Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 30, 2019

Overgeneralization and change: The role of acquisition in diachrony

Marit Westergaard EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Acknowledgements

This research has been partly funded by a grant from the Research Council of Norway for the project MiMS (Microvariation in Multilingual Acquisition and Attrition Situations), project number 250857.

References

Busterud, G., T. Lohndal, Y. Rodina & M. Westergaard. 2019. The loss of feminine gender in Norwegian: A dialect comparison. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22. 141–167.10.1007/s10828-019-09108-7Search in Google Scholar

Cournane, A. 2015. Modal development: input-divergent L1 acquisition in the direction of diachronic reanalysis. University of Toronto (Canada) PhD Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Cournane, A. & A. T. Pérez-Leroux. Under revision. Leaving obligations behind: epistemic incrementation in preschool English.Search in Google Scholar

Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. John Benjamins.10.1075/la.71Search in Google Scholar

Hall, E. & R. Maddeaux. 2018. /u/-fronting and /æ/-raising in Toronto Families. Talk Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 47. Amsterdam: New York University.Search in Google Scholar

Hinterhölzl, R. & A. van Kemenade. 2012. The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0066Search in Google Scholar

Hudson Kam, C. L. & E. L. Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1(2). 151–195.10.1080/15475441.2005.9684215Search in Google Scholar

Kemenade, A. van & M. Westergaard. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In A. M. Solin, et al. (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87–118. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar

Plunkett, K. & S. Strömquist. 1992. The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In D. I Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 457–556. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781315808208-10Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1992. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In J. M. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 23–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_2Search in Google Scholar

Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. 2013. The acquisition of gender and declension in a non-transparent system: Monolinguals and bilinguals. Studia Linguistica 67(1). 47–67.10.1111/stul.12012Search in Google Scholar

Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. 2015. Grammatical gender in Norwegian: Language acquisition and language change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27(2). 145–187.10.1017/S1470542714000245Search in Google Scholar

Rodina, Y. & M. Westergaard. Forthcoming. Grammatical gender and declension class in language change: A study of the loss of feminine gender in Norwegian. Journal of Germanic Linguistics.10.1017/S1470542719000217Search in Google Scholar

Roeper, T. 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–186.10.1017/S1366728999000310Search in Google Scholar

Schönenberger, M. 2001. Embedded V-to-C in child grammar: The acquisition of verb placement in Swiss German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0798-6Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, W. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Sollid, H. 2005. Språkdannelse og -stabilisering i møtet mellom kvensk og norsk. Oslo: Novus.Search in Google Scholar

Valian, V. 1990. Null subjects: A problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35(2). 105–122.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90011-8Search in Google Scholar

Valian, V. 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40. 21–81.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90046-7Search in Google Scholar

Waldmann, C. 2011. Moving in small steps towards verb second: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34(3). 331–359.10.1017/S0332586512000054Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. 2009a. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in Wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5). 1023–1051.10.1017/S0305000909009349Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. 2009b. The acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.145Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. 2009c. The development of word order in old and Middle English: The role of information structure and first language acquisition. Diachronica 26(1). 65–102.10.1075/dia.26.1.03wesSearch in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. 2009d. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1). 49–79.10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. 2014. Linguistic variation and micro-cues in first language acquisition. Linguistic Variation 14(1). 26–45.10.1075/lv.14.1.02wesSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-30
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2019-0014/html
Scroll Up Arrow