. International Monetary Fund Global Financial Stability Report: Navigating Monetary Policy Challenges and Managing Risks, April.10.5089/9781498344265.007Search in Google Scholar

Iyer, R., A. I. Khwaja, E. F. P. Luttmer and K. Shue (2010): Inferring Asset Quality: Determining Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending Markets, Working Paper. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/akhwaja/papers/Prosper_20100728_complete.pdf (accessed March 21, 2016)Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, P. (2013): Shadow Banking and New Lending Channels – Past and Future, in: M. Balling and E. Gnan (eds) 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges. Vienna: Larcier, 377–414.Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, E. and S. Worner (2014): Crowd-Funding: An Infant Industry Growing Fast, Staff Working Paper of the IOSCO Research Department 3/2014, February.Search in Google Scholar

Leland, H. E. and D. H. Pyle (1977): Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation, The Journal of Finance 32, 371–387.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03277.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lenz, R. (2016): Peer-to-Peer Lending – Opportunities and Risks, European Journal of Risk Regulation 7, 688–700.10.1017/S1867299X00010126Search in Google Scholar

Lin, M., N. R. Prabhala and S. Viswanathan (2013): Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending, Management Science 59, 17–35.10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Y., B. Gu, Q. Ye and Z. Sheng (2012): Social Influence and Defaults in Peer-to-Peer Lending Networks, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems and Technology, Orlando.Search in Google Scholar

Luo, B. and Z. Lin (2013): A Decision Tree Model for Herd Behavior and Empirical Evidence from the Online P2P Lending Market, Information Systems and e-Business Management 11, 141–160.10.1007/s10257-011-0182-4Search in Google Scholar

Magee, J. R. (2011): Peer-to-Peer Lending in the United States: Surviving after Dodd-Frank, North Carolina Banking Institute Journal 15, 139–174.Search in Google Scholar

Michels, J. (2012): Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending, The Accounting Review 87, 1385–1413.10.2308/accr-50159Search in Google Scholar

Nash, R. M. and E. Beardsley (2015): The Future of Finance: The Rise of the New Shadow Bank, Goldman Sachs Equity Research, March 3.Search in Google Scholar

Pope, D. G. and J. R. Sydnor (2011): What’s in a Picture? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper.Com, The Journal of Human Resources 46, 53–92.10.1353/jhr.2011.0025Search in Google Scholar

Price, S. and J. Abou-Jaoude (2014): Directing the Disruptive: Institutional Investors and the Secondary Market in Peer-to-Peer Loans, Cass-Capco Institute Paper Series on Risk No. 40.Search in Google Scholar

Rajan, R. G. (2005): Has Financial Development Made the World Riskier? Proceedings of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economics Symposium, 313—369.10.3386/w11728Search in Google Scholar

Ravina, E. (2012): Love & Loans – The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets, Working Paper, Columbia University.10.2139/ssrn.1107307Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H.-W. (1988): Gedanken Zur Volkswirtschaftlichen Bedeutung Des Versicherungswesens, Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 77, 1–27.10.1007/BF03188191Search in Google Scholar

Standard and Poor’s (2014): As Peer-to-Peer Lending Draws Wider Interest, Does Securitization Lie In Its Future? April 30.Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss (1981): Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information, The American Economic Review 71, 393–410.Search in Google Scholar

Verstein, A. (2012): The Misregulation of Person-to-Person Lending, University of California Davis Law Review 45, 445–530.10.2139/ssrn.1823763Search in Google Scholar

Wardrop, R., R. Rosenberg, B. Zhang, T. Ziegler, R. Squire, J. Burton, E. Arenas Hernandez and K. Garvey (2016): Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, Cambrige Centre for Alternative Finance https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative-finance/downloads/2016-americas-alternative-finance-benchmarking-report.pdf (accessed Fegruary 19, 2017)Search in Google Scholar

Wei, S. (2015): Internet Lending in China: Status Quo, Potential Risks and Regulatory Options, Computer Law & Security Review 31, 793–809.10.1016/j.clsr.2015.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Yan, J., W. Yu and J. L. Zhao (2015): How Signaling and Search Costs Affect Information Asymmetry in P2P Lending: The Economics of Big Data, Financial Innovation 1, 1–11.10.1186/s40854-015-0018-1Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., R. Wardrop, R. Rau and M. Gray (2015): Moving Mainstream: The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, University of Cambridge and EY.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. and P. Liu (2012): Rational Herding in Microloan Markets, Management Science 58, 892–912.10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-12-19
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow