Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 25, 2020

Exploring the impact of pain management programme attendance on complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) patients’ decision making regarding immunosuppressant treatment to manage their chronic pain condition

Calum Murray, Samantha Harrison, Andreas Goebel and Hannah Twiddy

Abstract

Objectives

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a rare chronic pain condition for which no curative treatment exists. Patients in tertiary centres are often required to make decisions about treatment options. This study was conducted to explore how prior attendance of a pain management program might alter patients’ decision making processes.

Methods

This qualitative study uses focus groups to gather patient views on an immunosuppressant drug treatment (mycophenolate) for the management of CRPS. Participants were allocated to one of three focus groups based on their treatment journey; Group 1 (n=3) were involved in a recent mycophenolate drug trial; Group 2 (n=5) were neither involved in the trial nor attended a Pain Management Programme (PMP); Group 3 (n=6) were not involved in the trial but had attended a PMP. Outcomes were considered within the framework of Leventhal’s Common Sense Model (CSM) in relation to the decision making process.

Results

Thematic analysis identified differing themes for each group. Group 1: (1) Medication as a positive form of treatment, (2) The trial/drug and (3) Pacing. Group 2: (1) Medication as form of treatment, (2) Other forms of support/treatment and (3) Side effects of mycophenolate. Group 3: (1) Varied view of medication, (2) Consideration of other forms of support and (3) Side effects.

Conclusions

Attendance on a PMP might provide patients with skills to better manage uncertainty when faced with various treatment options. Leventhal’s model goes some way to explaining this. The specific importance of, and benefit from understanding pacing when commencing an effective drug treatment for chronic pain became apparent.


Corresponding author: Hannah Twiddy, DClinPsy, Clinical Psychologist, Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UK, E-mail:

Andreas Goebel and Hannah Twiddy: Shared authorship.


  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complies with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board or equivalent committee.

References

1. Goebel, A, Barker, CH, Turner-Stokes, L, Atkins, RM, Cameron, H, Cossins, L. Complex regional pain syndrome in adults: UK guidelines for diagnosis, referral and management in primary and secondary care, 2nd ed. London: RCP; 2012:87 p. Search in Google Scholar

2. Quisel, A, Gill, JM, Witherell, P. Complex regional pain syndrome underdiagnosed: CRPS type 1 is an under-recognized problem in limbs recovering from fracture or immobilized post-stroke. J Fam Pract 2005; 54: 524–33. Search in Google Scholar

3. Bruehl, S. Complex regional pain syndrome. Bmj 2015; 351: h2730. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2730. Search in Google Scholar

4. Stanton‐Hicks, MD, Burton, AW, Bruehl, SP, Carr, DB, Harden, RN, Hassenbusch, SJ, et al. An updated interdisciplinary clinical pathway for CRPS: report of an expert panel. Pain Pract 2002; 2: 1–6. Search in Google Scholar

5. Tran, DQ, Duong, S, Bertini, P, Finlayson, RJ. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: a review of the evidence. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 149–66. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9237-0. Search in Google Scholar

6. Harden, RN, Oaklander, AL, Burton, AW, Perez, RS, Richardson, K, Swan, M, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Pain Med 2013; 14: 180–229. http://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12033. Search in Google Scholar

7. Gierthmühlen, J, Binder, A, Baron, R. Mechanism-based treatment in complex regional pain syndromes. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10: 518. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.140. Search in Google Scholar

8. McCormick, ZL, Gagnon, CM, Caldwell, M, Patel, J, Kornfeld, S, Atchison, J, et al. Short-term functional, emotional, and pain outcomes of patients with complex regional pain syndrome treated in a comprehensive interdisciplinary pain management program. Pain Med 2015; 16: 2357–67. http://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12817. Search in Google Scholar

9. Joosten, EA, DeFuentes-Merillas, L, De Weert, GH, Sensky, T, Van Der Staak, CP, de Jong, CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 219–26. http://doi.org/10.1159/000126073. Search in Google Scholar

10. Leventhal, H, Diefenbach, M, Leventhal, EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognit Ther Res 1992; 16: 143–63. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf01173486. Search in Google Scholar

11. Cheung, JM, Bartlett, DJ, Armour, CL, Laba, TL, Saini, B. To drug or not to drug: a qualitative study of patients’ decision-making processes for managing insomnia. Behav Sleep Med 2018; 16: 1–26. http://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2016.1163702. Search in Google Scholar

12. Nicklas, LB, Dunbar, M, Wild, M. Adherence to pharmacological treatment of non-malignant chronic pain: the role of illness perceptions and medication beliefs. Psych Health 2010; 25: 601–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/08870440902783610. Search in Google Scholar

13. Benson, J, Britten, N. Patients’ decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study. Bmj 2002; 325: 873. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7369.873. Search in Google Scholar

14. Townsend, A, Hunt, K, Wyke, S. Managing multiple morbidity in mid-life: a qualitative study of attitudes to drug use. Bmj 2003; 327: 837. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7419.837. Search in Google Scholar

15. Tamburin, S, Borg, K, Caro, XJ, Jann, S, Clark, AJ, Magrinelli, F, et al. Immunoglobulin G for the treatment of chronic pain: report of an expert workshop. Pain Med 2014; 15: 1072–82. http://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12319. Search in Google Scholar

16. Goebel, A. Autoantibody pain. Autoimmun Rev 2016; 15: 552–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2016.02.011. Search in Google Scholar

17. Helyes, Z, Tékus, V, Szentes, N, Pohóczky, K, Botz, B, Kiss, T, et al. Transfer of complex regional pain syndrome to mice via human autoantibodies is mediated by interleukin-1–induced mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116: 13067–76. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820168116. Search in Google Scholar

18. Aradillas, E, Schwartzman, RJ, Grothusen, JR, Goebel, A, Alexander, GM. Plasma exchange therapy in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Physician 2015; 18: 383–94. Search in Google Scholar

19. Goebel, A, Jacob, A, Frank, B, Sacco, P, Alexander, G, Philips, C, et al. Mycophenolate for persistent complex regional pain syndrome, a parallel, open, randomised, proof of concept trial. Scan J Pain 2018; 18: 29–37. http://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2017-0154. Search in Google Scholar

20. Puchta, C, Potter, J. Focus group practice. London: Sage; 2005. Search in Google Scholar

21. Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Search in Google Scholar

22. Kurklinsky, S, Perez, RB, Lacayo, ER, Sletten, CD. The efficacy of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for improving function in people with chronic pain. Pain Res Treat; 2016. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/prt/2016/7217684. Search in Google Scholar

23. Pike, A, Hearn, L, de C Williams, AC. Effectiveness of psychological interventions for chronic pain on health care use and work absence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2016; 157: 777–85. http://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000434. Search in Google Scholar

24. Guildford, BJ, Daly-Eichenhardt, A, Hill, B, Sanderson, K, McCracken, LM. Analgesic reduction during an interdisciplinary pain management programme: treatment effects and processes of change. Br J Pain 2018; 12: 72–86. http://doi.org/10.1177/2049463717734016. Search in Google Scholar

25. Kashdan, TB, Rottenberg, J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev 2010; 30: 865–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001. Search in Google Scholar

26. Onwuegbuzie, AJ, Jiao, QG, Bostick, SL. Library anxiety: theory, research, and applications. Maryland: Scarecrow Press; 2004. Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2019-0142).

Received: 2019-10-07
Accepted: 2020-04-13
Published Online: 2020-08-25
Published in Print: 2020-10-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston