Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 21, 2019

How to avoid overcommitment: Communication as thought sharing (with consequences)

Dietmar Zaefferer
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Arkin, A. N. 2018. Sleep talking: Psychology and psychophysiology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Astington, J. W. 1988. Children’s understanding of the speech act of promising. Journal of Child Language 15. 157–173.Search in Google Scholar

Benz, A. 2012. Implicatures of complex sentences in error models 2012. In Andrea Schalley (ed.), Practical theories and empirical practice, 273–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Ciardelli, I., J. Groenendijk & F. Roelofsen. 2018. Inquisitive semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1918. Der gedanke: Eine logische untersuchung. Erfurt: Stenger.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1956. The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind 65(259). 289–311. [Translation of Frege 1918].Search in Google Scholar

Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle morphologie der organismen [General morphology of the organisms]. Berlin: G. Reimer.Search in Google Scholar

Heck, R. G., Jr. 2000. Nonconceptual content and the “space of reasons”. The Philosophical Review 109(4). 483–523.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D. & D. Moser. 1989. To err is human: To study error-making is cognitive science. Michigan Quarterly Review XXVIII(2), Spring 1989. 185–215.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, K. S. 2019. The speaker authority problem for context-sensitivity (Or: You can’t always mean what you want). Erkenntnis.10.1007/s10670-018-0089-2Search in Google Scholar

Michael, J. & M. Székely. 2018. The developmental origins of commitment. Journal of Social Philosophy 49(1). 106–123.Search in Google Scholar

Pfaller, P. 2016. Theorie über das Denken und Sprechen über vorgestellte Situationen: Zusammenhänge zwischen Konditionalität, Topiks und Common Ground. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson University Library.Search in Google Scholar

Schalley, A. C. & D. Zaefferer. (eds.). 2008. Ontolinguistics: How ontological status shapes the linguistic coding of concepts. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5). 701–721.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. 2019. Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, D. 1977. Understanding misunderstanding: A proposal for an explanation of reading choices. Journal of Pragmatics 1(4). 329–346.Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, D. 2006. Deskewing the searlean picture. A new speech act ontology for linguistics. In Zhenya Antić et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 10–12, 2006, General Session, 453–464. Berkeley, CA.Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, D. 2016. Bridging the gap between language and action with an agent-based situation theory. Paper presented at the Workshop on Situations, Information, and Semantic Content, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich,16–18 December.Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, D. 2017. Questioning performatives. Paper presented at the Workshop on Questioning Speech Acts, Konstanz University, 14–16 September.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-21
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston