Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) September 5, 2015

Phrasal compounds are compatible with Lexical Integrity

Jürgen Pafel

Abstract

As phrasal compounds seem to be words that contain syntactic phrases they are a prominent case against the strict separation of morphology from syntax. However, it is not obvious at all that phrasal compounds do contain syntactic phrases. First, as for phrasal compounds whose non-head constituent is a quote, there is every reason to assume that they are NN compounds – whether or not the quote is the quote of a phrase. Second, taking the different types of phrasal compounds into account it is justified to assume that they do not contain syntactic phrases if one acknowledges phrase-to-word conversion.

Acknowledgment

I am indebted to Carola Trips and Jörg Meibauer for their critical comments, which gave me the opportunity to carry things a fine step forward.

References

Booij, Geert. 2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolf P. 1981. A base rule theory of Afrikaans’ synthetic compounding. In Michael Moortgat, Harry van der Hulst & Teun Hoekstra (eds.), The scope of lexical rules, 1–77. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112327364-002Search in Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolf P. 1984. Morphological mechanisms: Lexicalist analyses of synthetic compounding. Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66. 764–805.10.2307/414729Search in Google Scholar

Gallmann, Peter. 1990. Kategoriell komplexe Wortformen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111376332Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2009. Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 8. 213–236.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea D. Sims. 2010. Understanding morphology. London: Hodder Education.Search in Google Scholar

Höhle, Tilman N. 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1. 76–111.10.1515/zfsw.1982.1.1.76Search in Google Scholar

Höhle, Tilman N. 1985. On composition and derivation: The constituent structure of secondary words in German. In Jindřich Toman (ed.), Studies in German grammar, 319–376. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110882711-012Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Klockow, Reinhard. 1980. Linguistik der Gänsefüßchen. Untersuchungen zum Gebrauch der Anführungszeichen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt/M.: Haag und Herchen.Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2003. Phrasenkomposita zwischen Wortsyntax und Lexikon. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 22. 153–188.10.1515/zfsw.2003.22.2.153Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17. 233–259.10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1Search in Google Scholar

Lawrenz, Birgit. 2006. Moderne deutsche Wortbildung. Phrasale Wortbildung im Deutschen: Linguistische Untersuchung und sprachdidaktische Behandlung. Hamburg: Kovac.Search in Google Scholar

Leser, Martin. 1990. Das Problem der Zusammenbildungen. Eine Lexikalistische Studie. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Sergio Scalise. 2006. The lexical integrity hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 5. 7–32.Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, Jürgen. 2007. Ein Essay mit dem Titel ‘On pure quotation’. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Zitat und Bedeutung, 201–214. Hamburg: Buske.Search in Google Scholar

Pafel Jürgen. 2011. Two dogmas on quotation. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 249–276. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110240085.249Search in Google Scholar

Riehemann, Susanne Z. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 49–77.10.1023/A:1009746617055Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Hartmut. 2000. Hochkomplexe Lexeme: Wortbildung und Traditionen des Formulierens. In Mechthild Habermann, Peter O. Müller & Bernd Naumann (eds.), Wortschatz und Orthographie in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für Horst Haider Munske zum 65.Geburtstag, 135–158. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2012. Empirical and theoretical aspects of phrasal compounds: Against the ‘syntax explains it all’ attitude. In Angela Ralli, Geert Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds.), On-line proceedings of the eighth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8), 322–346. [URL http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm]Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. forthcoming. An analysis of phrasal compounds in the model of parallel architecture. In Pius ten Hacken (ed.), The semantics of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola & Jaklin Kornfilt. this volume. Typological aspects of phrasal compounds in English, German, Turkish and Turkic.Search in Google Scholar

Vries, Mark de. 2008. The representation of language within language: A syntactico-pragmatic typology of direct speech. Studia Linguistica 62. 39–77.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00142.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 183–193.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-5
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton