Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter June 30, 2017

First evidence and quantification of quercetin derivatives in dogberries (Cornus sanguinea L.)

Cornus sanguinea L. bir tür kızılcık kuersetin türevlerinin ilk bulgusu ve miktarının
Zorica Popović EMAIL logo , Jasna Bajić-Ljubičić , Rada Matić and Srdjan Bojović

Abstract

Aim

C. sanguinea L. is a widespread European shrubby species. It is a potential source of biologically active compounds, especially antioxidants, as indicated by the dogberries’ black color. The aim of the present study was to determine the content of several quercetin derivatives in the dogberries and to evaluate phytogeographical variability of these compounds.

Materials and methods

The dogberries were collected in the middle of September at two natural habitats of this species: Mt. Avala and Lake Zlatar, Serbia. The extract obtained from fresh fruits was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis to identify and quantify the content of five quercetin derivatives: quercetin-3-O-glucuronide (Q-3-O-GlcA), quercetin-3-O-galactoside (Q-3-O-Gal), quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Q-3-O-Rut), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (Q-3-O-Glc) and quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (Q-3-O-Rha).

Results

All of examined quercetin derivatives were detected in extract of fresh dogberries and their contents were in the following order: Q-3-O-GlcA>Q-3-O-Gal>Q-3-O-Rut>Q-3-O-Glc>Q-3-O-Rha. The average amount of Q-3-O- Rut varied significantly and depended on the geographic origin of the fruit sample.

Conclusions

These results indicate that dogberries could be a potential source of natural antioxidants, and encourage further investigation of this species considering that it has not yet been exploited in either nutrition or as a source of important pharmacological compounds.

Özet

Amaç

C. sanguinea L, yaygın bir avrupa ağaçsı türüdür. Dogberries’in siyah rengiyle belirtilen biyolojik olarak aktif bileşiklerin, özellikle de antioksidanların potansiyel bir kaynağıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, dogberries çeşitli quercetin türevlerinin içeriğini belirlemek ve bu bileşiklerin fitocoğrafik değişkenliklerini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve yöntemler

Köpek yavruları, Eylül ortasında bu türün iki doğal yaşam alanlarında toplandı: Mt. Avala ve Lake Zlatar, Sırbistan. Yeni meyvelerden elde edilen ekstre beş quercetin türevinin içeriğini belirlemek ve nicelleştirmek için LC-MS/MS analizine tabi tutuldu: quercetin-3-0-glukuronid (Q-3-0-GlcA), quercetin-3-0-galaktosid (Q-3-O-Gal), kuersetin-3-0-rutinosid (Q-3-0-Rut), kersetin-3-0-glukozid (Q-3-0-Glc) ve kersetin-3-0- Ramnosid (Q-3-0-Rha).

Tartışma

Kontrol edilen tüm quercetin türevleri taze dogberries ekstraktında tespit edildi ve içerikleri aşağıdaki sırada oldu: Q-3-0-GlcA>Q-3-O-Gal>Q-3-O-Rut>Q-3 -O-Glc>Q-3-0-Rha’dır. Ortalama Q-3-O-Rut miktarı, önemli ölçüde değişir ve meyve örneğinin coğrafik kökenine bağlıdır.

Sonuç

Bu sonuçlar dogberries’in doğal antioksidanların potansiyel bir kaynağı olabileceğini ve beslenmede veya önemli farmakolojik bileşiklerin kaynağı olarak henüz kullanılmadığını göz önüne alarak bu türün daha fazla araştırılmasını teşvik ettiğini göstermektedir.

Introduction

Cornus sanguinea L. (Cornaceae) is a fleshy-fruited shrub, 1–5 m in height, with a growth form similar to a small tree. It is widely distributed in the temperate regions of Europe, from the Mediterranean basin to England; it occurs on base-rich soils, in plentiful light conditions and prefers the temperature regime and soil moisture of a continental climate [1]. The blooming period is from May to June; the plant is insect-pollinated. Immature fruits are red, and when fully ripened, black; fruit ripening usually occurs in September. Leaves are rich in total phenolics and tannins [2] and the fruit pulp is rich in lipids (24.9%); it has relatively high protein content (6.4%), and the fiber fraction and soluble carbohydrates account for 10.3% and 53.8%, respectively [3].

Cornus sanguinea berries are not toxic, but their tart flavor makes them unpalatable in the raw form. This flavor can be improved by cooking, and so the plant could be potentially palatable, especially considering its seeds are rich in proteins and oils. Cooking decreases tannin content; if the sugar added, the sugar/acid radio increases, which both contribute to better taste of tart berries [4]. Dogwood is used in the treatment of malaria, as it is rich in bitter alkaloids [5]. It is also part of homeopathic and naturopathic medicines, indicated for mainly transitory syndromes of numerous subacute inflammatory and necrotic ailments. Ethnopharmacological importance of C. sanguinea berries is documented by several studies, i.e. for their nutraceutical properties [6], as a remedy for diarrhea and stomachaches [7] and for treatment of sore eyes, throat and gastrointestinal disorders [8].

Fleshy-fruited plants, namely berries, are rich in phytochemicals with antioxidant properties, and many of their health-beneficial effects are attributed to their high content of polyphenolic compounds, especially flavonoids [9]. Flavonols, a class of flavonoids, and especially glycosides of quercetin and kaempferol, exhibit strong free-radical scavenging activity and protect plant cell metabolism from oxidative damage; they protect animal cell metabolism from oxidative damage and consequently may have an important role in human health [10]. Quercetin is one of the most abundant flavonoids present in many fruits and vegetables, mainly in the leaves and external tissues of fleshy fruits (epicarp), as aglycones and glycosides. Quercetin glycosides contain a sugar group at the 3-position; the most frequently found sugar is glucose, followed by galactose and rhamnose [11].

Phytochemical characterization of the members of the genus Cornus has been mainly based on the relative distribution of total polyphenols [12], anthocyanins [13], flavonoids [14], iridoids [15] and carboxylic acids [16]. In addition to the phytochemical studies of certain species of the genus Cornus, data on the biological activities of fruit and leaf extracts, their antioxidant and cytotoxic properties have been reported [17].

Since the focus of phytochemical and pharmacological research has been directed toward species with edible fruits, data about the biologically active compounds in C. sanguinea are scarce. In several previous studies, an antioxidative activity of the leaves’ and fruits’ extracts has been reported [18, 19]. This study aimed to determine and quantify certain natural antioxidants in dogberries.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

All chemicals, including standards of phenolic compounds, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chem (Steinheim, Germany), Fluka Chemie GmbH (Buchs, Switzerland) or from ChromaDex (Santa Ana, USA), and were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Plant material was collected in September 2015, at two localities: Mt. Avala (44°41′25″ N, 20° 30ʹ 51″ E; 440 m a.s.l.) and Lake Zlatar (43° 30′ 31″ N, 19° 50′ 19″ E; 900 m a.s.l.). Each population was represented with 10 plants (Mt. Avala, n=10 and Lake Zlatar, n=10). Fully mature fruits were dark-purple, almost black and easily detachable from the stem. From each tree, five berries were collected (pooled sample). Fresh berries were refrigerated immediately after harvesting and over the night until further use. Samples of branches, leaves and fruits have been deposited in the Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade.

Extract preparations

For the determination of five quercetin derivatives: quercetin-3-O-glucuronide (Q-3-O-GlcA), quercetin-3-O-galactoside (Q-3-O-Gal), quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Q-3-O-Rut), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (Q-3-O-Glc) and quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (Q-3-O-Rha), a methanol extract prepared from the crushed fruits of C. sanguinea was used. Extract was obtained by diluting the plant material in methanol 70% (v/v) at a ratio 1:10; 0.5 g of fresh berries (without seeds) were extracted with 5 mL of methanol 70% (20 h of shaking at 150 rpm/min, at 20°C). Then the extracts were filtered through membrane filter (0.45 μm) and used for analysis.

LC-MS/MS analysis of selected flavonols

Determination of the selected compounds in the extracts of dogberries was conducted according to the Orčić et al. [20], using Agilent Technologies 1200 Series HPLC coupled with an Agilent Technologies 6410A QqQ mass spectrometer with electrospray ion source. Injection volume was 5 μL of samples/standards. Separation was performed using a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 (Agilent Technologies) column, 50 mm×4.6 mm×1.8 μm, held at 50°C. The mobile phase, consisting of 0.05% aqueous formic acid (phase A) and methanol (phase B), was delivered at a flow rate of 1 mL/min in gradient mode (0 min 30% B, 6 min 70% B, 9 min 100% B, 12 min 100% B, post time 3 min; total 15 min). The eluted compounds were ionized with ion source parameters as following: nebulization gas pressure 40 psi, drying gas flow 9L/min and temperature 350°C, capillary voltage 4000 V. All compounds were detected in negative mode, using dynamic selected reaction monitoring with optimized compound-specific parameters (Table 1).

Table 1:

Optimized dynamic MRM parameters.

CompoundPrecursor m/zProduct m/zVfragmentor (Vf)Vcollision (Vc)tR
Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide477300145201.97
Quercetin-3-O-galactoside463300200302.03
Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside609300135422.06
Quercetin-3-O-glucoside463300210302.11
Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside447300190272.61
  1. Precursor ion; Product ion; Vfragmentor, fragmentor voltage (cone voltage); Vcollision, collision voltage; tR, retention time.

Preparation of a mixture of standard solutions

Basic solutions of individual phenolic compounds (10 mg/mL) were prepared by dissolving the reference standard in DMSO, and were used for the preparation of the basic mixture with methanol:water (1:1), at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. The series of working solutions was prepared by successive dilution of the basic mixture, and ranged from 15.5 ng/mL to 40,000 ng/mL.

Data analysis

Peak areas were read in MassHunter Workstation Software-Qualitative analysis, version B.04.00 (Agilent Technologies). The concentrations of standard compounds in extracts were determined from the peak areas using the equation for linear regression obtained from the calibration curves (OriginPro 8), and expressed as μg of a compound in 1 g of fresh berries (μg/g).

Statistical analysis

Statistica (10.0) program was used for data analyses: one factor analysis of variance (ANOVA I), factor locality with two levels, locality 1 (Avala, n=10) and locality 2 (Lake Zlatar, n=10). For comparison of the localities by compounds, a parametric test, un-paired t-test [for normally distributed data (χ2 test) with equality of variance in standard deviation (F-test, p<0.05)], and Mann-Whitney U-test (when data did not show normality even after log transformation) were used.

Results and discussion

All of the examined glycosides from the group of quercetin derivatives were detected in the extracts. According to the results obtained by chromatography (chromatogram presented in Figure 1), dogwood berries stand out for their high content of quercetin derivatives (total amount of five analyzed derivatives in Avala and Lake Zlatar 1240 μg/g and 1830 μg/g, respectively). The prevailing Q-3-O-GlcA (Figure 2A) was present with 868.29±311.21 μg/g and 1090.82±383.02 μg/g in samples from Avala and Lake Zlatar, respectively; Q-3-O-Glc (Figure 2B) and Q-3-O-Gal (Figure 2D) were present in high amounts, whereas Q-3-O-Rut (Figure 2C) was detected in smaller amounts, with only traces of Q-3-O-Rha (Table 2). The amounts of Q-3-O-rutoside were significantly different, depending on the locality. Out of the five determined quercetin derivatives, the majority was conjugated with glucuronic acid (70% and 60% of the total analyzed quercetin glycosides in Avala and Lake Zlatar, respectively); the rest were conjugated with glucose (16% and 21.4% in Avala and Lake Zlatar, respectively), galactose (12.2% and 18.3% in Avala and Lake Zlatar, respectively) and the minor part was conjugated with rutinose and rhamnose. In the fruits of most frequently studied representative of the Cornaceae family, C. mas, quercetin is mostly present in the form of Q-3-O-glucuronide, Q-3-O-rhamnoside, Q-3-O-xyloside and Q-3-O-rutinoside [13]. In comparison to other berries rich in quercetin, dogberries far exceed the published content of individual quercetin derivatives, i.e. elderberry (total quercetin derivatives in cultivated plants 495.2 mg/kg of fresh weight, in wild grown 432.3 mg/kg, dominantly as rutinoside), chokeberry (263.2 mg/kg, highly present galactoside, glucoside and rutinoside), wild-growing blackberry (232.9 mg/kg, most abundant glucuronide) [9]. Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, the most abundant glycoside in dogberries, is a major quercetin metabolite that plays a protective role against oxidative modification of human plasma, which is why the consumption of berries rich in this compound is advocated [10].

Figure 1: Representative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatograms for (A) standard mix of five compounds (all present in the concentration of 2.5 μg/mL): 1, Q-3-O-GlcA 3,0 min; 2, Q-3-O-Gal 3,08 min; 3, Q-3-O-Rut 3,12 min; 4, Q-3-O-Glc 3,13 min; 5, Q-3-O-Rha 3,69 min. (B) Sample 048 (from Mt. Avala) [99 mg fresh sample/mL 70% MeOH, diluted 20× in mobile phase (5 mg/mL)], (C) Sample 125 (from Lake Zlatar) [97.4 mg fresh sample/mL 70% MeOH, diluted 20× in mobile phase (5 mg/g)].Retention times: Q-3-O-GlcA (3,01 min); Q-3-O-Gal (3,08 min); Q-3-O-Rut (3,12 min); Q-3-O-Glu (3,13 min); Q-3-O-Rha (3,70).
Figure 1:

Representative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatograms for (A) standard mix of five compounds (all present in the concentration of 2.5 μg/mL): 1, Q-3-O-GlcA 3,0 min; 2, Q-3-O-Gal 3,08 min; 3, Q-3-O-Rut 3,12 min; 4, Q-3-O-Glc 3,13 min; 5, Q-3-O-Rha 3,69 min. (B) Sample 048 (from Mt. Avala) [99 mg fresh sample/mL 70% MeOH, diluted 20× in mobile phase (5 mg/mL)], (C) Sample 125 (from Lake Zlatar) [97.4 mg fresh sample/mL 70% MeOH, diluted 20× in mobile phase (5 mg/g)].

Retention times: Q-3-O-GlcA (3,01 min); Q-3-O-Gal (3,08 min); Q-3-O-Rut (3,12 min); Q-3-O-Glu (3,13 min); Q-3-O-Rha (3,70).

Figure 2: Content of quercetin glycosides in fruit extracts of C. sanguinea (μg/g of fresh berries, means±SE): (A) Q-3-O-GlcA, (B) Q-3-O-Gal, (C) Q-3-O-Rut, (D) Q-3-O-Glc.
Figure 2:

Content of quercetin glycosides in fruit extracts of C. sanguinea (μg/g of fresh berries, means±SE): (A) Q-3-O-GlcA, (B) Q-3-O-Gal, (C) Q-3-O-Rut, (D) Q-3-O-Glc.

Table 2:

Content of five quercetin glycosides in fruit extracts of C. sanguinea (μg/g of fresh berries).

LocalityQ-3-O-GlcAQ-3-O-GalQ-3-O-RutQ-3-O-GlcQ-3-O-Rha
Avala (n=10)868.29 (311.21)a151.71 (166.86)20.72 (18.77)197.91 (164.70)0.15 (0.03)b
Lake Zlatar (n=10)1091.82 (383.02)a333.08 (327.71)54.56 (31.25)390.27 (311.62)0.25 (0.09)b
t=−1.43ct=−1.56ct=−2.93c,et=−1.73cw=65.5d
  1. n, sample size (number of plants); amean±standard deviation; bmediane (minimum-maximum); cunpaired t-test (df=18) applied; dMann-Whitney U test applied; estatistically significant differences (p<0.05).

Conclusion

In this work it is shown that the fruits of dogwood contain high concentrations of natural antioxidants in the form of quercetin derivatives. The amounts of quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, which displays powerful antioxidant activity in human plasma, exceed the amounts previously reported in other species that are regarded as natural sources of quercetin-based compounds. Considering the species has not been widely studied phytochemically, these results point to the need to determine its complete phytochemical profile. The natural antioxidant content in dogberry fruit promises considerable benefits from the cultivation and exploitation of this widespread and ecologically undemanding species.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological development, Republic of Serbia, Grant 173011. We are grateful to Dr. Emilija Svirčev, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Novi Sad, for her assistance in interpretation of the chromatograms. We also acknowledge the referees for recommending various improvements in manuscript.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Kollmann J, Grubb PJ. Biological flora of Central Europe: Cornus sanguinea L. Flora 2001;196:161–79.10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30039-7Search in Google Scholar

2. Karolewski P, Zadworny M, Mucha J, Napierala-Filipiaki A, Oleksyn J. Link between defoliation and light treatments on root vitality of five understory shrubs with different resistance to insect herbivory. Tree Physiol 2010;30:969–78.10.1093/treephys/tpq060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Snow B, Snow D. Birds and berries. Calton, UK: Poyser, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

4. Serrano J, Puupponen-Pimia R, Dauer A, Aura AM, Saura-Calixto F. Tannins: current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010;53:310–29.10.1002/mnfr.200900039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Hatfield G. Encyclopedia of folk medicine: old world and new world traditions. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

6. Saraç DU, Özkan ZC, Akbulut S. Ethnobotanic features of Rize/Turkey province. Biol Divers Conservat 2013;6:57–66.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bulut G. Folk medicinal plants of Silivri (Istanbul, Turkey). Marmara Pharm J 2011;15:25–9.10.12991/201115441Search in Google Scholar

8. Popović Z, Smiljanić M, Kostić M, Nikić P, Janković S. Wild flora and its usage in traditional phytotherapy (Deliblato Sands, Serbia, South East Europe). Indian J Tradit Knowl 2014;13:9–35.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mikulič-Petkovšek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberič, R. HPLC-MSn identification and quantification of flavonol glycosides in 28 and cultivated berry species. Food Chem 2012;135:2138–46.10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.115Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Scientific World J 2013;2013:162750.10.1155/2013/162750Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Wach A, Pyrzynska K, Biesaga M. Quercetin content in some food and herbal samples. Food Chem 2007;100:699–704.10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.028Search in Google Scholar

12. Forman V, Haladová M, Grančai D. Quantification of some secondary metabolites in selected Cornaceae species. Acta Fac Pharma Univ Comen 2015;62:8–11.Search in Google Scholar

13. Vareed SK, Reddy MK, Schutyki RE, Nair MG. Anthocyanins in Cornus alternifolia, Cornus controversa, Cornus kousa and Cornus florida fruits with health benefits. Life Sci 2006;78:777–84.10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.094Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Pawlowska AM, Camangi F, Braca A. Quali-quantitative analysis of flavonoids of Cornus mas L. (Cornaceae) fruits. Food Chem 2010;119:1257–61.10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.063Search in Google Scholar

15. Deng S, West BJ, Jensen JC. UPLC-TOF-MC characterization and identification of bioactive iridoids in Cornus mas fruit. J Anal Method Chem 2013:710972 (Article ID).10.1155/2013/710972Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Krivoruchko E. Carboxylic acids from Cornus mas. Chem Nat Compd 2014;50:112–3.10.1007/s10600-014-0879-ySearch in Google Scholar

17. Forman V, Haladová M, Grančai D, Ficková M. Antiproliferative activities of water infusions from leaves of five Cornus L. species. Molecules 2015;20:22546–52.10.3390/molecules201219786Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Hozoori Z, Pashna Z, Yousfbeyk F, Amin, G. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of methanolic extract of Cornus sanguinea subsp. australis fruits. Res Pharm Sci 2012;7:S790.Search in Google Scholar

19. Stanković MS, Topuzović MD. In vitro antioxidant activity of extracts from leaves and fruits of common dogwood (Cornus sanguinea L.). Acta Bot Gallica 2012;159:79–83.10.1080/12538078.2012.671650Search in Google Scholar

20. Orčić D, Francišković M, Bekvalac K, Svirčev E, Beara I, Lesjak M, et al. Quantitative determination of plant phenolics in Urtica dioica extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Food Chem 2014;143:48–53.10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.097Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-09-30
Accepted: 2017-04-25
Published Online: 2017-06-30
Published in Print: 2017-08-28

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2016-0175/html
Scroll Up Arrow