Summary
Antonomasia implies two opposing semantic mechanisms: the replacement of a proper name by an appellative, epithet or periphrasis (e. g. the Iron Lady standing for Margaret Thatcher), or the attribution of a proper name to an appellative or a set of certain personality traits (e. g. a Penelope standing for a faithful, devoted wife). The aim of this paper is to show that studying antonomasia as a figure of speech driven by a cognitive metonymic and metaphoric mechanism can contribute to revealing how women are conceptualised and consequently talked about. We do so by analysing figurative antonomasia in a dataset of 307 examples extracted from Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (BCMS) webpages, although the findings are generisable to other languages as well. We show that antonomasia is frequently based on entrenched stereotypes about women and that in the collective consciousness of the BCMS speakers women are often conceptualised as (sexual) objects, typically valued by aesthetic criteria, as well as in relation to their possession of certain stereotypical female traits (self-sacrifice or subordination to others, excessive emotion but also cruelty, manipulativeness, showiness, talkativeness, etc.). In addition, the analysis also revealed that a woman is principally identified through her relations with other beings (as a mother, sister, wife or lover). Our study thus confirms that studying antonomasia within gender and language studies is a goal well worth pursuing.
References
Bagić, Krešimir. 2012. Rječnik stilskih figura. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Search in Google Scholar
Bagić, Krešimir. 2010. Imena koja (se) pamte. In Vijenac XVIII (423). 7–7.Search in Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2004. Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly “irregular” grammatical behaviour of paragon names. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation 28. 357–374.Search in Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. Metonymy in cognitive linguistics. In Huber Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, Rene Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 223–255. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.243.15barSearch in Google Scholar
Benčić, Živa. 1995. Antonomazija. In Živa Benčić & Dunja Fališevac (eds.), Tropi i figure, 189–218. Zagreb: Zavod za znanost o književnosti. Search in Google Scholar
Bratić, Vesna & Milica Vuković-Stamatović. 2017. Commodification of women through conceptual metaphors: The metaphor woman as a car in the Western Balkans. In Gender and Language 11 (1). 51–76. 10.1558/genl.22009Search in Google Scholar
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó. 2007. When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 125–142. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.136.09brdSearch in Google Scholar
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó. 2001. Vlastita imena između metonimijske Scile i metaforičke Haridbe. In Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje 27. 31–48. Search in Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 2005. Jezik i kultura. Belgrade: Biblioteka XX vek. Search in Google Scholar
Diabah, Grace. 2016. SEX-FOR-GENDER metonymy? A consideration of three expressions from Akan. In Gender & Language 10 (2). 170–190.10.1558/genl.v10i2.19393Search in Google Scholar
Enos, Theresa. 1996. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition. Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. New York & London: Garland Publishing.10.2307/358608Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank & Robert Jäschke. 2020. ‘The Michael Jordan of greatness’ – Extracting Vossian antonomasia from two decades of The New York Times, 1987–2007. In Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35 (1). 34–42.Search in Google Scholar
Glušica, Rajka. 2006. Upotreba rodno senzitivnog jezika. In Nada Drobnjak (ed.), On je rekla. Upotreba rodno-senzitivnog jezika, 7–12. Podgorica: Kancelarija za ravnopravnost polova Vlade Republike Crne Gore.Search in Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In Cognitive Linguistics 1 (3). 323–342.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323Search in Google Scholar
Grgić, Ana & Davor Nikolić. 2011 a. Antonomazija – figura kulturnoga pamćenja. In Fluminensia 23 (2). 129–142.Search in Google Scholar
Grgić, Ana & Davor Nikolić. 2011 b. Upotreba i prepoznavanje antonomazija – usporedba mlađih i starijih govornika. In Govor XXVIII (1). 25–46. Search in Google Scholar
Holmquist, Kenneth & Jaroslaw Płuciennik. 2010. Princess Antonomasia and the Truth: Two Types of Metonymic Relations. In Armin Burkhardt & Brigitte Nerlich (eds.), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, 373–383. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110230215.373Search in Google Scholar
Kovačević, Barbara. 2020. Muško I žensko u frazeologiji II. In Hrvatski jezik: znanstveno-popularni časopis za kulturu hrvatskoga jezika 7 (1). 23–26. Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press. Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman’s place. In Language in Society 2 (1). 45–80. 10.1017/S0047404500000051Search in Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1990. Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Einführung für Studierende der klassischen, romanischen, englischen und deutschen Philologie. Ismaning: Max Hueber Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
López Rodríguez, Irene. 2008. The representation of women in teenage and women’s magazines: Recurring metaphors in English. In Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 15. 15–42.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos. 2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. In Social Semiotics 27 (1). 39–58.10.1080/10350330.2016.1145371Search in Google Scholar
Matešić, Josip. 1982. Frazeološki rječnik hrvatskog ili srpskog jezika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, Sarah. 2008. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Montashery, Iraj. 2013. Figurative construction of gender through metaphor and metonymy. In Advances in English Linguistics 2 (1). 105–109.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Charles. 2013. Margaret Thatcher: The authorised biography. London: Penguin (epub).Search in Google Scholar
Mršić, Dubravko. 2000. Eponimski leksikon. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Search in Google Scholar
Otašević, Đorđe. 2012. Frazeološki rečnik srpskog jezika. Novi Sad: Prometej.Search in Google Scholar
Perović, Slavica. 2017. Pojmovna metafora kulturno srodnih pojmova. Podgorica: CANU. Search in Google Scholar
Popović, Tanja et al. 2007. Rečnik književnih termina. Belgrade: Logos art.Search in Google Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol. 2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. In Journal of Pragmatics 42 (1). 64–96.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.019Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
