Beyond English Sentences

References

Bertrand, Anne, Johannes Heim, Sonja Thoma & Martina Wiltschko. 2017. Story-board elicitation for confirmationals. Ms. UBC.Search in Google Scholar

Boucher, Jill. 2012. Research review: Structural language in autistic spectrum disorder – characteristics and causes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53(3). 219–233.10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02508.xSearch in Google Scholar

Burton, Strang & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. In M. R. Bochnak & L. Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 135–156. New York: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Strang & Martina Wiltschko. 2016. The eh vs. geu problem. In E. Bakovic (ed.), A shortschrift for Alan Prince. https://princeshortschrift.wordpress.com/squibs/burton-wiltschko/Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Christopher. 2011. Constraining interpretation: Sentence final particles in Japanese. University of Massachusetts at Amherst Phd Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic inquiry 33(3). 409–442.10.1162/002438902760168554Search in Google Scholar

Elouazizi, Noureddine & Martina Wiltschko. 2006. The categorial status of (anti-) (anti-) agreement In D. Baumer et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 2006), 150–158. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. West flemish verb‐based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 116–139.10.1111/stul.12023Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. In Folli, R. et al. (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018Search in Google Scholar

Haggo, Douglas. 1987. The structure of English tonal morphemes. University of Canterbury PHD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Johannes et al. 2016 Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37. 109–129.10.1515/scl-2016-0005Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Virginia. 2013. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics. Leiden, Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004261389Search in Google Scholar

Hinzen, Wolfram. 2013. Narrow syntax and the language of thought. Philosophical Psychology 26(1). 1–23.10.1080/09515089.2011.627537Search in Google Scholar

Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann. 2016. Extra-clausal constituents. An overview. In G. Kaltenböck et al. (eds.), Outside the clause form and function of extra-clausal constituents, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.178Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. On the position of subjects. Lingua 85. 211–258.10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-WSearch in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2013. Response particles as propositional anaphors. In T. Snider (ed.), Semantics and linguistic theory, 23. 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Zoe. 2014. A complex ForceP for speaker- and addressee-oriented discourse particles in cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35. 61–80.Search in Google Scholar

Leonard, Lawrence. 2017. Cross-linguistic studies of child language disorders. In R. Schwartz (ed.), Handbook of child language disorders, 328–344. New York: Psychology Press.10.4324/9781315283531-13Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark & Ivan Sag. 1974. Prosodic form and discourse function. Chicago Linguistics Society 10. 416–427.Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2017. Agreement beyond phi. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Newell, Heather, Maire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.). 2017. The structure of words at the interfaces. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198778264.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Noterdaeme, Michele, Elke Wriedt & Christian Höhne 2010. Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism: Language, motor and cognitive profiles. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 19(6). 475–481.10.1007/s00787-009-0057-0Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence‐final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 77–115.10.1111/stul.12020Search in Google Scholar

Peppé Susan et al.. 2007. Receptive and expressive prosodic ability in children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50. 1015–28.10.1044/1092-4388(2007/071)Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John. 1970. On declarative sentences. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–277. Waltham MA: Ginn.Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold. 1974. Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In A. DiSciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam, London: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.57.15speSearch in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and philosophy 25(5). 701–721.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Thoma, Sonja. 2017. Discourse particles and the syntax of discourse-evidence from Miesbach Bavarian. University of British Columbia Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Trager, George & Henry Smith. 1951. An outline of English structure. Norman: Buttenburg Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trinh, Tue & Luka Crnic. 2011. On the rise and fall of declaratives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15. 645–660.Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2013. Satztyp, Prosodie und Intonation. In J. Meibauer et al. (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 570–601. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224832.570Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(2). 143–181.10.1023/A:1009719229992Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2017. The syntax of interaction. Talk given at AFLA, Seattle Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. in prep. The syntax of interaction. Ms. UBC.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. in press. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts. Coon, In J. D. Massam & L. Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Johannes Heim. 2016. The syntax of confirmationals. A neo-performative analysis. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer & A. Lohmann (eds.), Outside the clause. Form and function of extra-clausal constituent, 303–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.178.11wilSearch in Google Scholar