Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter Mouton February 5, 2021

Construction of a binary evaluative taxonomy within a story

Eric Hauser ORCID logo
From the journal Text & Talk

Abstract

Making use of Occasioned Semantics, I look at how a taxonomy of different types of alcoholic beverages is constructed within a story told during the closing of a meeting at a neighborhood organization. The data are in Japanese with English translation. The use of taxonomic analysis within Occasioned Semantics is discussed, with a separate example. The story is shown to be placed at a point in the closing routine where an invitation to join a post-meeting drinking session is expectable. Within the story, the teller, Kaicho, who is the head of the organization, constructs an occasioned inclusion taxonomy of alcoholic beverages. He then adds two binary evaluative contrasts to the more specific level of the taxonomy. What Kaicho accomplishes through telling the story, what he accomplishes through constructing the taxonomy with its evaluative contrasts, and how the constructed taxonomy cannot be seen simply as the reflection of an underlying cognitive structure are discussed. It is argued that an ad hoc element is an inherent part of any actually occurring taxonomy. The role of cultural knowledge in the analysis of meaning in interaction is discussed.


Corresponding author:Eric Hauser, The University of Electro-Communications, E1-614, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu-shi, Tokyo, 182-0021, Japan, E-mail:

Appendix: Symbols used in morpheme-by-morpheme gloss

Adopted from Greer et al. (2017) (GI&T), except where noted.

ASaspect marker (not in GI&T)
CLclassifier (not in GI&T)
CNDconditional
COMPcomplementizer (not in GI&T)
CPcopula
EXexistential verb (not in GI&T)
Hhesitation marker
HONhonorific
IPinteractional particle
LKlinking particle
Nnominalizer
NGnegative
Oobject marker
POLpolite form
PPpostposition (not in GI&T)
Qquestion marker
QTquotative
Ssubject marker
TPtopic marker
VOLvolitional

References

Bilmes, Jack. 2008. Generally speaking: Formulating an argument in the US Federal Trade Commission. Text & Talk 28(2). 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2008.009. Search in Google Scholar

Bilmes, Jack. 2009. Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1600–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.008. Search in Google Scholar

Bilmes, Jack. 2011. Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies 34(2). 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z. Search in Google Scholar

Bilmes, Jack. 2015. The structure of meaning in talk: Explorations in category analysis, vol. I. Co-categorization, contrast, and hierarchy. Internet document. Search in Google Scholar

Bilmes, Jack. 2019. Regrading as a conversational practice. Journal of Pragmatics 150. 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.020. Search in Google Scholar

Eglin, Peter. 1980. Talk and taxonomy: A methodological comparison of ethnosemantics and ethnomethodology with reference to terms for Canadian doctors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Frake, Charles O. 1961. The diagnosis of disease among the Subanun of Mindanao. American Anthropologist 63(1). 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1961.63.1.02a00070. Search in Google Scholar

Frake, Charles O. 1969. The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. In Stephen A. Tyler (ed.), Cognitive anthropology, 28–41. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston. Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, Philip. 2003. Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Goodenough, Ward H. 1964. Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Language in culture and society, 36–39. New York: Harper and Row. Search in Google Scholar

Greer, Tim, Midori Ishida & Yumiko Tateyama (eds.). 2017. Interactional competence in Japanese as an additional language. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center. Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric. 2011. Generalization: A practice of situated categorization in talk. Human Studies 34(2). 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9184-y. Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric & Matthew T. Prior. 2019. Introduction to the special issue: Topicalizing regrading in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 150. 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.001. Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Yuri Hosoda & Ikuyo Morimoto. 2019. Tte yuu ka as a repair preface in Japanese. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(2). 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1608093. Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1984. In defense of privative ambiguity. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 141–156. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Search in Google Scholar

Izumi, Hiroaki. 2017. A technical analysis of scaling in rehabilitation team talk. Journal of Pragmatics 121. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.008. Search in Google Scholar

Izumi, Hiroaki. 2019. Regrading and implicature: Sequential structures of mobility scales in Japanese rehabilitation team interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 150. 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.018. Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294–338. New York, NY: The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Murayama, Emi. 2012. Turn allocation in Japanese business meetings: Emergence of institutionality. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-09-27
Accepted: 2021-01-13
Published Online: 2021-02-05

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston