Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 9, 2021

Analysis and falsifiability in practice

Adam J. R. Tallman EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Corresponding author: Adam J. R. Tallman, Friedrich Schiller Universität, Jena, Germany, E-mail:

References

Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman. 2012. Linear Asymetries and the LCA. Syntax 15. 25–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00163.x.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen. 1985. Inflectional morphology. In Thimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 150–201. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Compounds and compounding. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781108235679Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause-linkage. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy, 51–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.121.03bicSearch in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & René Schiering. 2009. The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. In Janet Grijzenhout & Baris Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, 47–75. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219234.1.47Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 181–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992782.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language 94. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0000.Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 2005. The Dappled World: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1985. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Coon, Jessica. 2013. Aspects of split ergativity. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858743.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2010. Ten unwarranted assumptions in syntactic argumentation. In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language usage and language structure, 313–350. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Anthony & Jean-Pierre Koenig. 2020. The nature and role of the lexicon in HPSG. In Stefan Müller, Anne Abellé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar, 51–104. Berlin: Language Sciences Press.Search in Google Scholar

Desjardins, Jared. 2020. A Cross-theoretical and Cross-linguistic survey of lexical integrity and the nature of the morphology-syntax interface. https://jared-desjardins.github.io/LI/docs/home/.Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, David. 2003. A grammar of Matses. Rice University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Galison, Peter. 1987. How experiments end. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz. 2011. Compounding and Lexicalism. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Oxford handbook of compounding, 178–200. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0009Search in Google Scholar

Gildea, Spike. 2008. Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. Amerindia 32. 57–75.Search in Google Scholar

Good, Jeff. 2016. The linguistic typology of templates. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139057479Search in Google Scholar

Guardiano, Cristina & Giuseppe Longobardi. 2017. Parametric theory and parametric comparison. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of universal grammar, 377–400. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.16Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511814563Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of the morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45. 31–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.002.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. The moving parts and the fixed parts of our theories: Why functional-adaptive explanations are more testable. https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1167.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2019. Ergativity and depth of analysis. Rhema 4. 108–130. https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2019-4-108-130.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea Sims. 2010. Understanding morphology. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36. 161–195.10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2012. Linguistic data types and the interface between language documentation and description. Language Documentation and Conservation 6. 187–207.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer. 2011. Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 2011. The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258536.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.). 2015. Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter. 2002. What can we conclude? In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 266–281. Oxford: OUP.10.1017/CBO9780511486241.012Search in Google Scholar

Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chiacgo: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mayo, Deborah G. 2018. Statistical inference as severe testing: How to get beyond the statistics wars. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781107286184Search in Google Scholar

Mayo, Deborah G. & Aris Spanos. 2011. Error statistics. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay & M.R. Forster (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of science, Vol. 7, 153–198. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-51862-0.50005-8Search in Google Scholar

McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. Oxon: CRC Press.10.1201/9780429029608Search in Google Scholar

Mendívil-Giró, José-Luis. 2019. How much data does linguistic theory need? on the tolerance principle of linguistic theorizing. Frontiers in Communication, Language Sciences 3(62). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00062.Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2007. What is universal about typology? Linguistic Typology 11. 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2007.004.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2006. Phrasal and lexical constructions. Language 82. 850–883.10.1353/lan.2006.0213Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan & Stephen Wechsler. 2014. Lexical approaches to argument structure. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Neely, Kelsey. 2019. The linguistic expression of affective stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru). Berkeley PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2008. Universals in syntax. The Linguistic Review 25. 35–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2008.002.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2009. Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis: An overview and critique. In William D. Lewis, Simin Karimi, Heidi Harley & Scott O. Farrar (eds.), Time and again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics in honor of D. Terence Langendoen, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.135.07newSearch in Google Scholar

Nosek, Brian A., Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander C. DeHaven & Daviod T. Mellor. 2018. The preregistration revolution. PNAS 115(11). 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.10.1063/1.3060577Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and refutations. New York: Routledge.10.1063/1.3050617Search in Google Scholar

Rice, Karen. 2006. Let the language tell its story? The role of linguistic theory in writing grammars. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 235–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Salanova, Andrés & Adam J. R. Tallman. 2020. Nominalizations, case domains, and restructuring in two Amazonian languages. In Artemis Alexiadou & Hagit Borer (eds.), Nominalization: 50 years on from Chomsky’s Remarks, 363–389. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198865544.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Seuren, Pieter A. 2004. The importance of being modular. Journal of Linguistics 40. 593–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226704002786.Search in Google Scholar

Tallman, Adam J. R. 2018. A grammar of Chácobo, a southern Pano language of the northern Bolivian Amazon. University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Tallman, Adam J. R. 2020a. Constituency and coincidence. Studies in Language. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19025.tal.Search in Google Scholar

Tallman, Adam J. R. 2020b. Review of Caroline Féry, Intonation and prosodic structure (Key Topics in Phonology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Pp. ix 374. Journal of Linguistics 57. 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000456.Search in Google Scholar

Tallman, Adam J. R. 2021. Documentación y descripción lingüística. In Gladys Camacho-Rios & Gabriel Gallinate (eds.), Introducción a la Lingüística en el contexto Boliviano.Search in Google Scholar

Adam J. R. Tallman, Sandra Auderset & Hiroto Uchihara (eds.). in prep. Constituency and Convergence in the Americas. Berlin: Language Sciences Press.Search in Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo–Konibo in grammar. University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353–381. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0012Search in Google Scholar

Woodbury, Anthony C. 2007. On thick translation in linguistic documentation. Language Documentation and Description 4. 120–135.Search in Google Scholar

Zariquiey, Roberto. 2018. A grammar of Kakataibo. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1086/695544Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-24
Accepted: 2021-02-26
Published Online: 2021-09-09
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2021-2009/html
Scroll Up Arrow