Abstract
Climate change is an anthropogenic existential threat that provokes extreme concern among climate scientists, but not, it seems, among all member of the public. Here, there is considerably more variability in level of concern and, it appears, in everyday sustainable behavior. But how does personality affect this variability in behavior? And how are underlying personality states like dispositional optimism linked to more sustainable everyday practices? Research in clinical psychology has suggested that dispositional optimism is a very positive personality characteristic associated with higher levels of hope and resilience, but applied research from other domains has reported that optimists can, on occasion, bury their heads in the sand and avoid attending to external threats, like climate change, in order to maintain mood state. So are optimists more immune to climate change messaging than non-optimists? And do they make fewer sustainable choices? A series of experimental studies, manipulating signifiers of carbon footprint (Study 1) and eco labels on products (Study 2) found that optimists made more sustainable choices than non-optimists and that both groups were influenced equally by climate change film clips in terms of sustainable choices (Study 1). Optimists also displayed a false consensus effect, overestimating the proportion of people who would behave more sustainably like themselves (Study 3). Given that global problems like climate change need concerted, cooperative effort, these optimistic beliefs about how others behave could be adaptive in the long-run. Designing climate change messages to appeal to optimists might be a critical consideration for the future.
Funding source: British Academy Small Grants Scheme
References
Baddeley, Alan D. 1992. Working memory. Science 255. 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 1978. Sequential temporal patterns of speech and gaze in dialogue. Semiotica 23. 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.23.1-2.29.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 1979. Planning units in spontaneous speech: Some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation. Linguistics 17. 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.61.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 1981. A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology 20. 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00493.x.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 1983. Talk: An analysis of speech and non-verbal behaviour in conversation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2003. Visible thought: The new psychology of body language. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2010. Why aren’t we saving the planet? A psychologist’s perspective. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203840078Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2011a. Get the edge: How simple changes will transform your life. London: Headline.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2011b. Making an action film. Do films such as Al Gore’s an Inconvenient Truth really make any difference to how we think and feel about climate change?. Nature Climate Change 1. 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1257.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2012. Psychological effectiveness of carbon labelling. Nature Climate Change 2. 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1468.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey. 2016. Rethinking body language: How hand movements reveal hidden thoughts. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315880181Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Andrew Ellis. 2017. The psychology of language and communication. London: Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions.10.4324/9781315187198Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton. 1999a. Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18. 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x99018004005.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton. 1999b. Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica 123(1/4). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton. 2001. An experimental investigation of the role of different types of iconic gesture in communication: A semantic feature approach. Gesture 1. 129–149.10.1075/gest.1.2.03beaSearch in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton. 2002. An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that affect their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology 93. 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162526.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey, Melissa Marselle, Laura McGuire & Damien Litchfield. 2017. Staying over-optimistic about the future: Uncovering attentional biases to climate change messages. Semiotica 218(1/4). 22–64.10.1515/sem-2016-0074Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2011. Are we too optimistic to bother saving the planet? The relationship between optimism, eye gaze and negative images of climate change. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 7. 241–256. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/cgp/v07i04/54949.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2015. Harnessing the unconscious mind of the consumer: How implicit attitudes predict pre-conscious visual attention to carbon footprint information on products. Semiotica 204(1/4). 253–290.10.1515/sem-2014-0079Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2016. Consumption and climate change. Why we say one thing but do another in the face of our greatest threat. Semiotica 213(1/4). 493–538. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0109.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2018. The psychology of climate change. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351051828Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2020. The modifiability of implicit attitudes to carbon footprint and its implications for carbon choice. Environment and Behavior 52. 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518808571.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura Sale. 2009. Explicit and implicit attitudes to low and high carbon footprint products. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 5. 191–206.10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v05i04/54652Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura Sale. 2011. Shopping to save the planet? Implicit rather than explicit attitudes predict low carbon footprint consumer choice. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 7. 211–232. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/cgp/v07i04/54948.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey, Laura Sale & Laura McGuire. 2011. An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change? Semiotica 187(1/4). 105–125.10.1515/semi.2011.066Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey, Kate Webster & Jamie Ross. 2010. The fixation and processing of the iconic gestures that accompany talk. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29. 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x09359589.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2017. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Crane, Frederick & Erinn Crane. 2007. Dispositional optimism and entrepreneurial success. Psychologist-Manager Journal 10. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150709336610.Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2006. Brands. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2009. Bright-sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America. New York: Holt.Search in Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2010. Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled America and the world. New York: Granta.Search in Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans. 1950. Dimensions of personality. London: Transaction.Search in Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans J. & Michael W. Eysenck. 1987. Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar
Gifford, Robert. 2011. The dragons of inaction. Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation. American Psychologist 66. 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.Search in Google Scholar
Gifford, Robert, Leila Scannell, Christine Kormos, Lidia Smolova, Anders Biel Stefan Boncu, Victor Corral, Hartmut Güntherf, Kazunori Hanyu, Donald Hine, Florian G. Kaiser, Kalevi Korpela, Luisa Marie Lima, Angela G. Mertig, Ricardo Garcia Mira, Gabriel Moser, Paola Passafaro, José Q. Pinheiro, Sunil Saini, Toshihiko Sako, Elena Sautkina, Yannick Savina, Peter Schmuck, Wesley Schultz, Karin Sobeck, Eva-Lotta Sundblad & David Uzzell. 2009. Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001.Search in Google Scholar
Gillham, Jane. E., Karen J. Reivich, Lisa H. Jaycox & Seligman Martin. 1995. Prevention of depressive symptoms in schoolchildren: Two-year follow-up. Psychological Science 6. 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00524.x.Search in Google Scholar
Global Risk Report. 2016. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Media/TheGlobalRisksReport2016.pdf (accessed 10 July 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard. 1997. Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Dietrich. H. I. 1997. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A 50. 307–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/009841097160393.Search in Google Scholar
Isaacowitz, Derek M. 2005. The gaze of the optimist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31. 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271599.Search in Google Scholar
Isaacowitz, Derek M. 2006. Motivated gaze. The view from the gazer. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15. 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00409.x.Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1996. In J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg & K. Maskell (eds.), Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, N. Tignor & H. L. Miller (eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511546013Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. B. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex & P. M. Midgley (eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107415324Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107415416Search in Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2015. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koh, Kyung-Nan. 2015. Representing corporate social responsibility, branding the commodity as gift, and reconfiguring the corporation as super-person. Signs and Society 3. 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1086/679603.Search in Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, Anthony, Edward Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf & Jay Hmielowski. 2012. Global warming’s Six Americas. March 2012, November 2011 https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2012_07_Global-Warming%E2%80%99s-Six-Americas-in-March-2012-and-November-2011.pdf (accessed 17 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Leviston, Zoe & Iain Walker. 2012. Beliefs and denials about climate change: An Australian perspective. Ecopsychology 4. 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2012.0051.Search in Google Scholar
Luo, Jiang & Derek M. Isaacowitz. 2007. How optimists face skin cancer information: Risk assessment, attention, memory, and behavior. Psychology and Health 22. 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601070951.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, George. 2015. Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Mick, David. G. 1986. Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research 13. 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/209060.Search in Google Scholar
Nolan, Jessica. M. 2010. An Inconvenient Truth increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior 42. 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509357696.Search in Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi & Erik Conway. 2011. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pahl, Sabine., Peter R. Harris, Helen A. Todd & Derek R. Rutter. 2005. Comparative optimism for environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.12.004.Search in Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Nathan M. & William M. Klein. 2002. Dispositional, unrealistic, and comparative optimism: Differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28. 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289012.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, Lee. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10. 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3.Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinard de. 1995 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar
Scheier, Michael F., Karen A. Matthews, Jane F. Owens, George J. Magovern, R. Craig Lefebvre, R. Anne Abbott & Charles S. Carver. 1989. Dispositional optimism and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery: The beneficial effects on physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57. 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1024.Search in Google Scholar
Scheier, Michael, Charles S. Carver & Michael W. Bridges. 1994. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67. 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063.Search in Google Scholar
Schulz, Richard, Jamila Bookwala, Judith E. Knapp, Michael Scheier, M Gail & Williamson. 1996. Pessimism, age and cancer mortality. Psychology and Aging 11. 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.2.304.Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas. 1986. I think I am a verb: More contributions to the doctrine of signs. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-3490-1Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas. 2001. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Segerstrom, Suzanne C., Shelley E. Taylor, Margaret E. Kemeny & John L. Fahey. 1998. Optimism is associated with mood, coping and immune change in response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74. 1646–1655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1646.Search in Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin. 2002. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. New York: Atria.Search in Google Scholar
Sharot, Tali. 2012. The optimism bias: Why we’re wired to look on the bright side. London: Constable & Robinson.Search in Google Scholar
Sharot, Tali, Christoph W. Kom & Raymond J. Dolan. 2011. How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nature Neuroscience 14. 1475–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2949.Search in Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Melissa Finucane, Ellen Peters & Donald G. MacGregor. 2002. Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-5357(02)00174-9.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Nicholas. 2006. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817434Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Shelley. 1998. The MacArthur research network on socioeconomic status and health. http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/optimism (accessed 2 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar
UK Climate Change Risk Assessment. 2016. 2017 Synthesis Report: Priorities for the next five years. http://www.theccc.org.uk/tackling-climate-change/preparing-for-climate-change/climate-change-risk-assessment-2017/ (accessed 1 August 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Gabrielle & David King. 2009. The hot topic: How to tackle global warming and still keep the lights on. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Weinstein, Neil D. & William N. Klein. 1996. Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organization. 2017. Climate change and human health. http://www.who.int/globalchange/en/ (accessed 15 March 2021).Search in Google Scholar
World Resource Institute. 2014. The history of carbon dioxide emissions. http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/05/history-carbon-dioxide-emissions (accessed 10 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35. 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151.Search in Google Scholar
Zaval, Lisa, Elizabeth Keenan, Eric Johnson & Elke U. Weber. 2014. How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nature Climate Change 4. 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2093.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston