Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 26, 2018

Iconically modeling a demolition process in the photobook Palast Der Republik

  • Letícia Alves Vitral EMAIL logo and João Queiroz
From the journal Semiotica


Palast der Republik, by the photographer Christoph Rokitta, is an independent photobook published in 2013 in Berlin. In the photobook different semiotic resources are coupled in order to iconically model the demolition of the homonymous building in Berlin. In opposition to the trivial notion of icon as sign that stands for its object in a relation of similarity, we analyze the photobook as an icon whose main feature is the possibility of discovering information about its object through its manipulation. This specific feature is called operational criterion for iconicity, and it stresses the inherent quality of icons of revealing information available through their manipulation and observation. Our aim is to describe and analyze the relations between semiotic resources in this photobook by exploring the operational criterion of iconicity, and models as epistemic artifacts. We are interested in how couplings between semiotic resources in the photobook can iconically model a spatio-temporal process.


Achinstein, Peter. 1965. Theoretical models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16(62) 102–120.10.1093/bjps/XVI.62.102Search in Google Scholar

Ambrosio, Chiara. 2010. Iconicity as homomorphism: The case of Picasso’s Guernica. In: M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen and H. Rydenfelteds, Ideas in action: Proceedings of the applying Peirce conference (Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1), 151–162. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.Search in Google Scholar

Atkin, Albert. 2005. Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 41(1) 161–188.Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa. 2011. How scientific models can explain. Synthese 180(1) 33–45.10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1Search in Google Scholar

Chevalier, Jean-Marie. 2015. The problem of resemblance in Peirce’s semiotics and philosophy. Versus 120. 45–59.Search in Google Scholar

Downes, Stephen M. 1992. The importance of models in theorizing: A deflationary semantic view. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1. 142–153.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192750Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman. 2002. Models and representation: Why structures are not enough. In: Measurement in physics and economics discussion paper series, 1–42. London: London School of Economics.Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman & Stephan Hartmann. 2012. Models in science. In Edward Zaltaed, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, (accessed 25 April 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald N. 1988. Explaining science. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71(5) 742–752.10.1086/425063Search in Google Scholar

Harré, Rom & Daniel Rothbart. 2004. Modeling: Gateway to the unknown Vol. 1: Gulf. New York: Elsevier Science.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Michael H.G. 2005. Signs as means for discoveries. In: M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard and F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education, 45–56. New York: Springer.10.1007/0-387-24270-8_5Search in Google Scholar

Hookway, Christopher. 2002. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199256586.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, Jorgen D. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Tarja. 2005. Models as epistemic artefacts. Helskinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Tarja & Mieke Boon. 2011. How do models give us knowledge? The case of Carnot’s ideal heat engine. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(3) 309–334.10.1007/s13194-011-0029-3Search in Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Tarja & Atro Voutilainen. 2003. A parser as an epistemic artefact: A material view on models. Philosophy of Science 70. 1484–1495.10.1086/377424Search in Google Scholar

Kralemann, Björn & Claas Lattmann. 2013. Models as icons: Modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese 190(6) 3397–3420.10.1007/s11229-012-0176-xSearch in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 8 : C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burkseds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1982. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 6 : M. Fisch, E. Moore and C. Kloeseleds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913). Peirce Edition Projecteds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Search in Google Scholar

Pravica, David W. & Michael J. Spurr. 2011. Mathematical modeling for the scientific method. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Search in Google Scholar

Queiroz, João & Charbel Nino El-Hani. 2012. Downward determination in semiotic multi-level systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19. 123–136.Search in Google Scholar

Rokkita, Christoph. 2013. Palast der Republik. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Salthe, Stanley N. 2009. A hierarchical framework for levels of reality: Understanding through representation. Axiomathes 19(1) 87–99.10.1007/s10516-008-9056-xSearch in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 36(3) 357–384.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011. On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce’s diagrammatology. Semiotica 186(1/4) 395–419.10.1515/semi.2011.061Search in Google Scholar

Suppe, Frederick. 1989. The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Suppe, Frederik. 1974. Theories and phenomena. In: W. Leinfellner and E. Köhler (eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science, 45–91. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-2259-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198248601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-07-26
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.3.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow