Abstract
Common definitions of pluricentricity rely on the notions of centre, nation, and norm, frequently without, however, offering sufficient detail on what precisely these mean. These terms are often applied to classify languages as pluricentric or not, without adequately recognising intra-linguistic variation and dynamics of power within a speaker community (language ownership). Using the example of a national minority language from North-West Germany, North Frisian, this article discusses how a narrow reading of the definition of pluricentricity would deny such a status to this language, when in fact the sociolinguistic situation of North Frisian matches that of many acknowledged pluricentric languages. Instead, the article suggests that the term nation should no longer be equated with state, that the term centre be further specified to determine what institution or which individuals have authority over language, and that the term norm be more clearly articulated to account for the variability in “correct” language use.
Acknowledgement
I am grateful to Temmo Bosse (Flensburg), Samantha Litty (Flensburg), Debbie Pinfold (Bristol) and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful criticisms and useful suggestions. I also owe the guest editors of this volume particular thanks for the invitation to submit my thoughts on North Frisian and for their suggestions for improving this contribution. Any remaining errors and infelicitous judgements are, of course, my responsibility.
8 References
Ammon, Ulrich (ed.) (1989a): Status and Functions of Languages and Language Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110860252Search in Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich (1989b): Towards a descriptive framework for the status/function (social position) of a language within a country. In: U. Ammon (ed.): Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter, 21–106.10.1515/9783110860252.21Search in Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich (1995): Die deutsche Sprache in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872170Search in Google Scholar
Arfsten, Antje/Riecken, Claas (2017): Die nordfriesische Rechtschreibung im nationalen Konflikt. In: Nordfriesisches Jahrbuch 52, 67–74.Search in Google Scholar
Arfsten, Antje/Paulsen-Schwarz, Anne/Terhart, Lena (2020): Friesische Gebrauchsgrammatik Fering. Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut.Search in Google Scholar
Århammar, Nils (2008): Das Nordfriesische, eine bedrohte Minderheitensprache in zehn Dialekten: eine Bestandsaufnahme. In: Munske, Horst Haider (ed.): Sterben die Dialekte aus? Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dialektforschung. www.dialektforschung.phil.uni-erlangen.de/sterbendialekte.Search in Google Scholar
Bosse, Temmo (2019): (Mis)matching linguistic, geographical and ethnic identities. The case of the East Frisians. In: Fellerer, Jan/Pyrah, Robert/Turda, Marius (eds.): Identities in-between in East-Central Europe. London: Routledge, 250–270.10.4324/9780429282614-13Search in Google Scholar
Bosse, Temmo/Langer, Nils (2020): Zur Wahrnehmung von Sprachnormautoritäten in Nordfriesischen. In: Andresen, Helga/Fredsted, Elin/Januschek, Franz (eds.): Regionale Sprachenvielfalt. Hildesheim: Olms, 59–84.Search in Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael (ed.) (1992): Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110888140Search in Google Scholar
Cowe, S. Peter (1992): Amen tel hay kay: Armenian as a pluricentric language. In: Clyne, Michael (ed.): Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 325–346.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Winifred/Langer, Nils (2006): The Making of Bad Language. Frankfurt: Lang.Search in Google Scholar
del Valle, José (ed.) (2013): A Political History of Spanish: The Making of a Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794339Search in Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa/Elspaß, Stephan/Ziegler, Arne (2018): Variantengrammatik des Standarddeutschen. Institut für deutsche Sprache Mannheim [mediawiki.ids-mannheim.de/VarGra/]; last access on 27 March 2021.10.1515/9783110363449-024Search in Google Scholar
Faltings, Volkert (2019): Zum Gebrauch des niederdeutschen Reflexivpronomens sik ‘sich’ im Nordfriesischen. In: Nordfriesisches Jahrbuch 2020. Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut, 85–112.Search in Google Scholar
Havinga, Anna/Langer, Nils (eds.) (2015): Invisible Languages in the 19th Century. Oxford: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0353-0760-3Search in Google Scholar
Jacob-Owens, Timothy (2017): Multilingualism on Amrum Language Contact and Variation 1839–1851. Kiel: University of Kiel.Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, Peter (1927): Wörterbuch der nordfriesischen Sprache der Wiedingharde. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. (1988): Eloquence and Power. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz (1978): Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Search in Google Scholar
Landtag of Schleswig-Holstein (2004): Gesetz zur Förderung des Friesischen im öffentlichen Raum. [https://www.gesetze-rechtsprechung.sh.juris.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=FriesischG+SH+Eingangsformel&psml=bsshoprod.psml&max=true]; last access on 27 March 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Jens (1982): Halligfriesische Sprachlehre. Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut.Search in Google Scholar
Lüdi, Georges (1992): French as a pluricentric language. In: Clyne, Michael (ed.): Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 155–170.Search in Google Scholar
Muhr, Rudolf (2016): The state of the art of research on pluricentric languages: where we were and where we are now. In: Muhr, Rudolf (ed.): Pluricentric Languages and Non-Dominant Varieties Worldwide. Part I: Pluricentric Languages across Continents. Features and Usage. Vienna: Peter Lang, 13–40.Search in Google Scholar
Muhr, Rudolf (n.d.): What is a pluricentric language? [http://www.pluricentriclanguages.org/pluricentricity/what-is-a-pluricentric-language]; last access on 27 March 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Polenz, Peter von (1988): Binnendeutsch oder plurizentrische Sprachkultur? In: Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 16, 198–218.Search in Google Scholar
Schmidlin, Regina/Davies, Winifred/Wyss, Eva (2017): Plurizentrik revisited – aktuelle Perspektiven auf die Variation der deutschen Standardsprache. In: Davies, Winifred/Häcki Buhofer, Annelies/Schmidlin, Regula/Wagner, Melanie/Wyss, Eva (eds.): Standardsprache zwischen Norm und Praxis. Tübingen: Narr, 7–20.Search in Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove/Phillipson, Robert (1989): Mother tongue: the theoretical and sociopolitical dimensions of a concept. In: Ammon, Ulrich (ed.): Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter, 450–477.10.1515/9783110860252.450Search in Google Scholar
Steensen, Thomas (1986): Die friesische Bewegung in Nordfriesland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (1879–1945). Neumünster: Wachholtz.Search in Google Scholar
Terhart, Lena/Admiraal, Femmy/Langer, Nils (in press): Which North Frisian should be maintained? In: Linn, Mary (ed.): Sustaining Minority Languages in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Melanie (2009): Lay Linguistics and School Teaching: An Empirical Sociolinguistic Study in the Moselle Franconian Dialect Area. Stuttgart: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Alastair (2015): North Frisian: The North Frisian Language in Education in Germany. Ljouwert/Leeuwarden, NL: Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
