Establishing the correct order of trichotomies in Peirce’s projected ten-division typology of 1908 has been a preoccupation of Peirce scholars since at least 1945. Most seem to assume that the same phenomenological framework was adopted by Peirce in all his classification systems from 1903 to 1908 and that these ten divisions form a homogeneous set. The paper examines the status of typologies in Peirce’s semiotics and, by comparing two hexads of divisions from 1904 and 1908, shows how the theoretical framework of each was based upon entirely different principles.
Fisch, Max. 1982. Introduction. In M. Fisch, C. Kloesel, E. Moore & D. Roberts (eds.), The writings of Charles S. Peirce, Volume 1: 1857–1866, xv–xxxv. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1982. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 6 vols., M. Fisch, E. Moore & C. Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. & Lady Victoria Welby. 1977. Semiotic and significs, Charles S. Hardwick (ed.). Bloomington: Indianapolis University Press. [Reference to this work will be designated SS followed by page number.].Search in Google Scholar
Savan, David. 1988. An introduction to C. S. Peirce’s full system of semeiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1983. The sense of grammar: Language as semeiotic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston