Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 12, 2018

Ten forms of recognition and misrecognition in long-term care for older people

Arto Laitinen and Jari Pirhonen
From the journal SATS

Abstract

During recent decades, theories of mutual recognition have been intensively debated in social philosophy. According to one of the main theorists in the field, Axel Honneth, the entire social world may be based on interpersonal recognition (such as mutual respect, esteem and care). Our aim is to study what it would take that residents in long-term care would become adequately interpersonally recognized. We also examine who could be seen as bearing the responsibility for providing such recognition. In this paper, we distinguish ten aspects of recognition. We suggest that in order to support residents’ dignity, long-term care should be arranged in a way that preserves residents’ full personhood regardless of their cognitive or other abilities: the mere fact that they are human persons is a ground for recognition as a person. But further, in good care residents’ personal characteristics and residents’ ties to significant others are also recognized to enable them to feel loved, esteemed and respected.

References

Agich, George J. 2003. Dependence and autonomy in old Age. An ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511545801Search in Google Scholar

Antaki, Charles & Sue Widdicombe. 1998. Identities in talk. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1925. Nicomachean Ethics, translated by W.D. Ross. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html. (Accessed 18 October 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Barry, Monica. 2016. On the cusp of recognition: Using critical theory to promote desistance among young offenders. Theoretical Criminology 20(1). 91–106.10.1177/1362480615586613Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 1996. Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario: California Association for Bilingual Education.Search in Google Scholar

Degnen, Cathrine. 2007. Minding the gap: The construction of old age and oldness amongst peers. Journal of Aging Studies 21(1). 69–80.10.1016/j.jaging.2006.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, Ricca. 2009. Wisdom: A humanist approach to valuing older people. In R. Edmondson & H. J. von Kondratowitz (eds.), Valuing older people. A humanist approach to ageing, 201–215. Bristol: The Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847422927.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Ellison, Ralph. 1952. The invisible man. Toronto: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Finlex 2012. Act on supporting the functional capacity of the older population and on social and health services for older persons. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2012/en20120980. (Accessed 22 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Foner, Nancy. 1994. The caregiving dilemma: Work in an American nursing home. Berkeley and Los Angeles CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Foner, Nancy. 1995. Relatives as Trouble: Nursing Home Aides and Patients’ Families. In J. N. Henderson & M. D. Vesperi (eds.), The culture of long-term care: Nursing home ethnography, 165–178. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy & Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition?: A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.10.1002/9780470756119.ch54Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice. Power and ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber F. 2012. Living and dying at Murray Manor. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. 1991. Elements of the philosophy of right. A. H. Woods, ed.; H. B. Nisbet, tr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, (Berlin, 1821).10.1017/CBO9780511808012Search in Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. 1995. The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. 2001. Invisibility. On the epistemology of recognition. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75(1). 111–126.10.1111/1467-8349.00081Search in Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2002. On the genus and species of recognition. Inquiry 45(4). 447–462.10.1080/002017402320947540Search in Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2009. Personhood and the social inclusion of people with disabilities. A recognition-theoretical approach. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas & T. Shakespeare (eds.), Arguing about disability, 77–92. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki & Arto Laitinen (eds.). 2007. Dimensions of personhood. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki & Arto Laitinen (eds.). 2011. Recognition and social ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004202900.i-398Search in Google Scholar

Jolanki, Outi. 2009. Fate of choice?-Talking about old age and health. Tampere: Tampere University Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847422927.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

King, Jennifer, Lindsey Yourman, Cyrus Ahalt, Catherine Eng, Sara J. Knight, Eliseo J. Perez-Stable & Alexander K. Smith. 2012. Quality of life in late-life disability: ‘I Don’t Feel Bitter Because I am in a Wheelchair’. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 60(3). 569–576.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03844.xSearch in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. 2002. Interpersonal recognition: A response to value or a precondition of personhood?. Inquiry: An Interdiciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45(4). 463–478.10.1080/002017402320947559Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. 2010. On the scope of recognition: The role of adequate regard and mutuality. In H-C. Schmidt Am Busch & C. F. Zurn (eds.), The philosophy of recognition. Historical and contemporary perspectives, 319–342. Lanham: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto, Marketta Niemelä & Jari Pirhonen. 2016. Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition-theoretical approach. In Johanna Seibt et al. (eds.), What social robots can and should do, 155–163. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto & Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds). 2015. Solidarity – Theory and practice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. Originally published as Totalité et infini: essai sur l'extériorité, (La Haye, 1961).Search in Google Scholar

Lindemann, Thomas & Erik Ringmar (eds.). 2012. The international politics of recognition. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Lysaker, Odin & Jonas Jakobsen (eds.). 2015. Recognition and freedom: Axel Honneths political thought. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent rational animals. Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Peru, Il: Carus Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Margalit, Avishai. 1998. The decent society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels. 1978. Basic writings on politics and philosophy. Glasgow: William Collins and Co. Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2008 National framework for high-quality services for older people. http://www.stm.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=39503&name=DLFE-6710.pdf. (Accessed 24 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftwSearch in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2009. The capabilities of people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy 40(3–4). 331–351.10.1002/9781444322781.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061200Search in Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek. 1991. Equality or priority?. Lawrence: Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1958. Definitions of health and Illness in the light of American values and social structure. In E.G. Jaco (ed.), Patients, physicians and Illness: Sourcebook in behavioral science and medicine, 165–187. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pirhonen, Jari. 2015. Dignity and the capabilities approach in long-term care for older people. Nursing Philosophy 161. 29–39.10.1111/nup.12057Search in Google Scholar

Pirhonen, Jari. 2017. Good human life in assisted living for older people: What the residents are able to do and be. Tampere: University of Tampere. http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/101042.Search in Google Scholar

Pirhonen, Jari, Hanna Ojala, Kirsi Lumme-Sandt & Ilkka Pietilä. 2015. Old but not that old. Finnish community-dwelling 90+ aged persons negotiating their autonomy. Ageing and Society 36(8). 1625–1644.10.1017/S0144686X15000525Search in Google Scholar

Pirhonen, Jari & Ilkka Pietilä. 2016. Perceived resident-facility fit and sense of control in assisted living. Journal of Aging Studies 38. 47–56.10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Pirhonen, Jari, Elisa Tiilikainen & Ilkka Pietilä. 2017. Ruptures of affiliation: Social isolation in assisted living for older people. Ageing and Society 14. doi:10.1017/S0144686X17000289.Search in Google Scholar

Portacolone, Elena. 2011. The myth of independence for older Americans living alone in the bay area of San Francisco: A critical reflection. Ageing and Society 31(5). 803–828.10.1017/S0144686X10001169Search in Google Scholar

Quante, Michael. 2002. Personales Leben und menschlicher Tod. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2009. Contributive justice and meaningful work. Res Publica 15(1). 1–16.10.1007/s11158-008-9077-8Search in Google Scholar

Schafer, Markus H., Sarah A. Mustillo & Kenneth F. Ferraro. 2013. Age and the Tenses of Life Satisfaction. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 68(4). 571–579.10.1093/geronb/gbt038Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.). 2010. The philosophy of recognition. Historical and contemporary perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1980. Equality of what? In S.M. McMurrin (ed.), Tanner lectures on human values, 197–220. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1995. The politics of recognition. In Taylor & Charles (eds.), Philosophical arguments, 225–256. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, Jean, Mary Godfrey & Tracy Denby. 2006. Heroines, Villains and Victims: Older people’s perceptions of others. Ageing and Society 26(6). 883–900.10.1017/S0144686X06005149Search in Google Scholar

van Den Brink, Bert & David Owen (eds). 2007. Recognition and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498732Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Voswinkel, Stephan. 2012. Admiration without appreciation? The paradoxes of recognition of doubly subjectivised work. In N. H. Smith & J-P. Deranty (eds.), New philosophies of labour: Work and the social bond, 273–299. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Lorna & Amanda Clarke. 2009. ‘Woo-hoo, what a ride!’ Older people, life stories and active ageing. In R. Edmondson & H. J. von Kondratowitz, Valuing older people. A humanist approach to ageing, 233–248. Bristol: The Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847422927.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Weatherson, Brian. 2016. “The problem of the many”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy Winter 2016 Edition, Edward N. Zalta ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/problem-of-many/.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-12
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow