Abstract
In this paper, we explore whether the myriad production and consumption household practices in four societies of Southeastern Europe (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia) can empirically be reduced to a relatively small number of coherent and socially meaningful combinations, which we have labelled household strategies of action. Approaching the same data from two different angles, namely, using Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) and Two-Step Cluster Analysis (TCA), we have identified five general household strategies and eleven more detailed and specific sub-strategies. More importantly, by projecting these strategies and sub-strategies onto the social space, we have shown that these household practices are linked to the class position of households. On a more general level, it is indicated that the study of household strategies can be viewed as a way of rendering relatively static structural approaches, in this case the Bourdieusian approach to social space, more dynamic.
Appendix
Table A1
Household production and consumption practices in four SEE countries.[21]
B-H | B-H% | CRO | CRO% | SLO | SLO% | SRB | SRB% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main sources of household income | ||||||||
Income from full-time jobs | 414 | 43.8% | 511 | 51.3% | 424 | 47.3% | 425 | 42.8 |
Income from part-time jobs | 74 | 7.8% | 328 | 32.9% | - | - | 62 | 6.2% |
Pensions | 357 | 37.7% | 85 | 8.5% | 330 | 36.8% | 304 | 30.6% |
Agriculture | - | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 4.7% |
Other sources of income | 101 | 10.7% | 72 | 7.2% | 79 | 8.8% | 59 | 5.9% |
Mixed sources of income | - | - | - | - | 63 | 7.0% | 96 | 9.7% |
Total | 946 | 100% | 996 | 100% | 896 | 100% | 993 | 100% |
Number of household incomes | ||||||||
No permanent income | 146 | 14.7% | 75 | 7.6% | 39 | 4.4% | 113 | 11.5% |
One salary | 232 | 23.4% | 207 | 21.0% | 176 | 19.8% | 213 | 21.7% |
One pension | 285 | 28.8% | 217 | 22.0% | 157 | 17.7% | 192 | 19.6% |
Two salaries | 134 | 13.5% | 210 | 21.3% | 230 | 25.9% | 182 | 18.5% |
Two pensions | 41 | 4.1% | 96 | 9.7% | 139 | 15.6% | 84 | 8.6% |
Salary & pension | 89 | 9.0% | 74 | 7.5% | 55 | 6.2% | 88 | 9.0% |
3+ incomes | 63 | 6.4% | 109 | 10.9% | 93 | 10.5% | 110 | 11.2% |
Total | 990 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 889 | 100% | 982 | 100% |
Does the household perform any additional economic activities (in formal, informal or social economy) | ||||||||
Add_economic_activities-- | 902 | 90.0% | 909 | 90.9% | 790 | 87.4% | 852 | 85.2% |
Add_economic_activities++ | 100 | 10.0% | 91 | 9.1% | 114 | 12.6% | 148 | 14.8% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Household production | ||||||||
Food production & processing | 219 | 21.9% | 183 | 18.3% | 100 | 11.1% | 267 | 26.7% |
Food processing | 82 | 8.2% | 243 | 24.3% | 63 | 7.0% | 193 | 19.3% |
Mixed production | 132 | 13.2% | 64 | 6.4% | 274 | 30.3% | 86 | 8.6% |
No production | 569 | 56.8% | 510 | 51.0% | 467 | 51.7% | 454 | 45.4% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100.0% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Groups according to the percentage of food households produced themselves | ||||||||
Food_production 0% | 495 | 49.4% | 480 | 48.0% | 376 | 41.6% | 531 | 53.1% |
Food_production < 25% | 214 | 21.4% | 270 | 27.0% | 279 | 30.9% | 185 | 18.5% |
Food production 26-50% | 196 | 19.6% | 154 | 15.4% | 172 | 19.0% | 151 | 15.1% |
Food production 51-100% | 97 | 9.7% | 96 | 9.6% | 77 | 8.5% | 133 | 13.3% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Groups according to the percentage of food brought from a village (from parents or relatives) | ||||||||
Food_vilage 0% | 814 | 81.2% | 690 | 69.0% | 605 | 66.9% | 836 | 83.6% |
Food_village < 25% | 86 | 8.6% | 208 | 20.8% | 220 | 24.3% | 94 | 9.4% |
Food_village > 25% | 102 | 10.2% | 102 | 10.2% | 79 | 8.7% | 70 | 7.0% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Total number of products/activities reduced | ||||||||
Reduction 0 | 409 | 40.8% | 282 | 28.2% | 334 | 36.9% | 233 | 23.3% |
Reduction 1-3 | - | - | - | - | 195 | 21.6% | 180 | 18.0% |
Reduction 1-5 | 216 | 21.6% | 278 | 27.8% | - | - | - | - |
Reduction 4-7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 249 | 24.9% |
Reduction 4-9 | 264 | 29.2% | ||||||
Reduction 6-10 | 176 | 17.6% | 304 | 30.4% | - | - | - | - |
Reduction 8-10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 147 | 14.7% |
Reduction 10-13 | - | - | - | - | 111 | 12.3% | - | - |
Reduction 11-13 | 201 | 20.1% | 136 | 13.6% | - | - | 191 | 19.1% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 invest in business? | ||||||||
Invest_business++ | 74 | 7.6% | 72 | 7.2% | 48 | 5.3% | 83 | 8.3% |
Invest_business-- | 902 | 92.4% | 928 | 92.8% | 852 | 94.7% | 914 | 91.7% |
Total | 976 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 900 | 100% | 997 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 buy real estate? | ||||||||
Bought_real_estate++ | 43 | 4.4% | 51 | 5.1% | 68 | 7.5% | 54 | 5.4% |
Bought_real_estate-- | 934 | 95.6% | 949 | 94.9% | 834 | 92.5% | 942 | 94.6% |
Total | 977 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 902 | 100% | 996 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 buy a car? | ||||||||
Bought_car++ | 136 | 13.9% | 168 | 16.8% | 314 | 34.8% | 144 | 14.4% |
Bought_car-- | 839 | 86.1% | 832 | 83.2% | 588 | 65.2% | 853 | 85.6% |
Total | 975 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 902 | 100% | 997 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 save money? | ||||||||
Saved_money++ | 99 | 10.2% | 144 | 14.5% | 183 | 20.4% | 82 | 8.3% |
Saved_money-- | 876 | 89.8% | 852 | 85.5% | 713 | 79.6% | 906 | 91.7% |
Total | 975 | 100.0 | 996 | 100% | 896 | 100% | 988 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 decrease debt? | ||||||||
Decrease_debt++ | 96 | 10.2 | 156 | 16.0 | 149 | 16.7 | 121 | 12.6 |
Decrease_debt-- | 846 | 89.8 | 818 | 84.0 | 741 | 83.3 | 842 | 87.4 |
Total | 942 | 100.0 | 974 | 100.0 | 890 | 100.0 | 963 | 100.0 |
Has the household in the period 2010-2015 been forced to spend some savings? | ||||||||
Spent_savings++ | 112 | 11.6% | 256 | 25.8% | 256 | 28.5% | 259 | 26.2% |
Spent_savings-- | 857 | 88.4% | 735 | 74.2% | 643 | 71.5% | 728 | 73.8% |
Total | 969 | 100% | 991 | 100% | 899 | 100% | 987 | 100% |
Has the household in the period 2010-2015 been forced to borrow money? | ||||||||
Borrow_money++ | 160 | 16.5% | 262 | 26.3% | 152 | 16.9% | 342 | 34.4% |
Borrow_money-- | 809 | 83.5% | 734 | 73.7% | 749 | 83.1% | 652 | 65.6% |
Total | 969 | 100% | 996 | 100% | 901 | 100% | 994 | 100% |
Has the household in the period 2010-2015 been forced to sell gold, silverware, jewellery? | ||||||||
Sold_gold++ | 41 | 4.3% | 124 | 12.4% | 43 | 4.8% | 50 | 5.0% |
Sold_gold-- | 921 | 95.7% | 875 | 87.6% | 858 | 95.2% | 944 | 95.0% |
Total | 962 | 100% | 999 | 100% | 901 | 100% | 994 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 reduce meat in their diet? | ||||||||
Reduced_Meat_yes | 319 | 32.5% | 276 | 27.7% | 200 | 22.4% | 327 | 33.1% |
Reduced_Meat_no | 662 | 67.5% | 720 | 72.3% | 694 | 77.6% | 662 | 66.9% |
Total | 981 | 100% | 996 | 100% | 894 | 100% | 989 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 reduce hygiene products and cosmetics? | ||||||||
Reduced_Hyg_Yes | 250 | 26.0% | 224 | 22.4% | 201 | 22.5% | 284 | 28.7% |
Reduced_Hyg_No | 711 | 74.0% | 774 | 77.6% | 692 | 77.5% | 705 | 71.3% |
Total | 961 | 100% | 998 | 100% | 893 | 100% | 989 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 reduce buying clothing and footwear? | ||||||||
Reduced_Cloth_Yes | 405 | 41.6% | 525 | 52.8% | 391 | 43.6% | 518 | 52.3% |
Reduced_Cloth_No | 568 | 58.4% | 469 | 47.2% | 506 | 56.4% | 472 | 47.7% |
Total | 973 | 100% | 994 | 100% | 897 | 100% | 990 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 reduce summer vacations? | ||||||||
Reduced_Vacation_Yes | 424 | 45.7% | 454 | 47.3% | 334 | 37.5% | 540 | 55.1% |
Reduced_Vacation_No | 504 | 54.3% | 505 | 52.7% | 557 | 62.5% | 440 | 44.9% |
Total | 928 | 100% | 959 | 100% | 891 | 100% | 980 | 100% |
Did the household in the period 2010-2015 reduce cultural goods and programmes? | ||||||||
Reduced_Culture_Yes | 368 | 40.7% | 419 | 44.0% | 234 | 26.5% | 442 | 45.7% |
Reduced_Culture_No | 536 | 59.3% | 534 | 56.0% | 648 | 73.5% | 525 | 54.3% |
Total | 904 | 100% | 953 | 100% | 882 | 100% | 967 | 100% |
Number of household duties performed by members of the household’s social network | ||||||||
Network_HHwork0 | 889 | 88.7% | 791 | 79.1% | 724 | 80.1% | 799 | 79.9% |
Network_HHwork1 | 67 | 6.7% | 117 | 11.7% | 105 | 11.6% | 117 | 11.7% |
Network_HHwork2 | 46 | 4.6% | 47 | 4.7% | 42 | 4.6% | 46 | 4.6% |
Network_HHwork3+ | - | - | 45 | 4.5% | 33 | 3.7% | 38 | 3.8% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Number of household duties perfomed by paid persons | ||||||||
Paid_HHwork0 | 131 | 13.1% | 147 | 14.7% | 132 | 14.6% | 141 | 14.1% |
Paid_HHwork1 | 221 | 22.1% | 114 | 11.4% | 128 | 14.2% | 110 | 11.0% |
Paid_HHwork2 | 241 | 24.1% | 166 | 16.6% | 166 | 18.4% | 171 | 17.1% |
Paid_HHwork3 | 285 | 28.4% | 270 | 27.0% | 231 | 25.6% | 224 | 22.4% |
Paid_HHwork4 | 83 | 8.3% | 182 | 18.2% | 147 | 16.3% | 166 | 16.6% |
Paid_HHwork5 | 41 | 4.1% | 79 | 7.9% | 100 | 11.1% | 96 | 9.6% |
Paid_HHwork6+ | 1002 | 100% | 42 | 4.2% | - | - | 92 | 9.2% |
Total | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Table A2
Relative frequencies for 11 clusters representing household sub-strategies in four countries.[22]
B-H | CRO | SLO | SRB | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Full-Time Jobs | 17,2% | 15,6% | 18,8% | 6,8% |
Full-Time Jobs & Investment | 8,1% | 12,2% | 3,4% | 7,3% |
Full-Time Jobs & Small Business | 5,8% | 3,6% | 3,1% | 6,8% |
Moonlighting | 4,8% | 4,5% | 7,3% | 9,2% |
Multiple Part-Time Sources | 6,6% | 6,4% | 9,5% | 7,2% |
Cuts & Permanent Incomes | 9,1% | 11,7% | 5,8% | 20,1% |
Cuts & Mixed Incomes | 4,5% | 6,6% | 10,6% | 10,9% |
Social Transfers | 1,8% | 1,6% | 3,3% | 2,3% |
Permanent Incomes & Self-Provisioning | 16,9% | 15,2% | 19,7% | 5,9% |
Small Farm Mix | 8,6% | 6,5% | 8,1% | 11,0% |
Retired Persons Strategies | 16,6% | 16,1% | 10,5% | 12,5% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Table A3
Active variables used for the construction of social space in four SEE countries.[23]
B-H | B-H% | CRO | CRO% | SLO | SLO% | SRB | SRB% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average monthly household income per household member (in EUR)–economic capital | ||||||||
I:< 100 EUR | 106 | 15.4% | 46 | 5.3% | - | - | 225 | 28.4% |
I: 101-200 EUR | 281 | 40.9% | 176 | 20.1% | - | - | 323 | 40.8% |
I: < 200 EUR | - | - | - | - | 50 | 6.0% | - | - |
I: 201-300 EUR | 171 | 24.9% | 252 | 28.8% | - | - | - | - |
I: 201-400 EUR | - | - | - | - | 175 | 21.1% | - | - |
I: 201-350 EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 183 | 23.1% |
I: 301-400 EUR | 71 | 10.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
I: 301-500 EUR | - | - | 196 | 22.4% | - | - | - | - |
I: 350+ EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 61 | 7.7% |
I: 400+ EUR | 58 | 8.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
I: 401-600 EUR | - | - | - | - | 194 | 23.4% | - | - |
I: 501-700 EUR | - | - | 143 | 16.3% | - | - | - | - |
I: 601-800 EUR | - | - | - | - | 225 | 27.2% | - | - |
I: 700+ EUR | 63 | 7.2% | - | - | - | - | ||
I: 801-1000 EUR | - | - | - | - | 108 | 13.0% | - | - |
I: 1000+ EUR | - | - | - | - | 76 | 9.2% | - | - |
Total | 678 | 100% | 876 | 100% | 828 | 100% | 792 | 100% |
Value of flat/house that the household owns (in EUR)–economic capital | ||||||||
Flat_0 | 236 | 23.6% | 143 | 14.3% | 189 | 20.9% | 133 | 13.3% |
Flat < 20,000 EUR | - | - | 92 | 9.2% | - | - | 262 | 26.2% |
Flat < 25,000 EUR | 192 | 19.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flat_20,001-40,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 287 | 28.7% |
Flat_25,001-35,000 EUR | 209 | 20.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flat_20,001-50,000 EUR | - | - | 218 | 21.8% | - | - | - | - |
Flat_35,001-50,000 EUR | 226 | 22.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flat_40,001-60,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 143 | 14.3% |
Flat < 60,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | 176 | 19.5% | - | - |
Flat_50,001-70,000 EUR | 75 | 7.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flat_50,001-80,000 EUR | - | - | 219 | 21.9% | - | - | - | - |
Flat_70,000+ EUR | 64 | 6.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flat_60,001-100,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | 216 | 23.9% | 123 | 12.3% |
Flat_80,001-100,000 EUR | - | - | 121 | 12.1% | - | - | - | - |
Flat_100,000+ EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 52 | 5.2% |
Flat_100,001-150,000 EUR | - | - | 133 | 13.3% | 169 | 18.7% | - | - |
Flat_150,000+ EUR | - | - | 72 | 7.2% | - | - | - | - |
Flat_150,001-200,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | 76 | 8.4% | - | - |
Flat_200,000+ EUR | - | - | - | - | 78 | 8.6% | - | - |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 100 | 100% |
Value of automobiles that the household owns (in EUR)–economic capital | ||||||||
Car_0 | 474 | 57.7% | 319 | 35.6% | 220 | 26.3% | 564 | 56.4% |
Car<1,000 EUR | 107 | 13.0% | 142 | 15.8% | 167 | 19.9% | 169 | 16.9% |
Car_1,001-2,000 EUR | 81 | 9.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Car_1,001-3,000 EUR | - | - | 173 | 19.3% | 123 | 14.7% | 211 | 21.1% |
Car_2,001-4,000 EUR | 108 | 13.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Car > 3,000 EUR | - | - | - | - | - | - | 56 | 5.6% |
Car_3,001-5,000 EUR | - | - | 114 | 12.7% | 92 | 11.0% | - | - |
Car > 4,000 EUR | 52 | 6.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Car_5,001-10,000 EUR | - | - | 77 | 8.6% | 147 | 17.5% | - | - |
Car > 10,000 EUR | - | - | 71 | 7.9% | 89 | 10.6% | - | - |
Total | 822 | 100% | 998 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Arable land that the household possesses (in ha)–economic capital | ||||||||
Land_0 | 835 | 83.3% | 797 | 80.2% | 747 | 86.7% | 759 | 76.0% |
Land_1 ha | 95 | 9.5% | 77 | 8.7% | 53 | 6.1% | - | - |
Land < 2 ha | - | - | - | - | - | - | 133 | 13.3% |
Land_2-5 ha | - | - | 58 | 6.6% | - | - | - | - |
Land > 2 ha | 72 | 7.2% | - | - | 62 | 7.2% | 107 | 10.7% |
Land > 5 ha | - | - | 39 | 4.4% | - | - | - | - |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 896 | 100% | 862 | 100% | 999 | 100% |
Membership in political parties—social capital | ||||||||
Party ++ | 92 | 9.2% | 79 | 7.9% | 50 | 5.5% | 66 | 6.6% |
Party -- | 910 | 90.8% | 921 | 92.1% | 853 | 94.5% | 934 | 93.4% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
The size of the respondent’s social networks—social capital | ||||||||
Network_0-2 | 347 | 34.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Network_0-5 | - | - | 259 | 25.9% | 190 | 21.0% | 296 | 32.0% |
Network_3-5 | 177 | 17.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Network 6-10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 202 | 21.8% |
Network 6-20 | 333 | 33.2% | 431 | 43.1% | 418 | 46.3% | - | - |
Network 11-20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 252 | 27.2% |
Network 21-30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 123 | 13.3% |
Network 21-40 | 101 | 10.1% | 201 | 20.1% | 192 | 21.3% | - | - |
Network 30+ | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | 5.7% |
Network 40+ | 44 | 4.4% | 109 | 10.9% | 103 | 11.4% | - | - |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 926 | 100% |
Number of connections in public institutions—social capital | ||||||||
Connect_0 | 813 | 81.1% | 609 | 60.9% | 626 | 69.3% | 615 | 61.5% |
Connect_1 | 94 | 9.4% | - | - | 122 | 13.5% | - | - |
Connect_2 | 50 | 5.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Connect_ 1-3 | - | - | 300 | 30.0% | - | - | 296 | 29.6% |
Connect_ 2-3 | - | - | - | - | 97 | 10.7% | - | - |
Connect_ 3-7 | 45 | 4.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Connect_ 4-7 | - | - | 91 | 9.1% | 58 | 6.4% | 89 | 8.9% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 904 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Do the respondents hold managerial positions—political capital | ||||||||
Manager ++ | - | - | 67 | 6.7% | 43 | 4.8% | 50 | 5.0% |
Manager -- | - | - | 933 | 93.3% | 860 | 95.2% | 950 | 95.0% |
Total | 976 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 900 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Respondent’s highest educational level—cultural capital | ||||||||
Resp_Edu_elementary | 299 | 29.8% | 200 | 20.0% | 132 | 14.6% | 218 | 21.8% |
Resp_Edu_high-school | 555 | 55.4% | 596 | 59.6% | 493 | 54.6% | 544 | 54.4% |
Resp_Edu_college+ | 148 | 14.8% | 204 | 20.4% | 278 | 30.8% | 238 | 23.8% |
Total | 1002 | 100% | 1000 | 100% | 903 | 100% | 1000 | 100% |
Respondent’s spouse’s highest educational level—cultural capital | ||||||||
Spouse_Edu_elementary | 180 | 29.5% | 107 | 17.5% | 77 | 14.5% | 134 | 22.7% |
Spouse_Edu_high-school | 355 | 58.2% | 375 | 61.5% | 295 | 55.7% | 331 | 56.0% |
Spouse_Edu_college+ | 75 | 12.3% | 128 | 21.0% | 158 | 29.8% | 126 | 21.3% |
Total | 610 | 100% | 610 | 100% | 530 | 100% | 591 | 100% |
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston