Abstract
Sex toys promote a new consumptive ethos whose significance may be adequately outlined by attending to the institutional implications of this product category’s consumption. By drawing on Foucault’s theory of sexuality and the technologies of the self that materialize with the aid of discursive formations about sexuality, as well as on relevant sociological and ethnographic insights, I undertake a qualitative content analysis on a corpus of 100 sex toys’ product reviews from popular magazines and web sites in order to identify how the discourse about sex toys is articulated in terms of three dominant categories of sexual scripts (Simon and Gagnon 2007, Sexual scripts. In Richard Parker & Peter Aggleton (eds.), Culture, society, and sexuality: A reader, 29–38. London: Routledge), namely, cultural scenarios, interpersonal and intrapsychic scripts. By opening up the discussion to a broader cultural terrain, I outline how the consumption experience of sex toys, as articulated in the reviews’ discursive formations, facilitates the emergence of new consumer trends, particularly with reference to orgasm-on-the-go and no-touch-orgasm, while redefining existing ones.
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In Arjun Appadurai (ed.), The social lives of things, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul. 1990. The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Attwood, Feona. 2005. Fashion and passion: Marketing sex to women. Sexualities 8(4). 392–406.10.1177/1363460705056617Search in Google Scholar
Barker, Chris & Dariusz Galasinaski. 2001. Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446219249Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1970. Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1999. On postmodern uses of sex. In Mike Featherstone (ed.), Love and eroticism, 19–33. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446218945.n2Search in Google Scholar
Black, Daniel. 2014. Where bodies end and artefacts begin. Body & Society 20(1). 31–60.10.1177/1357034X13506946Search in Google Scholar
Fahs, Breanne & Eric Swank. 2013. Adventures with the “Plastic Man”: Sex toys, compulsory heterosexuality, and the politics of women’s sexual pleasure. Sexuality & Culture 17(4). 666–685.10.1007/s12119-013-9167-4Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992a. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2). 193–217.10.1177/0957926592003002004Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992b. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.10.4324/9781315838250-13Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Firat, Fuat A. & Alladi Venkatesh. 1995. Liberatory postmodernism and the re-enchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 22(1). 239–267.10.1086/209448Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality vol. I: An introduction. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1985. The history of sexuality vol. II: The use of pleasure. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1986. The history of sexuality vol. III: The care of the self. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988a. Technologies of the self. In Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman & Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, 16–49. London: Tavistock.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988b. The political technology of individuals. In Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman & Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, 145–162. London: Tavistock.Search in Google Scholar
Friese, Susanne. 2012. Qualitative data analysis with atlas.ti. London: Sage.10.4135/9781529799590Search in Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Herbenick, Debra, Michael Reece, Stephanie Sanders, Brian Dodge, Annahita Ghassemi & J. Dennis Fortenberry. 2009. Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: Results from a nationally representative Study. Journal of Sexual Medicine 6. 1857–1866.10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01318.xSearch in Google Scholar
Holt, Douglas. 1997. Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: Conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption in postmodernity. Journal of Consumer Research 23(4). 326–350.10.1086/209487Search in Google Scholar
Hutton, Patrick H. 1988. Foucault, Freud, and the technologies of the self. In Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman & Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, 121–144. London: Tavistock.Search in Google Scholar
Kozinets, Robert. 2010. Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Maines, Rachel P. 1999. The technology of orgasm. London: John Hopkins.10.56021/9780801859410Search in Google Scholar
Miles, Matthew B. & A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1984. The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar
Rossolatos, George. 2014a. Rapunzel, Benjamin Button, and Little Red Riding Hood in this and any other possible world: Philosophical, rhetorical and textual semiotic excursions in inter-textual formations amongst advertising, literary and filmic texts. Southern Semiotic Review 3. http://www.southernsemioticreview.net/rapunzel-benjamin-button-and-little-red-riding-hood-philosophical-rhetorical-and-textual-semiotic-excursions/ (accessed 8 May 2017).10.2139/ssrn.2171763Search in Google Scholar
Rossolatos, George. 2014b. Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with Atlas.ti 7. Multimodal Communication 3(1). 51–84.10.1515/mc-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar
Rossolatos, George. 2015. Semiotics of popular culture. Kassel: Kassel University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rossolatos, George. 2016. Before the consummation what? On the role of the semiotic economy of seduction. Continuum 30(4). 451–465.10.1080/10304312.2016.1141866Search in Google Scholar
Ruiz Collantes, Xavier & Merce Oliva. 2015. Narrativity approaches to branding. In George Rossolatos (ed.), Handbook of brand semiotics, 89–150. Kassel: Kassel University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Saukko, Paula. 2003. Doing research in cultural studies: An introduction to classical and new methodological approaches. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209021Search in Google Scholar
Simon, William. 1996. Postmodern sexualities. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, William & John H. Gagnon. 2007. Sexual scripts. In Richard Parker & Peter Aggleton (eds.), Culture, society, and sexuality: A reader, 29–38. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Sitz, Lionel. 2008. Beyond semiotics and hermeneutics: Discourse analysis as a way to interpret consumers’ discourses and experiences. Qualitative Market Research 11(2). 177–191.10.1108/13522750810864431Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Clarissa. 2007. Designed for pleasure: Style, indulgence and accessorized sex. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2). 167–184.10.1177/1367549407075901Search in Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher. 2007. Ethnography and material culture. In Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland & Lyn Lofland (eds.), Handbook of ethnography, 258–272. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608337.n18Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2009. Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511575273Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
