Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 9, 2017

Action-Based Grammar

Ruth Kempson, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Anderson, John 1990. Cognitive psychology and its implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesSearch in Google Scholar

Barton, Ellen 1991. Nonsentential constituents and theories of phrase structure. In K. Leffel & D. Bouchard (eds.), Views on phrase structure, 193–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, Mark H. 1993. Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(4). 285–333.Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, Mark H. 2009. The interactivist model. Synthese 166. 547591.Search in Google Scholar

Bouzouita, Miriam. 2008. Clitic placement in the history of Spanish. London: King’s College, Ph.D. thesis, 22.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie. 2011. Towards an account of the English auxiliary system. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (eds.), The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 279–317. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie & Wu Yicheng. 2011. The bei construction in Chinese. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (eds.), The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 239–378. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Daniel Wedgwood. 2012. Representialism and linguistic knowledge. In R. Kempson, T. Fernando & N. Asher (eds.), Philosophy of linguistics: Handbook of the philosophy of science 14, 357–401. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2010. Clitics in four dialects of Modern Greek: A dynamic account. London: King’s College, Ph.D. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2012. A dynamic account of the Cypriot Greek clitic positioning system. Lingua 122. 642–672.Search in Google Scholar

Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2017. Afterthoughts in Greek: Gender mismatches under a dynamic framework. Journal of Linguistics 53(2). 279–325.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morton & Nick Chater. 2016. Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2013. Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Brain and Behavioral Science 36. 181–204.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2016. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve. 2009. Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve & Marisa Casillas. 2016. First language acquisition. In K. Allan (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics, 311–329. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2012. Type theory and semantics in flux. in R. Kempson, T. Fernando & N. Asher (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2014. Phrase structure rules as dialogue update rules. In V. Rieser & P. Muller (eds.), Proceedings of the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (SEMDIAL), vol. 18, 26–34. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2017. Adapting type theory with records for natural language semantics. In S. Chatzikyriakidis & Z. Luo (eds.), Modern perspectives in type-theoretical semantics, 71–94 Cham: Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. in prep. Type theory and language: From perception to linguistic communication. Draft of book chapters. https://sites.google.com/site/typetheorywithrecords/drafts.Search in Google Scholar

De Groote, Philippe 2001. Towards abstract categorial grammars. Proceedings of Association for Computational Linguistics, 39th Annual Meeting and 10th Conference of the European Chapter. 148–155.Search in Google Scholar

Demberg-Winterfors, Vera. 2010. Broad-coverage model of prediction in human sentence processing. The University of Edinburgh, Ph.D. Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Christine Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS). London.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver & Julian Hough. 2011. DyLan: Parser for dynamic syntax. Technical Report, Queen Mary, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver, Julian Hough & Yo Sato. 2013. Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In D. Duchier & Y. Parmentier (eds.), CSLP lecture notes in computer science 8114, 92–107. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Friston, Karl & Christopher Frith. 2015. A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition 36. 390–405.Search in Google Scholar

Frith, Christopher. 2007. Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter. 2014. The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gargett, Andrew, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Christine Howes & Yo Sato. 2008. Dialogue-grammar correspondence in dynamic syntax. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. (LONDIAL’08).Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Hannah. 2015. The dynamics of structure building in Rangi: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 8. 41–55.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Massimo Poesio. 2016. Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, Section Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, ellipsis and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 297–365.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2014. Quotation via dialogical interaction. Journal of Logic, Linguistics and Information 23. 287–311.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan, Raquel Fernández & David Schlangen. 2014. Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(9). 1–64.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Graf, Thomas. 2013. Local and transderivational constraints in syntax and semantics. University of California, PhD Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2013a. Grammar as action in language and music. In M. Orwin, C. Howes & R. Kempson (eds.), Language, music and interaction. London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2013b. Clitic left dislocation and clitic doubling: A dynamic perspective on left-right asymmetries in Greek. In G. Webelhuth, M. Sailer & H. Walker (eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2016. Grammars as mechanisms for fine-grained situated conceptualisation. Talk presented at the ‘Word Meaning Workshop’ University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, November 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2017. The case of non-sentential speech acts. Ms University of Osnabrueck.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, in press. Quotation in dialogue. In P. Saka & M. Johnson (eds.), The pragmatics of quotation. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni & Ruth Kempson. 2015. Joint utterances and the (split-)turn taking puzzle. In J. L. Mey & A. Capone (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Ruth Kempson, Christine Howes, Arash Eshghi. 2013. On making syntax dynamic: The challenge of compound utterances and the architecture of the grammar. In I. Wachsmuth, J. de Ruiter, P. Jaeck & S. Kopp (eds.), Alignment in communication: Towards a new theory of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Ruth Kempson, Matthew Purver, Gregory Mills, Ronnie Cann, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2011. Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2(1). 199–233.Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Yo Sato, Ruth Kempson, Andrew Gargett & Christine Howes. 2009. Dialogue modelling and the remit of core grammar. Proceedings of IWCS 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 3(S41). 58.Search in Google Scholar

Guhe, Markus. 2007. Incremental conceptualization for language production. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, John. 2006. Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30. 643672.Search in Google Scholar

Healey, Patrick. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Language coordination, language variation, change and evolution. London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Healey, Patrick, Matthew Purver & Christine Howes. 2014. Divergence in dialogue. PLoS One 9(2). 10.1371/journal.pone.0098598. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7078Search in Google Scholar

Healey, Patrick G.T. 1997. Expertise or expert-ese? The emergence of task-oriented sub-languages. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Hendriks, Petra. 2014. Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Hilbrink, Elma, Herideth Gattis & Stephen Levinson. 2015. Early developmental changes in the timing of turn-taking: A longitudinal study of mother-infant interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01492.Search in Google Scholar

Honing, Henkjan & Willem Zuidema. 2014. Decomposing dendrophilia. Comment on Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition by W. Tecumseh Fitch. Physics of Life Reviews 11(3). 375–376.Search in Google Scholar

Hough, Julian. 2015. Modelling incremental self-repair processing in dialogue. Ph.D Queen Mary University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Hough, Julian & Matther Purver. 2017. Probabilistic record type lattices for incremental reference processing. In S. Chatzikyriakidis & Z. Luo (eds.), Modern perspectives in type-theoretical semantics. New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Hough, Julian & Matthew Purver. 2014. Probabilistic type theory for incremental dialogue processing. In R. Cooper, S. Dobnik & S. Lappin (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2014 workshop on Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics, 80–88. Gothenburg: ACL 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Hurley, Susan. 1998. Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kalatzis, Dimitrios, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on Learning Methods for Dialogue. Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Kempen, Gerard. 2014. Prolegomena to a neurocomputational architecture for human grammatical encoding and decoding. Neuroinformatics 12. 111–142.Search in Google Scholar

Kempen, Gerard, Nomi Olsthoorn & Simone Sprenger. 2012. Grammatical workspace sharing during language production and language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(3). 345–380.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth. 1996. Semantics, pragmatics and deduction. In S. Lappin (ed.) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 561–598. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth & Jieun Kiaer. 2010. Multiple long-distance dependent scrambling: Syntax as reflections of processing. Journal of Linguistics 46. 127–192.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Arash Eshghi, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Matthew Purver. 2015. Ellipsis. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (eds.), Handbook of contemporary semantics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Andrew Gargett & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2007. Clarification requests: An incremental account. Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Decalog 2007).Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. in press. Action sequences instead of representational levels: Commentary on branigan & pickering. Brain & Behavioral Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Arash Eshghi & Julian Hough. forthcoming. Dynamics of ellipsis in situated interaction. In J. Craenenbroek & T. Temmerman (eds.), Handbook of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kleist, Heinrich von. 1951. On the gradual construction of thoughts during speech. German Life and Letters 5(1). 42–46. Translated by Hamburger M.Search in Google Scholar

Kobele, Gregory, 2012a. Eliding the derivation: A minimalist formalization of ellipsis. In S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG 2012 Conference Chungnam National University Daejeon, 307–324. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kobele, Gregory, 2012b. Ellipsis: Computation of. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3(3). 411–418.Search in Google Scholar

Kobele, Gregory 2015. LF copying without LF. Lingua 166(part B). 236–259.Search in Google Scholar

Kobele, Gregory, Sabrina Gerth & John T. Hale. 2013. Memory resource allocation in top-down minimalist parsing. In G. Morrill & MJ. Nederhof (eds.), Formal grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8036. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Staffan. 2003. The information-state approach to dialogue management. In D. Traum & S. Larsson (eds.) Current and new directions in dialogue, 325–353.Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Staffan. 2011. The TTR perceptron: Dynamic perceptual meanings and semantic coordination. Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 2011 – Los Angelogue), 140–148.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2). 151–184.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Shevaun & Colin Phillips. 2015. Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1). 27–46.Search in Google Scholar

Lombardo, V. & P. Sturt 2002. Towards a dynamic version of TAG. Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on tree adjoining grammar and related formalisms. Universit‘a di Venezia.Search in Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 2005. A note on alleged cases of nonsentential assertion. In R. Elugardo & R. J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 95–108. Netherlands: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Marr, David. 1982. Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marti, Luisa 2006. Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy 29. 135. doi:10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4Search in Google Scholar

Mazzei, Alessandro, Vincenzo Lombardo & Patrick Sturt. 2007. Dynamic TAG and lexical dependencies. Research on Language and Computation 5(3). 309–332.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis. In F. Recanati, I. Stojanovic & N. Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity, 152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Milkowski, Marcin. 2013. Explaining the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Gregory J. 2011. The emergence of procedural conventions in dialogue. Cognitive Science Society Conference (COGSCI) 33. 471476.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Gregory J. & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2010. Establishing coherence in dialogue: Sequentiality, intentions and negotiation. In P. Lupkowski & M. Purver (eds.), Aspects of semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (SemDial), 1724. Poznan: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.Search in Google Scholar

Morrill, Glyn. 2011. Categorial grammar: Logical syntax, semantics, and processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Morrill, Glyn & Valentin Oriol. 2015. Multiplicative-additive focusing for parsing as deduction. In I. Cervesato & C. Schürmann (eds.), First International Workshop on Focusing, 29–54. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science series. DOI: 10,4204/EPCTS.197.4Search in Google Scholar

O’Grady, William. 2005. Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Perruchet, Pierre & Arnaud Rey. 2005. Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12(2). 307–313.Search in Google Scholar

Poesio, Massimo & Hannes Rieser. 2010. Completions, co-ordination and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2006. The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles & E. Barton (eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 33–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Purver, Matthew, Ronnie Cann & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Grammars as parsers: Meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation 4. 289–326.Search in Google Scholar

Purver, Matthew, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Ronnie Cann. 2010. Splitting the I’s and Crossing the You’s: Context, speech acts and grammar. Proceedings of the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue(PozDial). Poznan, Poland. June 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Ranta, Aarne. 2011. Grammatical framework: Programming with multilingual grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Rieser, Hannes 2016. A process algebra account of speech-gesture interaction. MS. University of Bielefeld. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30166.24644Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Yo. 2011. Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in dynamic syntax. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes. The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 205–234. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Schober, Michael & Susan Brennan. 2003. Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. Graesser, M. Garnbacher & S. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes, 123–164. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Sehraku, Tohru. 2013. Clefts, relatives, and language dynamics: The case of Japanese. Oxford: DPhil.Search in Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott & David Sloan. Wilson 1998. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stabler, Ed. 1997. Derivational minimalism. In C. Retoré (ed.), Logical aspects of computational linguistics, 68–95. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Stabler, Ed. 2011. Computational perspectives on minimalism. In C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 617–642. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stabler, Ed. 2013. Two models of minimalist, incremental syntactic analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science DOI: 10.1111/tops.12031.Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 2000. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stokhof, Martin & van Lambalgen. Michiel 2011. Abstractions and idealizations: The constructions of modern linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37(1–2). 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael 2008. The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weir, Andrew. 2014. Fragments and clausal ellipsis. Diss. University of Massachusetts Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, David Sloan. 2002 Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Yanchao, Yu, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Training an adaptive dialogue policy for interactive learning of visually grounded word meanings. Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2016 Conference, The 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 13-15 September 2016, Los Angeles, CA, 339–349.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-9
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston