Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 14, 2019

Somatocognitive therapy of women with provoked vulvodynia: a pilot study

Gro Killi Haugstad, Slawomir Wojniusz, Rolf Kirschner, Unni Kirste, Ingvild Lilleheie and Tor S. Haugstad

Abstract

Background and aims

Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a common persistent pain state among women in the Western world, causing dyspareunia, psychological distress and challenges against fertility. Therapies aimed at relieving pain (physiotherapy) and psychological distress (psychotherapy) are often recommended, sometimes in multimodal combinations. We have previously developed somatocognitive therapy (SCT) as a multimodal intervention, administered by a physiotherapist, to a different group of patients with gynecological pain, i.e. chronic (unprovoked) pelvic pain (CPP, also referred to as low abdominal pain). In a randomized, controlled study this intervention was shown to reduce pain experience and improve motor function or body awareness. Here we present the results of a clinical follow-up pilot study with 30 women with PVD, applying SCT administered by third year bachelor students in physiotherapy. Main outcome was pain experience, secondary outcomes were psychological distress and motor functions of the patients.

Methods

Thirty women diagnosed with PVD were recruited from a tertiary university hospital clinic of gynecology, and included in the follow-up pilot study at an out-patient physiotherapy clinic. Each patient participated in 10–14 therapy sessions over 6 weeks. The students were supervised by an experienced physiotherapist with extensive background in this clinical area, who also performed two clinical sessions with each of the patients at the end of the treatment period. Before therapy, the patients were evaluated for pain experience (visual analogue scale of pain, VAS), psychological distress (Tampa scale of kinesiophobia, TSK) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) as well as body function (standardized Mensendieck test, SMT). Statistical analyzes were performed by using the average ± standard deviation, statistical significance of changes calculated by means of the t-test.

Results

Average pain score before therapy were 7.77 ± 1.98, after 6 weeks of intervention 4.17 ± 2.07 and at 6 months’ follow-up 1.66 ± 1.08 (average ± standard deviation), changes being significant below p < 0.01 level. Secondary outcome variables assessing psychological distress and sub optimal motor patterns were also significantly improved. For example, anxiety and depression scores were reduced by approximately 40%, and respiration pattern score improved by almost 80%.

Conclusions

Multimodal somatocognitive therapy reduced levels of pain and psychological distress, and improved motor functions in women with PVD after 6 weeks of interventions. All variables were further improved at 6 months’ follow-up. Thus, somatocognitive therapy may be a useful treatment option for patients with PVD. However, there are limitations to this study, since there was no control group, and suboptimal blinding during assessment of the data.

Implications

Somatocognitive therapy may be a useful tool when treating PVD patients. More studies, in particular RCTs, should be performed to further evaluate this intervention and corroborate the results from this pilot study.


Corresponding author: Gro Killi Haugstad, MSH, PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 44, Oslo, Norway, Phone: (+47) 48066595

  1. Authors’ statements

  2. Research funding: None.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complies with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics North approved the study. The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research (2010-15/1546).

References

[1] Reed B, Harlow SD, Sen A. Prevalence and demographic characteristics of vulvodynia in a population-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:170.e1–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Moyal-Barracco M, Lynch PJ. ISSVD terminology and classification of vulvodynia: a historical perspective. J Reprod Med 2004;49:772–7.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Nunns D. Vulval pain syndromes. BJOG 2000;107:1185–93.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11606.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Sadownik L, Seal BN, Brotto LA. Provoked vestibulodynia-women’s experience of participating in a multidisciplinary vulvodynia program. J Sex Med 2012;9:1086–93.10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02641.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Desrochers G, Bergeron S, Khalifé S, Dupuis MJ, Jodoin M. Fear avoidance and self-efficacy in relation to pain and sexual impairment in women with provoked vestibulodynia. Clin J Pain 2009;25:520–7.10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819976e3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Dargie E, Gilron I, Pukall CF. Provoked vestibulodynia. A comparative examination of mental health, sleep, sexual functioning and relationship adjustment. Clin J Pain 2017;33:870–6.10.1097/AJP.0000000000000480Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Goldstein A, Pukall CF, Brown C, Bergeron S, Stein A, Kellogg-Spadt S. Vulvodynia: assessment and treatment. J Sex Med 2016;13:572–90.10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Dunkley C, Brutto LA. Psyhchological treatments for provoked vestibulodynia: integration of mindfulness-based and cognitive behavioral therapies. J Clin Psychol 2016;72:637–50.10.1002/jclp.22286Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Lindstrom S, Kvist LJ. Treatment of Provoked Vulvodynia in a Swedish cohort using desensitization exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy. BMC Womens Health 2015;15:108–9.10.1186/s12905-015-0265-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Haugstad G, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Wojniusz S, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Continuing improvement of chronic pelvic pain in women after short-term Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy: results of a 1-year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:615.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Haugstad G, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Wojniusz S, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy. A controlled, randomized intervention study of patients with chronic low abdominal pain. Preliminary report. 12th International Congress of the International Society of Psychosmatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Haugstad G, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy as treatment approach to chronic pelvic pain: results of a randomized controlled intervention study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1303–10.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Winterowd C, Beck AT, Gruener D. Cognitive therapy with chronic pain patients. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2003.10.1111/j.1530-7085.2004.04008.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Klemmetsen I. Håndbok i Mensendieck-gymnastikk. Oslo: Vett & Viten, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Fersum V, O’Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvåle A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2013;17:916–28.10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] International Association for the Study of Pain. International Pain Summit 2010. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/Advocacy/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1312.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nijs J, Roussel N, Wilgen C, Köke A, Smeets R. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists’ and patients’ attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther 2013;18:96–102.10.1016/j.math.2012.11.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Fougner M, Haugstad GK. Treating gynecological pain: the experiences of bachelor students in physiotherapy performing somatocognitive therapy. Physiother Theory Pract 2015;31:318–26.10.3109/09593985.2014.1003343Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] McCormack H, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 1988;18:1007–19.10.1017/S0033291700009934Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Golderberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Malt U. The validity of the General Health Questionnaire in a sample of accidentally injured adults. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1989;355:103–12.10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb05260.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Haugen A, Grøvle L, Keller A, Grotle M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia. Spine 2008;33:395–601.10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c6c4bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, del Real MT, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2915–20.10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75aeSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333.10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Moseley G, Vlaeyen J. Reply. Pain 2015;156:2109–10.10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000272Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] O’Sullivan PB, Caneiro JP, O’Keeffe M, Smith A, Dankaerts W, Fersum K, O’Sullivan K. Cognitive functional therapy: an integrated behavioral approach for the targeted management of disabling low back pain. Phys Ther 2018;98:408–23.10.1093/ptj/pzy022Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Malfliet A, Kregel J, Coppieters I, DePauw R, Meeus M, Roussel N, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Nijs J. Effect of pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training on chronic spinal pain a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:808–17.10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0492Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Morin M, Carroll MS, Bergeron S. Systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy modalities in women with provoked vestibulodynia. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:295–322.10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Stagg K, Douglas J, Iacono T. A scoping review of the working alliance in acquired brain injury rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2017;31:1–9.10.1080/09638288.2017.1396366Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Danielsen K, Dahl-Michelsen T, Håkonsen E, Haugstad GK. Recovering from provoked vestibulodynia: experiences from encounters with somatocognitive therapy. Physiother Theory Pract 2018;23:1–10.10.1080/09593985.2018.1442540Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Haugstad G, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Haakonsen E, Haugstad TS. Somatocognitive therapy in the management of chronic gynaecological pain. A review of the historical background and results of a current approach. Scand J Pain 2018;18:124–9.10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.02.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Groven K, Råheim M, Haakonsen E, Haugstad GK. Will I ever be a true woman? An exploration of the experiences of women with vestibulodynia. Health Care Women Int 2016;37:818–35.10.1080/07399332.2015.1103739Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Haugstad G, Wojniusz S, Kirste UM, Kirschner RS, Lilleheie I, Haugstad TS. Pain, psychological distress and motor pattern in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) – symptom characteristics and therapy suggestions. Scand J Pain 2018;18:221–7.10.1515/sjpain-2017-0173Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Moseley G, Butler D. 15 years of explaining pain – the past the present and the future. J Pain 2015;16:807–13.10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Kårbø M, Haugstad GK, Stubhaug A, Wojniusz S. The Standardised Mensendieck Test as a tool for evaluation of movement quality in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Scand J Pain 2018;18:203–10.10.1515/sjpain-2018-0028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Cramer H, Mehling WE, Saha FJ, Dobos G, Lauche R. Postural awareness and its relation to pain: validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:2031–9.10.1186/s12891-018-2031-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Laird R, Kent P, Keating JL. Modifying patterns of movement in people with low back pain – does it help? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:169.10.1186/1471-2474-13-169Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Miranda Varella Pereira G, Soriano Marcolino GM, Silveira Nogueira Reis Z, Vale de Castro Monteiro M. A systematic review of drug treatment of vulvodynia: evidence of a strong placebo effect. BJOG 2018;125:1216–24.10.1111/1471-0528.15223Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Davis SN, Bergeron S, Blink YM, Lambert B. Women with provoked vestibulodynia experience clinically significant reductions in pain regardless of treatment: results from a 2-year follow-up study. J Sex Med 2013;12: 3080–7.10.1111/jsm.12309Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-01-14
Revised: 2019-04-08
Accepted: 2019-04-15
Published Online: 2019-08-14
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

©2019 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved.

Scroll Up Arrow