Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 21, 2019

Commitment sharing as crucial step toward a developmentally plausible speech act theory?

Hannes Rakoczy and Tanya Behne
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Baillargeon, R., D. Buttelmann & V. Southgate. 2018. Invited commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Cognitive Development 46. 112–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001. Search in Google Scholar

Breheny, R. 2006. Communication and folk psychology. Mind and Language 21(1). 74–107. Search in Google Scholar

Dörrenberg, S., H. Rakoczy & U. Liszkowski. 2018. How (not) to measure infant theory of mind: Testing the replicability and validity of four non-verbal measures. Cognitive Development 46. 12–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.01.001. Search in Google Scholar

Frank, M. C., E. Bergelson, C. Bergmann, A. Cristia, C. Floccia, J. Gervain … D. Yurovsky. 2017. A collaborative approach to infant research: Promoting reproducibility, best practices, and theory-building. Infancy 22(4). 421–435. doi:10.1111/infa.12182. Search in Google Scholar

Kulke, L. & H. Rakoczy. 2018. Implicit theory of mind – An overview of current replications and non-replications. Data in Brief 16(SupplementC). 101–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.016. Search in Google Scholar

Kulke, L., M. Reiß, H. Krist & H. Rakoczy. 2018a. How robust are anticipatory looking measures of theory of mind? Replication attempts across the life span. Cognitive Development 46. 97–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.09.001. Search in Google Scholar

Kulke, L., B. von Duhn, D. Schneider & H. Rakoczy. 2018b. Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797617747090. Search in Google Scholar

Mellers, B., R. Hertwig & D. Kahneman. 2001. Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science 12(4). 269–275. Search in Google Scholar

Onishi, K. H. & R. Baillargeon. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308(5719). 255–258. doi:10.1126/science.1107621. Search in Google Scholar

Perner, J. & J. Roessler. 2012. From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(10). 519–525. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.004. Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, J., D. C. Ong, A. D. R. Surtees, Y. Xin, S. Williams, R. Saxe & M. C. Frank. 2015. A second look at automatic theory of mind. Psychological Science 26(9). 1353–1367. doi:10.1177/0956797614558717. Search in Google Scholar

Poulin-Dubois, D., H. Rakoczy, K. Burnside, C. Crivello, S. Dörrenberg, K. Edwards … T. Ruffman. 2018. Do infants understand false beliefs? We don’t know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate’s commentary. Cognitive Development 48. 302–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005 Search in Google Scholar

Powell, L. J., K. Hobbs, A. Bardis, S. Carey & R. Saxe. 2017. Replications of implicit theory of mind tasks with varying representational demands. Cognitive Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.004. Search in Google Scholar

Priewasser, B., E. Rafetseder, C. Gargitter & J. Perner. 2017. Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: Mentalism or teleology? Cognitive Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.002. Search in Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H. & M. F. H. Schmidt. 2013. The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives 7(1). 17–21. doi:10.1111/cdep.12010. Search in Google Scholar

Santiesteban, I., C. Catmur, S. C. Hopkins, G. Bird & C. Heyes. 2014. Avatars and arrows: Implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40(3). 929–937. Search in Google Scholar

Santiesteban, I., P. Shah, S. White, G. Bird & C. Heyes. 2015. Mentalizing or submentalizing in a communication task? Evidence from autism and a camera control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22(3). 844–849. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0716-0. Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, D., V. P. Slaughter & P. E. Dux. 2017. Current evidence for automatic theory of mind processing in adults. Cognition 162. 27–31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.018. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, R. M. & R. Baillargeon. 2017. Early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(4). 237–249. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.012. Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, H., D. Cross & J. Watson. 2001. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development 72(3). 655–684. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-21
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston