Use of polypropylene fibres to increase the resistance of reinforcement to chloride corrosion in concretes

Concrete with the addition of polypropylene fibres is more cohesive and has better adhesion, deformability and tightness because the fibres “bind” the concrete matrix together and prevent large pores from forming in the concrete mix and limit the formation and spread of shrinkage cracks. Therefore, it can be assumed that polypropylene fibres affect the effectiveness of the concrete cover as a layer protecting steel bars against corrosion. This article presents the results of tests allowing us to estimate the effect of addition of polypropylene fibres on the reduction of reinforcing bars corrosion in concrete caused by the action of chlorides. Evaluation of the degree of corrosion of the reinforcement was analysed using the electrochemical polarisationgalvanostatic pulse technique. Theuseof suchamethod allowed for the quantitative estimation of the effect of the addition of polypropylenefibre on the reduction of corrosion activity of the reinforcement in concrete.


Introduction
Research on concretes with randomly dispersed microreinforcement fibres has been conducted for decades, including concretes with the addition of polypropylene fibres (polymer fiber reinforced concrete (PFRC)) [1][2][3]. Many properties of this composite have been recognized, investigated and described [4][5][6][7][8]. The properties and application scope of polymer fibres are covered by PN-EN 14889-2:2007 [9]. However, this issue is still relevant, as evidenced by the latest publications from recent months. They mainly concern the mechanical properties of the PFRC [10][11][12][13], as well as rheological ones, especially analysed in the context of using fibre-reinforced concrete for repair [14]. In recent years, particular attention has also been paid to the analysis of the effectiveness of fibres in the context of resistance to high temperatures [15][16][17]. Although concrete is a material with high thermal resistance, the addition of polypropylene fibres additionally protects the structure during a fireit extends the time to save people and delays the spread of the fire. Moreover, randomly dispersed reinforcement fibres prevent concrete spattering during fire exposure [18,19]. Concrete with dispersed reinforcement is a "quasi-plastic" and "quasi-uniform" material, so it has better adhesion, deformability and tightness, as well as higher early strength, which is important for structures exposed to aggressive environmental impact, i.e. bridges, tunnels, viaducts, car parks, thin-walled elements (tanks and basins), weirs, retaining walls, elements subjected to dynamic loads, concrete surfaces, industrial floors, as well as for repairs of such structures. The randomly dispersed fibres in the concrete mix reduce stress concentrations and thus limit cracking [20,21]. Concrete with the addition of fibres is more cohesive as the fibres "bind" the concrete matrix together and prevent large pores from forming in the concrete mix and limit the formation and spread of shrinkage cracks that develop during the setting and final setting of the concrete. When added to a fresh concrete mix, they act as micro-reinforcement to reduce plastic shrinkage and limit the formation of shrinkage cracks in hardened concrete. Adding fibres to the concrete mix further aerates the concrete, which improves its frost resistance. The fibres are completely chemically inert, do not affect the hydration rate or the setting final time of the concrete, and do not require a change in the proportions of its components. They act purely mechanically. Zych [22] found that the addition of polypropylene fibres slightly increased the absorbability. However, the author does not state this definitively and suggests that more thorough research needs to be done. On the other hand, Kątna [23] shows that polypropylene fibres reduce absorbability. The effect of the addition of polypropylene fibres on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete mixes was studied by Sun and Xu [24]. They made observations of the microstructure and transition zone of concrete mixes under a scanning electron microscope. The described studies show that the proportion of microcracks in concrete mixes and the size and content of microcracks in the transition zone decrease with the addition of fibres. There are also ongoing studies on the workability of a concrete mix with the addition of polypropylene fibres. Although it has been established that the optimum addition of polypropylene fibres to concrete mixes should be 0.6-0.9 kg/m 3 , the authors in ref. [25] indicate the influence of the share of fibres on workability. The addition of fibres to the concrete reduces the workability of the mix, which is obviously a disadvantage and necessitates the adoption of certain modifications to the mix recipe [26,27]. It is necessary to use plasticizers and fluidizing admixtures, the water/cement ratio should not be less than 0.55, and the aggregate grain diameter should not exceed 16 mm (or even 8 mm in thin elements) [28]. It should also be remembered that the addition of fibres to the concrete increases the cost of the mixture by about 4-6%.
Despite so many publications on concretes with randomly dispersed polypropylene fibres, a few of them were aimed at assessing the effect of the addition of fibres on improving the properties of concretes as a layer protecting reinforcement against corrosion [20,29,30]. The above-mentioned objects, in which polypropylene fibres are added to the construction of reinforced concrete structural elements, are usually exposed to negative environmental influences, which often lead to the initiation and development of the corrosion process, including chloride corrosion. The publications on this subject mainly describe the indirect effect of fibres on the reduction of corrosion in concrete, i.e. the reduction of shrinkage or crack formation [31]. However, there are no quantitative data on how micro-reinforcement in the form of polypropylene fibres limits the corrosive activity of the reinforcement in concrete. Therefore it is worth assessing whether the addition of polypropylene fibres to concrete, despite their possible slight effect on increasing water absorption, but at the same time clearly limiting shrinkage (both plastic and drying shrinkage), will improve the performance of the concrete cover as a layer protecting the rebar against corrosion. This is a very important issue because reinforcement corrosion degree assessment and the corrosion progress prediction are, from the point of view of determining the structural durability, crucial [32][33][34]. This is of particular importance in the case of industrial and engineering facilities, which are usually operated under conditions of increased corrosive aggressiveness of the environment.
One of the main causes of reinforcement corrosion, besides the carbonation of concrete, is chloride corrosion [35,36]. Chloride ions dissolved in water (Cl − ) penetrate deep into the pores in the concrete structure, which is often related to the use of de-icing agents in winter containing NaCl and the cyclic freezing and de-icing of liquids in the concrete pores [37,38]. Corrosion centres are formed on the surface of the reinforcement due to electrochemical reactions and the corrosion process develops very quickly [35,36,[39][40][41][42]. In winter, bridge and road structures are mainly exposed to this type of corrosion. However, chloride corrosion also develops on coastal structures sited in the coastal zone, which, irrespective of the season, are affected by the so-called salt spray [43][44][45][46]. It is worth mentioning that the development of chloride corrosion occurs even at high, seemingly safe concrete pH, i.e. pH > 11.8 [47][48][49]. Chloride corrosion [50][51][52][53] is pitting corrosion, which acts punctually and can lead to the bursting of the concrete cover from the inside without any visible changes on the surface of an element. An additional factor increasing the risk of chloride corrosion initiation and development may be any microdefects in the concrete cover, e.g. shrinkage cracks that develop as a result of using the structure in adverse environmental conditions or as a result of recurring freezing and de-freezing of the liquid in winter, which generates stresses causing the concrete to crack. As a result of the microcracks, chloride ions penetrate by diffusion into the concrete cover and damage the passive layer protecting the reinforcement [54,55]. Chloride ions penetrate the concrete cover mainly by diffusion through liquid-filled capillaries. The wetter the environment and the more porous the concrete, with continuous (interconnected) pores, the deeper the ions penetrate with the liquid [36,39,52]. If there are cracks in the concrete, the progression of ion diffusion is even greater [40]. A key factor in protecting the reinforcement against chloride corrosion is therefore the concrete cover made of suitable materials, characterised, among other things, by high tightness, which prevents the penetration of chloride ions [56][57][58][59]. A very good way to limit chloride diffusion is to use so-called blast-furnace cements for concrete production. Unfortunately, concretes with blastfurnace cement are much less resistant to carbonation compared to concretes with Portland cement [49]. Therefore, the use of blast-furnace cement in concrete instead of Portland cement (except where increased resistance to chemical aggression is required) is not always beneficial.
An alternative solution, which may improve the protective properties of the concrete cover against the reinforcement in a chloride corrosion risk situation, may be the addition of synthetic polypropylene micro-reinforcement fibres to the concrete mix. This article presents research aimed at assessing the effect of the addition of polypropylene fibres to concrete on the improvement of concrete cover parameters in the context of its protective role in relation to reinforcement in an aggressive environment of chloride ions.
As already mentioned, despite many publications on polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete, a few of them aimed at assessing the effect of fibre addition on improving the properties of concrete as a layer protecting reinforcement against corrosion. Laboratory tests usually involve either testing the parameters of the fibres or fibre-reinforced concrete, but not steel in the fibre-reinforced concrete. Therefore, it is worth undertaking laboratory tests that will allow us to assess the impact of polypropylene fibres in concrete on reducing the corrosion process of the reinforcement. This article presents the results of such tests.
Measurements were made using the electrochemical polarisation galvanostatic pulse technique. It is one of the few non-destructive methods that allow for a quantitative estimation of the corrosion degree of reinforcement based on the measurements of the corrosion current density [59,60], the only method that allows the simultaneous measurement of three parameters for the assessment of the corrosion risk of reinforcement in concrete [60]. This method allows a relatively simple and quick way to estimate the size of the corrosion probability in the tested specimens and to assess the corrosion activity of the tested reinforcement.
In addition, shrinkage deformation measurements were made and the compressive strength of concrete mixes was determined, with and without fibres.

Galvanostatic pulse technique
Due to the electrochemical nature of the corrosion process of reinforcement in concrete, it is possible to use electrochemical measurement methods to estimate the degree of corrosion of the rebar and to predict the corrosion rate over time under given environmental conditions [59,[61][62][63]. Tests of this type involve measuring certain electrical quantities that indicate an ongoing corrosion process [64][65][66][67]. The tests performed cover measurements of the concrete cover resistivity and measurements of the stationary potential of the reinforcement on the concrete surface of the element, as well as measurements of the corrosion current density of the rebar. The obtained values, after referring them to the limit criteria values ( Table 1), allow one to locate the areas of corrosion with a certain probability (based on the results of the concrete cover resistivity and the stationary reinforcement potential) and to estimate the corrosion activity of the reinforcement (based on the results of the reinforcement corrosion current density). It is also possible to estimate the corrosion rate if Faraday's law relating to the electrochemical equivalent is applied, which states that a corrosion current density of i cor = 1 μA/cm 2 corresponds approximately to a depth of cross-sectional loss of the rebar equal to 11.6 μm/year [60].
Measurements of this type can be made using the polarisation galvanostatic pulse technique. In order to perform such measurements, it is necessary to polarize the tested reinforcement, i.e. to disturb the dynamic equilibrium of the corrosive system, which prevails on the electrode (rebar) immersed in the electrolyte (concrete with pores filled with liquid). In the galvanostatic pulse technique, in order to polarize the rebar and thus excite the flow of electric charges in the corrosive system (which becomes a steel bar immersed in concrete with liquid pores), a current of a certain value should be applied, i.e. generate an electric pulse. Immediately after inducing a charge flow, the corrosion current density should be measured, as well as the stationary potential of the reinforcement and the concrete cover resistivity. Diagrams of the connection of the tested reinforcing bar with a measuring device that allows for this type of measurement are shown in Figure 1. More detailed information on the method used can be found in publications [59,60,68,69]. This article presents the results of measurements performed using the galvanostatic pulse technique with the GP-5000 GalvaPulse TM kit, which allows measurements of the stationary potential of the reinforcement, the concrete cover resistivity and the corrosion current density simultaneously [60].
This article presents the results of the tests performed using the above-mentioned technique that allowed one to determine the differences in the degree of corrosion of the main reinforcement in standard concrete and fibrereinforced concrete with randomly dispersed polypropylene fibres. In order to reflect the impact of the aggressive corrosive environment and to initiate corrosion processes on the reinforcement, the specimens were soaked in a 3% sodium chloride solution. In addition, shrinkage deformations were measured and compressive strength values were determined for concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete specimens.

Testing to assess the degree of reinforcement corrosion
For the main tests to assess the degree of corrosion of the reinforcement in concrete, four specimens were prepared (Figure 2a), including two concrete (C) specimens and two fibre-reinforced concrete (PFC) specimens with the addition of polypropylene fibres in the amount of 0.6 kg per 1 m 3 of concrete mix. The specimens had dimensions  BauCon fibres with the following parameters were used in fibre-reinforced polypropylene concrete specimens: fibre length l w = 12 mm, fibre diameter ∅ 38 μm and shapestraight fibres (Figure 3).
Two parallel ϕ 8 mm diameter ribbed bars of BST 500 steel were placed in each specimen, spaced 70 mm apart from the side edges of the specimen. The assumed cover was 25 mm. The specimens were made under identical laboratory conditions at 20 ± 2°C and 50 ± 5% relative humidity. The specimens were removed from the moulds the day after concreting.
In order to initiate chloride corrosion, the specimens were kept for a period of 50 days in a 3% sodium chloride solution. The specimens were stored in a plastic bath in which the specimens were half submerged and the bath was covered with foil so that half of each specimen with one rebar placed there was directly affected by the sodium chloride solution, while the other half of the specimen with the other rebar was affected by the salt spray. The bath was placed in the laboratory hall at a temperature of 20 ± 2 o C. The main measurementsestimations of the corrosion probability and corrosion activity of the reinforcement included reference measurements (stage: E I) made before soaking the specimens and measurements after taking the specimens out of solution after 50 days of soaking (stage: E II). The tests used the galvanostatic pulse measurement technique and the GP-5000 GalvaPulse TM measurement kit. Measurements of the relevant parameters, i.e. the potential of the stationary reinforcement (E st ) and the concrete cover resistivity (Θ) to estimate the probability of corrosion on the tested surface, as well as a measurement of the corrosion current density (i cor ) to determine the corrosion activity of the bar, were performed for each bar in each specimen at two measurement points. The results obtained (shown  in Table 2) were compared to a database of benchmark results, as summarised in Table 1.

Measurements of shrinkage strain
As accompanying measurements, shrinkage strain measurements were performed on the specimens intended for testing reinforcement corrosion. For this purpose, in two bases located on the side surfaces of the specimens, along the position line of the rebars, benchmarks were glued ( Figure 4) to allow the measurement of shrinkage strains. The shrinkage strain was measured three times: the first time before immersing the specimens in the solution (reference measurement), the second time the day after removing the specimens from the solution (in which the specimens had been for 50 days) and the third time after a further 2 days. A Demec strain gauge manufactured by W.H. Mayes & Son on with a base of 200 mm and an accuracy of 0.002 mm was used for the measurements; the strain gauge constant was 1.6 × 10 −5 . The results from the shrinkage strain measurements are summarised in Table 3.

Testing the compressive strength of concretes
In addition, 18 cubic specimens measuring 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were made to determine compressive strength, including nine concrete specimens and nine fibre-reinforced concrete specimens. Testing specimens for compressive strength was performed 28 days after concreting in accordance with the standard [71]. The specimens were destroyed in a Zwick/ Roell SP-Z6000 testing machine with a maximum compressive force of 6,000 kN. The specimens were loaded continuously until destruction at a loading rate of ∼0.5 MPa/s. The results ( Table 4) were generated in testXpert software compatible with the testing machine.

The degree of reinforcement corrosion
Specimens for estimating the probability of corrosion on the test surface and for assessing the corrosion activity of the reinforcement provided results from 16 measurement points (including 8 points for each type of specimen). The stationary potential of the reinforcement, the concrete cover resistivity and the corrosion current density (E st , Θ, i cor ) were measured at each point. Based on the corrosion current density values, the corrosion rate determining the depth of loss of the rebar cross-section was calculated and given in (μm/year). Measurements were   taken twice: first, reference measurements were taken before immersing the specimens in a 3% sodium chloride solution, and then after 50 days, after removing the specimens from the solution. All results are summarised in Table 2 and presented in graphs (Figures 5-7). The specimen symbols in the table mean: C_air, PFC_airthe halves of the specimens above the solution, while C_sol, PFC_solthe halves of the specimens immersed in the solution, respectively, concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete specimens.
The results obtained are related to the criterion limits shown in Table 1.
The analysis of the results obtained focused on three aspects:  The results of measurements performed using the galvanostatic pulse technique after 50 days of exposure of the specimens to chloride ions by half immersion in a 3% NaCl solution, i.e. partly as a result of the direct action of the solution and partly as a result of salt spray and up to a certain level of capillary action, showed very clearly the impact of this factor on the increased probability of corrosion and the high corrosion activity of the rebars.
The values of the stationary potential of the reinforcement, regardless of whether the specimens were concrete or fibre-reinforced concrete, were E st = −102 to −194 mV at the reference measurement stage, indicating a negligible 5% of corrosion probability (according to Table 1). These values increased significantly after the treatment of the specimens with chlorides. In the concrete specimens, values of E st = −213 to −251 mV were recorded in areas that were immersed in the solution, and in areas above the solution, E st = −399 to −434 mV. Referring to the criteria values given in Table 1, it can be seen that the probability of corrosion increased to 50% in the halves of the specimens immersed in the solution and to 95% in the halves of the specimens above the solution. A similar trend was observed in the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens: the values of the stationary potential of the reinforcement in the halves of the specimens immersed in the solution were E st = −201 to 248 mV, and in the halves above the solution: E st = −397 to −442 mV, which indicated, respectively, 50% and 95% probability of corrosion as in the concrete specimens. In both types of specimens, a clear difference was observed in the values of the measured parameters depending on whether the part of the specimen tested was directly immersed in the solution or above the solution. In contrast, no significant effect was observed with the addition of micro-reinforcement fibres ( Figure 5). Judging by the clear changes in the value of the stationary reinforcement potential, it can be assumed that chloride ions penetrated deep into the concrete cover along its entire thickness, reaching a high concentration at the reinforcement surface [14].
Concrete cover resistivity measurements made after 50 days of storing the specimens in 3% NaCl solution also indicated significant changes with respect to the reference measurements (Table 2, Figure 6). In concrete specimens, the reference measurement values were in the range Θ = 11.4-16.8 kΩ/cm, indicating a medium corrosion probability. In this case, the medium (rather than low) level of probability of corrosion recorded at the reference measurement stage was probably due to the fact that concrete is an unstabilised material in which physical and chemical processes continue to occur long after the mix has set (even for years) and affect the formation of the internal structure of the concrete [47,59]. However, the measurement values taken after 50 days of storing the specimens in solution turned out to be much lower, indicating high corrosion probability: in concrete specimens in halves immersed in solution they were Θ = 1.2-3.8 kΩ/cm, and in halves of specimens above solution, Θ = 3.2-5.5 kΩ/cm. In contrast, in the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens, the resistivity values of the concrete cover varied markedly depending on whether the tested part of the specimen was immersed in the solution (Θ = 7.7-8.9 kΩ/cm), whether this was part of the specimen above the solution (Θ = 1.0-3.2 kΩ/cm). The parts of the specimens that were fully immersed in the solution had significantly higher resistivity. Measurements of the stationary potential of the reinforcement as well as of the concrete cover resistivity can sometimes lead to very misleading conclusions, as shown, among others, in studies [42,56,57]. Therefore, the most reliable results are provided by measurements of the corrosion current density. In the conducted tests, the values of reference measurements of this parameter, irrespective of whether they concerned concrete or fibrereinforced concrete specimens, were within the range i cor = 0.5-1.14 μA/cm 2 , which indicated insignificant corrosion activity of the reinforcement ( Table 1). On the other hand, the measurements taken after 50 days of storing the specimens in solution showed clearly higher values. Similar to the measurements of the previously described parameters: the stationary potential of the reinforcement and the concrete cover resistivity, the values varied depending on whether the tested halves of the specimens were immersed in the solution or were above the solution (Figure 7). In concrete specimens the halves of which were immersed, at most of the measured points the corrosion current density was in the range i cor = 3.67-4.2 μA/cm 2 and only at one point it reached the value i cor = 6.64 μA/cm 2 , which indicated rather a low corrosion activity of the reinforcement, while in the halves of the specimens above the solution it reached values in the range i cor = 7.25-13.65 μA/cm 2 indicating an average corrosion activity of the reinforcement. A similar trend was observed in the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens: the corrosion current density of the reinforcement in the halves of the specimens immersed in the solution was i cor = 3.15-4.49 μA/cm 2 (low corrosion activity of the reinforcement), while in the halves above the solution: i cor = 6.10-10.07 μA/cm 2 (average corrosion activity of the reinforcement). In addition, it can be noted that the results for the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens indicated a lower corrosion activity of the reinforcement than in the concrete specimenswhen comparing the maximum values from both specimen types, the differences reached 30%. These differences indicate that the use of polypropylene fibres in concrete increases the tightness of the concrete cover probably by blocking the formation of an interconnected pore system in the concrete, as well as a more uniform distribution of the concrete mix components.
The corrosion current density measurements made it possible not only to determine the corrosion activity of the reinforcement, but also, after conversion, to estimate the corrosion rate. In the concrete specimens, in those halves that were immersed in the solution, this value indicated a depth of bar section loss of approx. 43-77 μm/year, and in the halves above the solution: 84-158 μm/year. In contrast, these values were slightly lower in the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens and were, respectively, 37-52 μm/year for halves of specimens immersed in the solution and 71-117 μm/year for halves of specimens from the above solution.
Note that the above values predict the corrosion activity of the reinforcement in specimens subjected to constant, aggressive external environmental factors, such as those encountered during the test. If these factors change, the corrosion activity of the reinforcement also changes.
The differences in the values of the parameters that were measured on the same specimens but in their different halves (immersed in the solution and above the solution) indicating that corrosion of the reinforcement is clearly more likely to occur and faster in the parts of the specimens above the solution, are due to the corrosion process itself. Admittedly, the concentration of chloride ions in the solution is probably greater than in the "salt spray" (although this was not measured in the described tests) but for corrosion to develop on the reinforcement, the presence of oxygen, which is contained in the air, is required to penetrate more easily into the concrete cover above the solution [34,35,47].

Shrinkage strain
Linear strains were also measured during the tests. These measurements were made in each specimen (on the two side walls) three times, i.e. before immersing the specimens in the solution (reference measurement), the day after removing the specimens from the solution (in which they had been 50 days) and after another 2 days. On the basis of the performed measurements, the strain increments were calculated in relation to the reference measurements, which are presented in Table 3.
The second contains the values of strain increments obtained from measurements taken on the day after the removal of the specimens from solution referred to the measurements before immersion, and the third column contains the values of the strain increments 2 days later. A minus sign indicates that swelling associated with 50 days storage of specimens in solution has occurred in all specimens. However, the magnitude of the changes varied. Obviously, the magnitude of strains was very much affected by whether the wall of the specimen on which the measuring benchmarks were located was immersed in the solution or was above the solution. Furthermore, the effect of the addition of polypropylene fibres on the values obtained is also evident. In the fibre-reinforced concrete specimens on the walls that were immersed in the solution, the strain increments were on average 47% lower than in the similarly recorded concrete specimens. This confirms the conclusions of the electrochemical tests, which show that the use of polypropylene fibres in concrete has the effect of blocking the formation of a system of interconnected pores and thus limits the extent of penetration of the solution deep into the concrete.

Concrete compressive strength
Concrete compressive strength tests were performed as accompanying tests. The tests were performed on cubic specimens prepared for two types of concrete mixes: concrete without fibres (9 specimens) and concrete with polypropylene fibres (nine specimens). From the results obtained, the mean compressive strength, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated. Specimen compression charts (generated in the testXpert program compatible with the testing machine) are shown in Figure 8 and the values obtained are summarised in Table 4.
The result shows that the addition of polypropylene fibres at a rate of 0.6 kg/m 3 of the concrete mix did not significantly affect its strength parameters. The compressive strength of the fibre-reinforced concrete (PFC) specimens increased by 10% compared to the concrete specimens, and the standard deviation and coefficient of variation were comparable.

Conclusion
The tests presented in this paper were aimed at determining whether randomly dispersed polypropylene fibres in the concrete mix have an effect on improving the properties of the concrete cover as a layer protecting rebar against chloride-induced corrosion.
(1) Based on the results obtained from electrochemical polarisation measurements using the galvanostatic pulse technique, and a comparative analysis performed for concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete specimens, it was found that the addition of 0.6 kg/m 3 polypropylene fibres to the concrete mix reduced corrosion of the reinforcement in the specimens tested. (2) The analysis of the results of the corrosion current density (the most reliable of the three parameters measured by the galvanostatic pulse method) indicated nearly 30% lower corrosion activity of the reinforcement in specimens with the addition of polypropylene fibres than in concrete specimens. At the same time, it means a slower corrosion rate of the reinforcement in specimens with the addition of polypropylene fibres. (3) The results of the concrete cover resistivity measurements showed a positive effect of the fibre addition on increasing the protective role of the concrete cover in relation to the reinforcement. (4) The reinforcement stationary potential measurements gave comparable results in both types of specimens. However, it can be concluded that the addition of fibres did not adversely affect the properties of the concrete cover. (5) On the basis of the performed tests, it was found that the exposure of reinforced concrete specimens to a 3% sodium chloride solution for 50 days has a significant impact on the corrosive activity of the tested bars and significantly increases the likelihood of corrosion development.

(6)
The tests showed that the rods that were placed in the parts of the specimens located above the solution, and not directly in the solution, are more exposed to the development of chloride corrosion. (7) It was found that the addition of polypropylene fibres reduces linear strains in concrete. (8) It was also found that the addition of polypropylene fibres only slightly improves the compressive strength of the specimens.

Conflict of interest:
Author states no conflict of interest.