Abstract
The article proposes a reflection on cultural sign production in social contexts dominated by the socially generalized fear of the unknown other and the obsession for vulnerability avoidance. This phenomenon has been reflected in the generalized tendency of reliance upon contractual trust, where the coherence of the signs legitimating a trustful relationship is maintained by external agencies backed by authoritative forums (e.g., religious, legal, political) and sanctioned by well-defined rewards and punishments. In contrast with the contractual model of trust, I propose a different model, covenantal trust. Taking as a point of departure Levinas’s phenomenological interpretation of the responsible self-opening toward the “sign of the giving of signs” which involves covenantal elements, I advance toward proposing a more active involvement of the participants in the process of joint production of signs. This dynamic involvement is made possible thanks to essential elements of the covenant, such as summoning and response. The covenantal approach aims at proposing a semioethical solution to the social challenges emerging from frustrations of members of both marginal and external communities for being treated distrustfully.
References
Bacharach, Michael & Diego Gambetta. 2001. Trust in signs. In Karen S. Cook (ed.), Trust in society, 148–184. New York: Russell Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96(2). 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745.Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1990. Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.10.7560/704114Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1987. The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Dubroff, Harold. 2006. The implied covenant of good faith in contract interpretation and gap-filling: Reviling a revered relic. St. John’s Law Review 80(2). 559–619.Search in Google Scholar
Faulkner, Paul. 2017. The problem of trust. In Paul Faulkner & Thomas Simpson (eds.), The philosophy of trust, 109–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1997. Social trust and human communities. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Handelman, Susan. 1993. Facing the other: Levinas, Perelman, and Rosenzweig. In Ellen Spolsky (ed.), Summoning: Ideas of the covenant and interpretive theory, 47–70. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hardin, Russel. 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_383Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2003. The logic of reciprocity: Trust, collective action, and law. Michigan Law Review 102(1). 71–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595400.Search in Google Scholar
Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-015-1111-7Search in Google Scholar
Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1976. Difficile liberté. Paris: Albin Michel.Search in Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1997. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Search in Google Scholar
McLeod, Carolyn. 2002. Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6157.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. In Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.), The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2007. Significs and semioethics: Places of the gift in communication today. In Genevieve Vaughan (ed.), Women and the gift economy: A radically different worldview is possible, 108–120. Toronto: Inanna.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2014. Sign studies and semioethics: Communication, translation, and values. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614515227Search in Google Scholar
Rojman, Betty. 1993. The sign of the covenant. In Ellen Spolsky (ed.), Summoning: Ideas of the covenant and interpretive theory, 115–128. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Trainor, Brian T. 1985. The politics of peace: The role of the political covenant in Hobbes’s Leviathan. The Review of Politics 47(3). 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500036913.Search in Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1990. Signs before speech. In Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), The semiotic web 1989, 689–755. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874099.689Search in Google Scholar
Zeligs, Dorothy F. 1961. Abraham and the covenant of the pieces: A study in ambivalence. American Imago 18(2). 173–186. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26301751.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
