Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 9, 2021

(Non)conventional aspects of language and their relation to general linguistics

Susanne Fuchs and Ludger Paschen
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Corresponding author: Susanne Fuchs, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany, E-mail:

  1. Acknowledgments: This work has been supported by the Leibniz Association and a grant by the German Research Council (KR 951/17-1).

References

Amici, Federica, Alex Sánchez-Amaro, Carla Sebastián-Enesco, Trix Cacchione, Matthias Allritz, Juan Salazar-Bonet & Federico Rossano. 2019. The word order of languages predicts native speakers’ working memory. Scientific Reports 9(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37654-9.Search in Google Scholar

Barber, Alex & Eduardo Garcia Ramirez. 2020. Idiolects. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. .Search in Google Scholar

Belz, Malte. 2021. Die Phonetik von äh und ähm. Berlin: J.B. Metzler.Search in Google Scholar

Bögels, Sara, Kobin H. Kendrick & Stephen C. Levinson. 2015. Never say no… how the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. PLoS One 10(12). e0145474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145474.Search in Google Scholar

Cejtlin, Stella N. 2001. Slovar’ detskich slovoobrazovatel’nych innovacij, volume 132 of Specimina Philologiae Slavicae. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93. 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.93.3.283.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19. 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda & Karl G. Bailey. 2004. Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8. 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria A. 1973. Slips of the tongue. Scientific American 229(6). 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1273-110.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Susanne, Egor Savin, Stephanie Solt, Cornelia Ebert & Manfred Krifka. 2019. Antonym adjective pairs and prosodic iconicity: Evidence from letter replications in an English blogger corpus. Linguistics Vanguard 5(1). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2013. Para-linguistic usages of clicks. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob & Harry van der Hulst. 2013. Rhythm types. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Gogate, Lakshmi, Madhavilatha Maganti & Lorriane E. Bahrick. 2015. Cross-cultural evidence for multimodal motherese: Asian Indian mothers’ adaptive use of synchronous words and gestures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 129. 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Goldstein, Louis, Marianne Pouplier, Larissa Chen, Elliot Saltzman & Dani Byrd. 2007. Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition 103(3). 386–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Golestani, Narly, Cathy J. Price & Sophie K. Scott. 2011. Born with an ear for dialects? Structural plasticity in the expert phonetician brain. Journal of Neuroscience 31. 4213–4220. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3891-10.2011.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.Search in Google Scholar

Heldner, Mattias & Jens Edlund. 2010. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics 38. 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig. 2020. Understanding negation: Issues in the processing of negation. In Viviane Déprez & Teressa M. Espinal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation, 635–655. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Krivokapić, Jelena. 2007. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics 35. 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. 1993. Speaking: From intention to articulation, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Lurija, Aleksandr Romanovič. 2009 [1975]. Osnovnye problemy nejrolingvistiki, 3 edn. Moscow: Librokom.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013. Tone. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Maguire, Eleanor A., David G. Gadian, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Catriona D. Good, John Ashburner, Richard S. Frackowiak & Christopher D. Frith. 2000. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(8). 4398–4403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597.Search in Google Scholar

Mowrey, Richard A. & Ian R. MacKay. 1990. Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88. 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399706.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Ruth, Clare Hanson, Mark Hanson, Michael Penkler, Georgia Samaras, Luca Chiapperino, John Dupré, Martha Kenney, Christopher Kuzawa, Joanna Latimer, Lloyd Stephanie, Astrid Lunkes, Molly Macdonald, Maurizio Meloni, Brigitte Nerlich, Francesco Panese, Martyn Pickersgill, Sarah Richardson, Joëlle Rüegg, Sigrid Schmitz, Aleksandra Stelmach & Paula-Irene Villa. 2017. The biosocial genome? Interdisciplinary perspectives on environmental epigenetics, health and society. EMBO Reports 18(10). 1677–1682. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744953.Search in Google Scholar

Ogden, Richard. 2012. Making sense of outliers. Phonetica 69. 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343197.Search in Google Scholar

Onnis, Luca. 2017. Caregiver communication to the child as moderator and mediator of genes for language. Behavioural Brain Research 325. 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Pouplier, Marianne. 2007. Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the slip technique. Language and Speech 50. 311–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500030201.Search in Google Scholar

Pouplier, Marianne & Louis Goldstein. 2005. Asymmetries in the perception of speech production errors. Journal of Phonetics 33. 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Rescorla, Michael. 2019. Convention. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. .Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 550–569. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 1979. Speech errors as evidence for a serial ordering mechanism in sentence production. In William E. Cooper & Edward C.T. Walker (eds.), Speech processing, 295–342. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-31
Accepted: 2021-02-12
Published Online: 2021-09-09
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston