General linguistics and the nature of human language

References

Anderson, Stephen R. & David W. Lightfoot. 2002. The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511613869Search in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter & Stefan Pfänder (eds.). 2011. Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080Search in Google Scholar

Behme, Christina. 2015. Is the ontology of biolinguistics coherent? Language Sciences 47. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.012.Search in Google Scholar

Behme, Christina & Martin Neef (eds.). 2018. Essays on linguistic realism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.196Search in Google Scholar

Bergmann, Carl. 1848. Ueber die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 1. 595–708.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Philip. 2012. The philosophy of phonology. In R. M. Kempson, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher. (eds.), Philosophy of linguistics, 403–444. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-51747-0.50012-3Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Philip. 2019. English phonetics and phonology: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2020. Language as a phenomenon of the third kind. Cognitive Linguistics 31. 213–229.10.1515/cog-2019-0029Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. 2006. Ignorance of language. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/0199250960.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Kenneth Wexler, Robert C. Berwick, Cedric Boeckx, Lyle Jenkins, Juan Uriagereka, Karin Stromswold, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Heidi Harley, Andrew Wedel, James McGilvray, Elly van Gelderen & Thomas G. Bever. 2010. The biological nature of human language. Biolinguistics 4. 4–34.10.5964/bioling.8759Search in Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Cedric Boeckx (eds.). 2011. The Biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2016. Conceptualization in current approaches of language typology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1176372.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniël Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–114. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar

Hinzen, Wolfram. 2012. The philosophical significance of Universal Grammar. Language Sciences 24. 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. BLS 13. 139–157. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1988. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context, 117–134. Norwood: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155–175. London: Erlbaum.10.4324/9781315085678-6Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent, 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080.22Search in Google Scholar

Itkonen, Esa. 1978. Grammatical theory and metascience. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.5Search in Google Scholar

Kac, Michael. 1992. Grammars and grammaticality. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.78Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. 1981. Language and other abstract objects. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. 2000. Realistic rationalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal. 1991. Realism vs. Conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 515–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00632596.Search in Google Scholar

Levine, Robert. 2018. ‘Biolinguistics’: Some foundational problems. In Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds.), 21–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.196.03levSearch in Google Scholar

Melia, Joseph. 1999. Review of Jerrold J. Katz. Realistic Rationalism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50. 475–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/50.3.475.Search in Google Scholar

Montague, Richard. 1974. English as a formal language. In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, 188–221. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.10.1515/9783111546216-007Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan M. 2018. Languages and other abstract structures. In Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds.), 139–184. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.196.06nefSearch in Google Scholar

Pitt, David. 2018. What kind of science is linguistics? In C. Behme & M. Neef (eds.), 7–20.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 2009. The incoherence of Chomsky’s ‘biolinguistic’ ontology. Biolinguistics 3. 247–266.10.5964/bioling.8689Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 2018. The ontology of natural language. In Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds.), 1–6. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2017. Theory, data, and the epistemology of syntax. In Marek Konopka & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Grammatische Variation. Empirische Zugänge und theoretische Modellierung, 283–298. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110518214-016Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Gideon. 2020. Abstract objects. In Edward Nouri Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab.Search in Google Scholar

Scholz, Barbara C., Francis Jeffry Pelletier & K. Pullum Geoffrey. 2016. Philosophy of Linguistics. In Edward Nouri Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab.10.1002/0470018860.s00142Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margaret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.). 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.10Search in Google Scholar

Soschen, Alona. 2008. On the nature of Syntax. Biolinguistics 2. 196–224.10.5964/bioling.8641Search in Google Scholar

Spike, Matthew. 2020. Fifty shades of grue: Indeterminate categories and induction in and out of the language sciences. Linguistic Typology 24. 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2061.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Richmond H. 1974. Introduction. In R. H. Thomason (ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, 1–70. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera & Volker Gast. 2010. Categories and prototypes. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 166–189. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Wetzel, Linda. 2009. Types and tokens. On abstract objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013017.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wetzel, Linda. 2010. Linguistic reality. In Alex Barber & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language and linguistics, 368–371. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01126-3Search in Google Scholar

Wetzel, Linda. 2018. Types and tokens. In Edward Nouri Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013017.001.0001Search in Google Scholar