Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 31, 2018

A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory

Vern Poythress
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

The complexity and flexibility of tagmemic theory, as a semiotic theory developed by Kenneth L. Pike, can be better understood by examining how it applies to a simple semiotic system like traffic lights. We can then compare the result with how it functions in analyzing a piece of natural language. Tagmemic theory introduces three observer viewpoints – the particle view, the wave view, and the field view. Each view generates a suite of questions to answer. Any one of the views results in a “complete” description of traffic lights, from which the information about the other views can be inferred. And yet each view is distinct in texture from the others, and the existence of such multiple views – each with a claim to emic integrity and each serving as a perspective on the whole – has to be accounted for in a robust semiotic approach. The same phenomena occur when we apply the three views to the analysis of meaning in natural language. The chief illustration is to analyze the meaning of the word dog in multiple ways. The multi-dimensional potential for semiotic analysis highlights the limitations of Aristotelian logic and symbolic logic, both of which simplify for the sake of rigor.

References

Atkin, Albert. 2013. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/ (accessed 8 August 2016). Search in Google Scholar

Birkhoff, Garrett. 1948. Lattice theory. New York: American Mathematical Society. Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise. 2012. Language as social semiotic in Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Semiotix XN-7http://semioticon.com/semiotix/2012/03/language-as-social-semiotic-in-hallidays-systemic-functional-linguistics/ (accessed 8 August 2016). Search in Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N., Kenneth L. Pike & Marvin Harris (eds.). 1990. Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2016. Elements of semiotics. Signohttp://www.signosemio.com/elements-of-semiotics.asp (accessed 8 August 2016). Search in Google Scholar

Hong, Chong-Min, David Lurie & Jiro Tanaka. 1993. Umberto Eco: On semiotics and pragmatism: Interview. Harvard Review of Philosophy 3(1). 14–22.10.5840/harvardreview1993312 Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd edn. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1972 [1959]. Language as particle, wave, and field. In Ruth M. Brend (ed.), Kenneth L. Pike: Selected writings to commemorate the sixtieth birthday of Kenneth Lee Pike, 129–143, The Hague & Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1976. Toward the development of tagmemic postulates. In Ruth M. Brend & Kenneth L. Pike (eds.), Tagmemics Vol. 2, 91–127. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1982. Linguistic concepts: An introduction to tagmemics. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. & Evelyn G. Pike. 1977. Grammatical analysis. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 1976. Tagmemic analysis of elementary algebra. Semiotica 17(2). 131–151. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 1982. A framework for discourse analysis: The components of a discourse, from a tagmemic viewpoint. Semiotica 38(3/4). 277–298. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2009. In the beginning was the word: Language – A God-centered approach. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013a. Information-theoretic confirmation of semiotic structures. Semiotica 193(1/4). 67–82. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013b. An information-based semiotic analysis of theories concerning theories. Semiotica 193(1/4). 83–99. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013c. Logic: A God-centered approach to the foundation of western thought. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2015. Redeeming mathematics: A God-centered approach. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. Search in Google Scholar

Waterhouse, Viola G. 1974. The history and development of tagmemics. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-31
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston