Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) November 7, 2019

Proper name-marking via liaison in French

  • Natascha Pomino EMAIL logo and Elisabeth Stark

Abstract

The liaison consonant [z] in French noun phrases has traditionally been assumed to function as a plural marker. The realization of “plural [z]” in N(oun)-A(djective)-combinations is becoming, however, very rare in naturalistic data – except for contexts which allow a proper-name reading. On the one hand, one might think that we are dealing with a recent phenomenon, the beginning of a potential linguistic change in French in the sense of exaptation, reuse of former morphophonological material such as plural markers to signal proper-namehood in the sense of ‘frozen morphology’. If this turns out correct, we expect the productivity of the new synchronic function to increase: New NA-combinations which function as proper names should be realized systematically with liaison, and proper name-marking via liaison should also become possible with other liaison consonants. On the other hand, we may be dealing with a (completed) diachronic process, in that only those NA-combinations which allowed liaison at the relevant point in time may have a liaison consonant in their univerbalized form. That is, new NA-combinations, even though they are used as proper names, do not display a liaison consonant, because liaison is no longer possible. The purpose of this paper was to investigate, based on empirical studies, whether liaison productively marks NA-combinations which function as proper names and distinguishes them from NA-combinations that count as common nouns, or whether we are dealing with a completed diachronic process. In view of the poor productivity observed, we argue that we are dealing with cases of univerbation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank one anonymous French native speaker who commented on our study published in 2016 indicating to us a preference for liaison when the respective NA-combination could be understood as a proper name. The pilot study dealt with in this paper would not have been possible without our 18 native speakers of French and Swiss origin in the first experiment, our 28 speakers in a follow-up experiment, and our scientific collaborators, Dr. Lena Baunaz (Geneva/Zurich) and Kathrin Neuburger (Wuppertal), who collected the data. All remaining shortcomings are, of course, ours.

Abbreviations

dem

demonstrative

det

determiner

pl

plural

References

Ackermann, Tanja. 2018. Grammatik der Namen im Wandel. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110600865Search in Google Scholar

Ågren, John. 1973. Études sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique: Fréquence et facteurs. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Search in Google Scholar

Ashby, William J. 1981. French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon. In William W. Cressey & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Linguistic symposium on Romance languages, 46–57. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bosredon, Bernard. 2011. Dénominations monoréférentielles, figement et signalétique. In Jean-Claude Anscombre & Salah Mejri (eds.), Le figement linguistique: la parole entravée, 155–169. Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 337–359. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.17bybSearch in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2005. La liaison: Effets de fréquence et constructions. Langage 158. 24–37.10.3917/lang.158.0024Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2011. French liaison. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2685–2710. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1947. La liaison en français: Tendances et classifications. The French Review 21. 148–157.10.1515/9783112416105-004Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1955. Les facteurs de la liaison facultative en français. The French Review 29(1). 42–49.10.1515/9783112416105-006Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Studies in French and comparative phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112416105Search in Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques & Chantal Lyche. 2008. French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies 18. 33–66.10.1017/S0959269507003158Search in Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche. 2002. La phonologie du français contemporain: Usages, variétés et structure. In Claus D. Pusch & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache/Romance corpus linguistics: Corpora and spoken language, 93–106. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche. 2009. Le projet PFC: Une source de données primaires structurées. In Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche (eds.), Phonologie, variation et accents du français, 19–61. Paris: Hermès.Search in Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks, Basilio Calderone & Atanas Tchobanov. 2011. Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd'hui ? Langue Française 169. 103–135.10.3917/lf.169.0103Search in Google Scholar

Fuss, Eric. 2011. Eigennamen und adnominaler Genitiv im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 255. 19–42.Search in Google Scholar

Green, John N. & Marie-Anne Hintze. 2001. The maintenance of liaison in a family network. In Marie-Anne Hintze, Tim Pooley & Anne Judge (eds.), French accents: Phonological and sociolinguistic perspectives, 24–44. London: Association of French Language Studies in Association with the Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.Search in Google Scholar

Handschuh, Corinna. 2017. Nominal category marking on personal names: A typological study of case and definiteness. Folia Linguistica 51(2). 483–504.10.1515/flin-2017-0017Search in Google Scholar

Heusinger, Klaus von. 2010. Zur Grammatik indefiniter Eigennamen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 38(2). 88–120.10.1515/zgl.2010.005Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 2005. Spatien. Zum System der Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung im heutigen Deutsch. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110919295Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Hans-Wilhelm. 1982. Phonetik und Phonologie des heutigen Französisch. München: Hueber.Search in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26. 79–102.10.1017/S0022226700014432Search in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1993. How real(ist) are reconstructions? In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics. Problems and perspectives, 156–189. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Léon, Pierre-Roger. 1992. Phonétisme et prononciations du français avec des travaux d’application et leurs corrigés. Paris: Nathan.Search in Google Scholar

Leroy, Sarah. 2004. Le nom propre en français. Paris: Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, Jesse. 1968. Spelling-pronunciation in Modern French: Its origin and its functional significance. Linguistics 6(42). 19–28.10.1515/ling.1968.6.42.19Search in Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names. A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Search in Google Scholar

Malécot, André. 1975. French Liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables. Phonetica 32. 161–79.10.1159/000259697Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2008. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(5). 573–627.10.1007/s10988-008-9050-1Search in Google Scholar

Meinschaefer, Judith, Sven Bonifer & Christine Frisch. 2015. Variable and invariable liaison in a corpus of spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies 25. 367–396.10.1017/S0959269515000186Search in Google Scholar

Mok, Quirinus Ignatius Maria. 1966. Le rôle de la liaison en français moderne. Lingua 16. 27–39.10.1016/0024-3841(66)90016-7Search in Google Scholar

Morin, Yves-Charles & Jonathan Kaye. 1982. The syntactic bases for French liaison. Journal of Linguistics 18(2). 291–330.10.1017/S0022226700013621Search in Google Scholar

Nübling, Damaris. 1998. Auf der Suche nach dem idealen Eigennamen. In Karmen Terzan-Kopecky (ed.), Sammelband des II. Internationalen Symposiums zur Natürlichkeitstheorie, 23–25 Mai 1996, 231–254. Maribor: Universität Maribor.Search in Google Scholar

Nübling, Damaris. 2005. Zwischen Syntagmatik und Paradigmatik: Grammatische Eigennamenmarker und ihre Typologie. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 33. 25–56.10.1515/zfgl.2005.33.1.25Search in Google Scholar

Nübling, Damaris. 2012. Auf dem Wege zu Nicht-Flektierbaren: Die Deflexion der deutschen Eigennamen diachron und synchron. In Björn Rothstein (ed.), Nicht-flektierende Wortarten, 224–246. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110276619.224Search in Google Scholar

Pomino, Natascha. 2012. Partial or complete lack of plural agreement. In Sascha Gaglia & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Inflection and word formation in Romance languages, 201–229. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.186.08pomSearch in Google Scholar

Pomino, Natascha & Elisabeth Stark. 2016. Plural marking in French NA/AN combinations: What liaison can tell us. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 35(2). 137–169.10.1515/zfs-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Ranson, Diana. 2008. La liaison variable dans un corpus du français méridional: L’importance relative de la fonction grammaticale. In Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks (eds.), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF'08, 1669–1683. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.10.1051/cmlf08279Search in Google Scholar

Schlücker, Barbara & Tanja Ackermann. 2017. The morphosyntax of proper names: An overview. Folia Linguistica 51(2). 309–339.10.1515/flin-2017-0011Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Alan. 1996. A diachronic study of French variable liaison. Newcastle: University of Newcastle dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven & Peter Willemse. 2002. Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas. Word 53(1). 9–36.10.1080/00437956.2002.11432522Search in Google Scholar

Villoing, Florence. 2012. French compounds. Probus 24. 29–60.10.1515/probus-2012-0003Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-07
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/stuf-2019-0024/html
Scroll Up Arrow