Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) November 5, 2020

Psych predicates in European languages

A parallel corpus study

Laura Becker and Matías Guzmán Naranjo

Abstract

Previous work on psych predicates has so far mostly focused on verbs and their non-canonical argument structures within and across languages. In this study, we propose a usage-based account using parallel subtitles in seven European languages in order to examine the intralinguistic and crosslinguistic variation of psychological expressions. We start out from 12 semantically defined psychological concepts rather than concrete constructions; this allows us to include verbal and non-verbal expressions and thus to assess the variation and distribution of construction types of psychological expressions found in language use. We show that while there is a high degree of variation in terms of constructions used within languages, psychological expressions are relatively stable across languages. On the other hand, we find systematic, crosslinguistic concept-specific preferences for psychological expressions.


Corresponding author: Laura Becker, Department of Linguistics, University of Freiburg, Belfortstr. 18, 79085 Freiburg, Germany, E-mail:

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia. 2014. The psych causative alternation. Lingua 148. 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700011567.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adrian & Lougi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and -theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133902.Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, Hans. 2004. Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, vol. 5, 84–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bossong, Georg. 1998. Le marquage de l’expérient dans les langues d’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues d’Europe, 259–294. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1). 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324.Search in Google Scholar

Cosma, Ruxandra & Stefan Engelberg. 2014. Subjektsätze als alternative Valenzen im Deutschen und Rumänischen. Eine kontrastive, quantitative Korpusstudie zu Psych-Verben. In Ruxandra Cosma, Stefan Engelberg, Susan Schlotthauer, Speranta L. Stanescu & Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Komplexe Argumentstrukturen. Kontrastive Untersuchungen zum Deutschen, Rumänischen und Englischen, 339–420. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1993. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 55–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Keith T. Poole. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34(1). 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2008.001.Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael & Bernhard Wälchli. 2007. Parallel texts: Using translational equivalents in linguistic typology. STUF/Language Typology and Universals 60(2). 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.95.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2007. From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology. STUF/Language Typology and Universals 60(2). 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.172.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037.Search in Google Scholar

Engelberg, Stefan. 2018. The argument structure of psych-verbs: A quantitative corpus study on cognitive entrenchment. In Hans Boas & Alexander Ziem (eds.), Constructional approaches to syntactic structures in German, 47–84. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Fraisse, Amel, et al. 2018. TransLiTex: A parallel corpus of translated literary texts. In Eleventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2018). Miyazaki: Archive Ouvertes.Search in Google Scholar

Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53(3–4). 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambride, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Härtl, Holden. 2001. Cause and change: Thematische Relationen und Ereignisstrukturen in Konzeptualisierung und Grammatikalisierung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Alexandra Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 53–83. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Iwata, Seizi. 1995. The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis 25. 95–120.Search in Google Scholar

Kailuweit, Rolf. 2012. Linking: Syntax und Semantik französischer und italienischer Gefühlsverben. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Kassambara, Alboukadel. 2017. Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: Unsupervised machine learning. United States: STHDA.Search in Google Scholar

Keuleers, Emmanuel, Marc Brysbaert & Boris New. 2010. SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods 42(3). OCLC: 720543177, 643–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.42.3.643.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Katarina & Silvia Kutscher. 2005. Manuscript (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität zu Köln). https://ids-pub.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3417/file/Klein_Kutscher_Lexical+Economy_2005.pdf (accessed 5 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Klimek, Dorota & Bozena Rozwadowska. 2004. From psych adjectives to psych verbs. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39. 59–72. http://wa.amu.edu.pl/psicl/files/39/05Klimek%20&%20Rozwadowska.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kulkarni, Ajinkya. 2015. TED parallel corpora. https://github.com/ajinkyakulkarni14/TED-Multilingual-Parallel-Corpus (accessed 2 December 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Kutscher, Silvia. 2009. Kausalität und Argumentrealisierung. Zur Konstruktionsvarianz bei Psychverben am Beispiel europäischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 1999. Psych-adjectives and semantic selection. The Linguistic Review 16(4). 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.333.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2016. Verbs of letting in Germanic and Romance languages. Languages in Contrast 16(1). 84–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.04lev.Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2017. Online film subtitles as a corpus: An n-gram approach. Corpora 12(3). 311–338. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2017.0123.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2015. Valency classes in the world’s languages. In Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, Vol. 1. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L., Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2010. Studies in ditransitive constructions. A comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, Thomas & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Creating a massively parallel Bible corpus. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'14), 3158–3163. Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/220_Paper.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Miglio, Viola, Stefan Th. Gries, Michael J. Harris, Eva M. Wheeler & Raquel Santana-Paixão. 2013. Spanish lo(s)-le(s) clitic alternations in psych verbs: A multifactorial corpus-based analysis. In Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro, Gillian Lord, Ana de Prada Pérez & Jessi Elana Aaron (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 268–278. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

New, Boris , Marc Brysbaert, Jean, Veronis & Christophe Pallier. 2007. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(4). 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk & Dirk Speelman. 2017. Alternating argument constructions of Dutch psychological verbs: A theory-driven corpus investigation. Folia Linguistica 51(1). 207–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Primus, Beatrice. 2004. Proto-Rollen und Verbtyp: Kasusvariation bei psychischen Verben.In Martin Hummel & Rolf Kailuweit (eds.), Semantische Rollen, 377–401. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.Search in Google Scholar

Rozwadowska, Bożena. 2017. Psychological verbs and psychological adjectives. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., 1–26. London: Wiley Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Helmut. 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, 44–49. Manchester, UK. https://www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/~schmid/tools/TreeTagger/data/tree-tagger1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Helmut. 1995. TreeTagger: A language independent part-of-speech tagger, Vol. 43, 28. Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14. 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973.Search in Google Scholar

Temme, Anne. 2014. German psych-adjectives. In Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi (eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie, 131–156. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Temme, Anne. 2018. The peculiar nature of psych verbs and experiencer object structures. Berlin: Humboldt University Berlin dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2010. Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology 14. 213–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2010.009.Search in Google Scholar

Verkerk, Annemarie. 2014. Where Alice fell into: Motion events from a parallel corpus. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech, 324–354. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Marvin N. & Andreas Ziegler. 2017. Ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software 77(1). 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-05
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston