Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 30, 2020

Against Ethical Exceptionalism – Through Critical Reflection on the History of Use of the Terms ‘Ethics’ and ‘Morals’ in Philosophy

Hans Fink
From the journal SATS

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to support contextual ethics as a broad and open understanding of ethics and the ethical by commenting on the origin of the words ‘ethics’ and ‘ethical’ in Greek philosophy and on the ambiguities built into them from the beginning. I further list some complexities that arose when the Latinate words ‘morals’ and ‘moral’ began to be used in Roman, medieval and modern philosophy, sometimes as synonyms of and sometimes in contrast to ‘ethics’ and ‘ethical’. Finally, I return to discuss the prospects of contextual ethics in the context of developments in moral philosophy in the twentieth century, adding some pragmatist arguments in its favour.


Corresponding author: Hans Fink, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, E-mail:

References

For works by Homer and Hobbes, for works by Homer, Hesiod, Plato, Aristotle, Diogenes Laertius, Augustin, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Hegel and Mill, references are given by standard notation.

Other Works Referred to:

Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Cassin, B., ed. 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables. A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton and London: Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Crary, A. 2016. Inside Ethics. On the Demands of Moral Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1982(1920). “Reconstruction in Philosophy.” In Middle Works of John Dewey, 12, edited by J. A. Boydston, 77–202. Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Fink, H. 2006. “Three Sorts of Naturalism.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2): 202–21. Search in Google Scholar

Fink, H. 2012. “Hvad er etik, egentlig?.” In Filosofi og etik (Aalborg, Aalborg Universitetsforlag), edited by U. Thøgersen, and B. Troelsen, 15–27. Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 2001. “On the Pragmatic, the Ethical and the Moral Employments of Practical Reasons.” In Justification and Application, edited by J. Habermas, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, J., K. Gründer, and G. Gabriel, eds. 1970–2007. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Basel, Schabe AG. Search in Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1886. Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers, 6th ed. London: Macmillan. 1962. Search in Google Scholar

Singer, P., ed. 1994. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Social Morality and Personal Ideal.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, edited by P. F. Strawson, 29–49. London: Methuen. Search in Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. 1963. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, C. 2000. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots, 2nd ed. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-30
Published in Print: 2020-11-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston