Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 30, 2019

The Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry: development of a digital chronic pain registry and baseline data from 1,712 patients

Lars-Petter Granan, Silje Endresen Reme, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen, Audun Stubhaug and Tone Marte Ljoså

Abstract

Background and aims

Chronic pain is a leading cause to years lived with disability worldwide. However, few of the interventions used in pain medicine have proven efficacy, and evidence from the existing studies may not be valid for the general pain population. Therefore, it is of utmost need that we describe chronic pain conditions in their most relevant aspects, their various guises, as well as the real world outcomes of our clinical interventions. The most obvious and crude way to make these assessments are through large registries where patient characteristics, treatment characteristics (including but not limited to what, when, how often and by whom), treatment outcomes and patient outcomes are scrutinized and recorded.

Methods and results

This article describes in detail the design and baseline data of the comprehensive Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry (OPR). OPR is the local registry of the largest university and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinic in Norway. Data registration started in October 2015, and approximately 1,000 patients are assessed and treated at the clinic each year. During the first 2 years of running the OPR (through September 2017), a total of 1,712 patient baseline reports were recorded from 2,001 patients. Clinicians enter data about relevant treatments and interventions, while patients provide self-reported data on aspects related to pain and pain management. The patients complete an electronic registration immediately before their first consultation at the outpatient pain clinic. The baseline questions of the OPR cover: Basic demographics; The Modified Oswestry Disability Index to assess general function; A pain drawing to assess pain location; Questions regarding the temporal aspects of pain; Six 0–10 Numeric Rating Scales to assess pain intensity and bothersomeness; The EQ-5D-5L to measure health-related quality of life; The Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 to assess psychological distress; A single question about self-rated health; The general self-efficacy scale to assess the patient’s perceived self-efficacy; The Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist to assess functional disorders; The Injustice Experience Questionnaire to assess whether the patients experience injustice; Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire to assess fatigue; The Insomnia Severity Index to assesses the levels of insomnia symptoms; The Pain Catastrophizing Scale to measure pain catastrophizing and exaggerated negative orientation toward pain stimuli and pain experience; And the SF36v2 to assess patients’ self-report of generic health and wellbeing. The baseline data show that chronic pain patients have a high degree of negative impact in all aspects of their lives.

Conclusions and implications

The OPR is the most comprehensive pain registry for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinics in Norway. Detailed design of the registry and key baseline data are presented. Registries are of great value in that they enable real world effectiveness outcomes for patients with chronic pain conditions. The OPR can thus serve as a model for similar initiatives elsewhere. The OPR cohort may also serve as a historical control in future studies, both with experimental and observational design.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients, secretaries and colleagues at the outpatient clinic for their patience and cooperation.

  1. Authors’ statements

  2. Research funding: This article has been produced without funding sources.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

  4. Informed consent: All patients have signed a written informed consent.

  5. Ethical approval: This article contains only aggregated data, and is not in need of an approval from the Regional committees for medical and health research ethics (REK).

  6. Authors’ contributions: LPG conceived the study and wrote the first draft. SER, HBJ, AS and TML have made substantial contributions to the revisions, additions and reflections resulting in the final manuscript.

References

[1] Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2163–96.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2Search in Google Scholar

[2] Granan L-P. When researchers stumble, clinicians fall and patients suffer. Eur J Pers Centered Healthc 2016;4:431–2.10.5750/ejpch.v4i3.1192Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bidonde J, Busch AJ, Schachter CL, Overend TJ, Kim SY, Góes SM, Boden C, Foulds HJ. Aerobic exercise training for adults with fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD012700.10.1002/14651858.CD012700Search in Google Scholar

[4] Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD011279.10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Marin TJ, Van Eerd D, Irvin E, Couban R, Koes BW, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW, Kamper SJ. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD002193.10.1002/14651858.CD002193.pub2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Parreira P, Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Koes BW, Poquet N, Lin CC, Maher CG. Back schools for chronic non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;8:CD011674.10.1002/14651858.CD011674Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86–9.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124.10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Iqbal SA, Wallach JD, Khoury MJ, Schully SD, Ioannidis JP. Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature. PLoS Biol 2016;14:e1002333.10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Johnston BC, Alonso-Coello P, Friedrich JO, Mustafa RA, Tikkinen KA, Neumann I, Vandvik PO, Akl EA, da Costa BR, Adhikari NK, Dalmau GM, Kosunen E, Mustonen J, Crawford MW, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries. CMAJ 2016;188:25–32.10.1503/cmaj.150430Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Bromley Milton M, Börsbo B, Rovner G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Stibrant-Sunnerhagen K, Gerdle B. Is pain intensity really that important to assess in chronic pain patients? A study based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). PLoS One 2013;8:e65483.10.1371/journal.pone.0065483Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sturgeon JA, Darnall BD, Kao MC, Mackey SC. Physical and psychological correlates of fatigue and physical function: a Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR) study. J Pain 2015;16:291–8.10.1016/j.jpain.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[13] Choinière M, Ware MA, Pagé MG, Lacasse A, Lanctôt H, Beaudet N, Boulanger A, Bourgault P, Cloutier C, Coupal L, De Koninck Y, Dion D, Dolbec P, Germain L, Martin V, Sarret P, Shir Y, Taillefer MC, Tousignant B, Trépanier A, et al. Development and implementation of a registry of patients attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics: The Quebec Pain Registry. Pain Res Manag 2017;2017:8123812.10.1155/2017/8123812Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–3.10.1037/t04205-000Search in Google Scholar

[15] Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:241–7.10.1080/16501970306094Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117–26.10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20:309–18.10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004;5:133–7.10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005Search in Google Scholar

[20] Klepstad P, Loge JH, Borchgrevink PC, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS, Kaasa S. The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancer pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24:517–25.10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00526-2Search in Google Scholar

[21] The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9Search in Google Scholar

[22] Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974;19:1–15.10.1002/bs.3830190102Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sandanger I, Nygard JF, Ingebrigtsen G, Sorensen T, Dalgard OS. Prevalence, incidence and age at onset of psychiatric disorders in Norway. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:570–9.10.1007/s001270050177Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sandanger I, Moum T, Ingebrigtsen G, Sorensen T, Dalgard OS, Bruusgaard D. The meaning and significance of caseness: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. II. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:53–9.10.1007/s001270050112Search in Google Scholar

[25] Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:17–24.10.1093/bja/aen103Search in Google Scholar

[26] Holme I, Anderssen SA. Physical activity, smoking and mortality among men who participated in the Oslo studies of 1972 and 2000. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2014;134:1743–8.10.4045/tidsskr.14.0073Search in Google Scholar

[27] Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997;38:21–37.10.2307/2955359Search in Google Scholar

[28] Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:307–16.10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[29] Benyamini Y. Why does self-rated health predict mortality? An update on current knowledge and a research agenda for psychologists. Psychol Health 2011;26:1407–13.10.1080/08870446.2011.621703Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ganna A, Ingelsson E. 5 year mortality predictors in 498,103 UK Biobank participants: a prospective population-based study. Lancet 2015;386:533–40.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60175-1Search in Google Scholar

[31] Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol 2005;139:439–57.10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Martinez-Calderon J, Zamora-Campos C, Navarro-Ledesma S, Luque-Suarez A. The role of self-efficacy on the prognosis of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. J Pain 2018;19:10–34.10.1016/j.jpain.2017.08.008Search in Google Scholar

[33] Roysamb E, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Norwegian version of the general perceived self-efficacy scale [Internett]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1998. Available from: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/norway.htm. Retrieved 2018-08-23.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Fink P, Toft T, Hansen MS, Ornbol E, Olesen F. Symptoms and syndromes of bodily distress: an exploratory study of 978 internal medical, neurological, and primary care patients. Psychosom Med 2007;69:30–9.10.1097/PSY.0b013e31802e46ebSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Sullivan MJ, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:249–61.10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5Search in Google Scholar

[36] Rodero B, Luciano JV, Montero-Marin J, Casanueva B, Palacin JC, Gili M, López del Hoyo Y, Serrano-Blanco A, Garcia-Campayo J. Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia: psychometric characteristics of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire and relationship with pain catastrophising and pain acceptance. J Psychosom Res 2012;73:86–91.10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[37] Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments. Lyon: Mapi Research Institute, 2004:184.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P, ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005;8:94–104.10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.xSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 1993;37:147–53.10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-PSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Loge JH, Ekeberg O, Kaasa S. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: normative data and associations. J Psychosom Res 1998;45:53–65.10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00291-2Search in Google Scholar

[41] Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep 2011;34:601–8.10.1093/sleep/34.5.601Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med 2001;2:297–307.10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4Search in Google Scholar

[43] Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–35.10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524Search in Google Scholar

[44] Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Waite H, Sullivan M, Tripp DA. Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain 1998;77:253–60.10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00097-9Search in Google Scholar

[45] Fernandes L, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:111.10.1186/1471-2474-13-111Search in Google Scholar

[46] Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1069–76.10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00098-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-05
Revised: 2019-01-03
Accepted: 2019-01-05
Published Online: 2019-01-30
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved.