On type composition and agentivity

References

Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511793936Search in Google Scholar

Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. On the grammar of local prepositions. In M. Bierwisch et al. (eds.), Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon, 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar

Frisson, Steven. 2009. Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 111–127.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00104.xSearch in Google Scholar

Leach, Edmund R. 1964. Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal insults. In E. H. Lenneberg (ed.), New direction in the study of language, 23–63. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.1037/e685262012-044Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, Alan M. 1995. A theory of agency. In D. Sperber et al. (eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, 121–141, Oxford. Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524021.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. 2015. Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate–Inanimate distinction. Cognition 136. 85–90.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.021Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3. 143–184.10.1007/BF00126509Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112420027-006Search in Google Scholar

Primus, Beatrice. 2012. Animacy, generalized semantic roles and differential object marking. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds.), Case, word order, and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension, 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1463-2_4Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schumacher, Petra B. 2011. The hepatitis called …: Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds.), Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics, 199–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.175.10schSearch in Google Scholar

Schumacher, Petra B. 2013. When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00677Search in Google Scholar

Schumacher, Petra B. 2014. Content and context in incremental processing: “the ham sandwich” revisited. Philosophical Studies 168. 151–165.10.1007/s11098-013-0179-6Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

de Swart, Henriëtte, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 195–222.10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4Search in Google Scholar

Weckerly, Jill & Marta Kutas. 1999. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36. 559–570.10.1111/1469-8986.3650559Search in Google Scholar

Weiland-Breckle, Hanna & Petra B. Schumacher. 2017. Artist-for-work metonymy: Type clash or underspecification? Mental Lexicon 12. 219–233.10.1075/ml.16014.weiSearch in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.46Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yaxu, Jinlu Zhang & Baoquan Min. 2012. Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier–noun combinations. Brain and Language 120. 321–331.10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.007Search in Google Scholar