Background and aims
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common debilitating condition. As the reliability of CTS-specific physical tests and its clinical grading remain a matter of debate, we determined the correlations between these assessments with nerve conduction study (NCS).
In this cross-sectional study, patients with uni or bilateral CTS, which was confirmed in electrodiagnosis, were enrolled. Clinical grading was based on the modified criteria of the Italian CTS Study Group. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Boston Questionnaire (BQ) were used. Physical tests [Phalen’s, reverse Phalen’s, Tinel’s and manual carpal compression test (mCCT)] were performed by a single blinded neurologist. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A total of 100 patients (age=47.48±11.44 years; 85% female) with 181 involved hands were studied. The majority of hands (59.7%) were classified as grade 2 of clinical grading. On NCS, hands with mild (64%), moderate (27%) and severe (9%) CTS were identified. Sensory (velocity, latency and amplitude) and motor parameters (latency and amplitude) were significantly correlated with clinical grades (p-value<0.001). The correlation of NPRS (p-value=0.009) and BQ (p-value<0.001) scores with NCS was significant. None of the physical tests were significantly correlated with NCS in terms of result or duration (p-value>0.05).
We found that physical tests are not a reliable screening method for evaluation of CTS severity. However, the BQ and clinical grading can be more valuable due to their significant correlation with NCS.
Physicians might benefit from employing clinical grading and BQ in practice for better assessment of CTS severity.
This article was extracted from the thesis conducted by Seied Saeed Hosini Hooshiarand with the support of the dean of medical school and research vice-chancellor of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The authors appreciate the assistance of Dr. Laleh Khojasteh for proofreading this manuscript.
Research funding: Funded by a grant from the Shiraz University of Medical sciences (grant no. 10972).
Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Informed written declaration of consent was obtained from each patient and data confidentiality was guaranteed.
Ethical approval: Our study was designed according to the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
 Aroori S, Spence RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J 2008;77:6.18269111Search in Google Scholar
 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:153–8.10.1001/jama.282.2.153Search in Google Scholar
 Dale AM, Harris-Adamson C, Rempel D, Gerr F, Hegmann K, Silverstein B, Burt S, Garg A, Kapellusch J, Merlino L, Thiese MS, Eisen EA, Evanoff B. Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39:495.10.5271/sjweh.335123423472Search in Google Scholar
 Maghsoudipour M, Moghimi S, Dehghaan F, Rahimpanah A. Association of occupational and non-occupational risk factors with the prevalence of work related carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:152.1841870210.1007/s10926-008-9125-4Search in Google Scholar
 Alfonso C, Jann S, Massa R, Torreggiani A. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Neurol Sci 2010;31:243–52.2014596710.1007/s10072-009-0213-9Search in Google Scholar
 Ghasemi-rad M, Nosair E, Vegh A, Mohammadi A, Akkad A, Lesha E, Mohammadi MH, Sayed D, Davarian A, Maleki-Miyandoab T, Hasan A. A handy review of carpal tunnel syndrome: From anatomy to diagnosis and treatment. World J Radiol 2014;6:284.10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.28424976931Search in Google Scholar
 Descatha A, Dale A-M, Franzblau A, Coomes J, Evanoff B. Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:133–5.10.1136/oem.2009.04743119854697Search in Google Scholar
 Dale AM, Descatha A, Coomes J, Franzblau A, Evanoff B. Physical examination has a low yield in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Ind Med 2011;54:1–9.10.1002/ajim.20915Search in Google Scholar
 Amirfeyz R, Clark D, Parsons B, Melotti R, Bhatia R, Leslie I, Bannister G. Clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome in contemporary practice. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:471–4.2069002710.1007/s00402-010-1150-zSearch in Google Scholar
 Cudlip SA, Howe FA, Clifton A, Schwartz MS, Bell BA. Magnetic resonance neurography studies of the median nerve before and after carpal tunnel decompression. J Neurosurg 2002;96:1046–51.12066905Search in Google Scholar
 Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1089–94.10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5Search in Google Scholar
 Bland JD. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:1280–3.1091826910.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1280::AID-MUS20>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar
 Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente E, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;96:211–7.9325471Search in Google Scholar
 Padua L, Padua R, LoMonaco M, Romanini E, Tonali P, Group ICS. Italian multicentre study of carpal tunnel syndrome: study design. Ital J Neurol Sci 1998;19:285–9.1093344810.1007/BF00713854Search in Google Scholar
 Padua L, Padua R, Monaco ML, Aprile I, Tonali P, Group ICS. Multiperspective assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome a multicenter study. Neurology 1999;53:1654–9.1056360810.1212/WNL.53.8.1654Search in Google Scholar
 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585–92.10.2106/00004623-199311000-000028245050Search in Google Scholar
 de Carvalho Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:78.10.1186/1471-2474-7-7817054773Search in Google Scholar
 Greenslade J, Mehta R, Belward P, Warwick D. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg 2004;29:159–64.10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.010Search in Google Scholar
 Rezazadeh A, Bakhtiary AH, Samaei A, Moghimi J. Validity and reliability of the Persian Boston questionnaire in Iranian patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Koomesh 2014:138–45.Search in Google Scholar
 Foroozanfar Z, Ebrahimi H, Khanjani N. Validity and reliability of the Persian Boston Questionnaire in diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci 2015;2:50–6.Search in Google Scholar
 Becker J, Nora DB, Gomes I, Stringari FF, Seitensus R, Panosso JS, Ehlers JC. An evaluation of gender, obesity, age and diabetes mellitus as risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:1429–34.1216932410.1016/S1388-2457(02)00201-8Search in Google Scholar
 McDiarmid M, Oliver M, Ruser J, Gucer P. Male and female rate differences in carpal tunnel syndrome injuries: personal attributes or job tasks? Environ Res 2000;83:23–32.10.1006/enrs.2000.404210845778Search in Google Scholar
 Mattioli S, Baldasseroni A, Curti S, Cooke RM, Mandes A, Zanardi F, Farioli A, Buiatti E, Campo G, Violante FS. Incidence rates of surgically treated idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome in blue-and white-collar workers and housewives in Tuscany, Italy. Occup Environ Med 2009;66:299–304.1925491010.1136/oem.2008.040212Search in Google Scholar
 Gulliford MC, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Hughes RA. Increased incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome up to 10 years before diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1929–30.10.2337/dc06-093916873807Search in Google Scholar
 Karpitskaya Y, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Prevalence of smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and thyroid disease in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 2002;48:269–73.10.1097/00000637-200203000-0000711862031Search in Google Scholar
 Srikanteswara PK, Cheluvaiah JD, Agadi JB, Nagaraj K. The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:OC13–8.27630881Search in Google Scholar
 Ansari NN, Adelmanesh F, Naghdi S, Mousavi S. The relationship between symptoms, clinical tests and nerve conduction study findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009;49:53.Search in Google Scholar
 Ogura T, Akiyo N, Kubo T, Kira Y, Aramaki S, Nakanishi F. The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Surg Res 2003;11:190–3.10.1177/230949900301100215Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved