Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 28, 2021

Derrida’s “chimerical experimental exercise”: an ecolinguistic dream of a more biocentric language

Keith Moser
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to probe the implications of Derrida’s linguistic theories in his late philosophy. Adopting an interdisciplinary and deconstructive approach to critical discourse analysis that erodes the foundation of anthropocentric binary thought paradigms, this exploration of Derrida’s ecolinguistic dream of a more biocentric language (re-)problematizes three specific cognitive structures that represent an unsustainable form of dichotomous thinking. The philosopher illustrates that the concept of “human” and “animal,” the “genesis myth,” and the Cartesian notion of the Bête machine are deadly delusions that must be replaced with a more biocentric outlook on life.


Corresponding author: Keith Moser, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA, E-mail:

References

Batra, Nandita. 1996. Dominion, empathy, and symbiosis: Gender and anthropocentrism in romanticism. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 3(2). 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/3.2.101.Search in Google Scholar

Bekoff, Marc. 2009. Grief in animals: It’s arrogant to think we’re the only animals who mourn. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animal-emotions/200910/grief-in-animals-its-arrogant-think-were-the-only-animals-who-mourn (accessed 12 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Brett-Crowther, Michael. 2012. Barry Commoner (1917–2012). International Journal of Environmental Studies 69(6). 867–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2012.739723.Search in Google Scholar

Broglio, Ron. 2016. Interviewee: Lynn Turner. Interviewer: Ron Broglio. Antennae 38. 30–36.Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, Gerard. 2008. Derrida’s cat (who am I?). Research in Phenomenology 38. 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916408x336765.Search in Google Scholar

Burma, Nicole, Heather Leduc-Pessah, Churmy Y. Fan & Trang Tuan. 2017. Animal models of chronic pain: Advances and challenges for clinical transition. Journal of Neuroscience Research 95(6). 1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23768.Search in Google Scholar

Castricano, Jodey. 2008. Animal subjects: An ethical reader in a posthuman world. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Čermák, František. 2002. Types of language nomination: Universals, typology and lexicographical relevance. In Braasch Anna & Claus Povlesen (eds.), Proceedings of the tenth Euralex international congress, 237–240. Copenhagen: Center for Sprogteknologi.Search in Google Scholar

Congdon, Matthew. 2009. Derrida and other animals. Telos 148. 185–191. https://doi.org/10.3817/0909148185.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The animal that therefore I am, David Wills (trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The beast and the sovereign, vol. 1, Geoffrey Bennington (trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226144399.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2011. The beast and the sovereign, vol. 2, Geoffrey Bennington (trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226144405.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Donly, Corinne. 2017. Toward the eco-narrative: Rethinking the role of conflict in storytelling. Humanities 6. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6020017.Search in Google Scholar

Döring, Martin & Francesca Zunino. 2014. NatureCultures in old and new worlds: Step towards an ecolinguistic perspective on framing a “new” continent. Language Sciences 41. 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.005.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrenfeld, David. 1978. The arrogance of humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Estok, Simon. 2009. Theorizing in a space of ambivalent openness: Ecocriticism and ecophobia. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 16(2). 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isp010.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1984. Language and power. New York: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Garnier, Marie-Dominique. 2011. Animal writes: Derrida’s que donc and other tails. Demenageries 35. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200493_003.Search in Google Scholar

Guerlac, Suzanne. 2012. Derrida and his cat: The most important question. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 16(5). 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2012.739442.Search in Google Scholar

Heuberger, Reinhard. 2003. Anthropocentrism in monolingual English dictionaries. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 28(1). 93–105.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, Kurt Leroy. 2015. Modeling neuropsychiatric disorders in laboratory animals. Cambridge: Woodhead.Search in Google Scholar

Hurst, Andrea. 2007. This auto-bio-graphical animal that I am. Journal of Literary Studies 23(2). 118–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710701423343.Search in Google Scholar

James, Erin. 2015. The storyworld accord: Econarratology and postcolonial narratives. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1d9898mSearch in Google Scholar

Kakoliris, Gerasimos. 2016. Hospitality and non-human beings: Jacques Derrida’s reading of D. H. Lawrence’s poem “Snake”. Hospitality & Society 6(3). 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1386/hosp.6.3.243_1.Search in Google Scholar

Kellogg, Paul. 2014. Do machines have rights? Ethics in the age of artificial intelligence with David Gunkel. Aurora Online 5. http://aurora.icaap.org/index.php/aurora/article/view/92/114 (accessed 12 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

King, Barbara. 2016. Animal mourning: Précis of how animals grieve. Animal Sentience 4. 1–6.10.51291/2377-7478.1010Search in Google Scholar

Kleinhaus, Belinda. 2016. Posthuman ethics, violence, creaturely suffering and the (other) animal: Schnurre’s postwar animal stories. Humanities 5. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Lawlor, Leonard. 2007. Animals have no hand. The New Centennial Review 7(2). 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2007.0038.Search in Google Scholar

Lestel, Dominique. 2014. The infinite debt of the human towards the animal, Matthew Chrulew (trans.). Angelaki 19(3). 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2014.976067.Search in Google Scholar

Llored, Patrick. 2014. Zoopolitics. SubStance 43(2). 115–123.10.1353/sub.2014.0018Search in Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. L’inhumain: Causeries sur le temps. Paris: Galilée.Search in Google Scholar

Michaud, Ginette. 2011. On a serpentine note. Critical Studies 35. 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200493_004.Search in Google Scholar

Milstein, Tema. 2011. Nature identification: The power of pointing and naming. Environmental Communication 5(1). 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.535836.Search in Google Scholar

Moser, Keith. 2012. J. M. G. Le Clézio: A concerned citizen of the global village. New York: Lexington.Search in Google Scholar

Naas, Michael. 2010. Derrida’s flair (For the animals to follow … ). Research in Phenomenology 40. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916410x509931.Search in Google Scholar

Nash, Richard. 2011. Joy and pity: Reading animal bodies in late eighteenth-century culture. The Eighteenth Century 52(1). 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.2011.0002.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, Kelly. 2009. Sexual difference, animal difference: Derrida and difference “worthy of its name”. Hypatia 24(2). 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01032.x.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Christopher. 2014. The monolingualism of the human. SubStance 43(2). 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305251_5.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, James. 2008. Sovereignty’s ontological indecision: Derrida and Heidegger on the other line (Between the human and the animals). SubStance 43(2). 68–82.10.1353/sub.2014.0026Search in Google Scholar

Preece, Rod. 2008. Selfish genes, sociobiology and animal respect. In Jodey Castricano (ed.), Animal subjects: An ethical reader in a posthuman world, 40–62. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reszitnyk, Andrew. 2012. Eyes through oil: Witnessing the nonhuman victims of the deepwater horizon oil spill. Environmental Philosophy 9(2). 143–157. https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil20129213.Search in Google Scholar

Serres, Michel. 2008. La Guerre Mondiale. Paris: Le Pommier.Search in Google Scholar

Simma, Claudia. 2011. Ver(s): Toward a spirituality of one’s own. Demenageries 35. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200493_005.Search in Google Scholar

Slater, Michelle. 2012. Rethinking human–animal ontological differences: Derrida’s “animot” and Cixous’ “FIPS”. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 16(5). 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2012.739440.Search in Google Scholar

Sneddon, Lynne, Robert W. Elwood, Shelley A. Adamo & Matthew C. Leach. 2014. Defining and assessing animal pain. Animal Behaviour 97. 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri. 2012. An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1n1bsfhSearch in Google Scholar

Steffensen, Sune Vork & Alwin Fill. 2014. Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences 41. 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2013. An ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1). 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315718071Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Angus. 2008. Electric sheep and the new argument from nature. In Jodey Castricano (ed.), Animal subjects: An ethical reader in a posthuman world, 177–193. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, Simon & Marta Manser. 2012. Functionally referential communication in mammals: The past, present and the future. Ethology 119. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12015.Search in Google Scholar

Voelpel, John. 2010. Descartes’ bête machine, the Leibnizian correction and religious influence. University of South Florida PhD diss.Search in Google Scholar

Wadiwel, Dinesh. 2014. The will for self-preservation: Locke and Derrida on dominion, property and animals. SubStance 43(2). 148–161.10.1353/sub.2014.0029Search in Google Scholar

Wagler, Ron. 2011. The Anthropocene mass extinction: An emerging curriculum theme for science educators. The American Biology Teacher 73. 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.2.5.Search in Google Scholar

Walls, Laura. 1997. Michel Serres on thinking a multiple earth. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 4(2). 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/4.2.111.Search in Google Scholar

Watabiki, Tomonari, Tetsuo Kiso, Takahiro Kuramochi, Koichi Yonezawa, Noriko Tsuji, Atsuyuki Kohara, Shuichiro Kakimoto, Toshiaki Aoki & Nobuya Matsuoka. 2011. Amelioration of neuropathic pain by novel transient receptor potential Vanilloid 1 antagonist AS1928370 in rats without hyperthermic effect. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 336(3). 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.110.175570.Search in Google Scholar

Watkin, Christopher. 2015. Michel Serres’ great story: From biosemiotics to econarratology. SubStance 44(3). 171–187. https://doi.org/10.3368/ss.44.3.171.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, Traci. 2016. Whales mourn their dead, just like us. National Geographic. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/07/whales-death-grief-animals-science/ (accessed 12 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Linda. 2012. Darwin and Derrida on human and animal emotions: The question of shame as a measure of ontological difference. New Formations 76. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.76.02.2012.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, David. 2014. Derrida vert? The Oxford Literary Review 36(2). 319–322. https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.2014.0144.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-28
Accepted: 2021-03-01
Published Online: 2021-07-28
Published in Print: 2021-09-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston