Abstract
This paper introduces a manual movement performed recurrently by German children in the age range of four to six. Based on the movement gestalt and its meaning, we termed it the Slapping movement. All forms identified in the data were performed with a communicative function, yet they showed different degrees of “gesturality.” To be more precise, we observed versions that clearly count as actions or gestures, but we also observed transitional forms between them. Based on a thorough analyses of form, meaning, and context we determined variations of the Slapping gesture that showed different degrees of abstraction from action to gesture in a semiotic sense. These degrees are distinguished by modifications in the execution of the movement and different levels of form stability, environmental coupling, and representational complexity.
Funding source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
Award Identifier / Grant number: 501992940
-
Research funding: This research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant no. 501992940.
References
Andrén, Mats. 2010. Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund: Lund University.Search in Google Scholar
Andrén, Mats. 2014a. Multimodal constructions in children: Is the handshake part of language? Gesture 14(2). 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.2.02and.Search in Google Scholar
Andrén, Mats. 2014b. On the lower limit of gesture. In Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon, 153–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.188.08andSearch in Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Stefan Pfänder. 2011. Constructions, emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080Search in Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth. 1979. The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1968. Redundancy and coding. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Animal communication: Techniques of study and results of research, 614–626. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Search in Google Scholar
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline, Aliyah Morgenstern & Dominique Boutet. 2016. A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. In Pierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, vol. 1, 95–123. Cham: Springer International.10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_5Search in Google Scholar
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline & Camille Debras. 2017. Developing communicative postures: The emergence of shrugging in child communication. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8(1). 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea.Search in Google Scholar
Boyatzis, Chris J. & Malcolm W. Watson. 1993. Preschool children’s symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child Development 64(3). 729–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131214.Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2014. A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Bressem Jana (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1575–1592. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.1575Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2017. The “negative-assessment-construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160053. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053.Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana. 2021. Repetitions in gestures: Structures and cognitive aspects. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110697902Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller. 2013. A linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1098–1125. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.1098Search in Google Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève. 1990. The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Ezequiel, Elena Clare Cuffari & Hanne De Jaegher. 2018. Linguistic bodies. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11244.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fricke, Ellen. 2010. Phonaestheme, Kinaestheme und multimodale Grammatik: Wie Artikulationen zu Typen werden, die bedeuten können. Sprache und Literatur 41(105). 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000005.Search in Google Scholar
Fricke, Ellen. 2012. Grammatik multimodal. Wie Gesten und Wörter zusammenwirken. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218893Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York & London: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10). 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Environmentally coupled gestures. In Susan Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language, 195–212. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.18gooSearch in Google Scholar
Graziano, Maria. 2014. The development of two pragmatic gestures of the so-called Open Hand Supine family in Italian children. In Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon, 311–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.188.14graSearch in Google Scholar
Graziano, Maria, Kendon Adam & Carla Cristilli. 2011. “Parallel gesturing” in adult-child conversations. In Gale Stam & Mika Ishino (eds.), lntegrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture, 89–101. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.4.08graSearch in Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 2018 [1996]. Language and communicative practices. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429493522Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2018. The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108265065Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2021. The feel of a recurrent gesture: Embedding the Vertical Palm within a gift-giving episode in China (aka the “seesaw battle”). Special issue. Gesture 20(2). 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.har.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hotze, Lena. 2019. Multimodale Kommunikation in den Vorschuljahren – zur Verschränkung von Sprache und Gestik in der kindlichen Entwicklung. Frankfurt: Europa-Universität Viadrina.Search in Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 2012. Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, vol. 37, 816–840. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261325.816Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1980. A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the engaprovince of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion: Part II. Semiotica 32(1–2). 81–117.10.1515/semi.1980.32.1-2.81Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1988. How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23. 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-f.Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2008. Some reflections on the relationship between “gesture” and “sign”. Gesture 8(3). 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken.Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2010. Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – varianten einer rekurrenten Geste. Sprache und Literatur 41(1). 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000006.Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2014a. The cyclic gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Bressem Jana (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1605–1618. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2014b. Recurrent gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Bressem Jana (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1558–1575. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2020. Integrating gestures: The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110668568Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. Recurrent gestures: Cultural, individual, and linguistic dimensions of meaning making. In Alan Cienki (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, SilvaH. & Lena Hotze. 2021. The Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike: Inter-affectivity in interactions among children. Gesture 20(2). 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21013.lad.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David (ed.). 2000. Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David & Claudia Sowa. 2011. Birth of a morph. In Gale Stam & Mika Ishino (eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture, 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.4.04mcnSearch in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2005 [1962]. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Aliyah. 2014. Children’s multimodal language development. In Christiane Fäcke (ed.), Manual of language acquisition, 123–142. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110302257.123Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 1998. Redebegleitende gesten: Kulturgeschichte, theorie, sprachvergleich. Berlin: Arno Spitz.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 234–256. Berlin: Weidler.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2017. How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture 16(2). 278–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2018. Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology 9. 1651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651.Search in Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Esther van Loon. 2014. The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Bressem Jana (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 2133–2149. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.2133Search in Google Scholar
Rohlfing, Katharina J. Angela Grimminger & Carina Lüke. 2017. An interactive view on the development of deictic pointing in infancy. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 1319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01319.Search in Google Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara & Terry Janzen. 2000. Gesture, lexical words, and grammar: Grammaticalization processes in ASL. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26(1). 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1138.Search in Google Scholar
Singleton, Jenny L., Susan Goldin-Meadow & David McNeill. 1995. The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: Evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 287–311. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 1996. How to do things with things. Human Studies 19(4). 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00188849.Search in Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft: Manufacturing understanding. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.2Search in Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2013. Praxeology of gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 674–685. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Teßendorf, Sedinha. 2014. Pragmatic and metaphoric gestures – combining functional with cognitive approaches. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Bressem Jana (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1540–1558. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter & Ulf Liszkowski. 2007. A new look at infant pointing. Child Development 78. 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x.Search in Google Scholar
Volterra, Virginia & Carol Erting. 1994. From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman. 2005. Routes from gesture to language. Revista da ABRALIN – Associação Brasileira de Lingüística 4(1–2). 11–45. https://doi.org/10.5380/rabl.v4i1/2.52651.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth. 2014. English multimodal motion constructions. A construction grammar perspective. Linguistic Society of Belgium 8. 14–29.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
