Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 7, 2017

Grammars as Mechanisms for Interaction: The Emergence of Language Games

Arash Eshghi and Oliver Lemon
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Bouzouita, Miriam & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Clitic placement in old and modern Spanish: A dynamic account. In O. N. Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2016. Collective contexts in conversation: Grounding by proxy. Cognitive Science 40(2). 299–324.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2013a. Incremental grammar induction from child-directed dialogue utterances. In Proceedings of the 4th annual workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL), 94–103. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver, Julian Hough & Yo Sato. 2013b. Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In CSLP, lecture notes in computer science. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Chris Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2015). London, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash & Oliver Lemon. 2014. How domain-general can we be? Learning incremental dialogue systems without dialogue acts. In Proceedings of Semdial 2014 (DialWatt).Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 297–365.Search in Google Scholar

Healey, Patrick G. T. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (eds.), Language in flux. London, UK: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hiller, Sarah & Raquel Fernández. 2016. A data-driven investigation of corrective feedback on subject omission errors in first language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONNL).Search in Google Scholar

Kalatzis, Dimitris, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on learning methods for dialogue, Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. New Jersey, US: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Gregory J. 2014. Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New Ideas in Psychology 32. 158–173.Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, Massimo & Hannes Rieser. 2010. Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.Search in Google Scholar

Saxton, Matthew, Phillip Backley & Clare Gallaway. 2005. Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language 32(03). 643–672.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-7
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston