Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 7, 2017

Grammars as Mechanisms for Interaction: The Emergence of Language Games

  • Arash Eshghi EMAIL logo and Oliver Lemon
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics


Bouzouita, Miriam & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Clitic placement in old and modern Spanish: A dynamic account. In O. N. Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.279.16bouSearch in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2016. Collective contexts in conversation: Grounding by proxy. Cognitive Science 40(2). 299–324.10.1111/cogs.12225Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2013a. Incremental grammar induction from child-directed dialogue utterances. In Proceedings of the 4th annual workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL), 94–103. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver, Julian Hough & Yo Sato. 2013b. Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In CSLP, lecture notes in computer science. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_6Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Chris Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2015). London, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash & Oliver Lemon. 2014. How domain-general can we be? Learning incremental dialogue systems without dialogue acts. In Proceedings of Semdial 2014 (DialWatt).Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 297–365.10.1023/B:LING.0000023369.19306.90Search in Google Scholar

Healey, Patrick G. T. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (eds.), Language in flux. London, UK: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hiller, Sarah & Raquel Fernández. 2016. A data-driven investigation of corrective feedback on subject omission errors in first language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONNL).10.18653/v1/K16-1011Search in Google Scholar

Kalatzis, Dimitris, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on learning methods for dialogue, Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. New Jersey, US: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Gregory J. 2014. Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New Ideas in Psychology 32. 158–173.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, Massimo & Hannes Rieser. 2010. Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.10.5087/dad.2010.001Search in Google Scholar

Saxton, Matthew, Phillip Backley & Clare Gallaway. 2005. Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language 32(03). 643–672.10.1017/S0305000905006999Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-7
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2023 from
Scroll to top button