Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 30, 2019

Interpreting (un)interpretability

  • George Walkden EMAIL logo and Anne Breitbarth
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics


Baker, P. 1996. Some developmental inferences from historical studies of pidgins and creoles. In J. Arends (ed.), The early stages of creolization, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cll.13.03bakSearch in Google Scholar

Biberauer, T. 2017. Factors 2 and 3: A principled approach. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 10. 38–65.Search in Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. M. Gass & A. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 141–168. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005Search in Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 2009. The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31. 175–198.10.1017/S0272263109090275Search in Google Scholar

Breitbarth, A., C. Lucas & D. Willis. Forthcoming. The development of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 2: Patterns and processes. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1–22.10.1162/0024389052993655Search in Google Scholar

Cornips, L. 2008. Losing grammatical gender in Dutch: The result of bilingual acquisition and/or an act of identity? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1&2). 105–124.10.1177/13670069080120010701Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. & A. Y. Aikhenvald. 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Grüter, T., C. Lew-Williams & A. Fernald. 2012. Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research 28(2). 191–215.10.1177/0267658312437990Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. & T. Lohndal. 2010. Negative concord and (multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 181–211.10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.181Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, C. 2012. Contact-induced grammatical change: Towards an explicit account. Diachronica 29(3). 275–300.10.1075/dia.29.3.01lucSearch in Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 2004. What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511617188Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, J. L. 1972. Verb agreement as a rule of English. Chicago Linguistics Society 8. 278–286.Search in Google Scholar

Orgassa, A. & F. Weerman. 2008. Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 24(3). 333–364.10.1177/0267658308090184Search in Google Scholar

Parodi, T. 2016. Formal features and vulnerable domains in L2 acquisition and an outlook on language contact. In S. Fischer & M. Navarro (eds.), Proceedings of the VII Nereus international workshop: “Clitic doubling and other issues of the syntax/semantic interface in Romance DPs” (Arbeitspapier 128), 91–103. Konstanz: Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Preminger, O. 2019. What the PCC tells us about “abstract” agreement, head movement, and locality. Glossa 4(1). 13.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I. M., & M. Dimitrakopoulou. 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23. 215–242.10.1177/0267658307076546Search in Google Scholar

Unsworth, S. 2008. Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research 24(3). 365–395.10.1177/0267658308090185Search in Google Scholar

van Gelderen, E. 2007. The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19. 275–308.10.1017/S147054270700013XSearch in Google Scholar

van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, H. 2008. Negative concord is syntactic agreement. Ms, lingBuzz/000645.Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, H. 2014. On the uninterpretability of interpretable features. In P. Kosta et al. (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 109–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.11.05zeiSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-30
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.4.2023 from
Scroll to top button