Change language
English Deutsch
Change currency
€ EUR £ GBP $ USD
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 21, 2019

Some questions about the notion of “commitment”

  • Rodger Kibble EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0005

References

Kibble, R. 2013. Speech act theory and intelligent software agents. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214383.313Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-21
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

From the journal
Theoretical Linguistics
Theoretical Linguistics
Volume 45 Issue 1-2

Journal and Issue

Articles in the same Issue

Frontmatter
Communication as commitment sharing: speech acts, implicatures, common ground
Comments
A demanding commitment to non-psychological explanations
Think twice before paving illocutionary paradise
Intention and commitment in speech acts
Some questions about the notion of “commitment”
Commitments and beyond
Commitment sharing as crucial step toward a developmentally plausible speech act theory?
How to avoid overcommitment: Communication as thought sharing (with consequences)
Commitments continued
Downloaded on 21.3.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2019-0005/html
Scroll Up Arrow