Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 5, 2016

Compositionality and competition in monkey alert calls

  • Shane Steinert-Threlkeld EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics


Arnold, Kate & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2012. Call combinations in monkeys: Compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain and Language 120(3). 303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

Call, Josep & Michael Tomasello. 2008. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(5). 187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Cäsar, Cristiane, Klaus Zuberbühler, Robert J. Young & Richard W. Byrne. 2013. Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and type. Biology Letters 9(5). 20130535. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0535.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1965. Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages. In Y. Bar-Hillel, (ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, 3–17. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grandy, Richard E. 1989. On Grice on Language. The Journal of Philosophy 86(10). 514–525.10.5840/jphil1989861021Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence Robert. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD thesis, Los Angeles: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1995. Pushmi-Pullyu Representations. Philosophical Perspectives 9. 185–200.10.1093/0199284768.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Premack, David & Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4. 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512.Search in Google Scholar

Saul, Jennifer M. 2002. What is Said and Psychological Reality; Grice’s Project and Relevance Theorists’ Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 347–372.10.1023/A:1015221313887Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe, Emmanuel Chemla, Kate Arnold, & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2016a. Pyow-Hack Revisited: Two Analyses of Putty-nosed Monkey Alarm Calls. Lingua 171. 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe, Emmanuel Chemla, Anne M. Schel, James Fuller, Jean-Pierre Gautier, Jeremy Kuhn, Dunja Veselinović, Kate Arnold, Cristiane Cäsar, Sumir Keenan, Alban Lemasson, Karim Ouattara, Robin Ryder, & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2016b. Formal Monkey Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics.10.1515/tl-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

van Rooij, Robert & Katrin Schulz. 2004. Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13(4). 491–519. doi: 10.1007/s10849-004-2118-6.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-7-5
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 11.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button