References
Albertus, Laurentius. 1573. Teutsch Grammatick oder SprachKunst. Augsburg: Michael Manger.Search in Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Li Wei. 2008. Introduction: Multilingualism as a problem? Monolingualism as a problem? In P. Auer & L. Wei (eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication, 1–12. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198553.0.1Search in Google Scholar
Bergman, Lars R. & Kari Trost. 2006. The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 52. 601–632. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0023.Search in Google Scholar
Çetinoğlu, Özlem. 2017. A code-switching corpus of Turkish-German conversations. In Proceedings of the 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 34–40.10.18653/v1/W17-0804Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917.Search in Google Scholar
Colonna, Liane. 2013. A taxonomy and classification of data mining. SMU Science & Technology Law Review 16. 309–369.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1861. Letter to Henry Fawcett, 18 September 1861. Darwin Correspondence Project. “Letter no. 3257”. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-3257.xml (accessed 1 March 2021). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.703.Search in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2017. Usage-based linguistics. In Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.363.Search in Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild: With historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873733Search in Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2020. Introduction: Why the comparability problem is central in typology. Linguistic Typology 24. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2055.Search in Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010a. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010b. The interplay between comparative concepts and descriptive categories (reply to Newmeyer). Language 86. 696–699.10.1353/lan.2010.0004Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010c. The role of homosemasy for constructing comparative concepts in cross-linguistic studies. In Workshop on Re-thinking synonymy: Semantic sameness and similarity in languages and their description, 28–30. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Book of abstracts.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011a. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884210Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011b. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15. 535–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.035.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2014. Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery 12(2). 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1349/ps1.1537-0852.a.442.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial. Linguistic Typology 20. 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0008.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In D. Olmen, T. Mortelmans & F. Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–113. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2020. The structural uniqueness of languages and the value of comparison for description. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1. 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20032.has.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2021. Towards standardization of morphosyntactic terminology for general linguistics. In L Alfieri, G.F Arcodia & P Ramat (eds.), Linguistic categories, language description and linguistic typology, 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.132.02hasSearch in Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2019. Against trivializing language description and comparison. In Paper presented at the 13th conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, 4–6 September 2019. University of Pavia.10.1075/sl.19090.himSearch in Google Scholar
Höder, Steffen. 2018. Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of diasystematic construction grammar. In H.C. Boas & S. Höder (eds.), Constructions in contact: Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages, 37–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.24.02hodSearch in Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Sicong Dong, Yike Yang & Ren He. 2021. From language to meteorology: Kinesis in weather events and weather verbs across Sinitic languages. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00682-w.Search in Google Scholar
Jahoda, Gustav. 1977. In pursuit of the Emic-Etic distinction: Can we ever capture it? In Y. H. Poortinga (ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology, 128–138. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.Search in Google Scholar
Jahoda, Gustav. 1983. The cross-cultural emperor’s conceptual clothes: The emic-etic issue revisited. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec & R. C. Annis (eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology, 19–38. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, Niklas Erben, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24. 253–310.10.1515/lingty-2020-2034Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Pāṇini as a variationist. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Dan & Christopher D. Manning. 2004. Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL-04), 478–485.10.3115/1218955.1219016Search in Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde & Henry A. Murray. 1948. Personality formation: the determinants. In C. Kluckhohn & H.A. Murray (eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture, 53–67. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2018. Linguistic concepts and categories in language description and comparison. In M. Chini & P. Cuzzolin (eds.), Typology, acquisition, grammaticalization studies, 27–50. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich. 2017. Comparative concepts’ vs.‘descriptive categories: bridging the gap. SLE 2017 Book of Abstracts, 481f. Olga Spevak.Search in Google Scholar
Look, Brandon C. 2020. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/leibniz/.Search in Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human nature. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783111657158Search in Google Scholar
Prinz, Wolfgang. 2017. Modeling self on others: An import theory of subjectivity and selfhood. Consciousness and Cognition 49. 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.020.Search in Google Scholar
Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach. 2017. SignGram blueprint. A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501511806Search in Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Pétur Helgason. 2004. Distinctive [voice] does not imply regressive assimilation: Evidence from Swedish. International Journal of English Studies 4. 53–71.Search in Google Scholar
Round, Erich R. & Greville G. Corbett. 2020. Comparability and measurement in typological science: The bright future for linguistics. Linguistic Typology 24. 489–525. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2060.Search in Google Scholar
Spike, Matthew. 2020. Fifty shades of grue: Indeterminate categories and induction in and out of the language sciences. Linguistic Typology 24. 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2061.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, William. 1923. Die menschliche Persönlichkeit. Bd. 2 von: Person und Sache. System des kritischen Personalismus. Leipzig: Barth.Search in Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2000. Quantifier movement in Icelandic. In P. Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 255–292. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.31.10sveSearch in Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tvica, Seid. 2017. Agreement and verb movement: The Rich agreement hypothesis from a typological perspective. LOT.Search in Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Kalyanamalini Sahoo. 2015. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories, such as they are. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47. 136–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2015.1115636.Search in Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge, MA: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2002. Polysemy, polyvalence, and linking mismatches: The concept of RAIN and its codings in English, German, Italian, and Spanish. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 18(no.spe). 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-44502002000300004.Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2004. Competition is good for descriptions: For a consensus on dissenting entries as desideratum for linguistic database design. In Paper presented at E-MELD workshop on linguistic databases and best practice, July 15–18. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University.Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2006. Realizing Humboldt’s dream: Cross-linguistic grammatography as database creation. In F. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (eds.), Catching language. The standing challenge of grammar writing, 113–135. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 2007. Language as mind sharing device: Mental and linguistic concepts in a general ontology of everyday life. In A. C. Schalley & D. Zaefferer (eds.), Ontolinguistics: How ontological status shapes the linguistic coding of concepts, 189–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. Are new words predictable? A pilot study on the origin of neologies by means of natural selection. In I. Fiorentini, E. Goria & C. Mauri (eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar & David Poeppel. 2010. Linguistic universals as human universals – Divergent views and converging evidence on language congruence and diversity. Biolinguistics 4(2–3). 159–164.10.5964/bioling.8779Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
