Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 21, 2019

Commitments continued

Bart Geurts
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Acknowledgements

I owe a great debt of gratitude to the eight colleagues who volunteered to respond to my article. Their inquisitive, explorative, supportive, and unsupportive comments have been immensely useful to me, and are much appreciated. Thanks also to Thomas klein Goldewijk, Paula Rubio Fernández, and Huub Vromen for discussion and feedback on the first draft of this paper, and special thanks to Hans-Martin Gärtner for supervising the entire project with so much diligence, patience, and wisdom. Research for this paper was supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project 5-100.

References

Abramova, E. 2018. The role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive basis, and an alternative. Journal of Language Evolution 3. 26–40.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-On, D. 2013. Origins of meaning: must we “go Gricean”? Mind and Language 28. 342–375.Search in Google Scholar

Beyssade, C. & J.-M. Marandin 2009. Commitment: une attitude dialogique. Langue Française 162. 89–107.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1983. Asserting. Noûs 17. 637–650.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1994. Making it explicit. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Breheny, R. 2006. Communication and folk psychology. Mind and Language 21. 74–107.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. 1992. Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. 2017. How we talk: the inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gauker, C. 2003. Words without meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geurts, B. 2018. Making sense of self talk. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9. 271–285.Search in Google Scholar

Green, M. S. 2015. Speech acts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.edu.Search in Google Scholar

Horty, J. F. 2012. Reasons as defaults. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, J. 1984. Group speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 379–395.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, T. 2016. Evidence. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Search in Google Scholar

Kissine, M. 2013. Speech act classifications. In: M. Sbisà & K. Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 173–202. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, K. S. 2019. The speaker authority problem for context-sensitivity (or: you can’t always mean what you want). To appear in Erkenntniss.Search in Google Scholar

McHugh, C. & D. Whiting 2014. The normativity of belief. Analysis 74. 698–713.Search in Google Scholar

Meijers, A. 2007. Collective speech acts. In: S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Intentional acts and institutional facts, 93–110. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Poschmann, C. 2008. All declarative questions are attributive? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22. 247–269.Search in Google Scholar

Rubio-Fernández, P. & B. Geurts 2013. How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday. Psychological Science 24. 27–33.Search in Google Scholar

Sbisà, M. 2009. Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5. 33–52.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. & D. Vanderveken 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Verbeek, B. 2014. On the normativity of intentions. Topoi 33. 87–101.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-21
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston